Skip to content
  • MySensors
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Announcements
  3. SHA1 is broken, should I need to worry about MySensors security?

SHA1 is broken, should I need to worry about MySensors security?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Announcements
3 Posts 2 Posters 1.3k Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • AnticimexA Offline
    AnticimexA Offline
    Anticimex
    Contest Winner
    wrote on last edited by Anticimex
    #1

    Recently, Google announced that it had succeeded in calculation colliding SHA1 checksums with "reasonable" effort and thus concluding SHA1 is now obsolete and insecure.
    MySensors security backend rely on hashes as well, but rest assured there is absolutely no impact for message signatures as they are based on SHA256 and not SHA1.
    For details on the cracking, see here.

    Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
    • Nca78N Offline
      Nca78N Offline
      Nca78
      Hardware Contributor
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Great, no use to trash my stock of atsha :D

      AnticimexA 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • Nca78N Nca78

        Great, no use to trash my stock of atsha :D

        AnticimexA Offline
        AnticimexA Offline
        Anticimex
        Contest Winner
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        @Nca78 indeed you don't need to do that. And according to Linus himself, we don't really need to worry about our git repositories being compromised either. And he is correct, as there is a difference in using hashes for content identifiers (like git) and security signing (like us).
        For an attacker to try to make a collision attack they need to

        1. Hack githubs security (or fool the core team)
        2. Design a collision that contains data that would go unnoticed in our repo.

        Both quite unlikely ;)

        Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        Reply
        • Reply as topic
        Log in to reply
        • Oldest to Newest
        • Newest to Oldest
        • Most Votes


        14

        Online

        11.7k

        Users

        11.2k

        Topics

        113.1k

        Posts


        Copyright 2025 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
        • Login

        • Don't have an account? Register

        • Login or register to search.
        • First post
          Last post
        0
        • MySensors
        • OpenHardware.io
        • Categories
        • Recent
        • Tags
        • Popular