<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Better reception with nrf LPA?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">I'm using the normal NRFs right now, also on the gateway. But sometimes it can't receive some sensors (95/100 times its going fine).</p>
<p dir="auto">If i use a NRF LNA PA will it receive also better? Or does it only matter for sending?</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.mysensors.org/topic/1490/better-reception-with-nrf-lpa</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2026 23:46:27 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.mysensors.org/topic/1490.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2015 13:50:25 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Better reception with nrf LPA? on Wed, 03 Jun 2015 14:59:47 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">it also amplifies received signals, which works very well. I cover my whole flat (100m²)with this version for the gateway (and only the gateway, rest ist normal nrf24l01 modules)<br />
The non PA/LNA was not able to get into all corners of the flat.</p>
<p dir="auto">AFAIK PA stands for Power Amplifier (meant for TX) and LNA for Low Noise Amplifier ( meant for RX).</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.mysensors.org/post/15034</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.mysensors.org/post/15034</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dirk_H]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2015 14:59:47 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>