-
@sundberg84 As for issue of the length of the connector, no, it should not be a problem. It always start with pin1 and grows "downward". As long as pin1 is closest to the corner, any MYSX version should align, as long as they can physically fit.
@anticimex -exactly! But it will not work if you did like I did it in EasyPCB and start from the last pin :) (Bottom-left)
-
@anticimex -exactly! But it will not work if you did like I did it in EasyPCB and start from the last pin :) (Bottom-left)
@sundberg84 No, but that is just the price of evolution.
-
@sundberg84 No, but that is just the price of evolution.
@anticimex - happy to pay that price, isnt that what open hardware is all about? Stronger together...
-
@anticimex - happy to pay that price, isnt that what open hardware is all about? Stronger together...
@sundberg84 I will just go ahead and update the spec. Yes, it may cause some existing designs to violate the spec, but that will always be the case. We look forwards, not backwards :)
Spec is here. -
@sundberg84 I will just go ahead and update the spec. Yes, it may cause some existing designs to violate the spec, but that will always be the case. We look forwards, not backwards :)
Spec is here.@anticimex @Nca78
What would you say is the clearance needed for components above a motherboard? If we wants a daugtherboard to be "on-top" with only a 2,54 male header on the motherboard (should this be soldered to the daugherboard?) we are talking about 2-3mm clearance and with this... not many through-hole components will fit.Another way would be not to specify how the daugher and mother should be connected. In EasyPCB I have all the components on top... and I should without issues be able to solder a single 2.54 male header between these boards if the daugherboard connected under the motherboard. This is actually my plan... because to be able to follow the rules + clearance I have to solder male header onto the mother and a female header onto the daugher.
-
@anticimex @Nca78
What would you say is the clearance needed for components above a motherboard? If we wants a daugtherboard to be "on-top" with only a 2,54 male header on the motherboard (should this be soldered to the daugherboard?) we are talking about 2-3mm clearance and with this... not many through-hole components will fit.Another way would be not to specify how the daugher and mother should be connected. In EasyPCB I have all the components on top... and I should without issues be able to solder a single 2.54 male header between these boards if the daugherboard connected under the motherboard. This is actually my plan... because to be able to follow the rules + clearance I have to solder male header onto the mother and a female header onto the daugher.
@sundberg84 quoting the spec:
The motherboard provides the male part and the daughterboard mates using the corresponding female part.So clearance should be based on the male socket that the pins go through in the header. But we could add a few mm so the motherboard is able to place low profile parts underneath, while restricting daughterboards to only use low profile parts on the back side.
-
in the same time, it doesnt say if the motherboard should be on top or bottom :)
I want to be able to use a daugherboard as big as the motherboard (50x50) so I think the clearance needs to be atleast so you can fit a nrf24l01+.daughterboard mates using the corresponding female part.
This is possible if the daugherboard uses the female 2.54 pins.
-
in the same time, it doesnt say if the motherboard should be on top or bottom :)
I want to be able to use a daugherboard as big as the motherboard (50x50) so I think the clearance needs to be atleast so you can fit a nrf24l01+.daughterboard mates using the corresponding female part.
This is possible if the daugherboard uses the female 2.54 pins.
@sundberg84 correct, the spec allows you to place the connector on either side. And right now, it is permissive of component placement and only give recommendations.
-
@sundberg84 correct, the spec allows you to place the connector on either side. And right now, it is permissive of component placement and only give recommendations.
@anticimex ok, sounds good! That makes two possibilities for any user. If a user for example wants to use female + male header on radio + pro mini on EasyPCB they will not be able to use a daugherboard on top... but can connect it under.

and to save space im going to use single male headers and solder them to both boards.
-
@anticimex ok, sounds good! That makes two possibilities for any user. If a user for example wants to use female + male header on radio + pro mini on EasyPCB they will not be able to use a daugherboard on top... but can connect it under.

and to save space im going to use single male headers and solder them to both boards.
@sundberg84 just be careful if having a design that encourage mounting the MYSX on both sides. Since a daughterboard will have to do the same modification or the interface will be mirrored.
So if a user has a soldered daughterboard with the connector on the far side and decide to move it to your motherboard which has the connector on the far side, things might burn. -
@sundberg84 just be careful if having a design that encourage mounting the MYSX on both sides. Since a daughterboard will have to do the same modification or the interface will be mirrored.
So if a user has a soldered daughterboard with the connector on the far side and decide to move it to your motherboard which has the connector on the far side, things might burn.@anticimex yes, but that only apply if the daugherboard has been soldered with headers for top-mounting and the user descides to move the daugherboard to a new motherboard. As long as you decide how you want to use the daugherboard and pin 1 always is towards the corner it should be fine. No mirroring as long as you only swap from above to below.
Do you see any application where you have a daugherboard you move around between nodes? Maybe some sort of debug or programming daugherboard?
-
@anticimex yes, but that only apply if the daugherboard has been soldered with headers for top-mounting and the user descides to move the daugherboard to a new motherboard. As long as you decide how you want to use the daugherboard and pin 1 always is towards the corner it should be fine. No mirroring as long as you only swap from above to below.
Do you see any application where you have a daugherboard you move around between nodes? Maybe some sort of debug or programming daugherboard?
@sundberg84 right, but both boards have to be swapped. So boards won't be "off the shelf" if one of the two is swapped.