Skip to content
  • MySensors
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Hardware
  3. NRF24L01+ genuine vs. counterfeit - checked some modules

NRF24L01+ genuine vs. counterfeit - checked some modules

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
36 Posts 10 Posters 12.0k Views 13 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • gohanG Offline
    gohanG Offline
    gohan
    Mod
    wrote on last edited by
    #25

    could be if you don't put the SMA connector through a hole in box it would be heavy on a pcb/pins with that big antenna.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • TmasterT Offline
      TmasterT Offline
      Tmaster
      wrote on last edited by Tmaster
      #26

      i only saw this post today. So i dont have any nrf24 that have this square on top righ of the chip. all have a solid circle. that means they are fake right?
      obvius i already expect that because they cost 80cents on ebay righ now.... ::blush:

      i'm a arduino fan .Even sometimes don't undestanding how to use it :P

      V 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • V VaZso

        @Nca78 I have measured less than 1μA for real modules and about 660μA for counterfeit ones.
        However, multimeter may also give invalid result...

        Nca78N Offline
        Nca78N Offline
        Nca78
        Hardware Contributor
        wrote on last edited by
        #27

        @VaZso said in NRF24L01+ genuine vs. counterfeit - checked some modules:

        @Nca78 I have measured less than 1μA for real modules and about 660μA for counterfeit ones.
        However, multimeter may also give invalid result...

        That's huge, I'm running a few nodes with those modules on CR2025 and CR2032 they would die in 2 weeks with such a draw and obviously that's not the case. And I don't think a multimeter can be that far from reality ...

        V 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • gohanG Offline
          gohanG Offline
          gohan
          Mod
          wrote on last edited by
          #28

          0_1496957462613_upload-f4a8ab02-3060-4c9c-a409-4c88eb4443c7
          This a module I just got from Amazon produced by Sunfounder but it seems it has the same chip as the fake ones I got also from Amazon
          0_1496957630016_upload-354ce8ee-9ba3-4769-a03b-2d6730656a43

          The red one has actually a better range of about 3 meters more indoor but they cost 4.5€ each while the others cost 1.2€. I think I am going to return them and get some from Itead

          NeverDieN 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • TmasterT Tmaster

            i only saw this post today. So i dont have any nrf24 that have this square on top righ of the chip. all have a solid circle. that means they are fake right?
            obvius i already expect that because they cost 80cents on ebay righ now.... ::blush:

            V Offline
            V Offline
            VaZso
            wrote on last edited by
            #29

            @Tmaster Not necessarily. Marking is one thing, Nordic may used both square and solid circle (as far as I know they used both).
            However, for 80 cent, I assume they are fake for sure. :)

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • Nca78N Nca78

              @VaZso said in NRF24L01+ genuine vs. counterfeit - checked some modules:

              @Nca78 I have measured less than 1μA for real modules and about 660μA for counterfeit ones.
              However, multimeter may also give invalid result...

              That's huge, I'm running a few nodes with those modules on CR2025 and CR2032 they would die in 2 weeks with such a draw and obviously that's not the case. And I don't think a multimeter can be that far from reality ...

              V Offline
              V Offline
              VaZso
              wrote on last edited by
              #30

              @Nca78 Yes, it is true - if 240 mAh is the battery capacity, it would last for ~15 days.
              However, I have measured my modules uninitialized, so it may be better if one sends it to sleep mode by software... I have not measured them in other modes.

              Nca78N 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • V VaZso

                @Nca78 Yes, it is true - if 240 mAh is the battery capacity, it would last for ~15 days.
                However, I have measured my modules uninitialized, so it may be better if one sends it to sleep mode by software... I have not measured them in other modes.

                Nca78N Offline
                Nca78N Offline
                Nca78
                Hardware Contributor
                wrote on last edited by
                #31

                @VaZso said in NRF24L01+ genuine vs. counterfeit - checked some modules:

                However, I have measured my modules uninitialized, so it may be better if one sends it to sleep mode by software... I have not measured them in other modes.

                Ah yes that's probably the reason, I will test before I connect them.

                @gohan I thing your better range is due to the antenna design, same "style" than the one on "F" ESP8266 modules which also have a slightly better range.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • gohanG gohan

                  0_1496957462613_upload-f4a8ab02-3060-4c9c-a409-4c88eb4443c7
                  This a module I just got from Amazon produced by Sunfounder but it seems it has the same chip as the fake ones I got also from Amazon
                  0_1496957630016_upload-354ce8ee-9ba3-4769-a03b-2d6730656a43

                  The red one has actually a better range of about 3 meters more indoor but they cost 4.5€ each while the others cost 1.2€. I think I am going to return them and get some from Itead

                  NeverDieN Offline
                  NeverDieN Offline
                  NeverDie
                  Hero Member
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #32

                  @gohan

                  For better range, a lot of people seem to like this modification: http://www.instructables.com/id/Enhanced-NRF24L01/

                  gohanG 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • M Offline
                    M Offline
                    manutremo
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #33

                    I'm going to try these - they contain the signal amplifier but without the bulk of the sma connector and the external antenna.

                    link text

                    NeverDieN 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • NeverDieN NeverDie

                      @gohan

                      For better range, a lot of people seem to like this modification: http://www.instructables.com/id/Enhanced-NRF24L01/

                      gohanG Offline
                      gohanG Offline
                      gohan
                      Mod
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #34

                      @NeverDie I tried that already and also the other mod with a single wire but nothing changed. The real improvement was when I used the PA lna on the gateway but still I only gained a few meters

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • M manutremo

                        I'm going to try these - they contain the signal amplifier but without the bulk of the sma connector and the external antenna.

                        link text

                        NeverDieN Offline
                        NeverDieN Offline
                        NeverDie
                        Hero Member
                        wrote on last edited by NeverDie
                        #35

                        @manutremo

                        At that price it seems you'd be better off with RFM69 or Ra-01 modules instead. It's a real puzzle to me as to why some people get great range from their NRF24L01's, and others do not. I never had much luck with it myself, whereas the RFM69's seem to just work. In the past the RFM's cost a lot more than they do now. On the other hand, the RFM's can be a lot more complex to program, and their wire antenna makes them less compact than the NRF24L01's.

                        I do like that the Ra-01's appear to have passed FCC (assuming the stamp on their enclosure can be believed).

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • M Offline
                          M Offline
                          manutremo
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #36

                          Many thanks for your advice. For good or bad, reality is never black or white, but shades of grey. I already thought on switching to RFM69 or try the new LoRa but that would mean switching around 15 already functioning nodes, together with the associated cost. Out of those 15, the few showing problems to communicate with the gw are the furthest ones; those are where where I'm planning to give an oportunity to the new modules linked above. By the way, my gateway already has one PA+LNA module inside, but with an external whip antenna.

                          I actually just installed the first one. I removed the "normal" nrf24 and switched by one of these in the most problematic node. Soldering the wiring into the 1.27mm holes was a challenge; some adapters that should make connection easier should be about to arrive but I was eager to run some tests. For the moment this module seems to have less problems to connect to the gateway - of course I won't be able to draw more final conclusions until it's been in use for some days, but for the moment it looks promising.

                          Of course, should they finally not show a significant improvemen over the former modules, I'll consider testing some of the other options.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          27

                          Online

                          11.7k

                          Users

                          11.2k

                          Topics

                          113.1k

                          Posts


                          Copyright 2025 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
                          • Login

                          • Don't have an account? Register

                          • Login or register to search.
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • MySensors
                          • OpenHardware.io
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular