Skip to content
  • MySensors
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Hardware
  3. Powering the nano with a battery

Powering the nano with a battery

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
11 Posts 7 Posters 2.3k Views 4 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    StKilda
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    ok. Noob question. With a nano, I have at the radio wired to the 3.3v output and a ground pin, and the sensor tied to the 5v out and the other ground pin. If I want to power the three items from a 9v battery to the Vin pin - I presume I have to hack the battery to share a GND pin? Is there a well trodden path to do this? Thanks

    mfalkviddM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • S StKilda

      ok. Noob question. With a nano, I have at the radio wired to the 3.3v output and a ground pin, and the sensor tied to the 5v out and the other ground pin. If I want to power the three items from a 9v battery to the Vin pin - I presume I have to hack the battery to share a GND pin? Is there a well trodden path to do this? Thanks

      mfalkviddM Offline
      mfalkviddM Offline
      mfalkvidd
      Mod
      wrote on last edited by mfalkvidd
      #2

      @stkilda yes, GND needs to be shared with the battery. Except that, you should be good to go, as long as the power drain from the attached sensors do not exceed the specs.

      However, the Nano uses a linear voltage regulator that will simply burn the excess voltage/power so you won't get very good battery life from the 9V battery.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • mfalkviddM Offline
        mfalkviddM Offline
        mfalkvidd
        Mod
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        The original Nano supports max 500mA total on 5V (datasheet). This includes the Nano itself and everything that is powered through 5V and 3.3V. Nano clones will probably have a cheaper regulator though, so you'll need to check the specifications for that particular regulator if you have a clone.

        For 3.3V, the original Nano uses a FT323RL which supports max 50mA.

        S 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • mfalkviddM mfalkvidd

          The original Nano supports max 500mA total on 5V (datasheet). This includes the Nano itself and everything that is powered through 5V and 3.3V. Nano clones will probably have a cheaper regulator though, so you'll need to check the specifications for that particular regulator if you have a clone.

          For 3.3V, the original Nano uses a FT323RL which supports max 50mA.

          S Offline
          S Offline
          StKilda
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          @mfalkvidd Thanks. The sensor (an LM393 light pulse sensor) and the radio seem to consume about 12mA each (at their respective voltages).

          To test the sensor / gateway / controller combination I powered the sensor with a 9v battery. Looks like after about 12 hours it stopped transmitting (although the units lights are still lit) but guess it lost power to run.

          Will have to think about long term power as thats clearly not sustainable. However, it all seems to be working so the major learning is going well!

          electrikE zboblamontZ 2 Replies Last reply
          1
          • S StKilda

            @mfalkvidd Thanks. The sensor (an LM393 light pulse sensor) and the radio seem to consume about 12mA each (at their respective voltages).

            To test the sensor / gateway / controller combination I powered the sensor with a 9v battery. Looks like after about 12 hours it stopped transmitting (although the units lights are still lit) but guess it lost power to run.

            Will have to think about long term power as thats clearly not sustainable. However, it all seems to be working so the major learning is going well!

            electrikE Offline
            electrikE Offline
            electrik
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            @stkilda you can already gain quite some power saving if you take off the led and sleep the node, activate it when there is something to do.

            1 Reply Last reply
            1
            • HonkH Offline
              HonkH Offline
              Honk
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              I wouldn't power it from battery. To consuming.
              Had one powered with two AA batteries. It lasted for one week.
              Changed the nano with a pro mini 3.3v and now it runs forever.

              1 Reply Last reply
              2
              • S StKilda

                @mfalkvidd Thanks. The sensor (an LM393 light pulse sensor) and the radio seem to consume about 12mA each (at their respective voltages).

                To test the sensor / gateway / controller combination I powered the sensor with a 9v battery. Looks like after about 12 hours it stopped transmitting (although the units lights are still lit) but guess it lost power to run.

                Will have to think about long term power as thats clearly not sustainable. However, it all seems to be working so the major learning is going well!

                zboblamontZ Offline
                zboblamontZ Offline
                zboblamont
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                @stkilda As @Hermann-Kaiser highlighted, for battery power the pro mini is far more frugal for consumed energy, and there is a massive amount of information on how to make it even more efficient...

                S 1 Reply Last reply
                1
                • zboblamontZ zboblamont

                  @stkilda As @Hermann-Kaiser highlighted, for battery power the pro mini is far more frugal for consumed energy, and there is a massive amount of information on how to make it even more efficient...

                  S Offline
                  S Offline
                  StKilda
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  @zboblamont @Hermann-Kaiser Thanks guys. I'll order me one.

                  zboblamontZ 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • S StKilda

                    @zboblamont @Hermann-Kaiser Thanks guys. I'll order me one.

                    zboblamontZ Offline
                    zboblamontZ Offline
                    zboblamont
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    @stkilda It is worth mentioning that unless wishing to tinker and experiment, there are also pre-made alternatives on the market such as Moteino variants etc.. This is the route I chose to go having poor soldering skills and eye-sight, at higher cost compared to the chinese sourced pro minis but the additional component costs were not unreasonable.

                    The 3.3v 16MHz variants I chose have run flawlessy with onboard rfm69 radios, eg - the gas meter node now reads 3v on two AA cells after a year, and the onboard booster will draw them down dead at ca 1.7v possibly next summer. The only problem found afterward was the limited number of pins left available, but this is a limitation of the pro mini which would have been found had I DIYd it.

                    ie You have plenty of options these days...

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • alowhumA Offline
                      alowhumA Offline
                      alowhum
                      Plugin Developer
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      Would it be more efficient if you connect it to a 3X AA battery holder on the 5V pin, instead of the 9V battery?

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • Z Offline
                        Z Offline
                        zafirkalvin
                        wrote on last edited by zafirkalvin
                        #11

                        You can power the Nano with 3 x AA (or AAA) alkaline cells (4.5v) connected to the 5v pin. The 4.5v will also be suitable Speed Test Scrabble Word Finder Solitaire for powering a servo. And the AA (or AAA) cells will last longer than the 9v PP3 style battery.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        19

                        Online

                        11.7k

                        Users

                        11.2k

                        Topics

                        113.1k

                        Posts


                        Copyright 2025 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • MySensors
                        • OpenHardware.io
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular