Skip to content
  • MySensors
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. My Project
  3. How to Choose the Right NEMA 17 Motor for an Electric Focuser?

How to Choose the Right NEMA 17 Motor for an Electric Focuser?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved My Project
2 Posts 2 Posters 721 Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • B Offline
    B Offline
    Beatrice
    Banned
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Hello everyone, I plan to build an electric focuser using a NEMA 17 stepper motor. I have some questions during the selection process and would like to ask for your advice:

    1. What is a suitable holding torque for a focuser? Is around 40 N·cm sufficient, or is a higher recommended?

    2. Is it necessary to choose a NEMA 17 with a gearbox, or can microstepping drive meet the accuracy requirements?

    3. Is there a significant difference in focusing accuracy between a step angle of 1.8° and 0.9°?

    4. How can I reduce the impact of vibration and resonance on image quality when operating at low speeds?

    5. Are there any special recommendations regarding motor current and heat dissipation in astrophotography environments (low temperature, long-term operation)?

    I welcome experienced builders to share their model selections and troubleshooting experiences. Thank you very much!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • M Offline
      M Offline
      mens12
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Around 30–50 N·cm holding torque is typically sufficient for most focusers, and a standard NEMA 17 with microstepping (e.g., 1/16 or higher) usually provides enough resolution without needing a gearbox, though 0.9° motors offer slightly finer native precision than 1.8°.

      To reduce vibration and resonance, use lower current, acceleration ramps, and a flexible coupler, and for long sessions set the current just high enough to avoid missed steps while lowering holding current to manage heat.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0

      Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

      Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

      With your input, this post could be even better 💗

      Register Login
      Reply
      • Reply as topic
      Log in to reply
      • Oldest to Newest
      • Newest to Oldest
      • Most Votes


      12

      Online

      11.9k

      Users

      11.2k

      Topics

      113.4k

      Posts


      Copyright 2025 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
      • Login

      • Don't have an account? Register

      • Login or register to search.
      • First post
        Last post
      0
      • MySensors
      • OpenHardware.io
      • Categories
      • Recent
      • Tags
      • Popular