Skip to content
  • MySensors
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Troubleshooting
  3. Help: Some explanation requested regarding NACK

Help: Some explanation requested regarding NACK

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Troubleshooting
26 Posts 5 Posters 4.8k Views 4 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • O Offline
    O Offline
    Omemanti
    wrote on last edited by
    #3

    @gohan said in Help: Some explanation requested regarding NACK:

    d you try to put them just a couple of meters away from each other? Just to exclud

    how much should you advice? atm, its 3 meters.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • gohanG Offline
      gohanG Offline
      gohan
      Mod
      wrote on last edited by
      #4

      1-2 meters is the right distance to exclude range problem. Then also power issues could cause messages to be lost.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • O Offline
        O Offline
        Omemanti
        wrote on last edited by
        #5

        oke,
        well will look into the lost mssg.
        But my biggest question might be, why the node thinks they are NACK, but my gate tells me their fine?

        Y gohanG 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • O Omemanti

          oke,
          well will look into the lost mssg.
          But my biggest question might be, why the node thinks they are NACK, but my gate tells me their fine?

          Y Offline
          Y Offline
          yury
          wrote on last edited by
          #6

          @Omemanti said in Help: Some explanation requested regarding NACK:

          but my

          Could you post part of the code where you send those messages? do you send the node to sleep?

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • O Omemanti

            oke,
            well will look into the lost mssg.
            But my biggest question might be, why the node thinks they are NACK, but my gate tells me their fine?

            gohanG Offline
            gohanG Offline
            gohan
            Mod
            wrote on last edited by
            #7

            @Omemanti Because the node can't receive the ack message so it assumes it's lost: could the the gateway didn't receive it or the node itself couldn't receive the ack from gateway. It could me many reasons, so you need to address it one by one until you find it 😀

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • O Offline
              O Offline
              Omemanti
              wrote on last edited by
              #8

              @gohan said in Help: Some explanation requested regarding NACK:

              the node can't receive the ack message so it assumes it's lost: could the the gateway did

              mjah, ofcourse,
              Well I'll build me some more of these, see If the same things happen with some other nodes.

              thnx for the help so far!

              1 Reply Last reply
              1
              • O Offline
                O Offline
                Omemanti
                wrote on last edited by Omemanti
                #9

                After some time off I made more nodes. but somehow they all give me NACK's. (also changed the gateway, antennas and added more caps.)

                The strange thing still is that even if I get NACK's the gateway seems the handle them..

                Should I just accept this? Or am I missing something?

                MYSController :

                291	27/07/2017 22:46:03	RX	15 - Zolder	0 - S_HUM	C_SET	NO	V_HUM	49.1
                292	27/07/2017 22:46:09	RX	15 - Zolder	1 - S_TEMP	C_SET	NO	V_TEMP	25.5
                293	27/07/2017 22:46:09	RX	15 - Zolder	0 - S_HUM	C_SET	NO	V_HUM	49.2
                294	27/07/2017 22:46:16	RX	15 - Zolder	1 - S_TEMP	C_SET	NO	V_TEMP	25.5
                295	27/07/2017 22:46:16	RX	15 - Zolder	0 - S_HUM	C_SET	NO	V_HUM	49.2
                296	27/07/2017 22:46:23	RX	15 - Zolder	1 - S_TEMP	C_SET	NO	V_TEMP	25.5
                297	27/07/2017 22:46:23	RX	15 - Zolder	0 - S_HUM	C_SET	NO	V_HUM	49.2
                

                Serial Monitor

                227573 !TSF:MSG:SEND,15-15-0-0,s=0,c=1,t=1,pt=7,l=5,sg=0,ft=5,st=NACK:49.1
                227655 !TSM:READY:UPL FAIL,STATP
                227885 MCO:SLP:MS=5000,SMS=0,I1=255,M1=255,I2=255,M2=255
                227950 MCO:SLP:TPD
                227966 MCO:SLP:WUP=-1
                227999
                Loop
                228524 !TSF:MSG:SEND,15-15-0-0,s=1,c=1,t=0,pt=7,l=5,sg=0,ft=0,st=NACK:25.5
                228982 !TSF:MSG:SEND,15-15-0-0,s=0,c=1,t=1,pt=7,l=5,sg=0,ft=1,st=NACK:49.2
                229294 MCO:SLP:MS=5000,SMS=0,I1=255,M1=255,I2=255,M2=255
                229359 MCO:SLP:TPD
                229376 MCO:SLP:WUP=-1
                229408
                Loop
                229933 !TSF:MSG:SEND,15-15-0-0,s=1,c=1,t=0,pt=7,l=5,sg=0,ft=2,st=NACK:25.5
                230391 !TSF:MSG:SEND,15-15-0-0,s=0,c=1,t=1,pt=7,l=5,sg=0,ft=3,st=NACK:49.2
                230703 MCO:SLP:MS=5000,SMS=0,I1=255,M1=255,I2=255,M2=255
                230768 MCO:SLP:TPD
                230785 MCO:SLP:WUP=-1
                230817
                Loop
                231342 !TSF:MSG:SEND,15-15-0-0,s=1,c=1,t=0,pt=7,l=5,sg=0,ft=4,st=NACK:25.5
                231800 !TSF:MSG:SEND,15-15-0-0,s=0,c=1,t=1,pt=7,l=5,sg=0,ft=5,st=NACK:49.2
                231882 !TSM:READY:UPL FAIL,STATP
                232112 MCO:SLP:MS=5000,SMS=0,I1=255,M1=255,I2=255,M2=255
                232177 MCO:SLP:TPD
                

                I should add that booting up takes a couple of tries, but after a minute of the folling it pulls through and starts the previous shenanigans.

                32 TSM:INIT
                49 TSF:WUR:MS=0
                81 TSM:INIT:TSP OK
                98 TSM:INIT:STATID=15
                131 TSF:SID:OK,ID=15
                147 TSM:FPAR
                163 TSM:FPAR:STATP=0
                196 TSM:ID
                212 TSM:ID:OK
                229 TSM:UPL
                393 !TSF:MSG:SEND,15-15-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=24,pt=1,l=1,sg=0,ft=0,st=NACK:1
                2490 TSM:UPL
                2654 !TSF:MSG:SEND,15-15-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=24,pt=1,l=1,sg=0,ft=1,st=NACK:1
                4751 TSM:UPL
                4915 !TSF:MSG:SEND,15-15-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=24,pt=1,l=1,sg=0,ft=2,st=NACK:1
                7012 TSM:UPL
                7176 !TSF:MSG:SEND,15-15-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=24,pt=1,l=1,sg=0,ft=3,st=NACK:1
                9273 !TSM:UPL:FAIL
                9289 TSM:FPAR
                9306 TSM:FPAR:STATP=0
                9338 TSM:ID
                9338 TSM:ID:OK
                9371 TSM:UPL
                
                
                64274 TSM:ID
                64290 TSM:ID:OK
                64307 TSM:UPL
                64487 !TSF:MSG:SEND,15-15-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=24,pt=1,l=1,sg=0,ft=12,st=NACK:1
                66584 TSM:UPL
                66748 !TSF:MSG:SEND,15-15-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=24,pt=1,l=1,sg=0,ft=13,st=NACK:1
                66846 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-15,s=255,c=3,t=25,pt=1,l=1,sg=0:1
                66912 TSF:MSG:PONG RECV,HP=1
                66945 TSM:UPL:OK
                66961 TSM:READY:ID=15,PAR=0,DIS=1
                67158 !TSF:MSG:SEND,15-15-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=15,pt=6,l=2,sg=0,ft=0,st=NACK:0100
                69402 !TSF:MSG:SEND,15-15-0-0,s=255,c=0,t=17,pt=0,l=5,sg=0,ft=1,st=NACK:2.1.1
                69648 !TSF:MSG:SEND,15-15-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=6,pt=1,l=1,sg=0,ft=2,st=NACK:0
                69746 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-15,s=255,c=3,t=6,pt=0,l=1,sg=0:M
                70172 !TSF:MSG:SEND,15-15-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=11,pt=0,l=6,sg=0,ft=3,st=NACK:Zolder
                70418 !TSF:MSG:SEND,15-15-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=12,pt=0,l=3,sg=0,ft=4,st=NACK:1.0
                70860 !TSF:MSG:SEND,15-15-0-0,s=0,c=0,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=5,st=NACK:
                70942 !TSM:READY:UPL FAIL,STATP
                71286 !TSF:MSG:SEND,15-15-0-0,s=1,c=0,t=6,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=NACK:
                71712 !TSF:MSG:SEND,15-15-0-0,s=2,c=0,t=4,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=1,st=NACK:
                71811 MCO:REG:REQ
                71974 !TSF:MSG:SEND,15-15-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=26,pt=1,l=1,sg=0,ft=2,st=NACK:2
                74219 !TSF:MSG:SEND,15-15-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=26,pt=1,l=1,sg=0,ft=3,st=NACK:2
                76464 !TSF:MSG:SEND,15-15-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=26,pt=1,l=1,sg=0,ft=4,st=NACK:2
                78708 !TSF:MSG:SEND,15-15-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=26,pt=1,l=1,sg=0,ft=5,st=NACK:2
                78790 !TSM:READY:UPL FAIL,STATP
                80805 MCO:BGN:STP
                Si7021 Found
                Setup compleet
                80969 MCO:BGN:INIT OK,TSP=1
                
                
                
                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • gohanG Offline
                  gohanG Offline
                  gohan
                  Mod
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #10

                  it seems as the node can't receive correctly or the gw is not sending correctly. How far are they? If you put them a couple of meters apart do you see any change?

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • O Offline
                    O Offline
                    Omemanti
                    wrote on last edited by Omemanti
                    #11

                    @gohan said in Help: Some explanation requested regarding NACK:

                    f meters apart do you see any change?

                    The node gateway is in the room below me (wooden floors) about 2 to 3 meters from my node.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • O Offline
                      O Offline
                      Omemanti
                      wrote on last edited by Omemanti
                      #12

                      Funny Part still is, that once the connection is made, everything also if produced with a NACK is received by the controller. thats what im curious about. If I get errors, why does the controllers receive them without bottering.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • gohanG Offline
                        gohanG Offline
                        gohan
                        Mod
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #13

                        As I said, the GW is receiving the packet correctly but then the node doesn't get a good response so it throws a NACK. You could try and put them in same room and see if gets better or change channel just to avoid a possible interference

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • O Offline
                          O Offline
                          Omemanti
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #14

                          How can I change the channel? Can you point me in the right direction.?

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • gohanG Offline
                            gohanG Offline
                            gohan
                            Mod
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #15

                            Go in myconfig.h and search for "channel", you should find it in the nrf24 section, change the default channel there and recompile all your nodes and gateway

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • O Offline
                              O Offline
                              Omemanti
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #16

                              Stupid question.. because I use the rfm69. Will the also comply?

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • gohanG Offline
                                gohanG Offline
                                gohan
                                Mod
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #17

                                Of course not. What version of rfm69 and frequency are you using? Are you sure you got the antenna of the right size?

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • O Offline
                                  O Offline
                                  Omemanti
                                  wrote on last edited by Omemanti
                                  #18

                                  Rfm69w 868mhz , springcoil antenna from ebay.
                                  will test a long single wire right away.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • O Offline
                                    O Offline
                                    Omemanti
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #19

                                    Springcoil on the gw, straight line on the node, still the same

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • O Offline
                                      O Offline
                                      Omemanti
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #20

                                      Thnx for the help so far, Ill let it rest for a while, Im thinking of rebuilding the whole thing..

                                      K 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • O Omemanti

                                        Thnx for the help so far, Ill let it rest for a while, Im thinking of rebuilding the whole thing..

                                        K Offline
                                        K Offline
                                        kiesel
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #21

                                        @Omemanti
                                        Where you able to solve this? I am also experiencing a lot of NACKs in my rfm69 network (868mhz)

                                        O 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • K kiesel

                                          @Omemanti
                                          Where you able to solve this? I am also experiencing a lot of NACKs in my rfm69 network (868mhz)

                                          O Offline
                                          O Offline
                                          Omemanti
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #22

                                          @kiesel said in Help: Some explanation requested regarding NACK:

                                          e you able to solve this? I am also experiencing a lot of NACKs in my rfm69 network (868mhz)

                                          Nope, not that I can remember.
                                          BTW: I ditched the rfm69 and moved over to the NRF52.

                                          R 1 Reply Last reply
                                          1
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          16

                                          Online

                                          11.7k

                                          Users

                                          11.2k

                                          Topics

                                          113.1k

                                          Posts


                                          Copyright 2025 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • MySensors
                                          • OpenHardware.io
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular