Skip to content
  • MySensors
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Hardware
  3. Air Quality Sensor

Air Quality Sensor

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
calibrationaqigas sensorhchoair quality
270 Posts 46 Posters 308.8k Views 35 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • alexsh1A alexsh1

    @epierre I started looking at the formula you have used in ppmv calculation. Why do you need ppmv? All values in EPA or Europe are in μg/m3.

    The ppmv equation is:

    ppmv = mg/m^3 * (0.08205*T)/M 
    

    T = atmospheric temperature in kelvins = 273.15 + °C
    M = molecular weight of the air pollutant = 28.97
    (http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/molecular-mass-air-d_679.html - this is a good link)
    0.08205 = Universal Gas Law constant in atm·l/(mol·K)

    Your code for this equation is:

    ppmv=(float)(((concentrationPM25*0.0283168)/100) * ((0.08205*temp)/0.01))/1000;
    

    Now, I think it should be as follows:

    1. temp = °C + 273.15
    int temp=273.15 + 22;
    
    

    22C - is a typical temp inside though the intention is to use a sensor

    1. The amended ppmv equation is going to be:
    ppmv=(((concentrationPM25*0.0283168)/100) * ((0.08205*temp)/28.97))/1000;
    

    I have not changed 0.0283168 /100 - not sure that this is. And the whole thing is divided by 1000? why?

    IMPORTANT UPDATE:

    I have just received the following result:

    
    PM10: 7373
    
    send: 11-11-0-0 s=0,c=1,t=37,pt=7,l=5,sg=0,st=ok:1.744
    
    

    If I use the following web-site http://www.herramientasingenieria.com/onlinecalc/ppm-mg_m3.php and the result is
    mg/m3 = 7373 * 0.283168/100 = 2.08 mg/m3
    The molecular weight is 28.97 for dry air

    2.08 mg/m3 is equivalent to 1.74ppm for a gas with molecular weight=28.97 Pressure=1013.25, Temperature=22C 
    

    Success!
    Now I have found a spare BMP280 (temp and pressure sensor) which I can use here.
    Additionally, I need to use 24-h and 1 year averages - https://www3.epa.gov/airquality/particlepollution/2012/decfsstandards.pdf

    Stay tuned!

    epierreE Offline
    epierreE Offline
    epierre
    Hero Member
    wrote on last edited by
    #195

    @alexsh1 said:

    @epierre I started looking at the formula you have used in ppmv calculation. Why do you need ppmv? All values in EPA or Europe are in μg/m3.

    because domoticz only knows ppm... and many AIQ like use only that except for particles.

    1. temp = °C + 273.15
      int temp=273.15 + 22;
      22C - is a typical temp inside though the intention is to use a sensor

    not for me ;-)

    1. The amended ppmv equation is going to be:
      ppmv=(((concentrationPM250.0283168)/100) * ((0.08205temp)/28.97))/1000;
    I have not changed 0.0283168 /100 - not sure that this is. And the whole thing is divided by 1000? why?
    

    was a volume conversion

    The molecular weight is 28.97 for dry air

    2.08 mg/m3 is equivalent to 1.74ppm for a gas with molecular weight=28.97 Pressure=1013.25, Temperature=22C 
    

    Success!

    success for the mysensors value ?

    MySensors: Unknown/Invalid sensor type (43)
    

    Domoticz doesn't recognize this command... I use 1.5.x but I have my own gateway to domoticz

    z-wave - Vera -> Domoticz
    rfx - Domoticz <- MyDomoAtHome <- Imperihome
    mysensors -> mysensors-gw -> Domoticz

    alexsh1A bezeeflyB 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • epierreE epierre

      @alexsh1 said:

      @epierre I started looking at the formula you have used in ppmv calculation. Why do you need ppmv? All values in EPA or Europe are in μg/m3.

      because domoticz only knows ppm... and many AIQ like use only that except for particles.

      1. temp = °C + 273.15
        int temp=273.15 + 22;
        22C - is a typical temp inside though the intention is to use a sensor

      not for me ;-)

      1. The amended ppmv equation is going to be:
        ppmv=(((concentrationPM250.0283168)/100) * ((0.08205temp)/28.97))/1000;
      I have not changed 0.0283168 /100 - not sure that this is. And the whole thing is divided by 1000? why?
      

      was a volume conversion

      The molecular weight is 28.97 for dry air

      2.08 mg/m3 is equivalent to 1.74ppm for a gas with molecular weight=28.97 Pressure=1013.25, Temperature=22C 
      

      Success!

      success for the mysensors value ?

      MySensors: Unknown/Invalid sensor type (43)
      

      Domoticz doesn't recognize this command... I use 1.5.x but I have my own gateway to domoticz

      alexsh1A Offline
      alexsh1A Offline
      alexsh1
      wrote on last edited by
      #196

      @epierre Yes, all works fine now. I modified the combined sketch and here is the final result.

      0_1463152922051_Screenshot (21).jpg

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • M Offline
        M Offline
        moskovskiy82
        wrote on last edited by
        #197

        Which one to use for detection of fire smoke? Currently have got several MQ-7 but they don't seem so good at it

        epierreE 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • M moskovskiy82

          Which one to use for detection of fire smoke? Currently have got several MQ-7 but they don't seem so good at it

          epierreE Offline
          epierreE Offline
          epierre
          Hero Member
          wrote on last edited by
          #198

          @moskovskiy82 said:

          Which one to use for detection of fire smoke? Currently have got several MQ-7 but they don't seem so good at it

          as discussed just above, a particle sensor could be good for smoke is a particle concentration, coupled with heat this would be a good indicator

          if (concentration > 315000) {
               Serial.println("Smokes from cigarettes detected! Or It might be a huge fire! Beware!"); 
          

          z-wave - Vera -> Domoticz
          rfx - Domoticz <- MyDomoAtHome <- Imperihome
          mysensors -> mysensors-gw -> Domoticz

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • M Offline
            M Offline
            moskovskiy82
            wrote on last edited by
            #199

            What about mq2 or mq135? Any experience? As a gas sensor will be more suitable detecting early fire

            epierreE 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • M moskovskiy82

              What about mq2 or mq135? Any experience? As a gas sensor will be more suitable detecting early fire

              epierreE Offline
              epierreE Offline
              epierre
              Hero Member
              wrote on last edited by
              #200

              @moskovskiy82 said:

              What about mq2 or mq135? Any experience? As a gas sensor will be more suitable detecting early fire

              please see what it does, this is not a gas sensor this only detect particle size whatever the gas...

              z-wave - Vera -> Domoticz
              rfx - Domoticz <- MyDomoAtHome <- Imperihome
              mysensors -> mysensors-gw -> Domoticz

              M 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • epierreE epierre

                @moskovskiy82 said:

                What about mq2 or mq135? Any experience? As a gas sensor will be more suitable detecting early fire

                please see what it does, this is not a gas sensor this only detect particle size whatever the gas...

                M Offline
                M Offline
                moskovskiy82
                wrote on last edited by
                #201

                @epierre
                It still detects concentration. Both state CO detection. So in case of fire won't they detect the increase in concentration much faster that the particle sensor like Sharp’s GP2Y1010AU0F or alternative?

                alexsh1A 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • M moskovskiy82

                  @epierre
                  It still detects concentration. Both state CO detection. So in case of fire won't they detect the increase in concentration much faster that the particle sensor like Sharp’s GP2Y1010AU0F or alternative?

                  alexsh1A Offline
                  alexsh1A Offline
                  alexsh1
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #202

                  @moskovskiy82 For a fire smoke, you can use pretty much any gas or particle sensor - there are a quite few gases formed during the burning process. MQ2 is highly sensitivity and has a fast response time. I can recommend it for a fire detection usage. However, I have been disappointed in MQ* sensors in general - there are not accurate, require 24h heat-up time, consume a lot of power etc. The only advantage is the price.

                  To detect fire to can use a flame sensor - http://www.instructables.com/id/Flame-detection-using-Arduino-and-flame-sensor/

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  • rollercontainerR Offline
                    rollercontainerR Offline
                    rollercontainer
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #203

                    Can someone tell me how to read this line?

                    float mq135_ro = 10000.0;    // this has to be tuned 10K Ohm
                    

                    Do I have to messure the sensor and adjust the variable or do I have to tune the resistance? If I have to do the first thing, when do I have to messure it? In warm state and clean air with a multimeter?

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • alexsh1A Offline
                      alexsh1A Offline
                      alexsh1
                      wrote on last edited by alexsh1
                      #204

                      @epierre Did you check out the airbeam, which is based on a more expensive sensor Shinyei PPD60PV?
                      http://www.takingspace.org/airbeam-technical-specifications-operation-performance/

                      They made a step-by-step manual about building the same on Shinyei PPD42NS. I took their code and stripped a few parts and this is what I am left with:

                      #include  <SoftwareSerial.h>
                      #include  <FlexiTimer2.h>
                      
                      int pin = 3;
                      
                      volatile  double  rawParticalCount;
                      volatile  double  totalParticles  = 0;
                      volatile  double  particleCountToDisplay  = 0;
                      volatile  double  ratio = 0;
                      volatile  uint16_t  timeCounter = 0;
                      
                      #define         numberOfPeaksRecording                            5
                      volatile        uint32_t        previousPeaks[numberOfPeaksRecording];
                      volatile        uint32_t        sumOfPreviousPeaks          = 0;
                      volatile        uint32_t        instantGoal                         = 0;
                      volatile        int32_t         delta                                     = 0;
                      volatile        uint32_t        slowMovingAverage             = 0;
                      volatile  boolean readyToSendData = false;
                      
                      void  setup() {
                          Serial.begin(115200);
                          pinMode(pin,INPUT);
                          
                          FlexiTimer2::set(1,1.0/10000,readPin);
                          FlexiTimer2::start();
                          
                      }
                      void  loop()  {
                         
                          
                          if(readyToSendData){
                                      Serial.print(rawParticalCount,  DEC);
                                      Serial.print("  Raw Particle  Count (0-10000) ");
                                      Serial.print(ratio, DEC);
                                      Serial.print("  Ratio (0-100%)  ");
                                      Serial.print(particleCountToDisplay,  DEC); 
                                      Serial.print("  Particle  Count");
                                      Serial.println("");
                                                   
                                      readyToSendData = false;
                          }
                          
                      }
                      
                      void  readPin(){
                          if(digitalRead(pin) ==  LOW){
                              rawParticalCount++;
                          }    
                          timeCounter++;
                          if  (timeCounter  ==  10000)
                          {
                              timeCounter=0;
                                 
                              //Changes are made  here  based on  Chris Nafis's code: http://www.howmuchsnow.com/arduino/airquality/grovedust/
                              ratio = rawParticalCount/100.0; 
                              //Convert to  percentage, the shinyei reads 10milliseconds  to  90milliseconds  duration  for particles.  Basing on 10milliseconds, smallest  particle  assumingly  from  specification sheet.
                              //FlexiTimer2,  reads 10,000  readings  per second, which would be  1 reading per 100 microseconds. 100 readings  would be  10  milliseconds. Since Shinyei runs  at minimal 10  millisecond range.  I divided 10,000  readings  by  100 to  get 100.
                              //Good  example would be  rawPArticalCount  is  5000  half  of  the 10,000  readings were  active. 5000/100  would be  50  which translate to  50% low pulse occupancy.
                              totalParticles  = (1.1*pow(ratio,3)-3.8*pow(ratio,2)+520*ratio+0.62);
                              rawParticalCount  = 0;
                                
                                      //  shift counters  over, code  adapted from  template  provided  by  Mike  Taylor  and Joshua  Schapiro  from  Carnegie  Mellon  University's  CREATE  Lab
                                      for (uint8_t  i = 0;  i < (numberOfPeaksRecording-1); i++)  {
                                              previousPeaks[i]  = previousPeaks[i+1];
                                      }
                                      previousPeaks[numberOfPeaksRecording  - 1]  = totalParticles;
                                      sumOfPreviousPeaks  = 0;
                                      for (uint8_t  i = 0;  i < numberOfPeaksRecording; i++)  {
                                              sumOfPreviousPeaks  +=  previousPeaks[i];
                                      }
                                      instantGoal = 2*sumOfPreviousPeaks;
                                      
                                      delta = instantGoal - slowMovingAverage;
                                      
                                      if  (delta  < -5000){
                                              slowMovingAverage = slowMovingAverage - 250;
                                      } else  if  (delta  < -2500){
                                              slowMovingAverage = slowMovingAverage - 120;
                                      } else  if(delta  < -1200){
                                              slowMovingAverage = slowMovingAverage - 60;
                                      } else  if(delta  < -500){
                                              slowMovingAverage = slowMovingAverage - 25;
                                      } else  if(delta  < -5){
                                              slowMovingAverage = slowMovingAverage - 5;
                                      } else  if(delta  < -1){
                                              slowMovingAverage = slowMovingAverage - 1;
                                      } else  if(delta  > 5000) {
                                              slowMovingAverage = slowMovingAverage + 500;
                                      } else  if(delta  > 2500){
                                              slowMovingAverage = slowMovingAverage + 250;
                                      } else  if(delta  > 1200){
                                              slowMovingAverage = slowMovingAverage + 120;
                                      } else  if(delta  > 500){
                                              slowMovingAverage = slowMovingAverage + 50;
                                      } else  if(delta  > 5){
                                              slowMovingAverage = slowMovingAverage + 5;
                                      } else  if(delta  > 1){
                                              slowMovingAverage = slowMovingAverage + 1;
                                      }
                                      
                                      particleCountToDisplay  = slowMovingAverage;
                              readyToSendData = true;
                          }
                      }
                      

                      I have not adopted it for MySensors yet.
                      I like moving average they use, but the values do not make sense to me:

                      0.0000000000  Raw Particle  Count (0-10000) 0.0000000000  Ratio (0-100%)  53470.0000000000  Particle  Count
                      0.0000000000  Raw Particle  Count (0-10000) 27.0000000000  Ratio (0-100%)  53970.0000000000  Particle  Count
                      0.0000000000  Raw Particle  Count (0-10000) 0.0000000000  Ratio (0-100%)  54470.0000000000  Particle  Count
                      0.0000000000  Raw Particle  Count (0-10000) 21.6200008392  Ratio (0-100%)  54970.0000000000  Particle  Count
                      0.0000000000  Raw Particle  Count (0-10000) 0.0000000000  Ratio (0-100%)  55470.0000000000  Particle  Count
                      0.0000000000  Raw Particle  Count (0-10000) 24.2800006866  Ratio (0-100%)  55970.0000000000  Particle  Count
                      0.0000000000  Raw Particle  Count (0-10000) 0.0000000000  Ratio (0-100%)  56470.0000000000  Particle  Count
                      0.0000000000  Raw Particle  Count (0-10000) 24.1200008392  Ratio (0-100%)  56970.0000000000  Particle  Count
                      0.0000000000  Raw Particle  Count (0-10000) 0.0000000000  Ratio (0-100%)  57470.0000000000  Particle  Count
                      0.0000000000  Raw Particle  Count (0-10000) 22.3199996948  Ratio (0-100%)  57970.0000000000  Particle  Count
                      0.0000000000  Raw Particle  Count (0-10000) 0.0000000000  Ratio (0-100%)  58470.0000000000  Particle  Count
                      0.0000000000  Raw Particle  Count (0-10000) 20.3600006103  Ratio (0-100%)  58970.0000000000  Particle  Count
                      0.0000000000  Raw Particle  Count (0-10000) 0.0000000000  Ratio (0-100%)  59470.0000000000  Particle  Count
                      0.0000000000  Raw Particle  Count (0-10000) 17.6299991607  Ratio (0-100%)  59970.0000000000  Particle  Count
                      0.0000000000  Raw Particle  Count (0-10000) 0.0000000000  Ratio (0-100%)  60220.0000000000  Particle  Count
                      0.0000000000  Raw Particle  Count (0-10000) 19.0499992370  Ratio (0-100%)  60720.0000000000  Particle  Count
                      0.0000000000  Raw Particle  Count (0-10000) 0.0000000000  Ratio (0-100%)  60715.0000000000  Particle  Count
                      0.0000000000  Raw Particle  Count (0-10000) 20.6599998474  Ratio (0-100%)  61215.0000000000  Particle  Count
                      
                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • epierreE Offline
                        epierreE Offline
                        epierre
                        Hero Member
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #205

                        @alexsh1 said:

                        I took their code and stripped a few parts and this is what I am left with:

                        @alexsh1 the PPDN42 is for 1 micron and 2.5 micron , this one is for 0.5 micron

                        airbeam has standard code: https://github.com/HabitatMap/AirCastingAndroidClient/blob/master/arduino/aircasting/aircasting_shinyeiPPD42NS.ino

                        or I've not seen ?

                        z-wave - Vera -&gt; Domoticz
                        rfx - Domoticz &lt;- MyDomoAtHome &lt;- Imperihome
                        mysensors -&gt; mysensors-gw -&gt; Domoticz

                        alexsh1A 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • epierreE epierre

                          @alexsh1 said:

                          I took their code and stripped a few parts and this is what I am left with:

                          @alexsh1 the PPDN42 is for 1 micron and 2.5 micron , this one is for 0.5 micron

                          airbeam has standard code: https://github.com/HabitatMap/AirCastingAndroidClient/blob/master/arduino/aircasting/aircasting_shinyeiPPD42NS.ino

                          or I've not seen ?

                          alexsh1A Offline
                          alexsh1A Offline
                          alexsh1
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #206

                          @epierre this is not the air beam code. They introduced "do it yourself" consept similar to the airbeam but with a different sensor (shinyei ppd42ns)

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • rollercontainerR Offline
                            rollercontainerR Offline
                            rollercontainer
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #207

                            Hey guys, I am struggeling to get the MQ135 to work. Is there a step by step howto? Or can someone answer my question from 3 days ago?
                            I would appreciate it very much.

                            alexsh1A 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • rollercontainerR rollercontainer

                              Hey guys, I am struggeling to get the MQ135 to work. Is there a step by step howto? Or can someone answer my question from 3 days ago?
                              I would appreciate it very much.

                              alexsh1A Offline
                              alexsh1A Offline
                              alexsh1
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #208

                              @rollercontainer I followed David Gironi method to calibrate - it is described as follows:

                              Before you can use the sensor, it has to be calibrated. For this, connect the sensor to your circuit and leave it powered on for 12-24 h to burn it in. Then put it into outside air, preferably at 20°C/35% rel. hum. (humidity is not so crucial). Read out the calibration value as such

                              float rzero = gasSensor.getRZero();
                              Wait until the value has somewhat settled (30min-1h). Remember, this is an ADC measurement so you might not want to wait some time between reading the sensor and also do some averaging. Once you have determined your RZero, put it into the MQ135.h. Note: Different sensors will likely have different RZero!

                              #define RZERO 76.63

                              Congrats, you have calibrated the sensor and can now read the CO2 ppm value in your sketch

                              float ppm = gasSensor.getPPM();

                              rollercontainerR 1 Reply Last reply
                              1
                              • alexsh1A alexsh1

                                @rollercontainer I followed David Gironi method to calibrate - it is described as follows:

                                Before you can use the sensor, it has to be calibrated. For this, connect the sensor to your circuit and leave it powered on for 12-24 h to burn it in. Then put it into outside air, preferably at 20°C/35% rel. hum. (humidity is not so crucial). Read out the calibration value as such

                                float rzero = gasSensor.getRZero();
                                Wait until the value has somewhat settled (30min-1h). Remember, this is an ADC measurement so you might not want to wait some time between reading the sensor and also do some averaging. Once you have determined your RZero, put it into the MQ135.h. Note: Different sensors will likely have different RZero!

                                #define RZERO 76.63

                                Congrats, you have calibrated the sensor and can now read the CO2 ppm value in your sketch

                                float ppm = gasSensor.getPPM();

                                rollercontainerR Offline
                                rollercontainerR Offline
                                rollercontainer
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #209

                                @alexsh1 Thx
                                Is "RZERO" the same as "mq135_ro" or is it a seperate variable? (ro = R0 = RZERO?)

                                rollercontainerR alexsh1A 2 Replies Last reply
                                0
                                • rollercontainerR rollercontainer

                                  @alexsh1 Thx
                                  Is "RZERO" the same as "mq135_ro" or is it a seperate variable? (ro = R0 = RZERO?)

                                  rollercontainerR Offline
                                  rollercontainerR Offline
                                  rollercontainer
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #210

                                  So, obvious these are two variables. Wherefore is the mq135_ro? Is it the load resistor from signal to ground?

                                  alexsh1A 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • rollercontainerR rollercontainer

                                    So, obvious these are two variables. Wherefore is the mq135_ro? Is it the load resistor from signal to ground?

                                    alexsh1A Offline
                                    alexsh1A Offline
                                    alexsh1
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #211

                                    @rollercontainer let's start from the basic - which MQ-135 do you have? A bare unit or with a logic controller and a variable resistor?

                                    rollercontainerR 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • alexsh1A alexsh1

                                      @rollercontainer let's start from the basic - which MQ-135 do you have? A bare unit or with a logic controller and a variable resistor?

                                      rollercontainerR Offline
                                      rollercontainerR Offline
                                      rollercontainer
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #212

                                      @alexsh1 I bought a breakout board and desoldered everything but the sensor and the 33Ohm resistor for the heating. Then I soldered a 10kOhm pulldown from analog signal out to ground.

                                      alexsh1A 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • rollercontainerR rollercontainer

                                        @alexsh1 Thx
                                        Is "RZERO" the same as "mq135_ro" or is it a seperate variable? (ro = R0 = RZERO?)

                                        alexsh1A Offline
                                        alexsh1A Offline
                                        alexsh1
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #213

                                        @rollercontainer

                                        Apologies for the confusion. @epierre did not use this library, but I have used MQ135.h library, but have not adopted it for MySensors and I did not like the sensor's reading jumping up and down.

                                        In MQ135.h:

                                        // Calibration resistance at atmospheric CO2 level
                                        #define RZERO 394.5 //RZERO 76.63
                                        

                                        I think the principle of RZERO is the same as mq135_ro

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • rollercontainerR rollercontainer

                                          @alexsh1 I bought a breakout board and desoldered everything but the sensor and the 33Ohm resistor for the heating. Then I soldered a 10kOhm pulldown from analog signal out to ground.

                                          alexsh1A Offline
                                          alexsh1A Offline
                                          alexsh1
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #214

                                          @rollercontainer I have do not done any changes to my breakout board. Just tuning the variable resistor and that's it.

                                          One thing I noticed is that the sensor performs much better in enclosed premises (no windows and no doors). Alternatively, it has to be in the box or something. Any small light draft dramatically changing the readings.

                                          rollercontainerR 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          17

                                          Online

                                          11.7k

                                          Users

                                          11.2k

                                          Topics

                                          113.0k

                                          Posts


                                          Copyright 2025 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • MySensors
                                          • OpenHardware.io
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular