<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[bluetooth instead of wifi]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Hi everyone !</p>
<p dir="auto">I wonder if someone has already make his project using bluetooth instead of wifi. (because wifi is not the most safe for humans... sleeping etc)</p>
<p dir="auto">What about the price between bluetooth/wifi transceiver ?</p>
<p dir="auto">What about the code ?</p>
<p dir="auto">Would it be more judicious using bluetooth ?</p>
<p dir="auto">What do you think about this ?</p>
<p dir="auto">Thank you for your replies.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.mysensors.org/topic/2429/bluetooth-instead-of-wifi</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 10:40:59 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.mysensors.org/topic/2429.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2015 08:28:13 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to bluetooth instead of wifi on Tue, 24 Nov 2015 16:12:41 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">This is a interesting discussion, despite there are no proves that wi-fi its not safe...  wifi routers uses so low power  that in 20 m and a wall,signal is gone.<br />
Myself already serched about problems on wifi ,before have wi-fi and use wireless arduinos(nrf24..) ,but know i think its senseless.</p>
<p dir="auto">before of all you shoud read how this "world" works. because  compare nrf24l01 card with wifi is like compare a bicycle with a car...<br />
on temperature sensor for example ,each command activate the card for  milisenconds and sleep again during 10 minutes (in my case).<br />
i guess put your head in to the sun makes more dammage and get more radiation thant this.... :)</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.mysensors.org/post/25178</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.mysensors.org/post/25178</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2015 16:12:41 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to bluetooth instead of wifi on Sat, 21 Nov 2015 21:32:11 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Most sensors report only once per hour or so. Sending takes less than 10 milliseconds, so if you send once per hour the radio (not wifi, as <a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/tmaster" aria-label="Profile: Tmaster">@<bdi>Tmaster</bdi></a> mentioned before) is off more than 99.9997% of the time.</p>
<p dir="auto">If you could clarify what safety problems you are worried about, we might be able to give a better answer.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.mysensors.org/post/24989</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.mysensors.org/post/24989</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[mfalkvidd]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2015 21:32:11 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to bluetooth instead of wifi on Sat, 21 Nov 2015 21:29:44 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/magicguigui" aria-label="Profile: magicguigui">@<bdi>magicguigui</bdi></a> said:</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Another question, in all your project, do the sensors' data be always sent to the gateway (so always wifi activated) ? or do you create something to activate the wifi only 1 time by hour or something like that ?</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">No sure what you mean by "activated". Is that the same as listening? Then yes.. the gateway and repeaters is listening.</p>
<p dir="auto">The sensors send a uSec burst of data when transmitting whenever you decide to send. Could be once an hour or every second. All up to your needs.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.mysensors.org/post/24988</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.mysensors.org/post/24988</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[hek]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2015 21:29:44 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to bluetooth instead of wifi on Sat, 21 Nov 2015 20:50:36 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Hi and thank you for replying.</p>
<p dir="auto">My bad, I though bluetooth was more safe than wifi but you are right, the both are in the same frequency range.</p>
<p dir="auto">So my question becomes: are there some new technologies using safety wireless protocol ?</p>
<p dir="auto">Another question, in all your project, do the sensors' data be always sent to the gateway (so always wifi activated) ? or do you create something to activate the wifi only 1 time by hour or something like that ?</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.mysensors.org/post/24985</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.mysensors.org/post/24985</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[magicguigui]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2015 20:50:36 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to bluetooth instead of wifi on Sat, 21 Nov 2015 15:15:41 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/magicguigui" aria-label="Profile: magicguigui">@<bdi>magicguigui</bdi></a> Neutral: bluetooth uses the same frequency carrier as wifi and similar modulation. The eventual consequences would we similar. I don't know of a Bluetooth implementation but guess it would be possible.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.mysensors.org/post/24973</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.mysensors.org/post/24973</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[AWI]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2015 15:15:41 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to bluetooth instead of wifi on Sat, 21 Nov 2015 12:03:41 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">because wifi is not the most safe for humans... sleeping etc</p>
<p dir="auto"><strong>what are you talking about???</strong><br />
are you the ones that say wifi boils water on a cup?</p>
<p dir="auto">mysensors library works on nrf24l01+  modules, Not wifi.  its a kind of Bluetooth already... anyway Bluetooth is 2.4ghz like wi-fi, but  Bluetooth consumes less power (Theoricly)</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.mysensors.org/post/24969</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.mysensors.org/post/24969</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2015 12:03:41 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>