Piezzo siren/alarm

[FotoFieber]

@ben999 said in Piezzo siren/alarm:

I did also put a 1k resistor in between the piezo speaker pins... but it lowered the tone by quite a lot..

Cool, you sorted it out! The resistor may only help in an DC setup (one output from the arduino). In your AC setup it is useless.

[ben999]

@fotofieber gosh that a good analysis :+1: that makes a lot of sense
Then i can picture things better:

• one output with 0 et +5V is considered as DC
• two output pulling differentially -5V to +5V... looks like a sin curbe... so it's AC !

Breadboard is out and still cabled, i'll have a go asap and confirm

Thanks again for your knowledge

[FotoFieber]

@ben999
You could try DC (one output) with 12V to the piezo. If you want to use only 5V, the AC solution should be louder, as it gets 10V difference to the piezo.

I usually stop optimizing, when it is good enough. If AC is enough, go with it. :)

[ben999]

@fotofieber DC+ one output is really poor and voltage has no impact on noise. I have tested with up to 6S LiPo and there's absolutely no gain as compared to 5V DC

AC+ two outputs is a game changer! Much louder right from +/-5V and really a killer @ +/-12V.

So that's it: the first iteration of this project will go for a step-up converter from 5V up to 12V for the piezo speaker.

Thanks folks!

EDIT: could someone suggest a MOSFET (or transistor) that could be used in lieu of the huge (and probably over-sized) TIP120 (that where there, waiting in the drawer :) ). Through-hole is my league. SMD is a bit of a struggle (welding, machining pcb, ...)

Thanks again :smiley:

[ben999]

back at it !

I got my LCD microscope out and tried to reverse-engineer the original board. I should have done that to start with.

I drew that circuit on www.falstad.com (this link takes you to my actual circuit) and got several kV out of the simulation lol.

I used the original transformer: i could only measure resistance, so 5,5ohms on primary side, and 195ohms on secondary.

First transistor hooked to wave generator is J3Y. I replaced it with a BC547 (the "copy-paste" engineer hidden inside my head told me it's fairly close lol).

Second transistor is labeled J41CG and seems pretty strong to me so i replaced it with TIP120 .

Next I put all these components onto the breadboard, and load my favourite Nano with this sketch :

const int buzzerPin = 9;
int i = 0;
unsigned long duration = 1000;

void setup() {
  pinMode(buzzerPin, OUTPUT);
}

void   loop() {
  for (i = 1000; i < 5000; i++) {
    tone(buzzerPin, i, duration);
  }
  for (i = 5000; i > 1000; i--) {
    tone(buzzerPin, i, duration);
  }
}

That is ever so LOUD !!

So this is plenty good enough for my little project !

next step

[TheoL]

There are also a lot of circuits using 555 timers and some old CMOS or TTL chips that easily create the oscilation you need. It draws a bit more power when the piezo is active. But for me that's worth it, because it gets rid of the complication in the code.
And is you have a bad MySensors radio connection, MySensors will keep executing code that might interrupt code. Which is annoying for applications like this, because it will interfere with your piezo sound. That's why I prefer a hardware solution or an active piezo buzzer. The ones that have a range from 3.3V to 24V are usually very load at 24V. They can be driven with a simple fet.

At least that's how I look at electronics now, don't jump to a software solution when some old skool electronics make your life easier.

But I love the project!

[ben999]

Next step is to measure battery voltage on a daily basis.

Current setup is as follow:

• Pro Mini 8MHz 3.3V (regulator removed)
• Single cell LiPo (4.2V)
• Solar panel (unknown specs)
• Solar charger/boost to 5.0V based on 4056 chip

My reference for this part of the project is this post :
@Anticimex said in New library to read Arduino VCC supply level without resistors for battery powered sensor nodes that do not use a voltage regulator but connect directly to the batteries ;-)

I would like to activate the voltage divider on demand, via a transistor (NDP6020P as per previous link) as to not draw voltage 24/7 on a permanent divider.
I am also considering using AVR's internal 1.1V reference to measure the voltage.
Simulation gives this: link to falstad

As one looks at the "live" simulation one can notice that the transistor leaks a bit... a few mV.. that's the bit that worries me.

Is this a flaw from the calculation or does a transistor leak anyway ?

Thanks a lot for your suggestions !

[TheoL]

Just curious, still learning. Would a mosfet not draw less power? You could use a Mosfet and use a diode instead of a resistor to pull it high or low. That way it consumes micro amps.

[ben999]

@TheoL thanks a lot for your suggestions

Unfortunately this is way above my league
And i'm not brainy enough to modify his design

I am using that same transistor mentionned in @Anticimex 's post

My question was very general : does a transistor leak and by how much (is that a figure even given is the specs sheet?)

Thanks you anyway for replies

[TheoL]

Can't give you a 100% answer. I've noticed with FETS I sometimes have a low leak Voltage. But I've seen Chinese designs that gave a negative voltage when the FET was turned off haha