Skip to content
  • MySensors
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Announcements
  3. 💬 Connecting the Radio

💬 Connecting the Radio

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Announcements
162 Posts 49 Posters 101.1k Views 40 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S sundberg84

    Connection diagram/circuit between RFM module and atmega328p-au TQFP footprint.

    534dda4f-7899-44b6-b852-3b3fbeff6f2a-image.png

    T Offline
    T Offline
    tssk
    wrote on last edited by
    #161

    I would like to ask about the radio module connection - I am using SX1276 and I connect it the same way as described by @sundberg84 said in 💬 Connecting the Radio except I additionally connect also RST (NRESET) pin according to this https://github.com/sandeepmistry/arduino-LoRa/blob/master/README.md#semtech-sx1276777879-wiring

    Is it necessary?

    Thanks

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • J Offline
      J Offline
      jenspr
      wrote on last edited by
      #162

      I was wondering about the lengths for the antennas mentioned on this page.

      For 868Mhz is mentioned a length of 82.2 mm on this page. The length most often mentioned over the internet - as first result of the 1/4 wave calculation - is 86,5mm.
      Searching a little deeper through the internet, i found that the antenna should be "a little shorter". Then they end up with around -1cm shorter or something around or more.
      One page mentioned the physically effect that the wave is moving in chopper around 5% slower as the theoratical speed. If i substract 5% of 86,5mm i end up with the here mentioned 82,2mm.

      I was very suprised about the different "approaches" for such a basic thing as antenna length every single . As most of the application over the internet seem to work somehow with all that different lengths, it seems to be just a fine-tuning thing.
      Anyway, i think it would be nice to mention this details here because most people will wonder about the 82,2mm in the first view...

      best regards
      Jens

      1 Reply Last reply
      0

      Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

      Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

      With your input, this post could be even better 💗

      Register Login
      Reply
      • Reply as topic
      Log in to reply
      • Oldest to Newest
      • Newest to Oldest
      • Most Votes


      12

      Online

      12.1k

      Users

      11.2k

      Topics

      113.4k

      Posts


      Copyright 2025 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
      • Login

      • Don't have an account? Register

      • Login or register to search.
      • First post
        Last post
      0
      • MySensors
      • OpenHardware.io
      • Categories
      • Recent
      • Tags
      • Popular