Skip to content
  • MySensors
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Development
  3. GPS and GSM

GPS and GSM

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Development
5 Posts 3 Posters 1.9k Views 3 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • fhenrycoF Offline
    fhenrycoF Offline
    fhenryco
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Re: SMS enabled Gateway?

    GSM at node level is necessary for instance if one want to build a DIY GPS tracker. The arduino wold both read the GPS data and send them through GSM only when there is a significant change in position. This would need merging the sketches for the GPS and the GSM but also removing the unneeded code related to NRF transfers but also the whole mysensors protocol fro communication between nodes and gateway_to_controller. Eventually this is not related anymore to a smarthome network so probably this is not the good forum to discuss this project...

    However If the receiver is also a GSM node connected to a gateway i'm wondering wether we could keep the mysensors protocol being understood that it's just a matter of replacing the usual NRF24 communication by a GSM communication.

    mfalkviddM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • fhenrycoF fhenryco

      Re: SMS enabled Gateway?

      GSM at node level is necessary for instance if one want to build a DIY GPS tracker. The arduino wold both read the GPS data and send them through GSM only when there is a significant change in position. This would need merging the sketches for the GPS and the GSM but also removing the unneeded code related to NRF transfers but also the whole mysensors protocol fro communication between nodes and gateway_to_controller. Eventually this is not related anymore to a smarthome network so probably this is not the good forum to discuss this project...

      However If the receiver is also a GSM node connected to a gateway i'm wondering wether we could keep the mysensors protocol being understood that it's just a matter of replacing the usual NRF24 communication by a GSM communication.

      mfalkviddM Offline
      mfalkviddM Offline
      mfalkvidd
      Mod
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      In some locations, there are alternatives to GSM. I use LoRaWAN, which is more suited to low power devices.

      If using GSM, I would set up a gateway with a locally attached gps sensor. The gateway can be ethernet or mqtt. There would be no need to remove any nrf code or replacing anything, it would just work as a normal gateway.

      fhenrycoF 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • mfalkviddM mfalkvidd

        In some locations, there are alternatives to GSM. I use LoRaWAN, which is more suited to low power devices.

        If using GSM, I would set up a gateway with a locally attached gps sensor. The gateway can be ethernet or mqtt. There would be no need to remove any nrf code or replacing anything, it would just work as a normal gateway.

        fhenrycoF Offline
        fhenrycoF Offline
        fhenryco
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        @mfalkvidd Thanks for the info, i don't know much about LoraWAN , but the modules seem much more expansive than SIM800 GSM. for a DiY GPS tracker in a vehicle, the low energy consumption is also less crucial if the GSM is only used when motion is detected (GPS coordinates change).

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • gohanG Offline
          gohanG Offline
          gohan
          Mod
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          I'm also looking into GPS traker with a couple of actuators and for what I have seen so far, the easiest way is probably using mqtt but I still have to find what would be the best way to show it on a map. I'm looking at the adafruit fona that has the library to connect to mqtt.

          mfalkviddM 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • gohanG gohan

            I'm also looking into GPS traker with a couple of actuators and for what I have seen so far, the easiest way is probably using mqtt but I still have to find what would be the best way to show it on a map. I'm looking at the adafruit fona that has the library to connect to mqtt.

            mfalkviddM Offline
            mfalkviddM Offline
            mfalkvidd
            Mod
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            @gohan I use PubNub and MapBox. Example: https://www.pubnub.com/developers/eon/map/flight/ and https://github.com/pubnub/eon-workshop/tree/master/lesson3

            Publishing to PubNub can be done directly from Arduino, either through MQTT or REST.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            Reply
            • Reply as topic
            Log in to reply
            • Oldest to Newest
            • Newest to Oldest
            • Most Votes


            11

            Online

            11.7k

            Users

            11.2k

            Topics

            113.1k

            Posts


            Copyright 2025 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
            • Login

            • Don't have an account? Register

            • Login or register to search.
            • First post
              Last post
            0
            • MySensors
            • OpenHardware.io
            • Categories
            • Recent
            • Tags
            • Popular