Skip to content
  • MySensors
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Hardware
  3. Another nrf24l01+ fake or..?

Another nrf24l01+ fake or..?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
4 Posts 2 Posters 996 Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • alexsh1A Offline
    alexsh1A Offline
    alexsh1
    wrote on last edited by alexsh1
    #1

    Hi

    I have noticed higher than usual battery consumption on a few nodes. Further investigation discovered that several nrf24l01+, which were tested for mA/uA consumption and were fit in the beginning, were consuming 700uA and 1.8mA while sleeping (all sensors were disconnected and void loop () contained only sleep (60000); function).

    These nrf24l01+ were working fine for many months. RX/TX is working ok and the range is fine. Just sleeping consumption is way too high. I tried these modules with different nodes and similar current consumption.

    Anyone had such problem please?
    Is it curable or shall I just bin nrf24l01+?

    I feel like I’m going to ditch all nrf24l01+ in favour of its SMD version or rfm69.

    Thanks
    Alex

    YveauxY 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • alexsh1A alexsh1

      Hi

      I have noticed higher than usual battery consumption on a few nodes. Further investigation discovered that several nrf24l01+, which were tested for mA/uA consumption and were fit in the beginning, were consuming 700uA and 1.8mA while sleeping (all sensors were disconnected and void loop () contained only sleep (60000); function).

      These nrf24l01+ were working fine for many months. RX/TX is working ok and the range is fine. Just sleeping consumption is way too high. I tried these modules with different nodes and similar current consumption.

      Anyone had such problem please?
      Is it curable or shall I just bin nrf24l01+?

      I feel like I’m going to ditch all nrf24l01+ in favour of its SMD version or rfm69.

      Thanks
      Alex

      YveauxY Offline
      YveauxY Offline
      Yveaux
      Mod
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      @alexsh1 said in Another nrf24l01+ fake or..?:

      ditch all nrf24l01+ in favour of its SMD version

      Why? Sleep current will mainly be influence by the nrf chip and the crystal. Why do you assume smd versions use genuine nrf chips?
      Smd resonators (the small rectangular ones with 4 connections) have slightly lower power consumption than the crystals used on most modules (hc-49 package).

      http://yveaux.blogspot.nl

      alexsh1A 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • YveauxY Yveaux

        @alexsh1 said in Another nrf24l01+ fake or..?:

        ditch all nrf24l01+ in favour of its SMD version

        Why? Sleep current will mainly be influence by the nrf chip and the crystal. Why do you assume smd versions use genuine nrf chips?
        Smd resonators (the small rectangular ones with 4 connections) have slightly lower power consumption than the crystals used on most modules (hc-49 package).

        alexsh1A Offline
        alexsh1A Offline
        alexsh1
        wrote on last edited by alexsh1
        #3

        @yveaux SMD version has got a better assembly and better range in my view and generally speaking personally I never had issues with the SMD chips, but had various issues with a normal nrf24l01+.

        My concern is that the high consumption nrf24l01+ modules were perfectly working for a long time. What a setback....
        Do you know if this is repairable? Changing resonator, chip or both?
        Probably not worth spending time

        YveauxY 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • alexsh1A alexsh1

          @yveaux SMD version has got a better assembly and better range in my view and generally speaking personally I never had issues with the SMD chips, but had various issues with a normal nrf24l01+.

          My concern is that the high consumption nrf24l01+ modules were perfectly working for a long time. What a setback....
          Do you know if this is repairable? Changing resonator, chip or both?
          Probably not worth spending time

          YveauxY Offline
          YveauxY Offline
          Yveaux
          Mod
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          @alexsh1 said in Another nrf24l01+ fake or..?:

          Do you know if this is repairable? Changing resonator, chip or both?

          When power usage increases over time it would be interesting to know what is causing it...

          http://yveaux.blogspot.nl

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          Reply
          • Reply as topic
          Log in to reply
          • Oldest to Newest
          • Newest to Oldest
          • Most Votes


          25

          Online

          11.7k

          Users

          11.2k

          Topics

          113.1k

          Posts


          Copyright 2025 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
          • Login

          • Don't have an account? Register

          • Login or register to search.
          • First post
            Last post
          0
          • MySensors
          • OpenHardware.io
          • Categories
          • Recent
          • Tags
          • Popular