Skip to content
  • MySensors
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. General Discussion
  3. NRF24 Range

NRF24 Range

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
16 Posts 6 Posters 5.6k Views 6 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • ben999B Offline
    ben999B Offline
    ben999
    wrote on last edited by
    #4

    Dusting an old post here :)

    That previous video brings a solution... but it seems that it is not quite the right way to do it (by reading the comments, looks like keeping the original trace and adding a wire is not the recommended fashion..)

    Here is another approach, that looks good!
    http://www.instructables.com/id/Enhanced-NRF24L01/

    What about power consumption ? Does it necessarily go up as the range increases ?

    zboblamontZ 1 Reply Last reply
    2
    • ben999B ben999

      Dusting an old post here :)

      That previous video brings a solution... but it seems that it is not quite the right way to do it (by reading the comments, looks like keeping the original trace and adding a wire is not the recommended fashion..)

      Here is another approach, that looks good!
      http://www.instructables.com/id/Enhanced-NRF24L01/

      What about power consumption ? Does it necessarily go up as the range increases ?

      zboblamontZ Offline
      zboblamontZ Offline
      zboblamont
      wrote on last edited by
      #5

      @ben999 Power input and output remains exactly the same. If you take an analogy of radiated power as a tyre tube, the larger the antenna the tyre tube is squeezed on top and bottom extending the range and conversely sensitivity. Add a reflector and directors (as in antenna beam - yagi) the radiation is squeezed top bottom and back forcing the a lobe out away from the reflector.

      ben999B 1 Reply Last reply
      2
      • zboblamontZ zboblamont

        @ben999 Power input and output remains exactly the same. If you take an analogy of radiated power as a tyre tube, the larger the antenna the tyre tube is squeezed on top and bottom extending the range and conversely sensitivity. Add a reflector and directors (as in antenna beam - yagi) the radiation is squeezed top bottom and back forcing the a lobe out away from the reflector.

        ben999B Offline
        ben999B Offline
        ben999
        wrote on last edited by
        #6

        @zboblamont

        Thank you for the explaination :+1:

        Can you please confirm whether the last link provide or not an acceptable solution?

        Any down-side?

        zboblamontZ 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • ben999B ben999

          @zboblamont

          Thank you for the explaination :+1:

          Can you please confirm whether the last link provide or not an acceptable solution?

          Any down-side?

          zboblamontZ Offline
          zboblamontZ Offline
          zboblamont
          wrote on last edited by
          #7

          @ben999 It should work ok, but may require a bit of tweaking and experimentation to get the correct length. Effectively it is a quarter wave either side but the PCB track also forms part of that antenna so not just a straight calculation.

          1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • ben999B ben999

            @zboblamont

            Thank you for the explaination :+1:

            Can you please confirm whether the last link provide or not an acceptable solution?

            Any down-side?

            zboblamontZ Offline
            zboblamontZ Offline
            zboblamont
            wrote on last edited by
            #8

            @ben999 Ooops. PS - orientation of the antenna must be the same for send and receive, usually vertical. Do not mix polarisations it will attenuate signal strangth. Have no idea if the board itself would disrupt signal but would play safe and have the antenna end facing intended direction of receive.

            ben999B 1 Reply Last reply
            1
            • zboblamontZ zboblamont

              @ben999 Ooops. PS - orientation of the antenna must be the same for send and receive, usually vertical. Do not mix polarisations it will attenuate signal strangth. Have no idea if the board itself would disrupt signal but would play safe and have the antenna end facing intended direction of receive.

              ben999B Offline
              ben999B Offline
              ben999
              wrote on last edited by
              #9

              @zboblamont

              Thanks a lot for sharing :)

              I will have a go then !

              Boots33B 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • ben999B ben999

                @zboblamont

                Thanks a lot for sharing :)

                I will have a go then !

                Boots33B Offline
                Boots33B Offline
                Boots33
                Hero Member
                wrote on last edited by
                #10

                @ben999 I have used that di-pole mod on a few nodes now and have found it to make a reasonable increase in range, considering the cost.

                As @zboblamont has said alignment and orientation also play a part as does providing a clear line of sight where possible.

                1 Reply Last reply
                2
                • TmasterT Offline
                  TmasterT Offline
                  Tmaster
                  wrote on last edited by Tmaster
                  #11

                  i'm bilding this right now: http://www.qsl.net/eb4eqa/bt_yagi/bt_yagi.htm
                  i tell you what is the increment of range in the next weekend ...

                  0_1494431994498_upload-5f249d36-0af2-4bd6-b4f3-0b4b13788dad

                  i have one of temp sensors under a water solar panel and the aluminium from the frame get me crazy because that sensor lose many of the sent reads to gw. i will finish that yagi antenna and solder that to my nrf24 and i hope signal increase performance.

                  in my house (i dont have neighboard les than 80m with wifi signal and noise from other routers or any king of 2.4ghz signals ) i can send a door sensor signal(from my entrance gate) by 50m and 1 wall . that one have this antena alredy on tx:
                  http://martybugs.net/wireless/collinear.cgi
                  0_1494432012836_upload-41e2f334-6ce8-4308-8b9c-e67b2af5c252

                  i'm a arduino fan .Even sometimes don't undestanding how to use it :P

                  zboblamontZ 1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  • TmasterT Tmaster

                    i'm bilding this right now: http://www.qsl.net/eb4eqa/bt_yagi/bt_yagi.htm
                    i tell you what is the increment of range in the next weekend ...

                    0_1494431994498_upload-5f249d36-0af2-4bd6-b4f3-0b4b13788dad

                    i have one of temp sensors under a water solar panel and the aluminium from the frame get me crazy because that sensor lose many of the sent reads to gw. i will finish that yagi antenna and solder that to my nrf24 and i hope signal increase performance.

                    in my house (i dont have neighboard les than 80m with wifi signal and noise from other routers or any king of 2.4ghz signals ) i can send a door sensor signal(from my entrance gate) by 50m and 1 wall . that one have this antena alredy on tx:
                    http://martybugs.net/wireless/collinear.cgi
                    0_1494432012836_upload-41e2f334-6ce8-4308-8b9c-e67b2af5c252

                    zboblamontZ Offline
                    zboblamontZ Offline
                    zboblamont
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #12

                    @Tmaster A yagi at this frequency is going to be fun building without a GDO, but good luck, have fun... Buil a backfire Yagi and quads in my young HAM days (many moons ago), the quads were way easier. Why did you not try relocating the antenna as a simple dipole on a coax from the board hence avoiding the obstacle frame? Seems like total overkill for ca 50m, but hey it's all fun I guess....

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • TmasterT Offline
                      TmasterT Offline
                      Tmaster
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #13

                      @zboblamont said in NRF24 Range:

                      overkill for ca 50m,

                      overkill for this ebay nrf24L01+? in real life they don't have this range without modifications. 1 wall ..and its done

                      i'm a arduino fan .Even sometimes don't undestanding how to use it :P

                      zboblamontZ 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • TmasterT Tmaster

                        @zboblamont said in NRF24 Range:

                        overkill for ca 50m,

                        overkill for this ebay nrf24L01+? in real life they don't have this range without modifications. 1 wall ..and its done

                        zboblamontZ Offline
                        zboblamontZ Offline
                        zboblamont
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #14

                        @Tmaster Sorry if I was not clear, your problem as you described it is primarily obstructed signal path. The PCB antenna for sure is low gain but relocating the node antenna to a give clear line of sight is more important than the effective radiated power. Relocating with a decent dipole would dramatically increase gain, as would adding a reflector. Unlike the previous example of directly adding quarter waves to the PCB to make a dipole, using coax to remote the antenna brings it's own issues. A bazooka balun is a simple enough solution to incorporate, but never done one at these frequencies.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • TmasterT Offline
                          TmasterT Offline
                          Tmaster
                          wrote on last edited by Tmaster
                          #15

                          of corse that a clear path its always better that change what already is made. but i only change the antenna when im in a "hole". On that case i cant move my tx sensors so i have to increse power. i hope with a "mini yagi" i can redirect the signal in one direction insted ominidirectional antena. on gw i`m using an old laptop antenna with good results

                          i'm a arduino fan .Even sometimes don't undestanding how to use it :P

                          zboblamontZ 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • TmasterT Tmaster

                            of corse that a clear path its always better that change what already is made. but i only change the antenna when im in a "hole". On that case i cant move my tx sensors so i have to increse power. i hope with a "mini yagi" i can redirect the signal in one direction insted ominidirectional antena. on gw i`m using an old laptop antenna with good results

                            zboblamontZ Offline
                            zboblamontZ Offline
                            zboblamont
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #16

                            @Tmaster I am not doubting the principle of increasing effective radiated power by way of relocating the antenna, or improving the radiation lobe in a set direction. The additional gain is important with weak signals at both send and receive ends, but at 50m it should not be an issue at these frequencies unless there are major attenuations to the signal. I have to guess you already have a dipole at the receiver ?

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            Reply
                            • Reply as topic
                            Log in to reply
                            • Oldest to Newest
                            • Newest to Oldest
                            • Most Votes


                            17

                            Online

                            11.7k

                            Users

                            11.2k

                            Topics

                            113.1k

                            Posts


                            Copyright 2025 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
                            • Login

                            • Don't have an account? Register

                            • Login or register to search.
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            0
                            • MySensors
                            • OpenHardware.io
                            • Categories
                            • Recent
                            • Tags
                            • Popular