Skip to content
  • MySensors
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Hardware
  3. dht11 CR2032 longevity

dht11 CR2032 longevity

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
21 Posts 4 Posters 5.9k Views 4 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • fhenrycoF fhenryco

    @Nca78
    thanks but ...
    !! that's much less trivial than i anticipated... OK to use small voltage sensors and to remove Leds but :
    Is it really necessary to remove the regulator ? my previous message linked to an analysis according to which even with a regulator like LQ33 (what about LG33 ?) the arduino could last one year on CR2032 if sleeping most of the time ... i really don't mind replacing CR2032 once a year ...

    fhenrycoF Offline
    fhenrycoF Offline
    fhenryco
    wrote on last edited by
    #8

    @fhenryco said:
    " Is it really necessary to remove the regulator ? my previous message linked to an analysis according to which even with a regulator like LQ33 (what about LG33 ?) the arduino could last one year on CR2032 ..."
    And apparantly according this more complete datasheet for LG33 , which has the same very low GND current as LQ33 for vanishingly small load currents :
    http://ww1.microchip.com/downloads/en/devicedoc/mic5219.pdf
    it's not really mandatory to remove such regulator to get long live CR2032... no objection around ?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • Nca78N Offline
      Nca78N Offline
      Nca78
      Hardware Contributor
      wrote on last edited by
      #9

      From the link you gave, 54µA and 200mAh available that's 200 000 / 54 = 3704 hours = 154 days = less than 6months. (the one year claim is with AA batteries...)
      And that's not including the wake up time and transmits.

      Anyway if you keep the regulator, you have to connect the power on Vcc and not RAW, case not measured in the page you link. It should be better but you would still have an unnecessary leak of current just to save the 2 mn it takes to remove the regulator.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • fhenrycoF Offline
        fhenrycoF Offline
        fhenryco
        wrote on last edited by
        #10

        MMM OK, hesitating just because i'm not sure removing this regulator is going to be as easy and safe for board as i would like ...

        just to be sure , if i keep the regulator what you say about connecting power directly to Vcc is in case the power is provided by a single CR2032, right ?

        About your third other points (BOD modification) : this is necessary in case the voltager that the atmega eventually receives (either through RAW without regulator , or through Vcc) is lower than a regulated 3.3 V, do i understand well ?

        about your last point (capacitor and sleep between consecutive transmissions): is this again related to the above harware choices for powering the board ? i mean is it made necessary again by the fact that the atmega is running on a less than 3.3V CR2032 ? just to be sure i understand

        thanks again

        fhenrycoF Nca78N 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • fhenrycoF fhenryco

          MMM OK, hesitating just because i'm not sure removing this regulator is going to be as easy and safe for board as i would like ...

          just to be sure , if i keep the regulator what you say about connecting power directly to Vcc is in case the power is provided by a single CR2032, right ?

          About your third other points (BOD modification) : this is necessary in case the voltager that the atmega eventually receives (either through RAW without regulator , or through Vcc) is lower than a regulated 3.3 V, do i understand well ?

          about your last point (capacitor and sleep between consecutive transmissions): is this again related to the above harware choices for powering the board ? i mean is it made necessary again by the fact that the atmega is running on a less than 3.3V CR2032 ? just to be sure i understand

          thanks again

          fhenrycoF Offline
          fhenrycoF Offline
          fhenryco
          wrote on last edited by
          #11

          @fhenryco
          eventually it also appears that i have ordered step up regulators for nothing unless ... in which case might these be usefull and operate for a longtime ?

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • fhenrycoF fhenryco

            MMM OK, hesitating just because i'm not sure removing this regulator is going to be as easy and safe for board as i would like ...

            just to be sure , if i keep the regulator what you say about connecting power directly to Vcc is in case the power is provided by a single CR2032, right ?

            About your third other points (BOD modification) : this is necessary in case the voltager that the atmega eventually receives (either through RAW without regulator , or through Vcc) is lower than a regulated 3.3 V, do i understand well ?

            about your last point (capacitor and sleep between consecutive transmissions): is this again related to the above harware choices for powering the board ? i mean is it made necessary again by the fact that the atmega is running on a less than 3.3V CR2032 ? just to be sure i understand

            thanks again

            Nca78N Offline
            Nca78N Offline
            Nca78
            Hardware Contributor
            wrote on last edited by
            #12

            @fhenryco said:

            MMM OK, hesitating just because i'm not sure removing this regulator is going to be as easy and safe for board as i would like ...

            I never had problem to remove it, try it it's easy !

            just to be sure , if i keep the regulator what you say about connecting power directly to Vcc is in case the power is provided by a single CR2032, right ?
            Yes, in that case voltage will be a bit over 3V with full battery and go down to 2V (but at 2.4V the battery will be neard dead already.

            About your third other points (BOD modification) : this is necessary in case the voltager that the atmega eventually receives (either through RAW without regulator , or through Vcc) is lower than a regulated 3.3 V, do i understand well ?
            Yes, this is in case you are using cell only.

            about your last point (capacitor and sleep between consecutive transmissions): is this again related to the above harware choices for powering the board ? i mean is it made necessary again by the fact that the atmega is running on a less than 3.3V CR2032 ? just to be sure i understand

            No that's necessary because you are using a CR2032. These type of battery has a high internal resistance, that will go higher and higher when the voltage decreases. It means if you draw a lot of current, you will lose power because of this internal resistance. Then it means voltage drops and as it drops internal resistance increases.... etc etc So you need extra capacitor to help the battery by providing a bit of extra current during transmit.
            Using 2 cells will not improve that much, you might even not have better battery life life that as the regulator will consume a bit of power, and as your input voltage will be from 6V to 5V it makes a sharp drop in voltage meaning the efficiency of the regulator will be far from it's best.

            thanks again

            fhenrycoF 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • Nca78N Nca78

              @fhenryco said:

              MMM OK, hesitating just because i'm not sure removing this regulator is going to be as easy and safe for board as i would like ...

              I never had problem to remove it, try it it's easy !

              just to be sure , if i keep the regulator what you say about connecting power directly to Vcc is in case the power is provided by a single CR2032, right ?
              Yes, in that case voltage will be a bit over 3V with full battery and go down to 2V (but at 2.4V the battery will be neard dead already.

              About your third other points (BOD modification) : this is necessary in case the voltager that the atmega eventually receives (either through RAW without regulator , or through Vcc) is lower than a regulated 3.3 V, do i understand well ?
              Yes, this is in case you are using cell only.

              about your last point (capacitor and sleep between consecutive transmissions): is this again related to the above harware choices for powering the board ? i mean is it made necessary again by the fact that the atmega is running on a less than 3.3V CR2032 ? just to be sure i understand

              No that's necessary because you are using a CR2032. These type of battery has a high internal resistance, that will go higher and higher when the voltage decreases. It means if you draw a lot of current, you will lose power because of this internal resistance. Then it means voltage drops and as it drops internal resistance increases.... etc etc So you need extra capacitor to help the battery by providing a bit of extra current during transmit.
              Using 2 cells will not improve that much, you might even not have better battery life life that as the regulator will consume a bit of power, and as your input voltage will be from 6V to 5V it makes a sharp drop in voltage meaning the efficiency of the regulator will be far from it's best.

              thanks again

              fhenrycoF Offline
              fhenrycoF Offline
              fhenryco
              wrote on last edited by fhenryco
              #13

              @Nca78

              Last question : what about 3 AA LR6 in series then :

              • also has the problem of a large internal resistance ?
              • sharp drop of voltage again because voltage ~ 4.5 V still too much greater than 3.3 ==> bad regulator efficiency , right ?
              mfalkviddM 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • fhenrycoF fhenryco

                @Nca78

                Last question : what about 3 AA LR6 in series then :

                • also has the problem of a large internal resistance ?
                • sharp drop of voltage again because voltage ~ 4.5 V still too much greater than 3.3 ==> bad regulator efficiency , right ?
                mfalkviddM Online
                mfalkviddM Online
                mfalkvidd
                Mod
                wrote on last edited by
                #14

                @fhenryco 2xAA without regulator is what is recommended in https://www.mysensors.org/build/battery

                fhenrycoF 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • mfalkviddM mfalkvidd

                  @fhenryco 2xAA without regulator is what is recommended in https://www.mysensors.org/build/battery

                  fhenrycoF Offline
                  fhenrycoF Offline
                  fhenryco
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #15

                  @mfalkvidd

                  Oh! sorry, i had completely missed this battery section on this site "build" page. All right
                  There is just something that is not yet completely clear for me for this recommended usage of 2 AA batteries in series.
                  The boost 3.3 V regulator is presented as a good way to take "all the juice from batteries" for them to last longer, but at the same time, as a regulator it is expected to continuously draw current even during sleeping time ... and in this way reduce lifetime of batteries
                  so i remain a little bit confused as for the actual usefullness of such step up regulator : is it only usefull in a project where sensors are transmitting very often so that the sleeping current is not the dominant factor reducing battery lifetime ?

                  mfalkviddM 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • fhenrycoF fhenryco

                    @mfalkvidd

                    Oh! sorry, i had completely missed this battery section on this site "build" page. All right
                    There is just something that is not yet completely clear for me for this recommended usage of 2 AA batteries in series.
                    The boost 3.3 V regulator is presented as a good way to take "all the juice from batteries" for them to last longer, but at the same time, as a regulator it is expected to continuously draw current even during sleeping time ... and in this way reduce lifetime of batteries
                    so i remain a little bit confused as for the actual usefullness of such step up regulator : is it only usefull in a project where sensors are transmitting very often so that the sleeping current is not the dominant factor reducing battery lifetime ?

                    mfalkviddM Online
                    mfalkviddM Online
                    mfalkvidd
                    Mod
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #16

                    @fhenryco there is no agreement in the community. Some have had success without step-up, some with step-up.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • Nca78N Offline
                      Nca78N Offline
                      Nca78
                      Hardware Contributor
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #17

                      A lot of people don't change the BOD settings on the prominis and so when using only 2 AA or AAA the sensor will stop running when the batteries are around 1.35V which is a lot of waste. In that situation yes you will get better battery life with the booster.

                      But if you use a sensor that can go below 2V and set your promini to have 1.8V BOD and bootloader to run at 1MHz (so the pro mini can run below 2V) the batteries can go down a bit below 1V and at that level there's not much "juice" left in them. With that configuration you'll get a much better battery life than with a booster, and you will avoid the main disavantage of the booster: the interferences with the radio that sometimes make the sensors unreliable.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      • Nca78N Offline
                        Nca78N Offline
                        Nca78
                        Hardware Contributor
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #18

                        And no, no problems with AA/AAA regarding internal resistance. You can draw a lot of power from them without problem, so you don't need a capacitor for that. Just keep the capacitor for the radio.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        2
                        • fhenrycoF Offline
                          fhenrycoF Offline
                          fhenryco
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #19

                          Now that i have received pro minis 3.3 i can practice !

                          following the method in http://www.home-automation-community.com/arduino-low-power-how-to-run-atmega328p-for-a-year-on-coin-cell-battery/
                          i just tried to cut the trace to the LED with a cutter, ... but the LED remained shining after several deeper and deeper attempts .... so i just removed the LED, but now my mini pro is not responding anymore: dead!

                          so i'm wondering if i have destroyed something else trying to cut this trace , and considering how easy it is rather to just remove the led, i'm wondering why the guy advices to cut the trace which is probably a more dangerous method for the pro mini

                          fhenrycoF Nca78N 2 Replies Last reply
                          0
                          • fhenrycoF fhenryco

                            Now that i have received pro minis 3.3 i can practice !

                            following the method in http://www.home-automation-community.com/arduino-low-power-how-to-run-atmega328p-for-a-year-on-coin-cell-battery/
                            i just tried to cut the trace to the LED with a cutter, ... but the LED remained shining after several deeper and deeper attempts .... so i just removed the LED, but now my mini pro is not responding anymore: dead!

                            so i'm wondering if i have destroyed something else trying to cut this trace , and considering how easy it is rather to just remove the led, i'm wondering why the guy advices to cut the trace which is probably a more dangerous method for the pro mini

                            fhenrycoF Offline
                            fhenrycoF Offline
                            fhenryco
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #20

                            eventually, i was more skilled with a second mini pro : after removing both LED and board regulator, the consumption i measured is about 19mA when active and 80 microA when sleeping , i guess mainly because of the step up regulator (from 2xAA to 3.3V)

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • fhenrycoF fhenryco

                              Now that i have received pro minis 3.3 i can practice !

                              following the method in http://www.home-automation-community.com/arduino-low-power-how-to-run-atmega328p-for-a-year-on-coin-cell-battery/
                              i just tried to cut the trace to the LED with a cutter, ... but the LED remained shining after several deeper and deeper attempts .... so i just removed the LED, but now my mini pro is not responding anymore: dead!

                              so i'm wondering if i have destroyed something else trying to cut this trace , and considering how easy it is rather to just remove the led, i'm wondering why the guy advices to cut the trace which is probably a more dangerous method for the pro mini

                              Nca78N Offline
                              Nca78N Offline
                              Nca78
                              Hardware Contributor
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #21

                              @fhenryco I agree with you, I find it more simple to just remove the led. Cutting trace can lead to mistake (like you did on your first board) and there are a bunch of different promini clones, some might have traces using different paths than on the example.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              Reply
                              • Reply as topic
                              Log in to reply
                              • Oldest to Newest
                              • Newest to Oldest
                              • Most Votes


                              20

                              Online

                              11.7k

                              Users

                              11.2k

                              Topics

                              113.1k

                              Posts


                              Copyright 2025 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
                              • Login

                              • Don't have an account? Register

                              • Login or register to search.
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              0
                              • MySensors
                              • OpenHardware.io
                              • Categories
                              • Recent
                              • Tags
                              • Popular