<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[problems with RFM69_RFM95_ATC_SignalReport example]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Hello,</p>
<p dir="auto">I'm running since some weeks a serial GW (based on Nano) and some nodes (based on pro mini) with RFM69HW. I use lib version 2.3.2 and tried to get running the RFM69_RFM95_ATC_SignalReport.ino example. I only changed in the sketch the definition to RFM69HW (refer git diff report at the end) and put the sketch to a node. At the GW I additionally added #define MY_RFM69_NEW_DRIVER. The communication is working.</p>
<p dir="auto">The problem is that all 6 return values of transportGetSignalReport are always zero.</p>
<p dir="auto">Has anybody a hint for me what I do not in the right way?</p>
<p dir="auto">Thanks for an answer in advance.<br />
Uwe</p>
<pre><code> // RFM69
-//#define MY_RADIO_RFM69
-//#define MY_RFM69_NEW_DRIVER   // ATC on RFM69 works only with the new driver (not compatible with old=default driver)-//#define MY_RFM69_ATC_TARGET_RSSI_DBM (-70)  // target RSSI -70dBm
-//#define MY_RFM69_MAX_POWER_LEVEL_DBM (10)   // max. TX power 10dBm = 10mW
+#define MY_RADIO_RFM69
+#define MY_IS_RFM69HW //only for high power version
+#define MY_RFM69_NEW_DRIVER   // ATC on RFM69 works only with the new driver (not compatible with old=default driver)
+#define MY_RFM69_ATC_TARGET_RSSI_DBM (-70)  // target RSSI -70dBm
+#define MY_RFM69_MAX_POWER_LEVEL_DBM (10)   // max. TX power 10dBm = 10mW

 // RFM95
-#define MY_RADIO_RFM95
-#define MY_RFM95_ATC_TARGET_RSSI_DBM (-70)  // target RSSI -70dBm
-#define MY_RFM95_MAX_POWER_LEVEL_DBM (10)   // max. TX power 10dBm = 10mW
+//#define MY_RADIO_RFM95
+//#define MY_RFM95_ATC_TARGET_RSSI_DBM (-70)  // target RSSI -70dBm
+//#define MY_RFM95_MAX_POWER_LEVEL_DBM (10)   // max. TX power 10dBm = 10mW
</code></pre>
]]></description><link>https://forum.mysensors.org/topic/11651/problems-with-rfm69_rfm95_atc_signalreport-example</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 01:13:41 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.mysensors.org/topic/11651.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2021 18:53:22 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to problems with RFM69_RFM95_ATC_SignalReport example on Fri, 16 Apr 2021 18:13:22 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Great, that was the right hint. Now I get values. Thanks!!!</p>
<p dir="auto">But should it included in the example code? I had a look in the development branch. There it was fixed. But in the development -3.0.0 branch not.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.mysensors.org/post/109957</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.mysensors.org/post/109957</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[uwe taz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2021 18:13:22 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to problems with RFM69_RFM95_ATC_SignalReport example on Fri, 16 Apr 2021 01:44:18 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">You should define MY_SIGNAL_REPORT_ENABLED</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.mysensors.org/post/109953</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.mysensors.org/post/109953</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[lood29]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2021 01:44:18 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>