<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Parallel Gateways]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Hi,</p>
<p dir="auto">I have an Arduino Ethernet Gateway with NRF24L01+ PA/LNA since several years. Now I want to switch over to Raspberry Pi Ethernet Gateway with the same type of radio.</p>
<p dir="auto">Is it possible to have two gateways running in parallel or will they interfere with each other and/or the sensors?<br />
Just to make the development/testing without much downtime.</p>
<p dir="auto">Are there any special issues to think of when doing a migration and/or actions that need to done?</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.mysensors.org/topic/11181/parallel-gateways</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2026 05:20:31 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.mysensors.org/topic/11181.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2020 11:12:20 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Parallel Gateways on Fri, 29 May 2020 12:35:41 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/jocke4u" aria-label="Profile: jocke4u">@<bdi>jocke4u</bdi></a> I run 2 RF gateways and it's not a problem. When you 'migrate' a node to a new gateway make sure to run the mysensors clear eeprom sketch first to get rid of the old routing table or you might have issues.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.mysensors.org/post/105894</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.mysensors.org/post/105894</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[skywatch]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2020 12:35:41 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Parallel Gateways on Fri, 29 May 2020 12:34:04 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/jocke4u" aria-label="Profile: jocke4u">@<bdi>jocke4u</bdi></a> said in <a href="/post/105882">Parallel Gateways</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">In what sense do you consider RPi-Ethernet-GW to be more tricky than Arduino-Ethernet-GW?</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">See <a href="https://forum.mysensors.org/topic/11145/started-with-mysensors-and-about-to-give-up-some-feedback">https://forum.mysensors.org/topic/11145/started-with-mysensors-and-about-to-give-up-some-feedback</a> for a lot of people reporting about running into problems. Imo it doesn't make much sense fiddling around with a very complex base (Pi) when using a very simple base (arduino@serial or LAN-gateway)  is possible...<br />
Just my2ct.</p>
<p dir="auto">Wrt. the other stuff, I completly agree with <a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/mfalkvidd" aria-label="Profile: mfalkvidd">@<bdi>mfalkvidd</bdi></a>'s approach; at first sight it seemed you were looking for a drop-in replacement. But as soon, as you want to update nodes also, different channel is a very good idea.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.mysensors.org/post/105893</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.mysensors.org/post/105893</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[rejoe2]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2020 12:34:04 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Parallel Gateways on Fri, 29 May 2020 12:25:47 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/jocke4u" aria-label="Profile: jocke4u">@<bdi>jocke4u</bdi></a> yes. Having two gateways in the same MySensors network will lead to odd stuff happening, and running 1.5x nodes with a 2.x gateway can also lead to odd stuff happening.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.mysensors.org/post/105891</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.mysensors.org/post/105891</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[mfalkvidd]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2020 12:25:47 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Parallel Gateways on Fri, 29 May 2020 12:23:50 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/mfalkvidd" aria-label="Profile: mfalkvidd">@<bdi>mfalkvidd</bdi></a> Thanks, maybe a better approach since I anyway should upgrade the sensors since they haven't been touched for a very long time and running 1.5.x</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.mysensors.org/post/105889</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.mysensors.org/post/105889</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[jocke4u]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2020 12:23:50 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Parallel Gateways on Fri, 29 May 2020 12:21:33 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/jocke4u" aria-label="Profile: jocke4u">@<bdi>jocke4u</bdi></a> correct</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.mysensors.org/post/105887</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.mysensors.org/post/105887</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[mfalkvidd]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2020 12:21:33 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Parallel Gateways on Fri, 29 May 2020 12:16:31 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/mfalkvidd" aria-label="Profile: mfalkvidd">@<bdi>mfalkvidd</bdi></a> By using a different channel you mean that (1) get the GW up and running and then (2) migrate each sensor from GW1 to GW2, right?</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.mysensors.org/post/105883</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.mysensors.org/post/105883</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[jocke4u]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2020 12:16:31 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Parallel Gateways on Fri, 29 May 2020 12:14:10 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/rejoe2" aria-label="Profile: rejoe2">@<bdi>rejoe2</bdi></a> I don't know, thats why I asked  if I should expect problems ;)<br />
My thinking is to have Home Assistant connected to GW1 (mostly logging values not really acting) and develop/configure/test GW2 and using MysController to just watch the traffic i.e. my wish is to have all sensor messages to both GWs and when happy I reconfigure Home Assistant to GW2 and shut down GW1.</p>
<p dir="auto">I already have RPi hardware, radios etc on the shelf.</p>
<p dir="auto">In what sense do you consider RPi-Ethernet-GW to be more tricky than Arduino-Ethernet-GW?</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.mysensors.org/post/105882</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.mysensors.org/post/105882</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[jocke4u]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2020 12:14:10 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Parallel Gateways on Fri, 29 May 2020 12:07:26 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/jocke4u" aria-label="Profile: jocke4u">@<bdi>jocke4u</bdi></a> make sure you use a different radio channel for the second MySensors network and you'll be fine.<br />
define MY_RF24_CHANNEL in the gateway and all sketches. Documentation: <a href="https://www.mysensors.org/apidocs/group__RF24SettingGrpPub.html#gafb356a7718f74a37f2081fb636dfacd2" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.mysensors.org/apidocs/group__RF24SettingGrpPub.html#gafb356a7718f74a37f2081fb636dfacd2</a></p>
<p dir="auto">If you use a rpi gateway, use</p>
<pre><code>
 --my-rf24-channel=&lt;0-125&gt;   RF channel for the sensor net. [76]

</code></pre>
<p dir="auto">in the configure command.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.mysensors.org/post/105881</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.mysensors.org/post/105881</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[mfalkvidd]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2020 12:07:26 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Parallel Gateways on Fri, 29 May 2020 11:21:32 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/jocke4u" aria-label="Profile: jocke4u">@<bdi>jocke4u</bdi></a> In which aspects do you expect problems?<br />
Imo it's just a question how your controller deals with that. E.g. in FHEM, one can switch around IO devices without problems, and a second GW will just "see" all messages beeing send. Note: Using both to controll anything most likely isn't a good idea.<br />
I assume, you already know the PI-GW-variants to be more tricky than ordinary serial WiFi or ethernet gateways?<br />
If you are about to build up new hardware, you may have a look at <a href="https://forum.mysensors.org/topic/11135/something-s-cooking-in-the-mysensors-labs/10">https://forum.mysensors.org/topic/11135/something-s-cooking-in-the-mysensors-labs/10</a> as well and e.g. prepare the hardware to use different type of transports as well in the future?</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.mysensors.org/post/105880</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.mysensors.org/post/105880</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[rejoe2]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2020 11:21:32 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>