Skip to content
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Controllers
  3. OpenHAB
  4. openHAB 2.0 binding
  • Getting Started
  • Controller
  • Build
  • Hardware
  • Download/API
  • Forum
  • Store

openHAB 2.0 binding

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved OpenHAB
534 Posts 88 Posters 479.5k Views 99 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • K Offline
    K Offline
    kolaf
    Hero Member
    wrote on last edited by
    #181

    Hi all,

    After battling with some radio issues with my sensors (in the RFM69 library) I am again ready to get things working using OH2. I downloaded the latest copy of the binding, but sadly things are not working for me. I believe the problem is still related to collecting to the serial port. I have lots of zwave stuff going on in my log, but i have included it anyhow in case someone feels the urge to take a look :-).
    0_1461437647445_temporary log

    andreacioniA 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • K kolaf

      Hi all,

      After battling with some radio issues with my sensors (in the RFM69 library) I am again ready to get things working using OH2. I downloaded the latest copy of the binding, but sadly things are not working for me. I believe the problem is still related to collecting to the serial port. I have lots of zwave stuff going on in my log, but i have included it anyhow in case someone feels the urge to take a look :-).
      0_1461437647445_temporary log

      andreacioniA Offline
      andreacioniA Offline
      andreacioni
      wrote on last edited by andreacioni
      #182

      @kolaf Same thing as @Francois, in the binding configuration try add this: skipStartupCheck=true.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • K Offline
        K Offline
        kolaf
        Hero Member
        wrote on last edited by
        #183

        Thanks for the suggestion. I updated the configuration like this:

        Bridge mysensors:bridge-ser:gateway [ serialPort="/dev/mysensorsUSB", sendDelay=200, skipStartupCheck=true ] {
        	baro	stableBarometer	[ nodeId="6", childId="3" ]
        	power	mainPower	[ nodeId="3", childId="1" ]
        	temperature		basementTemperature		[ nodeId="10", childId="1"]
            }
        

        It did not work as expected. The resulting log is like this:

            22:34:35.570 [INFO ] [el.core.internal.ModelRepositoryImpl] - Refreshing model 'mysensors.things'
            22:34:35.606 [DEBUG] [col.serial.MySensorsSerialConnection] - Shutting down serial connection!
            22:34:35.606 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.protocol.MySensorsWriter] - Stopping Writer thread
            22:34:35.606 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.protocol.MySensorsReader] - Stopping Reader thread
            22:34:35.606 [DEBUG] [nsors.handler.MySensorsBridgeHandler] - Initialization of the MySensors Bridge
            22:34:35.607 [DEBUG] [col.serial.MySensorsSerialConnection] - Connecting to /dev/mysensorsUSB [baudRate:115200]
            22:34:35.614 [DEBUG] [col.serial.MySensorsSerialConnection] - Successfully connected to serial port.
            22:34:35.614 [DEBUG] [col.serial.MySensorsSerialConnection] - Waiting 5 seconds to allow correct reset trigger on serial connection opening
            22:34:40.608 [ERROR] [ome.core.thing.internal.ThingManager] - Exception occured while calling thing updated at ThingHandler 'org.openhab.binding.mysensors.handler.MySensorsBridgeHandler@534c4d92: null
            java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException
                    at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.get(FutureTask.java:205)[:1.8.0_66]
                    at org.eclipse.smarthome.core.common.SafeMethodCaller.callAsynchronous(SafeMethodCaller.java:179)[88:org.eclipse.smarthome.core:0.8.0.201604051458]
                    at org.eclipse.smarthome.core.common.SafeMethodCaller.call(SafeMethodCaller.java:72)[88:org.eclipse.smarthome.core:0.8.0.201604051458]
                    at org.eclipse.smarthome.core.common.SafeMethodCaller.call(SafeMethodCaller.java:56)[88:org.eclipse.smarthome.core:0.8.0.201604051458]
                    at org.eclipse.smarthome.core.thing.internal.ThingManager.thingUpdated(ThingManager.java:515)[94:org.eclipse.smarthome.core.thing:0.8.0.201604051458]
                    at org.eclipse.smarthome.core.thing.internal.ThingRegistryImpl.notifyTrackers(ThingRegistryImpl.java:218)[94:org.eclipse.smarthome.core.thing:0.8.0.201604051458]
                    at org.eclipse.smarthome.core.thing.internal.ThingRegistryImpl.notifyListenersAboutUpdatedElement(ThingRegistryImpl.java:141)[94:org.eclipse.smarthome.core.thing:0.8.0.201604051458]
                    at org.eclipse.smarthome.core.thing.internal.ThingRegistryImpl.notifyListenersAboutUpdatedElement(ThingRegistryImpl.java:1)[94:org.eclipse.smarthome.core.thing:0.8.0.201604051458]
                    at org.eclipse.smarthome.core.common.registry.AbstractRegistry.updated(AbstractRegistry.java:102)[88:org.eclipse.smarthome.core:0.8.0.201604051458]
                    at org.eclipse.smarthome.core.common.registry.AbstractProvider.notifyListeners(AbstractProvider.java:57)[88:org.eclipse.smarthome.core:0.8.0.201604051458]
                    at org.eclipse.smarthome.core.common.registry.AbstractProvider.notifyListenersAboutUpdatedElement(AbstractProvider.java:82)[88:org.eclipse.smarthome.core:0.8.0.201604051458]
                    at org.eclipse.smarthome.model.thing.internal.GenericThingProvider.access$3(GenericThingProvider.java:1)[118:org.eclipse.smarthome.model.thing:0.8.0.201604051458]
                    at org.eclipse.smarthome.model.thing.internal.GenericThingProvider$18.apply(GenericThingProvider.java:700)[118:org.eclipse.smarthome.model.thing:0.8.0.201604051458]
                    at org.eclipse.smarthome.model.thing.internal.GenericThingProvider$18.apply(GenericThingProvider.java:1)[118:org.eclipse.smarthome.model.thing:0.8.0.201604051458]
                    at org.eclipse.xtext.xbase.lib.IterableExtensions.forEach(IterableExtensions.java:399)[129:org.eclipse.xtext.xbase.lib:2.6.2.v201407030533]
                    at org.eclipse.smarthome.model.thing.internal.GenericThingProvider.modelChanged(GenericThingProvider.java:705)[118:org.eclipse.smarthome.model.thing:0.8.0.201604051458]
                    at org.eclipse.smarthome.model.core.internal.ModelRepositoryImpl.notifyListeners(ModelRepositoryImpl.java:200)[107:org.eclipse.smarthome.model.core:0.8.0.201604051458]
                    at org.eclipse.smarthome.model.core.internal.ModelRepositoryImpl.addOrRefreshModel(ModelRepositoryImpl.java:116)[107:org.eclipse.smarthome.model.core:0.8.0.201604051458]
                    at org.eclipse.smarthome.model.core.internal.folder.FolderObserver.checkFile(FolderObserver.java:240)[107:org.eclipse.smarthome.model.core:0.8.0.201604051458]
                    at org.eclipse.smarthome.model.core.internal.folder.FolderObserver.access$1(FolderObserver.java:235)[107:org.eclipse.smarthome.model.core:0.8.0.201604051458]
                    at org.eclipse.smarthome.model.core.internal.folder.FolderObserver$WatchQueueReader.processWatchEvent(FolderObserver.java:117)[107:org.eclipse.smarthome.model.core:0.8.0.201604051458]
                    at org.eclipse.smarthome.core.service.AbstractWatchQueueReader.run(AbstractWatchQueueReader.java:95)[88:org.eclipse.smarthome.core:0.8.0.201604051458]
                    at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)[:1.8.0_66]
            22:34:40.612 [INFO ] [smarthome.event.ThingUpdatedEvent   ] - Thing 'mysensors:bridge-ser:gateway' has been updated.
            22:34:40.620 [INFO ] [el.core.internal.ModelRepositoryImpl] - Refreshing model 'mysensors.things'
            22:34:40.815 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.protocol.MySensorsWriter] - Sending to MySensors: 0;0;3;0;2;
            22:34:45.619 [ERROR] [s.internal.MySensorsBridgeConnection] - Cannot start reading/writing thread, probably sync message (I_VERSION) not received
            22:34:45.619 [DEBUG] [col.serial.MySensorsSerialConnection] - Shutting down serial connection!
            22:34:45.619 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.protocol.MySensorsWriter] - Stopping Writer thread
            22:34:45.621 [WARN ] [g.mysensors.protocol.MySensorsWriter] - Writer thread interrupted
            22:34:45.621 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.protocol.MySensorsReader] - Stopping Reader thread
        
        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • K Offline
          K Offline
          kolaf
          Hero Member
          wrote on last edited by kolaf
          #184

          I restarted OH2 after changing the configuration, and this time I get no exceptions, but I see no more messages from the binding after the one included below.

          @kolaf said:

          22:34:40.815 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.protocol.MySensorsWriter] - Sending to MySensors: 0;0;3;0;2;
          

          Edit: after a while I finally received a few packets in the debug console:

          2016-04-23 23:10:49.020 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.protocol.MySensorsReader] - 0;d0;6t,
          2016-04-23 23:10:49.021 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.protocol.MySensorsReader] - 0;4;1012.9
          

          Both of the packets seem quite mangled, they are missing pieces, and some of the pieces present do not make sense. I have verified that the baud rate is correct, and when I correct directly to the Gateway using a serial console the output looks normal.

          andreacioniA 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • K kolaf

            I restarted OH2 after changing the configuration, and this time I get no exceptions, but I see no more messages from the binding after the one included below.

            @kolaf said:

            22:34:40.815 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.protocol.MySensorsWriter] - Sending to MySensors: 0;0;3;0;2;
            

            Edit: after a while I finally received a few packets in the debug console:

            2016-04-23 23:10:49.020 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.protocol.MySensorsReader] - 0;d0;6t,
            2016-04-23 23:10:49.021 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.protocol.MySensorsReader] - 0;4;1012.9
            

            Both of the packets seem quite mangled, they are missing pieces, and some of the pieces present do not make sense. I have verified that the baud rate is correct, and when I correct directly to the Gateway using a serial console the output looks normal.

            andreacioniA Offline
            andreacioniA Offline
            andreacioni
            wrote on last edited by andreacioni
            #185

            @kolaf that's my output, check if there's something different.

            Have you tried rebooting the entire board/system?

            23:08:55.305 [DEBUG] [nsors.handler.MySensorsBridgeHandler] - Initialization of the MySensors Bridge
            23:08:55.379 [DEBUG] [col.serial.MySensorsSerialConnection] - Connecting to /dev/ttyS80 [baudRate:115200]
            23:08:56.542 [DEBUG] [col.serial.MySensorsSerialConnection] - Successfully connected to serial port.
            23:08:56.558 [DEBUG] [col.serial.MySensorsSerialConnection] - Waiting 5 seconds to allow correct reset trigger on serial connection opening
            23:09:00.220 [INFO ] [me.event.ThingStatusInfoChangedEvent] - 'mysensors:bridge-ser:gateway' changed from INITIALIZING to UNINITIALIZED (HANDLER_INITIALIZING_ERROR)
            23:09:00.232 [WARN ] [ome.core.thing.internal.ThingManager] - Registering handler for thing 'mysensors:bridge-ser:gateway' takes more than 5000ms.
            23:09:00.403 [INFO ] [el.core.internal.ModelRepositoryImpl] - Loading model 'logging.persist'
            23:09:00.623 [INFO ] [el.core.internal.ModelRepositoryImpl] - Loading model 'rrd4j.persist'
            23:09:01.380 [INFO ] [el.core.internal.ModelRepositoryImpl] - Loading model 'demo.rules'
            23:09:01.615 [WARN ] [s.internal.MySensorsBridgeConnection] - Skipping I_VERSION connection test, not recommended...
            23:09:01.641 [INFO ] [me.event.ThingStatusInfoChangedEvent] - 'mysensors:bridge-ser:gateway' changed from UNINITIALIZED (HANDLER_INITIALIZING_ERROR) to ONLINE
            23:09:01.733 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.protocol.MySensorsWriter] - Sending to MySensors: 0;0;3;0;2;
            23:09:01.737 [DEBUG] [org.openhab.binding.mysensors       ] - ServiceEvent REGISTERED - {org.eclipse.smarthome.core.thing.binding.ThingHandler}={thing.type=mysensors:bridge-ser, thing.id=mysensors:bridge-ser:gateway, service.id=319, service.bundleid=181, service.scope=singleton} - org.openhab.binding.mysensors
            23:09:01.768 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.protocol.MySensorsReader] - 0;0;3;0;2;1.5
            23:09:01.785 [DEBUG] [s.internal.MySensorsBridgeConnection] - Good,Gateway is up and running! (Ver:1.5)
            23:09:04.490 [INFO ] [el.core.internal.ModelRepositoryImpl] - Loading model 'demo.script'
            23:09:05.262 [INFO ] [el.core.internal.ModelRepositoryImpl] - Loading model 'demo.items'
            

            EDIT: Do you see Skipping I_VERSION connection test, not recommended...?

            K 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • andreacioniA andreacioni

              @kolaf that's my output, check if there's something different.

              Have you tried rebooting the entire board/system?

              23:08:55.305 [DEBUG] [nsors.handler.MySensorsBridgeHandler] - Initialization of the MySensors Bridge
              23:08:55.379 [DEBUG] [col.serial.MySensorsSerialConnection] - Connecting to /dev/ttyS80 [baudRate:115200]
              23:08:56.542 [DEBUG] [col.serial.MySensorsSerialConnection] - Successfully connected to serial port.
              23:08:56.558 [DEBUG] [col.serial.MySensorsSerialConnection] - Waiting 5 seconds to allow correct reset trigger on serial connection opening
              23:09:00.220 [INFO ] [me.event.ThingStatusInfoChangedEvent] - 'mysensors:bridge-ser:gateway' changed from INITIALIZING to UNINITIALIZED (HANDLER_INITIALIZING_ERROR)
              23:09:00.232 [WARN ] [ome.core.thing.internal.ThingManager] - Registering handler for thing 'mysensors:bridge-ser:gateway' takes more than 5000ms.
              23:09:00.403 [INFO ] [el.core.internal.ModelRepositoryImpl] - Loading model 'logging.persist'
              23:09:00.623 [INFO ] [el.core.internal.ModelRepositoryImpl] - Loading model 'rrd4j.persist'
              23:09:01.380 [INFO ] [el.core.internal.ModelRepositoryImpl] - Loading model 'demo.rules'
              23:09:01.615 [WARN ] [s.internal.MySensorsBridgeConnection] - Skipping I_VERSION connection test, not recommended...
              23:09:01.641 [INFO ] [me.event.ThingStatusInfoChangedEvent] - 'mysensors:bridge-ser:gateway' changed from UNINITIALIZED (HANDLER_INITIALIZING_ERROR) to ONLINE
              23:09:01.733 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.protocol.MySensorsWriter] - Sending to MySensors: 0;0;3;0;2;
              23:09:01.737 [DEBUG] [org.openhab.binding.mysensors       ] - ServiceEvent REGISTERED - {org.eclipse.smarthome.core.thing.binding.ThingHandler}={thing.type=mysensors:bridge-ser, thing.id=mysensors:bridge-ser:gateway, service.id=319, service.bundleid=181, service.scope=singleton} - org.openhab.binding.mysensors
              23:09:01.768 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.protocol.MySensorsReader] - 0;0;3;0;2;1.5
              23:09:01.785 [DEBUG] [s.internal.MySensorsBridgeConnection] - Good,Gateway is up and running! (Ver:1.5)
              23:09:04.490 [INFO ] [el.core.internal.ModelRepositoryImpl] - Loading model 'demo.script'
              23:09:05.262 [INFO ] [el.core.internal.ModelRepositoryImpl] - Loading model 'demo.items'
              

              EDIT: Do you see Skipping I_VERSION connection test, not recommended...?

              K Offline
              K Offline
              kolaf
              Hero Member
              wrote on last edited by kolaf
              #186

              @andreacioni The difference is that I never get a response from the board for some reason. Connecting using screen works without issues. I think the still might be an issue with the serial lock, but given that we actually receive some data at all this might not be the case after all.

              Edit: I have rebooted the board by unplugging it and reconnecting it.

              andreacioniA 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • K kolaf

                @andreacioni The difference is that I never get a response from the board for some reason. Connecting using screen works without issues. I think the still might be an issue with the serial lock, but given that we actually receive some data at all this might not be the case after all.

                Edit: I have rebooted the board by unplugging it and reconnecting it.

                andreacioniA Offline
                andreacioniA Offline
                andreacioni
                wrote on last edited by
                #187

                @kolaf Could you try link the serial port to another name (ln -s /dev/mysensorsUSB /dev/ttyS80)

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • K Offline
                  K Offline
                  kolaf
                  Hero Member
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #188

                  I just tried disconnecting and reconnecting the board and restarting OH2 again, and this time it seems to have initialised correctly :-). I'm not sure why it didn't work the first two times, though.

                  andreacioniA 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • K kolaf

                    I just tried disconnecting and reconnecting the board and restarting OH2 again, and this time it seems to have initialised correctly :-). I'm not sure why it didn't work the first two times, though.

                    andreacioniA Offline
                    andreacioniA Offline
                    andreacioni
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #189

                    @kolaf Perfect! ;)

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • K Offline
                      K Offline
                      kolaf
                      Hero Member
                      wrote on last edited by kolaf
                      #190

                      Now that things seem to be working on all levels, I have a very small request. Could someone please update the "baro" thing definition to include "V_PRESSURE" as well as "V_FORECAST"? My arduino is not big enough to calculate the forecast without running out of memory, so I can only send the actual barometric pressure.

                      Edit: Perhaps it is better to replace forecast with pressure for baro and create a new channel for the forecast?

                      What would also have been great, but this is a longer shot, would be to have some standardised way of getting received signal strength for the (at least directly connected) sensors. At least the RFM69 has an easy way of reporting RSSI, so just need a standard way of reporting this to the binding. Currently I'm reporting it as a generic debug message like this: 0;255;3;0;9;Received RSSI: -32

                      The reason I want to keep track of this is to keep an eye on the RF environments around my sensors. Things may change for many reasons (appliances, foliage, et cetera) and this will allow me to pre-emptively correct any problems in the future :-)

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • andreacioniA andreacioni

                        Hi @undee

                        Can you post your node firmware version and log of OH2? It's very important for us to troubleshoot your problem.
                        Thanks!

                        undeeU Offline
                        undeeU Offline
                        undee
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #191

                        @andreacioni

                        Here is the output generated after restarting the TimeAwareSensor sketch from the MySensors examples.

                        You can see that the I_TIME (3;0;1) message is received by the gateway several times, but it never sends a response to the node.

                        Do you need anything else?

                        12:20:59.677 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.protocol.MySensorsReader] - 0;255;3;0;9;Starting gateway (RNNGA-, 2.0.0-beta)
                        12:20:59.683 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.protocol.MySensorsReader] - 0;255;3;0;9;Radio init successful.
                        12:20:59.683 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.protocol.MySensorsReader] - 0;255;3;0;14;Gateway startup complete.
                        12:20:59.683 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.protocol.MySensorsReader] - 0;255;3;0;9;Init complete, id=0, parent=0, distance=0
                        12:20:59.683 [INFO ] [me.event.ThingStatusInfoChangedEvent] - 'mysensors:bridge-ser:2dc775c4' changed from INITIALIZING to ONLINE
                        12:20:59.776 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.protocol.MySensorsWriter] - Sending to MySensors: 0;0;3;0;2;
                        12:20:59.782 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.protocol.MySensorsReader] - 0;255;3;0;2;2.0.0-beta
                        12:20:59.782 [DEBUG] [s.internal.MySensorsBridgeConnection] - Good,Gateway is up and running! (Ver:2.0.0-beta)
                        12:21:01.067 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.protocol.MySensorsReader] - 0;255;3;0;9;read: 167-167-0 s=255,c=3,t=1,pt=0,l=0,sg=0:
                        12:21:01.071 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.protocol.MySensorsReader] - 167;255;3;0;1;
                        12:21:01.076 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.protocol.MySensorsReader] - 0;255;3;0;9;read: 167-167-0 s=255,c=3,t=15,pt=0,l=2,sg=0:
                        12:21:01.119 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.protocol.MySensorsReader] - 0;255;3;0;9;send: 0-0-167-167 s=255,c=3,t=15,pt=0,l=2,sg=0,st=fail:
                        12:21:01.125 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.protocol.MySensorsReader] - 0;255;3;0;9;read: 167-167-0 s=255,c=0,t=17,pt=0,l=10,sg=0:2.0.0-beta
                        12:21:01.128 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.protocol.MySensorsReader] - 167;255;0;0;17;2.0.0-beta
                        12:21:01.131 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.protocol.MySensorsReader] - 0;255;3;0;9;read: 167-167-0 s=255,c=3,t=6,pt=1,l=1,sg=0:0
                        12:21:01.134 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.protocol.MySensorsReader] - 167;255;3;0;6;0
                        12:21:03.135 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.protocol.MySensorsReader] - 0;255;3;0;9;read: 167-167-0 s=255,c=3,t=11,pt=0,l=5,sg=0:Clock
                        12:21:03.138 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.protocol.MySensorsReader] - 167;255;3;0;11;Clock
                        12:21:03.144 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.protocol.MySensorsReader] - 0;255;3;0;9;read: 167-167-0 s=255,c=3,t=12,pt=0,l=3,sg=0:1.0
                        12:21:03.146 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.protocol.MySensorsReader] - 167;255;3;0;12;1.0
                        12:21:11.059 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.protocol.MySensorsReader] - 0;255;3;0;9;read: 167-167-0 s=255,c=3,t=1,pt=0,l=0,sg=0:
                        12:21:11.061 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.protocol.MySensorsReader] - 167;255;3;0;1;
                        12:21:21.061 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.protocol.MySensorsReader] - 0;255;3;0;9;read: 167-167-0 s=255,c=3,t=1,pt=0,l=0,sg=0:
                        12:21:21.063 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.protocol.MySensorsReader] - 167;255;3;0;1;
                        12:21:31.063 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.protocol.MySensorsReader] - 0;255;3;0;9;read: 167-167-0 s=255,c=3,t=1,pt=0,l=0,sg=0:
                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • T TimO

                          New version of the binding available!

                          • A requestTime from a node is now answered by the controller. Is anyone able to test it? (@undee )
                          • The controller will answer a request for "imperial or metric" like temperature sensors might ask. We need to test that too.

                          Big thanks @andreacioni for the implementation and @Francois for testing/reporting!

                          I've added an example page in the wiki: https://github.com/tobof/openhab2-addons/wiki/Examples
                          These are the type of things I'm currently using. (SensebenderMicro, Humidity, Temperature, Cover, Motion, Light ...)

                          Has anyone additional examples yet?

                          andreacioniA Offline
                          andreacioniA Offline
                          andreacioni
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #192

                          Hi @TimO, me and @undee have tested everything (thanks again!). I'll push a little PR on github to fix a problem found in I_TIME response.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • T Offline
                            T Offline
                            TimO
                            Hero Member
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #193

                            Hey @andreacioni & @undee , thanks for the test & fix!
                            I've merged the PR.

                            andreacioniA 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • T TimO

                              Hey @andreacioni & @undee , thanks for the test & fix!
                              I've merged the PR.

                              andreacioniA Offline
                              andreacioniA Offline
                              andreacioni
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #194

                              Hi @TimO ! I want to tell you an idea for the OH2 binding. What do you think about adding a date time channel to every thing that hold the last communication of the thing with the gateway? For example, it will be useful if you want to notify user that some sensors have become unavailable. Tell me what do you think! :)

                              K 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • andreacioniA andreacioni

                                Hi @TimO ! I want to tell you an idea for the OH2 binding. What do you think about adding a date time channel to every thing that hold the last communication of the thing with the gateway? For example, it will be useful if you want to notify user that some sensors have become unavailable. Tell me what do you think! :)

                                K Offline
                                K Offline
                                kolaf
                                Hero Member
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #195

                                @andreacioni This can be easily done with a periodic rule that checks the latest update of the value assuming you have some persistence like rrd configured.

                                andreacioniA 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • K kolaf

                                  @andreacioni This can be easily done with a periodic rule that checks the latest update of the value assuming you have some persistence like rrd configured.

                                  andreacioniA Offline
                                  andreacioniA Offline
                                  andreacioni
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #196

                                  Hi @kolaf, yes this is how to do it. But my idea is to integrate the datetime channel into the binding in order to automatically update that value when updates are received. I think is better than have to do rules into OH config for each devices. What do you think?

                                  K D 2 Replies Last reply
                                  0
                                  • andreacioniA andreacioni

                                    Hi @kolaf, yes this is how to do it. But my idea is to integrate the datetime channel into the binding in order to automatically update that value when updates are received. I think is better than have to do rules into OH config for each devices. What do you think?

                                    K Offline
                                    K Offline
                                    kolaf
                                    Hero Member
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #197

                                    @andreacioni Sure, getting automatically configured alerts both for silent sensors and low battery for free would be great ☺️.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • andreacioniA andreacioni

                                      Hi @kolaf, yes this is how to do it. But my idea is to integrate the datetime channel into the binding in order to automatically update that value when updates are received. I think is better than have to do rules into OH config for each devices. What do you think?

                                      D Offline
                                      D Offline
                                      Denke
                                      Hardware Contributor
                                      wrote on last edited by Denke
                                      #198

                                      @andreacioni i support your idea to implementing this in the bindning.

                                      RaspberryPi-Openhab

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • T Offline
                                        T Offline
                                        TimO
                                        Hero Member
                                        wrote on last edited by TimO
                                        #199

                                        Hi @andreacioni !

                                        I can't decide if I like the idea or not. :-)
                                        For sure, the result is needed. I currently have a rule that does store the last update from a sensor. In fact, I have a few rules, for all my battery powered sensors, so a reduction in the number of rules would be great.
                                        BUT I suppose implementing this in the binding is not the OpenHAB-way, because the binding is only the interface to the hardware and should be lightweight.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • D Offline
                                          D Offline
                                          Denke
                                          Hardware Contributor
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #200

                                          Open query.
                                          I think it is a bit boring that when you give the sensor a new adress that you have to power cycle the device to get it added. I can see that the sensor is starting to transmitt with the new address but The binding is not finding it as a new device. I can see that this happens becouse the sonsor dont present it self to the binding. how ever what about implementing a feature that asks the sensor for data when it just gave out a new address. I have also asked for mySensor to add the feature that when the node gets a new adress that it should present it self.

                                          Which way do you see as best? Or is it nothing that can be one?

                                          RaspberryPi-Openhab

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          3

                                          Online

                                          11.7k

                                          Users

                                          11.2k

                                          Topics

                                          113.0k

                                          Posts


                                          Copyright 2019 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • OpenHardware.io
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular