Skip to content
  • MySensors
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Hardware
  3. Air Quality Sensor

Air Quality Sensor

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
calibrationaqigas sensorhchoair quality
270 Posts 46 Posters 308.8k Views 35 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • alexsh1A alexsh1

    @epierre I wonder if you looked at this sensor Figaro TGS8100:

    http://www.figarosensor.com/products/entry/tgs8100.html

    Looks like it is perfect for a low-powered platform.

    epierreE Offline
    epierreE Offline
    epierre
    Hero Member
    wrote on last edited by epierre
    #182

    @alexsh1 said:

    @epierre I wonder if you looked at this sensor Figaro TGS8100:

    http://www.figarosensor.com/products/entry/tgs8100.html

    Looks like it is perfect for a low-powered platform.

    as a replacement for MQ in low power yes could be... the bad part is how to get one ?

    z-wave - Vera -> Domoticz
    rfx - Domoticz <- MyDomoAtHome <- Imperihome
    mysensors -> mysensors-gw -> Domoticz

    alexsh1A 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • epierreE epierre

      @alexsh1 said:

      @epierre I wonder if you looked at this sensor Figaro TGS8100:

      http://www.figarosensor.com/products/entry/tgs8100.html

      Looks like it is perfect for a low-powered platform.

      as a replacement for MQ in low power yes could be... the bad part is how to get one ?

      alexsh1A Offline
      alexsh1A Offline
      alexsh1
      wrote on last edited by
      #183

      @epierre said:
      the bad part is how to get one ?

      How about http://www.soselectronic.com/?str=371&artnum=170939&name=figaro-tgs8100 ?

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • epierreE epierre

        I'm now testing the MICS-6814 (3 sensors in one) given for :
        Carbon monoxide CO 1 -1000ppm
        **Nitrogen dioxide NO2 0.05 –10ppm **
        Ethanol C2H5OH 10 –500ppm
        Hydrogen H2 1 –1000ppm
        Ammonia NH3 1 –500ppm
        Methane CH4 >1000ppm
        Propane C3H8 >1000ppm
        Iso-butane C4H10 >1000ppm

        Datasheet maionly speaks on CO, NO2 and NH3:
        http://www.seeedstudio.com/wiki/images/1/10/MiCS-6814_Datasheet.pdf

        Here is are scripts:
        http://www.seeedstudio.com/wiki/Grove_-_Multichannel_Gas_Sensor

        http://www.seeedstudio.com/wiki/images/1/10/MiCS-6814_Datasheet.pdf

        Some readings:

        The concentration of NH3 is 0.99 ppm
        The concentration of CO is 1.20 ppm
        The concentration of NO2 is 0.15 ppm
        The concentration of C3H8 is 1000.04 ppm
        The concentration of C4H10 is 999.98 ppm
        The concentration of CH4 is 2991.14 ppm
        The concentration of H2 is 1.09 ppm
        The concentration of C2H5OH is 1.40 ppm
        

        I guess I'll make a script soon...

        VirV Offline
        VirV Offline
        Vir
        wrote on last edited by
        #184

        Hi, It all make sense, I am just confused that in your code once your multiply and once you divide...

        case CO:
        {
        if(ratio1 < 0.01) ratio1 = 0.01;
        if(ratio1 > 3) ratio1 = 3;
        //c = pow(10, 0.6) / pow(ratio1, 1.2);
        ** c = pow(ratio1, -1.179)4.385; //mod by jack*
        break;
        }
        case NO2:
        {
        if(ratio2 < 0.07) ratio2 = 0.07;
        if(ratio2 > 40) ratio2 = 40;
        //c = ratio2 / pow(10, 0.8);
        ** c = pow(ratio2, 1.007)/6.855; //mod by jack**
        break;
        }
        SO, what is the actual formula?

        Vir

        @epierre said:

        I'm now testing the MICS-6814 (3 sensors in one) given for :
        Carbon monoxide CO 1 -1000ppm
        **Nitrogen dioxide NO2 0.05 –10ppm **
        Ethanol C2H5OH 10 –500ppm
        Hydrogen H2 1 –1000ppm
        Ammonia NH3 1 –500ppm
        Methane CH4 >1000ppm
        Propane C3H8 >1000ppm
        Iso-butane C4H10 >1000ppm

        Datasheet maionly speaks on CO, NO2 and NH3:
        http://www.seeedstudio.com/wiki/images/1/10/MiCS-6814_Datasheet.pdf

        Here is are scripts:
        http://www.seeedstudio.com/wiki/Grove_-_Multichannel_Gas_Sensor

        http://www.seeedstudio.com/wiki/images/1/10/MiCS-6814_Datasheet.pdf

        Some readings:

        The concentration of NH3 is 0.99 ppm
        The concentration of CO is 1.20 ppm
        The concentration of NO2 is 0.15 ppm
        The concentration of C3H8 is 1000.04 ppm
        The concentration of C4H10 is 999.98 ppm
        The concentration of CH4 is 2991.14 ppm
        The concentration of H2 is 1.09 ppm
        The concentration of C2H5OH is 1.40 ppm
        

        I guess I'll make a script soon...

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • epierreE epierre

          @tantt2810 said:

          Hello,
          I'm don't understand the recipe below. Why RL_Value(Load Resistance)(1023-raw_adc)/raw_adc)? Can you explain for me?
          Thank you so much !!!
          Input: raw_adc - raw value read from adc, which represents the voltage
          Output: the calculated sensor resistance
          Remarks: The sensor and the load resistor forms a voltage divider. Given the voltage
          across the load resistor and its resistance, the resistance of the sensor
          could be derived.
          float MQ2::MQResistanceCalculation(int raw_adc)
          RL_VALUE
          (1023-raw_adc)/raw_adc));

          in fact it is above described, you have a voltage, you want a resistance.
          https://learn.sparkfun.com/tutorials/voltage-dividers

          datasheet needs a value which is the Rs/Ro (called here RL) where
          Ro: sensor resistance at 100ppm of NH3 in the clean air.
          Rs:sensor resistance at various concentrations of gases

          here the formula is a simplification of this:

          float Vrl = val * ( 5.00 / 1024.0 ); // V
          float Rs = 20000 * ( 5.00 - Vrl) / Vrl ; // Ohm
          int ratio = Rs/Ro;
          ppm = 37143 * pow (ratio, -3.178);

          VirV Offline
          VirV Offline
          Vir
          wrote on last edited by
          #185

          What does 37143 represents, Rs? and -3.178 is a second value from your regression method, but what about the first value?
          Can you elaborate on ppm line, please
          Vir

          here the formula is a simplification of this:

          float Vrl = val * ( 5.00 / 1024.0 ); // V
          float Rs = 20000 * ( 5.00 - Vrl) / Vrl ; // Ohm
          int ratio = Rs/Ro;
          ppm = 37143 * pow (ratio, -3.178);

          VirV 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • B bhavika

            I am confused with MiCS 4514 sensor. What I had done is :

            using MiCS quick start evaluation board, measured ADC value
            calculated Vout and from that calculated R0.
            Rs/R0 concentration gives me high value, which is not possible, My data is as follows
            clean air file is used for the purpose of R0 value
            https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B8sF8a6FHoseWjhWOHRoYzIxakk/view?usp=sharing
            and Polluted file is used to calculate the actual pollution
            https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B8sF8a6FHoseR1BnclhCUHdibEU/view?usp=sharing

            I am confused. Please help me

            VirV Offline
            VirV Offline
            Vir
            wrote on last edited by
            #186

            @bhavika said:

            I am confused with MiCS 4514 sensor. What I had done is :

            using MiCS quick start evaluation board, measured ADC value
            calculated Vout and from that calculated R0.
            Rs/R0 concentration gives me high value, which is not possible, My data is as follows
            clean air file is used for the purpose of R0 value
            https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B8sF8a6FHoseWjhWOHRoYzIxakk/view?usp=sharing
            and Polluted file is used to calculate the actual pollution
            https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B8sF8a6FHoseR1BnclhCUHdibEU/view?usp=sharing

            I am confused. Please help me

            I am confused by the formula you are using, could you please explain?
            Pollution NO2 = (POWER((RS/R0)*(1/POWER(10,0.8068)),(1/1.01)))

            Pollution CO = POWER((RS/R0)*(1/POWER(10 , 0.5476)),(1/-0.8497)))

            is the actual formula like this?:

            pollution = POWER((ratio *(1/POWER(10, curve[0])),(1/[curve[1])))

            This is different than any other formulas discussed in this thread...
            Vir

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • VirV Vir

              What does 37143 represents, Rs? and -3.178 is a second value from your regression method, but what about the first value?
              Can you elaborate on ppm line, please
              Vir

              here the formula is a simplification of this:

              float Vrl = val * ( 5.00 / 1024.0 ); // V
              float Rs = 20000 * ( 5.00 - Vrl) / Vrl ; // Ohm
              int ratio = Rs/Ro;
              ppm = 37143 * pow (ratio, -3.178);

              VirV Offline
              VirV Offline
              Vir
              wrote on last edited by
              #187

              so does 37164 represents the scaling factor and -3.178 the exponent?
              Vir
              @Vir said:

              What does 37143 represents, Rs? and -3.178 is a second value from your regression method, but what about the first value?
              Can you elaborate on ppm line, please
              Vir

              here the formula is a simplification of this:

              float Vrl = val * ( 5.00 / 1024.0 ); // V
              float Rs = 20000 * ( 5.00 - Vrl) / Vrl ; // Ohm
              int ratio = Rs/Ro;
              ppm = 37143 * pow (ratio, -3.178);

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • alexsh1A Offline
                alexsh1A Offline
                alexsh1
                wrote on last edited by alexsh1
                #188

                @epierre I have the problem with the dust sketch (shinyei ppd42ns). The following code does not work in MySensors 1.5

                ...
                gw.send(msgPM10.set("ppm"));
                  ...
                gw.send(msgPM25.set("ppm")); 
                ...
                
                2016-04-24 14:44:19.438 Error: MySensors: Unknown/Invalid sensor type (43)
                2016-04-24 14:44:19.438 Error: MySensors: Unknown/Invalid sensor type (43)
                

                So far both PM10 and PM25 are showing zero. However, if I upload the following code, it works fine (one channel though):

                // Watch video here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a8r4CeQopfY
                
                /* 
                 Connection:
                 
                 JST Pin 1 (Black Wire)  => Arduino GND
                 JST Pin 3 (Red wire)    => Arduino 5VDC
                 JST Pin 4 (Yellow wire) => Arduino Digital Pin 8
                
                 Green Led connected to Arduino D7
                 Yellow Led connected to Arduino D6
                 Red Led connected to Arduino D5
                 
                 
                Dust Sensor possible application:
                - Applications of customer
                - Air quality sensor
                - Dustlessness workshop
                - Cigarette detector
                */
                
                /*
                Sensor is to create Digital (Lo Pulse) output to Particulate Matters (PM). Lo Pulse Occupancy time (LPO time) is in proportion
                to PM concentration. The output is for PM whose size is around 1 micro meter or larger. We can use the sensor to detect the dust in clean room.
                Minimum detect particle: 1um
                http://www.seeedstudio.com/wiki/Grove_-_Dust_Sensor
                 Grove - Dust Sensor Demo v1.0
                 Interface to Shinyei Model PPD42NS Particle Sensor
                 Program by Christopher Nafis 
                 Written April 2012
                 
                 http://www.seeedstudio.com/depot/grove-dust-sensor-p-1050.html
                 http://www.sca-shinyei.com/pdf/PPD42NS.pdf
                 */
                
                int pin = 8;
                unsigned long duration;
                unsigned long starttime;
                unsigned long sampletime_ms = 1000;//sampe 1s ;
                unsigned long lowpulseoccupancy = 0;
                float ratio = 0;
                float concentration = 0;
                int gLed = 7;
                int yLed = 6;
                int rLed = 5;
                
                void setup() {
                  Serial.begin(9600);
                  pinMode(8,INPUT);
                  pinMode(gLed,OUTPUT);
                  pinMode(yLed,OUTPUT);
                  pinMode(rLed,OUTPUT);
                  starttime = millis();//get the current time;
                }
                
                void loop() {
                  duration = pulseIn(pin, LOW);
                  lowpulseoccupancy = lowpulseoccupancy+duration;
                
                  if ((millis()-starttime) > sampletime_ms)//if the sampel time == 30s
                  {
                    ratio = lowpulseoccupancy/(sampletime_ms*10.0);  // Integer percentage 0=>100
                    concentration = 1.1*pow(ratio,3)-3.8*pow(ratio,2)+520*ratio+0.62; // using spec sheet curve
                    Serial.print("concentration = ");
                    Serial.print(concentration);
                    Serial.print(" pcs/0.01cf  -  ");
                    if (concentration < 1.0) {
                     Serial.println("It's a smokeless and dustless environment"); 
                     digitalWrite(gLed, HIGH);
                     digitalWrite(yLed, LOW);
                     digitalWrite(rLed, LOW);
                  }
                    if (concentration > 1.0 && concentration < 20000) {
                     Serial.println("It's probably only you blowing air to the sensor :)"); 
                     digitalWrite(gLed, HIGH);
                     digitalWrite(yLed, LOW);
                     digitalWrite(rLed, LOW);
                    }
                    
                    if (concentration > 20000 && concentration < 315000) {
                     Serial.println("Smokes from matches detected!"); 
                     digitalWrite(gLed, LOW);
                     digitalWrite(yLed, HIGH);
                     digitalWrite(rLed, LOW);
                    }
                      if (concentration > 315000) {
                     Serial.println("Smokes from cigarettes detected! Or It might be a huge fire! Beware!"); 
                     digitalWrite(gLed, LOW);
                     digitalWrite(yLed, LOW);
                     digitalWrite(rLed, HIGH);
                  }
                    
                    lowpulseoccupancy = 0;
                    starttime = millis();
                  }
                }
                
                
                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • epierreE epierre

                  Hello,

                  sadly the discussions were lost...

                  So let's start again on the subject:

                  https://github.com/empierre/arduino

                  Here is the list of my current experimentations:

                  • MQ135.ino : for CO2/COV ... validated
                    
                  • MQ2.ino : for ethanol... needs pre-heat : ongoing
                  • MQ6 sensor : just received
                  • MQ131 sensor : just received
                  • TGS2600 sensor : just received

                  I'm getting serious a with a mega and a sensor board, 4 of them are connected together !

                  The MQ135 is not on the list, I use it to measure CO2 in children's room...
                  Values:

                  • MQ2: 85 - Combustible gas and smoke
                  • MQ6: 25 - Isobutane, Butane, LPG
                  • MQ131: 57 - O3, CL2
                  • TGS2600: 943 - ethanol, hydrogen, iso-butane, CO, Methane

                  As discussed before, I would appreciate someone helping me reading the logarithmic curves in the datasheet (link on each sensor name above) to get the linear value based on analog reading. I need to learn reading it... thanks!

                  as an example here in sandboxelectronics we saw that several values could be read from the datasheet:

                  float           LPGCurve[3]  =  {2.3,0.21,-0.47};   //two points are taken from the curve.
                                                                      //with these two points, a line is formed which is "approximately equivalent"
                                                                   //to the original curve.
                                                                  //data format:{ x, y, slope}; point1: (lg200, 0.21), point2: (lg10000, -0.59)
                  float           COCurve[3]  =  {2.3,0.72,-0.34};    //two points are taken from the curve.
                                                                  //with these two points, a line is formed which is "approximately equivalent"
                                                                  //to the original curve.
                                                                  //data format:{ x, y, slope}; point1: (lg200, 0.72), point2: (lg10000,  0.15)
                  float           SmokeCurve[3] ={2.3,0.53,-0.44};    //two points are taken from the curve.
                                                                  //with these two points, a line is formed which is "approximately equivalent"
                                                                  //to the original curve.
                                                                  //data format:{ x, y, slope}; point1: (lg200, 0.53), point2: (lg10000,  -0.22)                                                    
                  float           Ro           =  10;                 //Ro is initialized to 10 kilo ohms
                  
                  AnneFRA Offline
                  AnneFRA Offline
                  AnneFR
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #189

                  @epierre hi, could remove some doubts regarding the mq131 sensor?
                  thanks,
                  Anne

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • epierreE Offline
                    epierreE Offline
                    epierre
                    Hero Member
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #190

                    @alexsh1 said:

                    (shinyei ppd42ns)

                    I corrected the following sketch which had bad yg/m3 to ppm conversion thanks to LouiS22 from Domoticz forum remark (type conversion errors leading to 0 values).

                    https://github.com/empierre/arduino/blob/master/DustSensor_SamYoung_DSM501.ino

                    I guess I'll have to do the same here (but I lack time...):
                    DustSensor_Shinyei_PPD42NS.ino

                    z-wave - Vera -&gt; Domoticz
                    rfx - Domoticz &lt;- MyDomoAtHome &lt;- Imperihome
                    mysensors -&gt; mysensors-gw -&gt; Domoticz

                    alexsh1A 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • epierreE epierre

                      @alexsh1 said:

                      (shinyei ppd42ns)

                      I corrected the following sketch which had bad yg/m3 to ppm conversion thanks to LouiS22 from Domoticz forum remark (type conversion errors leading to 0 values).

                      https://github.com/empierre/arduino/blob/master/DustSensor_SamYoung_DSM501.ino

                      I guess I'll have to do the same here (but I lack time...):
                      DustSensor_Shinyei_PPD42NS.ino

                      alexsh1A Offline
                      alexsh1A Offline
                      alexsh1
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #191

                      @epierre Thanks - I'll have another go at Shinyei PPD42NS sketch once I have time. Ideally, I'd like to combine it with MH-Z14A sketch.

                      epierreE 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • alexsh1A alexsh1

                        @epierre Thanks - I'll have another go at Shinyei PPD42NS sketch once I have time. Ideally, I'd like to combine it with MH-Z14A sketch.

                        epierreE Offline
                        epierreE Offline
                        epierre
                        Hero Member
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #192

                        @alexsh1 which is a good idea, also a temp/him is quite usefull though I didn't added the impact in the formulas so far.

                        z-wave - Vera -&gt; Domoticz
                        rfx - Domoticz &lt;- MyDomoAtHome &lt;- Imperihome
                        mysensors -&gt; mysensors-gw -&gt; Domoticz

                        alexsh1A 2 Replies Last reply
                        0
                        • epierreE epierre

                          @alexsh1 which is a good idea, also a temp/him is quite usefull though I didn't added the impact in the formulas so far.

                          alexsh1A Offline
                          alexsh1A Offline
                          alexsh1
                          wrote on last edited by alexsh1
                          #193

                          @epierre I have combined the two sketches - works just fine, but need to find a spare temp sensor.The hardware setup looks messy so adding an extra i2c sensor will complicate it even more. I'll come back with the combined three-in-one sketch shortly.

                          BTW, this

                          gw.send(msgPM25.set("ppm"));
                          

                          still throws the following error. What version MySensors are you using?

                           MySensors: Unknown/Invalid sensor type (43)
                          
                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • epierreE epierre

                            @alexsh1 which is a good idea, also a temp/him is quite usefull though I didn't added the impact in the formulas so far.

                            alexsh1A Offline
                            alexsh1A Offline
                            alexsh1
                            wrote on last edited by alexsh1
                            #194

                            @epierre I started looking at the formula you have used in ppmv calculation. Why do you need ppmv? All values in EPA or Europe are in μg/m3.

                            The ppmv equation is:

                            ppmv = mg/m^3 * (0.08205*T)/M 
                            

                            T = atmospheric temperature in kelvins = 273.15 + °C
                            M = molecular weight of the air pollutant = 28.97
                            (http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/molecular-mass-air-d_679.html - this is a good link)
                            0.08205 = Universal Gas Law constant in atm·l/(mol·K)

                            Your code for this equation is:

                            ppmv=(float)(((concentrationPM25*0.0283168)/100) * ((0.08205*temp)/0.01))/1000;
                            

                            Now, I think it should be as follows:

                            1. temp = °C + 273.15
                            int temp=273.15 + 22;
                            
                            

                            22C - is a typical temp inside though the intention is to use a sensor

                            1. The amended ppmv equation is going to be:
                            ppmv=(((concentrationPM25*0.0283168)/100) * ((0.08205*temp)/28.97))/1000;
                            

                            I have not changed 0.0283168 /100 - not sure that this is. And the whole thing is divided by 1000? why?

                            IMPORTANT UPDATE:

                            I have just received the following result:

                            
                            PM10: 7373
                            
                            send: 11-11-0-0 s=0,c=1,t=37,pt=7,l=5,sg=0,st=ok:1.744
                            
                            

                            If I use the following web-site http://www.herramientasingenieria.com/onlinecalc/ppm-mg_m3.php and the result is
                            mg/m3 = 7373 * 0.283168/100 = 2.08 mg/m3
                            The molecular weight is 28.97 for dry air

                            2.08 mg/m3 is equivalent to 1.74ppm for a gas with molecular weight=28.97 Pressure=1013.25, Temperature=22C 
                            

                            Success!
                            Now I have found a spare BMP280 (temp and pressure sensor) which I can use here.
                            Additionally, I need to use 24-h and 1 year averages - https://www3.epa.gov/airquality/particlepollution/2012/decfsstandards.pdf

                            Stay tuned!

                            epierreE 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • alexsh1A alexsh1

                              @epierre I started looking at the formula you have used in ppmv calculation. Why do you need ppmv? All values in EPA or Europe are in μg/m3.

                              The ppmv equation is:

                              ppmv = mg/m^3 * (0.08205*T)/M 
                              

                              T = atmospheric temperature in kelvins = 273.15 + °C
                              M = molecular weight of the air pollutant = 28.97
                              (http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/molecular-mass-air-d_679.html - this is a good link)
                              0.08205 = Universal Gas Law constant in atm·l/(mol·K)

                              Your code for this equation is:

                              ppmv=(float)(((concentrationPM25*0.0283168)/100) * ((0.08205*temp)/0.01))/1000;
                              

                              Now, I think it should be as follows:

                              1. temp = °C + 273.15
                              int temp=273.15 + 22;
                              
                              

                              22C - is a typical temp inside though the intention is to use a sensor

                              1. The amended ppmv equation is going to be:
                              ppmv=(((concentrationPM25*0.0283168)/100) * ((0.08205*temp)/28.97))/1000;
                              

                              I have not changed 0.0283168 /100 - not sure that this is. And the whole thing is divided by 1000? why?

                              IMPORTANT UPDATE:

                              I have just received the following result:

                              
                              PM10: 7373
                              
                              send: 11-11-0-0 s=0,c=1,t=37,pt=7,l=5,sg=0,st=ok:1.744
                              
                              

                              If I use the following web-site http://www.herramientasingenieria.com/onlinecalc/ppm-mg_m3.php and the result is
                              mg/m3 = 7373 * 0.283168/100 = 2.08 mg/m3
                              The molecular weight is 28.97 for dry air

                              2.08 mg/m3 is equivalent to 1.74ppm for a gas with molecular weight=28.97 Pressure=1013.25, Temperature=22C 
                              

                              Success!
                              Now I have found a spare BMP280 (temp and pressure sensor) which I can use here.
                              Additionally, I need to use 24-h and 1 year averages - https://www3.epa.gov/airquality/particlepollution/2012/decfsstandards.pdf

                              Stay tuned!

                              epierreE Offline
                              epierreE Offline
                              epierre
                              Hero Member
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #195

                              @alexsh1 said:

                              @epierre I started looking at the formula you have used in ppmv calculation. Why do you need ppmv? All values in EPA or Europe are in μg/m3.

                              because domoticz only knows ppm... and many AIQ like use only that except for particles.

                              1. temp = °C + 273.15
                                int temp=273.15 + 22;
                                22C - is a typical temp inside though the intention is to use a sensor

                              not for me ;-)

                              1. The amended ppmv equation is going to be:
                                ppmv=(((concentrationPM250.0283168)/100) * ((0.08205temp)/28.97))/1000;
                              I have not changed 0.0283168 /100 - not sure that this is. And the whole thing is divided by 1000? why?
                              

                              was a volume conversion

                              The molecular weight is 28.97 for dry air

                              2.08 mg/m3 is equivalent to 1.74ppm for a gas with molecular weight=28.97 Pressure=1013.25, Temperature=22C 
                              

                              Success!

                              success for the mysensors value ?

                              MySensors: Unknown/Invalid sensor type (43)
                              

                              Domoticz doesn't recognize this command... I use 1.5.x but I have my own gateway to domoticz

                              z-wave - Vera -&gt; Domoticz
                              rfx - Domoticz &lt;- MyDomoAtHome &lt;- Imperihome
                              mysensors -&gt; mysensors-gw -&gt; Domoticz

                              alexsh1A bezeeflyB 2 Replies Last reply
                              0
                              • epierreE epierre

                                @alexsh1 said:

                                @epierre I started looking at the formula you have used in ppmv calculation. Why do you need ppmv? All values in EPA or Europe are in μg/m3.

                                because domoticz only knows ppm... and many AIQ like use only that except for particles.

                                1. temp = °C + 273.15
                                  int temp=273.15 + 22;
                                  22C - is a typical temp inside though the intention is to use a sensor

                                not for me ;-)

                                1. The amended ppmv equation is going to be:
                                  ppmv=(((concentrationPM250.0283168)/100) * ((0.08205temp)/28.97))/1000;
                                I have not changed 0.0283168 /100 - not sure that this is. And the whole thing is divided by 1000? why?
                                

                                was a volume conversion

                                The molecular weight is 28.97 for dry air

                                2.08 mg/m3 is equivalent to 1.74ppm for a gas with molecular weight=28.97 Pressure=1013.25, Temperature=22C 
                                

                                Success!

                                success for the mysensors value ?

                                MySensors: Unknown/Invalid sensor type (43)
                                

                                Domoticz doesn't recognize this command... I use 1.5.x but I have my own gateway to domoticz

                                alexsh1A Offline
                                alexsh1A Offline
                                alexsh1
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #196

                                @epierre Yes, all works fine now. I modified the combined sketch and here is the final result.

                                0_1463152922051_Screenshot (21).jpg

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • M Offline
                                  M Offline
                                  moskovskiy82
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #197

                                  Which one to use for detection of fire smoke? Currently have got several MQ-7 but they don't seem so good at it

                                  epierreE 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • M moskovskiy82

                                    Which one to use for detection of fire smoke? Currently have got several MQ-7 but they don't seem so good at it

                                    epierreE Offline
                                    epierreE Offline
                                    epierre
                                    Hero Member
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #198

                                    @moskovskiy82 said:

                                    Which one to use for detection of fire smoke? Currently have got several MQ-7 but they don't seem so good at it

                                    as discussed just above, a particle sensor could be good for smoke is a particle concentration, coupled with heat this would be a good indicator

                                    if (concentration > 315000) {
                                         Serial.println("Smokes from cigarettes detected! Or It might be a huge fire! Beware!"); 
                                    

                                    z-wave - Vera -&gt; Domoticz
                                    rfx - Domoticz &lt;- MyDomoAtHome &lt;- Imperihome
                                    mysensors -&gt; mysensors-gw -&gt; Domoticz

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • M Offline
                                      M Offline
                                      moskovskiy82
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #199

                                      What about mq2 or mq135? Any experience? As a gas sensor will be more suitable detecting early fire

                                      epierreE 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • M moskovskiy82

                                        What about mq2 or mq135? Any experience? As a gas sensor will be more suitable detecting early fire

                                        epierreE Offline
                                        epierreE Offline
                                        epierre
                                        Hero Member
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #200

                                        @moskovskiy82 said:

                                        What about mq2 or mq135? Any experience? As a gas sensor will be more suitable detecting early fire

                                        please see what it does, this is not a gas sensor this only detect particle size whatever the gas...

                                        z-wave - Vera -&gt; Domoticz
                                        rfx - Domoticz &lt;- MyDomoAtHome &lt;- Imperihome
                                        mysensors -&gt; mysensors-gw -&gt; Domoticz

                                        M 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • epierreE epierre

                                          @moskovskiy82 said:

                                          What about mq2 or mq135? Any experience? As a gas sensor will be more suitable detecting early fire

                                          please see what it does, this is not a gas sensor this only detect particle size whatever the gas...

                                          M Offline
                                          M Offline
                                          moskovskiy82
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #201

                                          @epierre
                                          It still detects concentration. Both state CO detection. So in case of fire won't they detect the increase in concentration much faster that the particle sensor like Sharp’s GP2Y1010AU0F or alternative?

                                          alexsh1A 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          16

                                          Online

                                          11.7k

                                          Users

                                          11.2k

                                          Topics

                                          113.0k

                                          Posts


                                          Copyright 2019 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • MySensors
                                          • OpenHardware.io
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular