Skip to content
  • MySensors
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Announcements
  3. 💬 Building a Raspberry Pi Gateway

💬 Building a Raspberry Pi Gateway

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Announcements
1.1k Posts 173 Posters 423.2k Views 131 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Sergio RiusS Offline
    Sergio RiusS Offline
    Sergio Rius
    wrote on last edited by Sergio Rius
    #570

    Seems that I'll need some help for getting this properly done.
    I can't launch two instances of the service.

    What I've done is following the guide instructions with the following configuration:

    ./configure \
     --my-transport=nrf24 \
     --my-rf24-irq-pin=18 \
     --my-gateway=ethernet --my-port=5003 \
     --prefix=/opt/mysgw-nrf
    

    Then manually executed it, and it run ok and get one test node connected and Domoticz saw it all.

    Then I duplicated the MySensors folder and in there made the build with the following configuration:

    ./configure \
     --my-transport=nrf24 \
     --my-rf24-channel=82 \
     --my-rf24-ce-pin=37 \
     --my-rf24-cs-pin=36 \
     --my-rf24-irq-pin=33 \
     --my-gateway=ethernet --my-port=5004 \
     --prefix=/opt/mysgw-rfm
    

    Even when it says rfm, i connected a second NRF with the following pinout (blue=first NRF, green=second):
    0_1501511919817_Pinouts.png
    *IRQ on pin 33 as config says, and power from 1.

    Then I tried to make and run and I get this output:

    pi@domo_testing:~/MySGW_RFM $ sudo ./bin/mysgw -d
    mysgw: Starting gateway...
    mysgw: Protocol version - 2.2.0-beta
     __  __       ____
    |  \/  |_   _/ ___|  ___ _ __  ___  ___  _ __ ___
    | |\/| | | | \___ \ / _ \ `_ \/ __|/ _ \| `__/ __|
    | |  | | |_| |___| |  __/ | | \__ \  _  | |  \__ \
    |_|  |_|\__, |____/ \___|_| |_|___/\___/|_|  |___/
            |___/                      2.2.0-beta
    
    mysgw: MCO:BGN:INIT CP=RNNG--Q-
    mysgw: TSF:LRT:OK
    mysgw: TSM:INIT
    mysgw: TSF:WUR:MS=0
    mysgw: pinMode: invalid pin: 33
    mysgw: pinMode: invalid pin: 37
    mysgw: pinMode: invalid pin: 36
    mysgw: digitalWrite: invalid pin: 37
    mysgw: digitalWrite: invalid pin: 36
    mysgw: You need root privilege to use SPI.
    

    Is that I have to connect MOSI and MISO to the same pins that the first NRF?

    mfalkviddM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • Sergio RiusS Sergio Rius

      Seems that I'll need some help for getting this properly done.
      I can't launch two instances of the service.

      What I've done is following the guide instructions with the following configuration:

      ./configure \
       --my-transport=nrf24 \
       --my-rf24-irq-pin=18 \
       --my-gateway=ethernet --my-port=5003 \
       --prefix=/opt/mysgw-nrf
      

      Then manually executed it, and it run ok and get one test node connected and Domoticz saw it all.

      Then I duplicated the MySensors folder and in there made the build with the following configuration:

      ./configure \
       --my-transport=nrf24 \
       --my-rf24-channel=82 \
       --my-rf24-ce-pin=37 \
       --my-rf24-cs-pin=36 \
       --my-rf24-irq-pin=33 \
       --my-gateway=ethernet --my-port=5004 \
       --prefix=/opt/mysgw-rfm
      

      Even when it says rfm, i connected a second NRF with the following pinout (blue=first NRF, green=second):
      0_1501511919817_Pinouts.png
      *IRQ on pin 33 as config says, and power from 1.

      Then I tried to make and run and I get this output:

      pi@domo_testing:~/MySGW_RFM $ sudo ./bin/mysgw -d
      mysgw: Starting gateway...
      mysgw: Protocol version - 2.2.0-beta
       __  __       ____
      |  \/  |_   _/ ___|  ___ _ __  ___  ___  _ __ ___
      | |\/| | | | \___ \ / _ \ `_ \/ __|/ _ \| `__/ __|
      | |  | | |_| |___| |  __/ | | \__ \  _  | |  \__ \
      |_|  |_|\__, |____/ \___|_| |_|___/\___/|_|  |___/
              |___/                      2.2.0-beta
      
      mysgw: MCO:BGN:INIT CP=RNNG--Q-
      mysgw: TSF:LRT:OK
      mysgw: TSM:INIT
      mysgw: TSF:WUR:MS=0
      mysgw: pinMode: invalid pin: 33
      mysgw: pinMode: invalid pin: 37
      mysgw: pinMode: invalid pin: 36
      mysgw: digitalWrite: invalid pin: 37
      mysgw: digitalWrite: invalid pin: 36
      mysgw: You need root privilege to use SPI.
      

      Is that I have to connect MOSI and MISO to the same pins that the first NRF?

      mfalkviddM Offline
      mfalkviddM Offline
      mfalkvidd
      Mod
      wrote on last edited by
      #571

      @Sergio-Rius see https://forum.mysensors.org/post/72145 and https://github.com/mysensors/MySensors/issues/895

      Sergio RiusS 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • mfalkviddM mfalkvidd

        @Sergio-Rius see https://forum.mysensors.org/post/72145 and https://github.com/mysensors/MySensors/issues/895

        Sergio RiusS Offline
        Sergio RiusS Offline
        Sergio Rius
        wrote on last edited by Sergio Rius
        #572

        @mfalkvidd That was the culprit. Thanks.
        But now... seems that the radio that is using channel 76 also get connections from nodes on channel 83, and the second radio, the 83 one doesn't pick anything.

        Is there a way to confirm that gw and nodes are using one channel or other during the bootup?

        gohanG 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • Sergio RiusS Sergio Rius

          @mfalkvidd That was the culprit. Thanks.
          But now... seems that the radio that is using channel 76 also get connections from nodes on channel 83, and the second radio, the 83 one doesn't pick anything.

          Is there a way to confirm that gw and nodes are using one channel or other during the bootup?

          gohanG Offline
          gohanG Offline
          gohan
          Mod
          wrote on last edited by
          #573

          @Sergio-Rius try increasing the distance between channels to at least 10 or more

          Sergio RiusS 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • gohanG gohan

            @Sergio-Rius try increasing the distance between channels to at least 10 or more

            Sergio RiusS Offline
            Sergio RiusS Offline
            Sergio Rius
            wrote on last edited by
            #574

            @gohan Done. I've just burnt the node with channel 125 and it seems to have no effect. It registers on the 76 radio.

            Does the #define MY_RF24_CHANNEL 125 has to be before or after the include of mysensors.h? I have it before.

            Sergio RiusS 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • Sergio RiusS Sergio Rius

              @gohan Done. I've just burnt the node with channel 125 and it seems to have no effect. It registers on the 76 radio.

              Does the #define MY_RF24_CHANNEL 125 has to be before or after the include of mysensors.h? I have it before.

              Sergio RiusS Offline
              Sergio RiusS Offline
              Sergio Rius
              wrote on last edited by Sergio Rius
              #575

              Well, I've changed the channel for the 1st radio to 83 and left the second at 125.
              If I burn the testing node for ch125 it doesn't receives reply from the gw. If I then burn it on ch83, it registers and comunicates with the first radio.

              So I think the second radio does not work on the Raspberry Pi. The service communicates with the controller but does nothing for the network side.
              Also on the second radio:

              mysgw: Client 0: 0;0;3;0;18;PING
              mysgw: Client 0: 0;0;3;0;18;PING
              mysgw: Client 0: 0;0;3;0;18;PING
              mysgw: !TSF:SAN:FAIL
              mysgw: TSM:FAIL:CNT=1
              mysgw: TSM:FAIL:DIS
              mysgw: TSF:TDI:TSL
              mysgw: Client 0: 0;0;3;0;18;PING
              mysgw: TSM:FAIL:RE-INIT
              mysgw: TSM:INIT
              mysgw: TSM:INIT:TSP OK
              mysgw: TSM:INIT:GW MODE
              mysgw: TSM:READY:ID=0,PAR=0,DIS=0
              mysgw: Client 0: 0;0;3;0;18;PING
              mysgw: Client 0: 0;0;3;0;18;PING
              
              mfalkviddM 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • Sergio RiusS Sergio Rius

                Well, I've changed the channel for the 1st radio to 83 and left the second at 125.
                If I burn the testing node for ch125 it doesn't receives reply from the gw. If I then burn it on ch83, it registers and comunicates with the first radio.

                So I think the second radio does not work on the Raspberry Pi. The service communicates with the controller but does nothing for the network side.
                Also on the second radio:

                mysgw: Client 0: 0;0;3;0;18;PING
                mysgw: Client 0: 0;0;3;0;18;PING
                mysgw: Client 0: 0;0;3;0;18;PING
                mysgw: !TSF:SAN:FAIL
                mysgw: TSM:FAIL:CNT=1
                mysgw: TSM:FAIL:DIS
                mysgw: TSF:TDI:TSL
                mysgw: Client 0: 0;0;3;0;18;PING
                mysgw: TSM:FAIL:RE-INIT
                mysgw: TSM:INIT
                mysgw: TSM:INIT:TSP OK
                mysgw: TSM:INIT:GW MODE
                mysgw: TSM:READY:ID=0,PAR=0,DIS=0
                mysgw: Client 0: 0;0;3;0;18;PING
                mysgw: Client 0: 0;0;3;0;18;PING
                
                mfalkviddM Offline
                mfalkviddM Offline
                mfalkvidd
                Mod
                wrote on last edited by
                #576

                @Sergio-Rius if you shut down mysgw for the first radio and restart mysgw for the second radio, does the second radio start to work?
                And do you get the same debug output? The SPI message looks bad. Maybe the two gateways are conflicting.

                Sergio RiusS 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • mfalkviddM mfalkvidd

                  @Sergio-Rius if you shut down mysgw for the first radio and restart mysgw for the second radio, does the second radio start to work?
                  And do you get the same debug output? The SPI message looks bad. Maybe the two gateways are conflicting.

                  Sergio RiusS Offline
                  Sergio RiusS Offline
                  Sergio Rius
                  wrote on last edited by Sergio Rius
                  #577

                  @mfalkvidd Nope, the service seems to have stopped the SAN errors but still no communication:

                  pi@domo_testing:~/MySGW_RFM $ sudo ./bin/mysgw -d
                  mysgw: Starting gateway...
                  mysgw: Protocol version - 2.2.0-beta
                   __  __       ____
                  |  \/  |_   _/ ___|  ___ _ __  ___  ___  _ __ ___
                  | |\/| | | | \___ \ / _ \ `_ \/ __|/ _ \| `__/ __|
                  | |  | | |_| |___| |  __/ | | \__ \  _  | |  \__ \
                  |_|  |_|\__, |____/ \___|_| |_|___/\___/|_|  |___/
                          |___/                      2.2.0-beta
                  
                  mysgw: MCO:BGN:INIT CP=RNNG--Q-
                  mysgw: TSF:LRT:OK
                  mysgw: TSM:INIT
                  mysgw: TSF:WUR:MS=0
                  mysgw: TSM:INIT:TSP OK
                  mysgw: TSM:INIT:GW MODE
                  mysgw: TSM:READY:ID=0,PAR=0,DIS=0
                  mysgw: MCO:REG:NOT NEEDED
                  mysgw: Listening for connections on 0.0.0.0:5004
                  mysgw: MCO:BGN:STP
                  mysgw: MCO:BGN:INIT OK,TSP=1
                  mysgw: New connection from 127.0.0.1
                  mysgw: Client 0 connected
                  mysgw: Client 0: 0;0;3;0;2;
                  mysgw: Client 0: 0;0;3;0;2;Get Version
                  mysgw: Client 0: 0;0;3;0;18;PING
                  mysgw: Client 0: 0;0;3;0;18;PING
                  mysgw: Client 0: 0;0;3;0;18;PING
                  mysgw: Client 0: 0;0;3;0;18;PING
                  mysgw: Client 0: 0;0;3;0;18;PING
                  
                  0 MCO:BGN:INIT NODE,CP=RNNNA--,VER=2.1.1
                  4 TSM:INIT
                  4 TSF:WUR:MS=0
                  12 TSM:INIT:TSP OK
                  14 TSF:SID:OK,ID=1
                  16 TSM:FPAR
                  51 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-255-255,s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
                  2060 !TSM:FPAR:NO REPLY
                  2062 TSM:FPAR
                  2099 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-255-255,s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
                  4106 !TSM:FPAR:NO REPLY
                  4108 TSM:FPAR
                  4145 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-255-255,s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
                  6152 !TSM:FPAR:NO REPLY
                  6154 TSM:FPAR
                  6191 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-255-255,s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
                  8198 !TSM:FPAR:FAIL
                  8200 TSM:FAIL:CNT=1
                  8202 TSM:FAIL:PDT
                  18206 TSM:FAIL:RE-INIT
                  18208 TSM:INIT
                  18214 TSM:INIT:TSP OK
                  18219 TSF:SID:OK,ID=1
                  18221 TSM:FPAR
                  18257 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-255-255,s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
                  20267 !TSM:FPAR:NO REPLY
                  20269 TSM:FPAR
                  20305 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-255-255,s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
                  22315 !TSM:FPAR:NO REPLY
                  22317 TSM:FPAR
                  22353 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-255-255,s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
                  24363 !TSM:FPAR:NO REPLY
                  24365 TSM:FPAR
                  24401 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-255-255,s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
                  26411 !TSM:FPAR:FAIL
                  26413 TSM:FAIL:CNT=2
                  26415 TSM:FAIL:PDT
                  36419 TSM:FAIL:RE-INIT
                  36421 TSM:INIT
                  36427 TSM:INIT:TSP OK
                  36431 TSF:SID:OK,ID=1
                  36433 TSM:FPAR
                  36470 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-255-255,s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
                  38479 !TSM:FPAR:NO REPLY
                  38481 TSM:FPAR
                  38518 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-255-255,s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
                  40527 !TSM:FPAR:NO REPLY
                  40529 TSM:FPAR
                  40566 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-255-255,s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
                  42575 !TSM:FPAR:NO REPLY
                  42577 TSM:FPAR
                  42614 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-255-255,s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
                  44623 !TSM:FPAR:FAIL
                  44625 TSM:FAIL:CNT=3
                  

                  You find the pinouts I send before are right to you?

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • mfalkviddM Offline
                    mfalkviddM Offline
                    mfalkvidd
                    Mod
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #578

                    MY_* defines need to be before #include MySensors.h so you're doing the right thing.
                    I don't know about the pins, have never used anything but the default wiring myself. But if the pins were wrong you should get TSM:INIT:TSP FAIL instead of TSM:INIT:TSP OK.

                    If you reconfigure the first mysgw (the one with the default pins) to use channel 83, does communication with the node on channel 83 work?

                    Sergio RiusS 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • mfalkviddM mfalkvidd

                      MY_* defines need to be before #include MySensors.h so you're doing the right thing.
                      I don't know about the pins, have never used anything but the default wiring myself. But if the pins were wrong you should get TSM:INIT:TSP FAIL instead of TSM:INIT:TSP OK.

                      If you reconfigure the first mysgw (the one with the default pins) to use channel 83, does communication with the node on channel 83 work?

                      Sergio RiusS Offline
                      Sergio RiusS Offline
                      Sergio Rius
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #579

                      @mfalkvidd yeah, look three posts before.
                      I'll try to get mosi and miso from the default pin out sharing with the first radio. Now I'm using the ones marked as 1, when the default ones are marked 0.

                      mfalkviddM 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • Sergio RiusS Sergio Rius

                        @mfalkvidd yeah, look three posts before.
                        I'll try to get mosi and miso from the default pin out sharing with the first radio. Now I'm using the ones marked as 1, when the default ones are marked 0.

                        mfalkviddM Offline
                        mfalkviddM Offline
                        mfalkvidd
                        Mod
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #580

                        @Sergio-Rius I see. Sorry. Then we know the channel parameter works. Good testing.
                        Strange problem. It looks from the threads I linked earlier that using the second SPI does indeed work (if the pin definition fix is applied). When the first mysgw is stopped, your second mysgw should behave just as it did for Velo17 and wergeld. Can you think of any difference in your setup?

                        Sergio RiusS 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • mfalkviddM mfalkvidd

                          @Sergio-Rius I see. Sorry. Then we know the channel parameter works. Good testing.
                          Strange problem. It looks from the threads I linked earlier that using the second SPI does indeed work (if the pin definition fix is applied). When the first mysgw is stopped, your second mysgw should behave just as it did for Velo17 and wergeld. Can you think of any difference in your setup?

                          Sergio RiusS Offline
                          Sergio RiusS Offline
                          Sergio Rius
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #581

                          @mfalkvidd I have the impression that if I stop the first service, the second picks the first radio.
                          I disconnected the power from the first radio and left the second all connected and I only got TSM errors and fails. As soon as I attached power to the first NRF it worked.
                          Perhaps the other users only used the configurable pins (CS/CE/IRQ) on the extended bank...

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • Sergio RiusS Offline
                            Sergio RiusS Offline
                            Sergio Rius
                            wrote on last edited by Sergio Rius
                            #582

                            That's it. It doesn't use MOSI, MISO and SCLK from the SPI1. I removed the NRF1 and only connected those tree pins of NRF2 into SPI0 and service2 works with NRF2 at channel 125.

                            I've tried to share those pins (MOSI, MISO, SCLK) between both radios but as soon as I connect NRF1, 2 stops communicating. Same effect than connecting NRF2 to SPI1.

                            What a pity... #@%&!!! :grinning:

                            Edit: I finally tried a more "standard" configuration. Using only the first SPI bank and also doesn't work.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • R Offline
                              R Offline
                              Roman
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #583

                              Hi!
                              I have a problem with the pseudo port. Node-serialport (v4.0.7) on the command serialport.list produces the result of the undefined.

                              Rpi3 and DietPi, nodejs 4.8.4

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • mfalkviddM mfalkvidd

                                @Matt log files for the time where the problem occurred will be essential for troubleshooting.

                                make uninstall will stop the service and uninstall
                                make cleanconfig will remove previous ./configure settings
                                make clean will remove compiled code

                                M Offline
                                M Offline
                                Matt
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #584

                                @mfalkvidd OK have attached the logfiles below.
                                No clues that I can see. At 1502 the NRF goes quiet. I have tried a different pi2, different NRF (PA/LNA) and am currently running the NRF off of 5V from the PI through one of those $1.00 regulator adapter things with built in caps and such. Have also tried different PSUs including a 2A one.
                                Only thing I can think left to try is reducing the power output in case the high output of the radio module is inducing transients in the cables...
                                Am kinda stumped here. I have an arduino NRF gateway that I will try via USB if low power does not work. I have tried setting up MYSGW as LAN and USB via ./configure but the same thing happens each time.
                                One thought just came to me, I AM using the pin15 IRQ option on the NRF now that is still experimental?
                                So next time will try without IRQ and low power...

                                Any help/suggestions greatly appreciated.
                                FYI I have had domoticz running on a lubuntu netbook with USB arduino NRF gateway that has been rock solid. Am trying the get a workable PI solution though, for myself and my father in law but not workable as yet sadly...

                                At 15:02:34 you can see the last incoming node message after that the only MYSGW activity is the PING thing... which seems to happen every 10S or so. This goes on for an hour after that with no more incomings. I have ~12 sensors around the place including a power meter one which reports every minute.

                                15:02:29 raspberrypi dhcpcd[734]: wlan0: Router Advertisement from fe80::260:64ff:fed7:f613
                                Aug  5 15:02:33 raspberrypi mysgw: TSF:MSG:READ,23-23-0,s=1,c=1,t=0,pt=7,l=5,sg=0:18.0
                                Aug  5 15:02:33 raspberrypi mysgw: TSF:MSG:READ,23-23-0,s=0,c=1,t=1,pt=7,l=5,sg=0:21.0
                                Aug  5 15:02:34 raspberrypi mysgw: TSF:MSG:READ,23-23-0,s=255,c=3,t=0,pt=1,l=1,sg=0:68
                                Aug  5 15:02:34 raspberrypi dhcpcd[734]: wlan0: Router Advertisement from fe80::260:64ff:fed7:f613
                                Aug  5 15:02:36 raspberrypi mysgw: Client 0: 0;0;3;0;18;PING
                                Aug  5 15:02:37 raspberrypi mysgw: TSF:MSG:READ,41-7-0,s=0,c=1,t=0,pt=7,l=5,sg=0:11.6
                                Aug  5 15:02:41 raspberrypi dhcpcd[734]: wlan0: Router Advertisement from fe80::260:64ff:fed7:f613
                                Aug  5 15:02:46 raspberrypi mysgw: Client 0: 0;0;3;0;18;PING
                                Aug  5 15:02:50 raspberrypi dhcpcd[734]: wlan0: Router Advertisement from fe80::260:64ff:fed7:f613
                                Aug  5 15:02:56 raspberrypi mysgw: Client 0: 0;0;3;0;18;PING
                                Aug  5 15:02:57 raspberrypi dhcpcd[734]: wlan0: Router Advertisement from fe80::260:64ff:fed7:f613
                                Aug  5 15:03:06 raspberrypi dhcpcd[734]: wlan0: Router Advertisement from fe80::260:64ff:fed7:f613
                                Aug  5 15:03:06 raspberrypi mysgw: Client 0: 0;0;3;0;18;PING
                                Aug  5 15:03:13 raspberrypi dhcpcd[734]: wlan0: Router Advertisement from fe80::260:64ff:fed7:f613
                                Aug  5 15:03:16 raspberrypi mysgw: Client 0: 0;0;3;0;18;PING
                                

                                Also FWIW to log from domoticz below. Ignore FANFLAG thats just a blockly flag I use...

                                2017-08-05 15:01:18.936 (GW) General/Voltage (FanIntakeV)
                                2017-08-05 15:02:04.935 (GW) General/kWh (Meter)
                                2017-08-05 15:02:33.940 (GW) Temp + Humidity (Mitch2)
                                2017-08-05 15:02:33.945 (GW) Temp + Humidity (Mitch2)
                                2017-08-05 15:02:37.941 (GW) Temp (MBR Fan)
                                2017-08-05 15:50:02.678 Set UserVariable FanFlag = 1
                                2017-08-05 15:51:02.693 Set UserVariable FanFlag = 1
                                2017-08-05 15:52:02.703 Set UserVariable FanFlag = 1
                                2017-08-05 15:53:02.710 Set UserVariable FanFlag = 1
                                2017-08-05 15:54:00.037 Set UserVariable FanFlag = 1
                                

                                Thanks,
                                Matt

                                mfalkviddM 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • M Matt

                                  @mfalkvidd OK have attached the logfiles below.
                                  No clues that I can see. At 1502 the NRF goes quiet. I have tried a different pi2, different NRF (PA/LNA) and am currently running the NRF off of 5V from the PI through one of those $1.00 regulator adapter things with built in caps and such. Have also tried different PSUs including a 2A one.
                                  Only thing I can think left to try is reducing the power output in case the high output of the radio module is inducing transients in the cables...
                                  Am kinda stumped here. I have an arduino NRF gateway that I will try via USB if low power does not work. I have tried setting up MYSGW as LAN and USB via ./configure but the same thing happens each time.
                                  One thought just came to me, I AM using the pin15 IRQ option on the NRF now that is still experimental?
                                  So next time will try without IRQ and low power...

                                  Any help/suggestions greatly appreciated.
                                  FYI I have had domoticz running on a lubuntu netbook with USB arduino NRF gateway that has been rock solid. Am trying the get a workable PI solution though, for myself and my father in law but not workable as yet sadly...

                                  At 15:02:34 you can see the last incoming node message after that the only MYSGW activity is the PING thing... which seems to happen every 10S or so. This goes on for an hour after that with no more incomings. I have ~12 sensors around the place including a power meter one which reports every minute.

                                  15:02:29 raspberrypi dhcpcd[734]: wlan0: Router Advertisement from fe80::260:64ff:fed7:f613
                                  Aug  5 15:02:33 raspberrypi mysgw: TSF:MSG:READ,23-23-0,s=1,c=1,t=0,pt=7,l=5,sg=0:18.0
                                  Aug  5 15:02:33 raspberrypi mysgw: TSF:MSG:READ,23-23-0,s=0,c=1,t=1,pt=7,l=5,sg=0:21.0
                                  Aug  5 15:02:34 raspberrypi mysgw: TSF:MSG:READ,23-23-0,s=255,c=3,t=0,pt=1,l=1,sg=0:68
                                  Aug  5 15:02:34 raspberrypi dhcpcd[734]: wlan0: Router Advertisement from fe80::260:64ff:fed7:f613
                                  Aug  5 15:02:36 raspberrypi mysgw: Client 0: 0;0;3;0;18;PING
                                  Aug  5 15:02:37 raspberrypi mysgw: TSF:MSG:READ,41-7-0,s=0,c=1,t=0,pt=7,l=5,sg=0:11.6
                                  Aug  5 15:02:41 raspberrypi dhcpcd[734]: wlan0: Router Advertisement from fe80::260:64ff:fed7:f613
                                  Aug  5 15:02:46 raspberrypi mysgw: Client 0: 0;0;3;0;18;PING
                                  Aug  5 15:02:50 raspberrypi dhcpcd[734]: wlan0: Router Advertisement from fe80::260:64ff:fed7:f613
                                  Aug  5 15:02:56 raspberrypi mysgw: Client 0: 0;0;3;0;18;PING
                                  Aug  5 15:02:57 raspberrypi dhcpcd[734]: wlan0: Router Advertisement from fe80::260:64ff:fed7:f613
                                  Aug  5 15:03:06 raspberrypi dhcpcd[734]: wlan0: Router Advertisement from fe80::260:64ff:fed7:f613
                                  Aug  5 15:03:06 raspberrypi mysgw: Client 0: 0;0;3;0;18;PING
                                  Aug  5 15:03:13 raspberrypi dhcpcd[734]: wlan0: Router Advertisement from fe80::260:64ff:fed7:f613
                                  Aug  5 15:03:16 raspberrypi mysgw: Client 0: 0;0;3;0;18;PING
                                  

                                  Also FWIW to log from domoticz below. Ignore FANFLAG thats just a blockly flag I use...

                                  2017-08-05 15:01:18.936 (GW) General/Voltage (FanIntakeV)
                                  2017-08-05 15:02:04.935 (GW) General/kWh (Meter)
                                  2017-08-05 15:02:33.940 (GW) Temp + Humidity (Mitch2)
                                  2017-08-05 15:02:33.945 (GW) Temp + Humidity (Mitch2)
                                  2017-08-05 15:02:37.941 (GW) Temp (MBR Fan)
                                  2017-08-05 15:50:02.678 Set UserVariable FanFlag = 1
                                  2017-08-05 15:51:02.693 Set UserVariable FanFlag = 1
                                  2017-08-05 15:52:02.703 Set UserVariable FanFlag = 1
                                  2017-08-05 15:53:02.710 Set UserVariable FanFlag = 1
                                  2017-08-05 15:54:00.037 Set UserVariable FanFlag = 1
                                  

                                  Thanks,
                                  Matt

                                  mfalkviddM Offline
                                  mfalkviddM Offline
                                  mfalkvidd
                                  Mod
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #585

                                  @Matt I agree that power is the most likely cause. The nrf24 is very sensitive.

                                  Before you recompile, add --extra-cxxflags=-DMY_DEBUG_VERBOSE_RF24 to the configure command and you'll get extra details on the radio status in the gateway's debug log.

                                  M 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • mfalkviddM mfalkvidd

                                    @Matt I agree that power is the most likely cause. The nrf24 is very sensitive.

                                    Before you recompile, add --extra-cxxflags=-DMY_DEBUG_VERBOSE_RF24 to the configure command and you'll get extra details on the radio status in the gateway's debug log.

                                    M Offline
                                    M Offline
                                    Matt
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #586

                                    @mfalkvidd Thankyou. Stable for now. Not sure if they are even genuine modules so... Can reach outside to my glasshouse even on low power setting.
                                    If it starts playing up again I'll add verbose logging and have another look.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    1
                                    • O Offline
                                      O Offline
                                      Oliviakrk
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #587

                                      Anyone having issues with compilation of latest stable?

                                      Looks like missing libraries... fatal error: SPI.h: No such file or directory

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • N Offline
                                        N Offline
                                        niehoff80
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #588

                                        Yesterday I've tried compiling it also (first time for me) and I had same error.

                                        mfalkviddM 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • N niehoff80

                                          Yesterday I've tried compiling it also (first time for me) and I had same error.

                                          mfalkviddM Offline
                                          mfalkviddM Offline
                                          mfalkvidd
                                          Mod
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #589

                                          @niehoff80 and/or @Oliviakrk can you run

                                          sudo raspi-config
                                          

                                          (install it using sudo apt-get install raspi-config if it isn't already installed)
                                          Select

                                          8 Advanced Options
                                          

                                          and

                                          A6 SPI
                                          

                                          and

                                          Yes
                                          

                                          to all questions. Reboot the raspberry pi and try running make again. If that works I'll add it to the documentation.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          1
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          21

                                          Online

                                          11.7k

                                          Users

                                          11.2k

                                          Topics

                                          113.0k

                                          Posts


                                          Copyright 2019 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • MySensors
                                          • OpenHardware.io
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular