Skip to content
  • MySensors
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Announcements
  3. šŸ’¬ Security & Signing

šŸ’¬ Security & Signing

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Announcements
137 Posts 20 Posters 17.5k Views 19 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M melwinek

    @Anticimex, @mfalkvidd But with the use of encryption so easily no one will take control, must break the code.
    So it is best to simultaneously encrypt (eg RFID tag serial number when opening the gate) and sign (eg gate open message)?

    AnticimexA Offline
    AnticimexA Offline
    Anticimex
    Contest Winner
    wrote on last edited by
    #26

    @melwinek what prevents anyone from copying your encrypted message and record it. And then later send the same thing?
    Encryption provides obscurity. You need signing for authentication. Signed messages cannot be repeated because they are always unique. Encryption does not necessarily guarantee that.

    Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • B bilbolodz

      I'm trying to start play with ATSHA204A signing. I've ATSHA204A-SSHCZ-T chip (8-lead SOIC single wire). I've connected chip pins: 4 - GND, 8 - VCC (5v), 5 - A3, I've added 100nF between 4 and 8 and 4K7 resistor between 5 and 8. I've loaded "near clear" SecurityPersonalizer sketch (only added #define MY_SIGNING_ATSHA204_PIN A3 #define MY_SIGNING_ATSHA204) but I've got:

      Personalization sketch for MySensors usage.

      Failed to wake device. Response: E7
      Halting!

      any ideas?

      t3chieT Offline
      t3chieT Offline
      t3chie
      wrote on last edited by
      #27

      @bilbolodz I am getting the same message with a Sensebender Micro. I configured it for soft-signing with LOCK_CONFIGURATION enabled. Now I wanted to switch to hardware based signing.

      Any way to unlock a locked configuration?

      AnticimexA 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • t3chieT t3chie

        @bilbolodz I am getting the same message with a Sensebender Micro. I configured it for soft-signing with LOCK_CONFIGURATION enabled. Now I wanted to switch to hardware based signing.

        Any way to unlock a locked configuration?

        AnticimexA Offline
        AnticimexA Offline
        Anticimex
        Contest Winner
        wrote on last edited by
        #28

        @t3chie there is no configuration to lock for soft signing. Configuration locking only applies to atsha204a. And if locked it cannot be unlocked. And normally you shouldn't need to either as the default settings set are the one to use, and unless you have been very creative in hacking the personalizer that configured should work just fine.

        Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

        t3chieT 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • AnticimexA Anticimex

          @t3chie there is no configuration to lock for soft signing. Configuration locking only applies to atsha204a. And if locked it cannot be unlocked. And normally you shouldn't need to either as the default settings set are the one to use, and unless you have been very creative in hacking the personalizer that configured should work just fine.

          t3chieT Offline
          t3chieT Offline
          t3chie
          wrote on last edited by
          #29

          @Anticimex I tested first with softsigning but shortly after this realized that with soft signing the Sensebender has not enough space for debug messages.
          I rerun the personalizer to switch to hardware based signing and hit the "Failed to wake device. Response: E7" message.
          Played around and found that

          #define MY_SIGNING_ATSHA204_PIN 17
          instead of
          #define MY_SIGNING_ATSHA204_PIN 4

          made the personalizer happy again. I am still fighting with getting signing to work. Setting #define MY_SIGNING_REQUEST_SIGNATURES and MY_SIGNING_GW_REQUEST_SIGNATURES_FROM_ALL did not get me going.

          AnticimexA 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • t3chieT t3chie

            @Anticimex I tested first with softsigning but shortly after this realized that with soft signing the Sensebender has not enough space for debug messages.
            I rerun the personalizer to switch to hardware based signing and hit the "Failed to wake device. Response: E7" message.
            Played around and found that

            #define MY_SIGNING_ATSHA204_PIN 17
            instead of
            #define MY_SIGNING_ATSHA204_PIN 4

            made the personalizer happy again. I am still fighting with getting signing to work. Setting #define MY_SIGNING_REQUEST_SIGNATURES and MY_SIGNING_GW_REQUEST_SIGNATURES_FROM_ALL did not get me going.

            AnticimexA Offline
            AnticimexA Offline
            Anticimex
            Contest Winner
            wrote on last edited by
            #30

            @t3chie I assume you have personalized nodes and gw with the same hmac key?

            Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • t3chieT t3chie

              @Anticimex I tested first with softsigning but shortly after this realized that with soft signing the Sensebender has not enough space for debug messages.
              I rerun the personalizer to switch to hardware based signing and hit the "Failed to wake device. Response: E7" message.
              Played around and found that

              #define MY_SIGNING_ATSHA204_PIN 17
              instead of
              #define MY_SIGNING_ATSHA204_PIN 4

              made the personalizer happy again. I am still fighting with getting signing to work. Setting #define MY_SIGNING_REQUEST_SIGNATURES and MY_SIGNING_GW_REQUEST_SIGNATURES_FROM_ALL did not get me going.

              AnticimexA Offline
              AnticimexA Offline
              Anticimex
              Contest Winner
              wrote on last edited by
              #31

              @t3chie also that you also defined the signing enabled flag on all participants (but I think you get a preprocessor error if you don't)

              Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • skywatchS Offline
                skywatchS Offline
                skywatch
                wrote on last edited by
                #32

                Is it possible to use the ATSHA204A along with the Rpi directly attached NRF24L01+ gateway? I can see how to attach the ATSHA to the nodes, but how to attach it to the pi?
                Thank you.

                AnticimexA 2 Replies Last reply
                0
                • skywatchS skywatch

                  Is it possible to use the ATSHA204A along with the Rpi directly attached NRF24L01+ gateway? I can see how to attach the ATSHA to the nodes, but how to attach it to the pi?
                  Thank you.

                  AnticimexA Offline
                  AnticimexA Offline
                  Anticimex
                  Contest Winner
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #33

                  @skywatch no, not to my knowledge. The atsha driver is Arduino specific. I would happily review a pull request that ports the bit banged driver for Linux though :)

                  Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  • skywatchS skywatch

                    Is it possible to use the ATSHA204A along with the Rpi directly attached NRF24L01+ gateway? I can see how to attach the ATSHA to the nodes, but how to attach it to the pi?
                    Thank you.

                    AnticimexA Offline
                    AnticimexA Offline
                    Anticimex
                    Contest Winner
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #34

                    @skywatch the use case for atsha204a backed signing on rPi is limited though. As it is used as I gw (I presume) it is considered "protected" and is less sensitive for key dumping.

                    Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • skywatchS Offline
                      skywatchS Offline
                      skywatch
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #35

                      Thank you for the quick response. Maybe i mis-understand this?
                      I have got 10 ATSHA chips that I would like to attach to arsuino nodes to use with a raspberry pi based gateway/controller combo. Do I therefore need to attach the ATSHA to the rpi, or could I still use the ATSHA hardware on the arduinos without an ATSHA attached to the rpi?
                      I had assumed that the atsha chip would be needed at both ends for signing to work. Maybe that's not how it works?

                      AnticimexA 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • skywatchS skywatch

                        Thank you for the quick response. Maybe i mis-understand this?
                        I have got 10 ATSHA chips that I would like to attach to arsuino nodes to use with a raspberry pi based gateway/controller combo. Do I therefore need to attach the ATSHA to the rpi, or could I still use the ATSHA hardware on the arduinos without an ATSHA attached to the rpi?
                        I had assumed that the atsha chip would be needed at both ends for signing to work. Maybe that's not how it works?

                        AnticimexA Offline
                        AnticimexA Offline
                        Anticimex
                        Contest Winner
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #36

                        @skywatch no, the software port is fully compatible with the atsha204a. So you can use Arduino nodes with atsha204a and they will work just fine with your rPi with software signing. Just as long as they all use the same hmac key.

                        Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • S Offline
                          S Offline
                          sineverba
                          Hardware Contributor
                          wrote on last edited by sineverba
                          #37

                          I'm hoping that I did done all ok.
                          I've personalized the Arduino that acts as Gateway (connected via USB to a Raspberry PI) and I've personalized first node (a DHT22).
                          Both with software signature.

                          This is the cat from Raspberry / Gateway Arduino:

                          0;255;3;0;9;TSF:MSG:READ,3-3-0,s=0,c=3,t=16,pt=0,l=0,sg=1:
                          0;255;3;0;9;Skipping security for command 3 type 16
                          0;255;3;0;9;SHA256: 37FA7FD8F19D55E99C952F467E45D9A7439AAAAAAAAAA                                                                             AAAA
                          0;255;3;0;9;Skipping security for command 3 type 17
                          0;255;3;0;9;TSF:MSG:SEND,0-0-3-3,s=255,c=3,t=17,pt=6,l=25,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:37FA7F                                                                             D8F19D5CE9A07E95992C45D9A7439
                          0;255;3;0;9;Transmitted nonce
                          0;255;3;0;9;TSF:MSG:READ,3-3-0,s=0,c=1,t=1,pt=7,l=5,sg=1:59.3
                          0;255;3;0;9;Signature in message: 010F55F31D04DBFCA0AFC7E139475
                          0;255;3;0;9;Message to process: 03033336D4201
                          0;255;3;0;9;Current nonce: 37FA7FD8F19D55E99C955992C45D9A7439AAA                                                                             AAAAAAAAAAA
                          0;255;3;0;9;HMAC: B50F55F31D04DBFFC7E139475D91093F0A1EABB174B86E9                                                                             E9
                          3;0;1;0;1;59.3
                          0;255;3;0;9;TSF:MSG:READ,3-3-0,s=2,c=3,t=16,pt=0,l=0,sg=1:
                          0;255;3;0;9;Skipping security for command 3 type 16
                          0;255;3;0;9;SHA256: 803B7127EB3B049768C59D328C89862FF731AAAAAAAAAA                                                                             AAAA
                          0;255;3;0;9;Skipping security for command 3 type 17
                          0;255;3;0;9;TSF:MSG:SEND,0-0-3-3,s=255,c=3,t=17,pt=6,l=25,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:803B71                                                                             27EB3D0DED839579D328C89862FF731
                          0;255;3;0;9;Transmitted nonce
                          0;255;3;0;9;TSF:MSG:READ,3-3-0,s=2,c=1,t=38,pt=7,l=5,sg=1:3.42
                          0;255;3;0;9;Signature in message: 010E8B790708A39930F73D511F48DAECA
                          0;255;3;0;9;Message to process: 03002E23BAE5A4002
                          0;255;3;0;9;Current nonce: 803B7127EB3D0DED83957BB5C59D328C89862FF731AAA                                                                             AAAAAAAAAAA
                          0;255;3;0;9;HMAC: D10E8B79D511F48DAECAFB4A3D89F553A2DDB26F1614
                          3;2;1;0;38;3.42
                          

                          and so on...

                          This is the Pro MIni serial console:

                          T: 28.00
                          1023
                          Battery Voltage: 3.44 V
                          Battery percent: 102 %
                          40413 Skipping security for command 3 type 16
                          40421 TSF:MSG:SEND,3-3-0-0,s=2,c=3,t=16,pt=0,l=0,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:
                          40429 Nonce requested from 0. Waiting...
                          40546 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-3,s=255,c=3,t=17,pt=6,l=25,sg=1:9CC096EF18295BEFAC43638CA2673A1D759B0CEC6E49C3E060
                          40558 Skipping security for command 3 type 17
                          40562 Nonce received from 0.
                          40564 Proceeding with signing...
                          Message to process: 03002EF24002
                          Current nonce: 9CC096EF18295BEFA59B0CEC3E060AAAAAAAAAAAAAA
                          HMAC: 5D8E8A59EF1420406004E1318A650686E19E3A8
                          Signature in message: 018E8A5BD166D106004E
                          40740 Message signed
                          40749 Message to send has been signed
                          40755 TSF:MSG:SEND,3-3-0-0,s=2,c=1,t=38,pt=7,l=5,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:3.44
                          40763 Skipping security for command 3 type 16
                          40769 TSF:MSG:SEND,3-3-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=16,pt=0,l=0,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:
                          40777 Nonce requested from 0. Waiting...
                          40900 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-3,s=255,c=3,t=17,pt=6,l=25,sg=1:1C17F1A31D500CB0E840B7214BE961E
                          40910 Skipping security for command 3 type 17
                          40916 Nonce received from 0.
                          40919 Proceeding with signing...
                          Message to process: 03000E66
                          Current nonce: 1C17FE25D7B26441A31D961EAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
                          HMAC: D5992FF4CFB6238CD4062397EEE986F47E0BD65020F39C18662
                          Signature in message: 01992FF4CFB6238C0FDA62397EEE986F47E0
                          41095 Message signed
                          41101 Message to send has been signed
                          41109 TSF:MSG:SEND,3-3-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=0,pt=1,l=1,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:102
                          41115 MCO:SLP:MS=5000,SMS=0,I1=255,M1=255,I2=255,M2=255
                          41121 MCO:SLP:TPD
                          

                          Are they secure communicating? :)

                          PS I did delete some chars from the HMAC, nonces, etc etc :D

                          AnticimexA 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • S sineverba

                            I'm hoping that I did done all ok.
                            I've personalized the Arduino that acts as Gateway (connected via USB to a Raspberry PI) and I've personalized first node (a DHT22).
                            Both with software signature.

                            This is the cat from Raspberry / Gateway Arduino:

                            0;255;3;0;9;TSF:MSG:READ,3-3-0,s=0,c=3,t=16,pt=0,l=0,sg=1:
                            0;255;3;0;9;Skipping security for command 3 type 16
                            0;255;3;0;9;SHA256: 37FA7FD8F19D55E99C952F467E45D9A7439AAAAAAAAAA                                                                             AAAA
                            0;255;3;0;9;Skipping security for command 3 type 17
                            0;255;3;0;9;TSF:MSG:SEND,0-0-3-3,s=255,c=3,t=17,pt=6,l=25,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:37FA7F                                                                             D8F19D5CE9A07E95992C45D9A7439
                            0;255;3;0;9;Transmitted nonce
                            0;255;3;0;9;TSF:MSG:READ,3-3-0,s=0,c=1,t=1,pt=7,l=5,sg=1:59.3
                            0;255;3;0;9;Signature in message: 010F55F31D04DBFCA0AFC7E139475
                            0;255;3;0;9;Message to process: 03033336D4201
                            0;255;3;0;9;Current nonce: 37FA7FD8F19D55E99C955992C45D9A7439AAA                                                                             AAAAAAAAAAA
                            0;255;3;0;9;HMAC: B50F55F31D04DBFFC7E139475D91093F0A1EABB174B86E9                                                                             E9
                            3;0;1;0;1;59.3
                            0;255;3;0;9;TSF:MSG:READ,3-3-0,s=2,c=3,t=16,pt=0,l=0,sg=1:
                            0;255;3;0;9;Skipping security for command 3 type 16
                            0;255;3;0;9;SHA256: 803B7127EB3B049768C59D328C89862FF731AAAAAAAAAA                                                                             AAAA
                            0;255;3;0;9;Skipping security for command 3 type 17
                            0;255;3;0;9;TSF:MSG:SEND,0-0-3-3,s=255,c=3,t=17,pt=6,l=25,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:803B71                                                                             27EB3D0DED839579D328C89862FF731
                            0;255;3;0;9;Transmitted nonce
                            0;255;3;0;9;TSF:MSG:READ,3-3-0,s=2,c=1,t=38,pt=7,l=5,sg=1:3.42
                            0;255;3;0;9;Signature in message: 010E8B790708A39930F73D511F48DAECA
                            0;255;3;0;9;Message to process: 03002E23BAE5A4002
                            0;255;3;0;9;Current nonce: 803B7127EB3D0DED83957BB5C59D328C89862FF731AAA                                                                             AAAAAAAAAAA
                            0;255;3;0;9;HMAC: D10E8B79D511F48DAECAFB4A3D89F553A2DDB26F1614
                            3;2;1;0;38;3.42
                            

                            and so on...

                            This is the Pro MIni serial console:

                            T: 28.00
                            1023
                            Battery Voltage: 3.44 V
                            Battery percent: 102 %
                            40413 Skipping security for command 3 type 16
                            40421 TSF:MSG:SEND,3-3-0-0,s=2,c=3,t=16,pt=0,l=0,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:
                            40429 Nonce requested from 0. Waiting...
                            40546 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-3,s=255,c=3,t=17,pt=6,l=25,sg=1:9CC096EF18295BEFAC43638CA2673A1D759B0CEC6E49C3E060
                            40558 Skipping security for command 3 type 17
                            40562 Nonce received from 0.
                            40564 Proceeding with signing...
                            Message to process: 03002EF24002
                            Current nonce: 9CC096EF18295BEFA59B0CEC3E060AAAAAAAAAAAAAA
                            HMAC: 5D8E8A59EF1420406004E1318A650686E19E3A8
                            Signature in message: 018E8A5BD166D106004E
                            40740 Message signed
                            40749 Message to send has been signed
                            40755 TSF:MSG:SEND,3-3-0-0,s=2,c=1,t=38,pt=7,l=5,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:3.44
                            40763 Skipping security for command 3 type 16
                            40769 TSF:MSG:SEND,3-3-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=16,pt=0,l=0,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:
                            40777 Nonce requested from 0. Waiting...
                            40900 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-3,s=255,c=3,t=17,pt=6,l=25,sg=1:1C17F1A31D500CB0E840B7214BE961E
                            40910 Skipping security for command 3 type 17
                            40916 Nonce received from 0.
                            40919 Proceeding with signing...
                            Message to process: 03000E66
                            Current nonce: 1C17FE25D7B26441A31D961EAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
                            HMAC: D5992FF4CFB6238CD4062397EEE986F47E0BD65020F39C18662
                            Signature in message: 01992FF4CFB6238C0FDA62397EEE986F47E0
                            41095 Message signed
                            41101 Message to send has been signed
                            41109 TSF:MSG:SEND,3-3-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=0,pt=1,l=1,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:102
                            41115 MCO:SLP:MS=5000,SMS=0,I1=255,M1=255,I2=255,M2=255
                            41121 MCO:SLP:TPD
                            

                            Are they secure communicating? :)

                            PS I did delete some chars from the HMAC, nonces, etc etc :D

                            AnticimexA Offline
                            AnticimexA Offline
                            Anticimex
                            Contest Winner
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #38

                            @sineverba the best way to determine that is to see if the messages you send arrive :) if you enable signing and require signatures, unsigned or incorrectly signed messages will be rejected.
                            I see no errors in the log so it seems it works. The logs however don't match up. The hmac:s in one log does not match the hmac:s in the other.

                            Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

                            S 1 Reply Last reply
                            1
                            • AnticimexA Anticimex

                              @sineverba the best way to determine that is to see if the messages you send arrive :) if you enable signing and require signatures, unsigned or incorrectly signed messages will be rejected.
                              I see no errors in the log so it seems it works. The logs however don't match up. The hmac:s in one log does not match the hmac:s in the other.

                              S Offline
                              S Offline
                              sineverba
                              Hardware Contributor
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #39

                              @Anticimex
                              I can assure you that messages, nonces, hmacs and signatures are exactly the same in console gateway and in console of arduino mini.
                              I did delete some chars before posting for.... security (?) :D
                              Thank you for your answer!

                              AnticimexA 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • S sineverba

                                @Anticimex
                                I can assure you that messages, nonces, hmacs and signatures are exactly the same in console gateway and in console of arduino mini.
                                I did delete some chars before posting for.... security (?) :D
                                Thank you for your answer!

                                AnticimexA Offline
                                AnticimexA Offline
                                Anticimex
                                Contest Winner
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #40

                                @sineverba why did you delete them? There is nothing secret about them. They are sent over your radio link so they are to be considered very public, or signing wouldn't be useful, would it? ;)

                                Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

                                S 1 Reply Last reply
                                2
                                • AnticimexA Anticimex

                                  @sineverba why did you delete them? There is nothing secret about them. They are sent over your radio link so they are to be considered very public, or signing wouldn't be useful, would it? ;)

                                  S Offline
                                  S Offline
                                  sineverba
                                  Hardware Contributor
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #41

                                  @Anticimex
                                  I understand :)
                                  The last thing: what's the sense of this message:

                                  Skipping security for command 3 type 17
                                  

                                  ?

                                  Thank you!

                                  AnticimexA 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • S sineverba

                                    @Anticimex
                                    I understand :)
                                    The last thing: what's the sense of this message:

                                    Skipping security for command 3 type 17
                                    

                                    ?

                                    Thank you!

                                    AnticimexA Offline
                                    AnticimexA Offline
                                    Anticimex
                                    Contest Winner
                                    wrote on last edited by Anticimex
                                    #42

                                    @sineverba it means that message is not signed. Because it is of a type not suitable for signing. Typically an ack or a handshake message. You can look the type up in the api specification. In this case it is a handshake message (a nonce reply to be precise).

                                    Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    1
                                    • S Offline
                                      S Offline
                                      sindrome73
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #43

                                      Hello!! I'm also trying to implement SOFT Signature, but because of my poor English I have many problems !!
                                      Someone could post the socket of a node + a working MQTT gateway.

                                      So you can study the code and understand how it works !!!

                                      Thanks 1000 in advance to who can help me

                                      AnticimexA 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • S sindrome73

                                        Hello!! I'm also trying to implement SOFT Signature, but because of my poor English I have many problems !!
                                        Someone could post the socket of a node + a working MQTT gateway.

                                        So you can study the code and understand how it works !!!

                                        Thanks 1000 in advance to who can help me

                                        AnticimexA Offline
                                        AnticimexA Offline
                                        Anticimex
                                        Contest Winner
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #44

                                        @sindrome73 There is no difference for a MQTT gw than from other GW:s. There are code examples in the documentation. See this post and follow the Doxygen links.

                                        Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • S Offline
                                          S Offline
                                          sindrome73
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #45

                                          As I said, my English is not good and therefore it is difficult for me to follow the discussions.

                                          That's why I was asking for a snapshot already done, in order to study the code and understand how to solve ....
                                          Ā  If anyone can help me ????

                                          AnticimexA 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          23

                                          Online

                                          11.7k

                                          Users

                                          11.2k

                                          Topics

                                          113.1k

                                          Posts


                                          Copyright 2025 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • MySensors
                                          • OpenHardware.io
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular