Skip to content
  • MySensors
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Development
  3. ESP8266 RFM69 gateway

ESP8266 RFM69 gateway

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Development
21 Posts 5 Posters 9.5k Views 4 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    scalz
    Hardware Contributor
    wrote on last edited by scalz
    #10

    @chrille nice ;) a little advice if you're ok, that would have been better if you had nothing under your esp8266 antenna (no routes or gnd plane near the ant).

    Y chrilleC 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • S scalz

      @chrille nice ;) a little advice if you're ok, that would have been better if you had nothing under your esp8266 antenna (no routes or gnd plane near the ant).

      Y Offline
      Y Offline
      Yveaux
      Mod
      wrote on last edited by
      #11

      @korttoma said:

      only the Gateway messages sent counter is increasing

      I had a look at the code. The indications are only implemented for TX on MQTT- and serial Gateway, which is a bug.
      Ref. https://github.com/mysensors/MySensors/issues/585

      http://yveaux.blogspot.nl

      1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • K Offline
        K Offline
        korttoma
        Hero Member
        wrote on last edited by
        #12

        Thanks @Yveaux for looking in to the code. From your post, l am not sure if I should get both tx an rx counts in my setup since I am not using MQTT or serial GW. I have just the ESP/RFM69 gateway an one sensebender sending data. Later when I checked I noticed that the other counter had actual increased also. I need to get another node implemented to my test system to test further but I don't have any more RGM69 modules at the moment.

        • Tomas
        chrilleC 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • S scalz

          @chrille nice ;) a little advice if you're ok, that would have been better if you had nothing under your esp8266 antenna (no routes or gnd plane near the ant).

          chrilleC Offline
          chrilleC Offline
          chrille
          wrote on last edited by
          #13

          @scalz said:

          @chrille nice ;) a little advice if you're ok, that would have been better if you had nothing under your esp8266 antenna (no routes or gnd plane near the ant).

          If I make a new board to add support for the 3-pin version of the ATSHA204 and fix the swapped SCL/SDA pins I will take this into account. Thanks for the comment.
          (I guess the best solution if I want to extend wifi coverage would be to use at ESP-07 with an external antenna - however I don't have issues with wifi coverage for the gateways with my current setup)

          • Jan
          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • K korttoma

            Thanks @Yveaux for looking in to the code. From your post, l am not sure if I should get both tx an rx counts in my setup since I am not using MQTT or serial GW. I have just the ESP/RFM69 gateway an one sensebender sending data. Later when I checked I noticed that the other counter had actual increased also. I need to get another node implemented to my test system to test further but I don't have any more RGM69 modules at the moment.

            chrilleC Offline
            chrilleC Offline
            chrille
            wrote on last edited by
            #14

            @korttoma said:

            From your post, l am not sure if I should get both tx an rx counts in my setup since I am not using MQTT or serial GW. I have just the ESP/RFM69 gateway an one sensebender sending data. Later when I checked I noticed that the other counter had actual increased also. I need to get another node implemented to my test system to test further but I don't have any more RGM69 modules at the moment.

            Could try changing

            if (indication) {
                indication(ind);
            

            to

            sleep(10);
            if (indication) {
                indication(ind);
            

            in MyIndication.cpp (almost in the bottom of file) - it works for me! - although I have no idea why

            Y 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • chrilleC chrille

              @korttoma said:

              From your post, l am not sure if I should get both tx an rx counts in my setup since I am not using MQTT or serial GW. I have just the ESP/RFM69 gateway an one sensebender sending data. Later when I checked I noticed that the other counter had actual increased also. I need to get another node implemented to my test system to test further but I don't have any more RGM69 modules at the moment.

              Could try changing

              if (indication) {
                  indication(ind);
              

              to

              sleep(10);
              if (indication) {
                  indication(ind);
              

              in MyIndication.cpp (almost in the bottom of file) - it works for me! - although I have no idea why

              Y Offline
              Y Offline
              Yveaux
              Mod
              wrote on last edited by
              #15

              @chrille that doesn't seem to make sense.
              Sleep will power down the mpu, sending even more indications (sleep & wake up).
              The library is not reentrant, so expect erroneous behavior using your change!

              http://yveaux.blogspot.nl

              chrilleC 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • Y Yveaux

                @chrille that doesn't seem to make sense.
                Sleep will power down the mpu, sending even more indications (sleep & wake up).
                The library is not reentrant, so expect erroneous behavior using your change!

                chrilleC Offline
                chrilleC Offline
                chrille
                wrote on last edited by
                #16

                @Yveaux said:

                Sleep will power down the mpu, sending even more indications (sleep & wake up).
                The library is not reentrant, so expect erroneous behavior using your change!

                I fully agree that it does not make sense! It just seems that a slight delay is required - see my comments in issue #584 - just adding a couple of lines of serial debug is also sufficient. Also, I do not propose this is as a permanent fix, but hopefully my observations can help someone with a better knowledge of the codebase to narrow down the real issue

                For now the code behaves as expected and looking at my serial console I do not get any additional indication calls because of this

                • Jan
                Y 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • chrilleC chrille

                  @Yveaux said:

                  Sleep will power down the mpu, sending even more indications (sleep & wake up).
                  The library is not reentrant, so expect erroneous behavior using your change!

                  I fully agree that it does not make sense! It just seems that a slight delay is required - see my comments in issue #584 - just adding a couple of lines of serial debug is also sufficient. Also, I do not propose this is as a permanent fix, but hopefully my observations can help someone with a better knowledge of the codebase to narrow down the real issue

                  For now the code behaves as expected and looking at my serial console I do not get any additional indication calls because of this

                  • Jan
                  Y Offline
                  Y Offline
                  Yveaux
                  Mod
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #17

                  @chrille Maybe I'm lost because of the split of the topic, but can you summarize what problem you actually solve by adding an extra delay?

                  http://yveaux.blogspot.nl

                  chrilleC 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • Y Yveaux

                    @chrille Maybe I'm lost because of the split of the topic, but can you summarize what problem you actually solve by adding an extra delay?

                    chrilleC Offline
                    chrilleC Offline
                    chrille
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #18

                    @Yveaux said:

                    Maybe I'm lost because of the split of the topic, but can you summarize what problem you actually solve by adding an extra delay?

                    Yes, the issue is missing callbacks to the indication() function

                    To verify I add a simple indication() function in my gateway sketch, that prints the indication type to the serial console. When running on an ESP8266/NRF24 gateway it works as expected. When running on an ESP8266/RFM69 gateway only some events generates the callback

                    For instance type 11 (client connect) generates a callback but type 2 and 3 (RX and TX) does not. However type 2 and 3 events does trigger the function to flash the corresponding LED's on my gateway, and the calls to the LED flashing and the indication() function, both happens within MyIndication.cpp. By introducing a small delay right before the indication call, suddenly all events generates the indication() call. The delay can be created by writing debug info to the serial console or sleep()'ing for 10 ms.

                    (Arduino 1.6.11 and latest MySensors beta)

                    Maybe we should continue in the comments section of the issue I created for this?

                    https://github.com/mysensors/MySensors/issues/584

                    Y 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • chrilleC chrille

                      @Yveaux said:

                      Maybe I'm lost because of the split of the topic, but can you summarize what problem you actually solve by adding an extra delay?

                      Yes, the issue is missing callbacks to the indication() function

                      To verify I add a simple indication() function in my gateway sketch, that prints the indication type to the serial console. When running on an ESP8266/NRF24 gateway it works as expected. When running on an ESP8266/RFM69 gateway only some events generates the callback

                      For instance type 11 (client connect) generates a callback but type 2 and 3 (RX and TX) does not. However type 2 and 3 events does trigger the function to flash the corresponding LED's on my gateway, and the calls to the LED flashing and the indication() function, both happens within MyIndication.cpp. By introducing a small delay right before the indication call, suddenly all events generates the indication() call. The delay can be created by writing debug info to the serial console or sleep()'ing for 10 ms.

                      (Arduino 1.6.11 and latest MySensors beta)

                      Maybe we should continue in the comments section of the issue I created for this?

                      https://github.com/mysensors/MySensors/issues/584

                      Y Offline
                      Y Offline
                      Yveaux
                      Mod
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #19

                      @chrille at least issue https://github.com/mysensors/MySensors/issues/585 (missing rx indications) has been solved in development.

                      http://yveaux.blogspot.nl

                      chrilleC 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • Y Yveaux

                        @chrille at least issue https://github.com/mysensors/MySensors/issues/585 (missing rx indications) has been solved in development.

                        chrilleC Offline
                        chrilleC Offline
                        chrille
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #20

                        @Yveaux My gateway is a plain ethernet gateway, so this is not the issue for me

                        Y 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • chrilleC chrille

                          @Yveaux My gateway is a plain ethernet gateway, so this is not the issue for me

                          Y Offline
                          Y Offline
                          Yveaux
                          Mod
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #21

                          @chrille the fact that it works for nrf24, but not for rfm69 seems very strange as there are no indication-related calls in either radio code.
                          The gw_rx and gw_rx indications are generated for valid message exchange on the gateway interface (Ethernet, serial, mqtt), while regular TX and rx indications are for valid message exchange by the connected radio (nrf24, rfm69).

                          http://yveaux.blogspot.nl

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0

                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                          Register Login
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          13

                          Online

                          12.0k

                          Users

                          11.2k

                          Topics

                          113.4k

                          Posts


                          Copyright 2025 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
                          • Login

                          • Don't have an account? Register

                          • Login or register to search.
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • MySensors
                          • OpenHardware.io
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular