Skip to content
  • MySensors
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Controllers
  3. OpenHAB
  4. openHAB 2.0 binding

openHAB 2.0 binding

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved OpenHAB
534 Posts 88 Posters 479.6k Views 99 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • K Offline
    K Offline
    kolaf
    Hero Member
    wrote on last edited by
    #245

    Hello again.

    As a temporary fix I found a simple TCP/serial Gateway Python snippet that handles the connection to the serial mysensors device and provides a TCP interface to openhab. Switching the binding of aggression from serial to socket and having it connected to this software gateway removes the core dump issue. This confirms my suspicions that the issues are with the serial port library.

    It works okay as a workaround until someone figure something out :-)

    If anyone else is having issues with the serial connection, this is the by then snippet I found and used:

    https://github.com/pyserial/pyserial/blob/master/examples/tcp_serial_redirect.py

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • T Offline
      T Offline
      TimO
      Hero Member
      wrote on last edited by
      #246

      @kolaf I'm only using one serial gw and that is running rock stable within OH2. My last update was 22 days ago, so maybe it is time for an update again. :-)

      I recently changed my job, so I'm a little low in time at the moment. :-(

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • Fredrik JönssonF Offline
        Fredrik JönssonF Offline
        Fredrik Jönsson
        wrote on last edited by
        #247

        From what i can see this binding is not part of the official bindings for openHAB. Are there any plans to try to get this as a official binding for openhab?

        /Fredrik

        T 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • Fredrik JönssonF Fredrik Jönsson

          From what i can see this binding is not part of the official bindings for openHAB. Are there any plans to try to get this as a official binding for openhab?

          /Fredrik

          T Offline
          T Offline
          TimO
          Hero Member
          wrote on last edited by
          #248

          @Fredrik-Jönsson : Yes, this is on my to do list with high priority. I've done some preparations but need to contact the OH2 developers before creating a PR.

          Fredrik JönssonF 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • G gonzalonal

            @TimO I have solved my probles using OH2 Beta3 and the last release of the MyS binding.

            It seems that the problem is only reproduced with the last release of OH2 from Cloudbees. At least withe the release 372.

            Have you tryed it?

            T Offline
            T Offline
            TimO
            Hero Member
            wrote on last edited by
            #249

            @gonzalonal :

            I've found the time to sync my repository with upstream master OH2. Now I do see the behaviour you described above. The status of every item is send out at startup.

            Using the current package of the MySensors binding from today with an older version of OH2 does work fine. But my development environment now throws out the status of all things.

            Are you using any other bindings? Are they working fine?At first I need to find out if this problem only occures with the MySensors binding or if there is a bug. ;-)

            G 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • T TimO

              @gonzalonal :

              I've found the time to sync my repository with upstream master OH2. Now I do see the behaviour you described above. The status of every item is send out at startup.

              Using the current package of the MySensors binding from today with an older version of OH2 does work fine. But my development environment now throws out the status of all things.

              Are you using any other bindings? Are they working fine?At first I need to find out if this problem only occures with the MySensors binding or if there is a bug. ;-)

              G Offline
              G Offline
              gonzalonal
              wrote on last edited by gonzalonal
              #250

              Hi @TimO.
              I am using several bindings in my OH2 setup.
              As I am using MyS and OH2 in a productive and sensible environement I could try out how the other bindings behaved. As soon as I detect the error I had to rollback my setup. So I can't really tell is there is a bug with the latest snapshot of OH2 or if it is something more specific of MyS binding.

              I am currently using OH2 Beta 3 with no issues.

              T 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • T TimO

                @Fredrik-Jönsson : Yes, this is on my to do list with high priority. I've done some preparations but need to contact the OH2 developers before creating a PR.

                Fredrik JönssonF Offline
                Fredrik JönssonF Offline
                Fredrik Jönsson
                wrote on last edited by
                #251

                @TimO That sounds great, i will start trying this out. By reading this thread it sounds like it works quite well..

                Thanks for all you time you put into this binding.

                /Fredrik

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • G gonzalonal

                  Hi @TimO.
                  I am using several bindings in my OH2 setup.
                  As I am using MyS and OH2 in a productive and sensible environement I could try out how the other bindings behaved. As soon as I detect the error I had to rollback my setup. So I can't really tell is there is a bug with the latest snapshot of OH2 or if it is something more specific of MyS binding.

                  I am currently using OH2 Beta 3 with no issues.

                  T Offline
                  T Offline
                  TimO
                  Hero Member
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #252

                  @gonzalonal : I've found the reason for this beaviour and fixed the bug.

                  @andreacioni contributed a PR to the code that includes a channel for the last update of a thing. If you want to know at which time there was a message from a node you may subscribe to the "lastupdate" channel.

                  Example:

                  DateTime   lastUpdate01 "Last Update" { channel="mysensors:baro:gateway:baro01:lastupdate" }
                  

                  Thanks @andreacioni !

                  G 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • T TimO

                    @gonzalonal : I've found the reason for this beaviour and fixed the bug.

                    @andreacioni contributed a PR to the code that includes a channel for the last update of a thing. If you want to know at which time there was a message from a node you may subscribe to the "lastupdate" channel.

                    Example:

                    DateTime   lastUpdate01 "Last Update" { channel="mysensors:baro:gateway:baro01:lastupdate" }
                    

                    Thanks @andreacioni !

                    G Offline
                    G Offline
                    gonzalonal
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #253

                    Hi @TimO .
                    I have tried the binding and the issue is fixed as you have said.
                    I have been looking at the logs, and found the following regarding last update feature:

                    15:52:11.580 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.protocol.MySensorsReader] - 1;253;1;0;2;1
                    15:52:11.583 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.handler.MySensorsHandler] - Setting last update for node 1 to 2016-08-08T15:52:11.581-0300
                    15:52:11.585 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.handler.MySensorsHandler] - Setting last update for node 1 to 2016-08-08T15:52:11.584-0300
                    15:52:11.590 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.handler.MySensorsHandler] - Setting last update for node 1 to 2016-08-08T15:52:11.588-0300
                    15:52:11.594 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.handler.MySensorsHandler] - Setting last update for node 1 to 2016-08-08T15:52:11.592-0300
                    15:52:11.598 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.handler.MySensorsHandler] - Setting last update for node 1 to 2016-08-08T15:52:11.597-0300
                    15:52:11.602 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.handler.MySensorsHandler] - Setting last update for node 1 to 2016-08-08T15:52:11.601-0300
                    15:52:11.606 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.handler.MySensorsHandler] - Setting last update for node 1 to 2016-08-08T15:52:11.604-0300
                    15:52:11.609 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.handler.MySensorsHandler] - Setting last update for node 1 to 2016-08-08T15:52:11.608-0300
                    15:52:11.613 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.handler.MySensorsHandler] - Setting last update for node 1 to 2016-08-08T15:52:11.611-0300
                    15:52:11.618 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.handler.MySensorsHandler] - Setting last update for node 1 to 2016-08-08T15:52:11.616-0300
                    15:52:11.624 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.handler.MySensorsHandler] - Setting last update for node 1 to 2016-08-08T15:52:11.622-0300
                    15:52:11.628 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.handler.MySensorsHandler] - Setting last update for node 1 to 2016-08-08T15:52:11.626-0300
                    

                    Is this the expected behavior? It seems to me that we should have only one "Setting last.." for value updated.
                    Maybe is my setup. Can someone check this.
                    Thanks!

                    andreacioniA 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • G gonzalonal

                      Hi @TimO .
                      I have tried the binding and the issue is fixed as you have said.
                      I have been looking at the logs, and found the following regarding last update feature:

                      15:52:11.580 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.protocol.MySensorsReader] - 1;253;1;0;2;1
                      15:52:11.583 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.handler.MySensorsHandler] - Setting last update for node 1 to 2016-08-08T15:52:11.581-0300
                      15:52:11.585 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.handler.MySensorsHandler] - Setting last update for node 1 to 2016-08-08T15:52:11.584-0300
                      15:52:11.590 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.handler.MySensorsHandler] - Setting last update for node 1 to 2016-08-08T15:52:11.588-0300
                      15:52:11.594 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.handler.MySensorsHandler] - Setting last update for node 1 to 2016-08-08T15:52:11.592-0300
                      15:52:11.598 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.handler.MySensorsHandler] - Setting last update for node 1 to 2016-08-08T15:52:11.597-0300
                      15:52:11.602 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.handler.MySensorsHandler] - Setting last update for node 1 to 2016-08-08T15:52:11.601-0300
                      15:52:11.606 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.handler.MySensorsHandler] - Setting last update for node 1 to 2016-08-08T15:52:11.604-0300
                      15:52:11.609 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.handler.MySensorsHandler] - Setting last update for node 1 to 2016-08-08T15:52:11.608-0300
                      15:52:11.613 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.handler.MySensorsHandler] - Setting last update for node 1 to 2016-08-08T15:52:11.611-0300
                      15:52:11.618 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.handler.MySensorsHandler] - Setting last update for node 1 to 2016-08-08T15:52:11.616-0300
                      15:52:11.624 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.handler.MySensorsHandler] - Setting last update for node 1 to 2016-08-08T15:52:11.622-0300
                      15:52:11.628 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.handler.MySensorsHandler] - Setting last update for node 1 to 2016-08-08T15:52:11.626-0300
                      

                      Is this the expected behavior? It seems to me that we should have only one "Setting last.." for value updated.
                      Maybe is my setup. Can someone check this.
                      Thanks!

                      andreacioniA Offline
                      andreacioniA Offline
                      andreacioni
                      wrote on last edited by andreacioni
                      #254

                      Hi @gonzalonal

                      The implementation of the binding create a thing for every channel of a single node. So the solution result is what you can see in the log. We can do a little bit more to prevent a single message to fire every 'lastupdate' channel of every thing that have the same node ID. But I think it is not a good idea.

                      G 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • andreacioniA andreacioni

                        Hi @gonzalonal

                        The implementation of the binding create a thing for every channel of a single node. So the solution result is what you can see in the log. We can do a little bit more to prevent a single message to fire every 'lastupdate' channel of every thing that have the same node ID. But I think it is not a good idea.

                        G Offline
                        G Offline
                        gonzalonal
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #255

                        Got it!
                        Thanks for your quick reply @andreacioni

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • G Offline
                          G Offline
                          Gustafsson
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #256

                          Hi guys,

                          I've tried to add my ethernet gateway to openhab2 through but I just cant get the Online-status on, it. Do I have to do anything else than just adding it into the things file?

                          andreacioniA 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • G Gustafsson

                            Hi guys,

                            I've tried to add my ethernet gateway to openhab2 through but I just cant get the Online-status on, it. Do I have to do anything else than just adding it into the things file?

                            andreacioniA Offline
                            andreacioniA Offline
                            andreacioni
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #257

                            Hi @Gustafsson,

                            Have you read the readme? Readme . Probably you have not configured things? See the readme on how to do that :)

                            G 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • andreacioniA andreacioni

                              Hi @Gustafsson,

                              Have you read the readme? Readme . Probably you have not configured things? See the readme on how to do that :)

                              G Offline
                              G Offline
                              Gustafsson
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #258

                              @andreacioni That's exactly what I did.

                              Things

                              Bridge mysensors:bridge-eth:gateway [ ipAddress="192.168.254.228", tcpPort=5003, sendDelay=200 ]
                                      door    frontDoor       [ nodeId="102", childId="4" ]
                              }
                              

                              Items

                              Text    frontDoor       "Door"  { channel="mysensors:door:gateway:frontDoor:tripped" }
                              

                              Sitemap

                              sitemap MySitemap label="Main Menu" {
                                      Frame {
                                              Text item=frontDoor
                                      }
                              }
                              

                              This is how everything looks like now. I get the door item green in habmin but still the red cross on the gateway. The door item dosn't show me if it's open or closed.

                              G 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • G Gustafsson

                                @andreacioni That's exactly what I did.

                                Things

                                Bridge mysensors:bridge-eth:gateway [ ipAddress="192.168.254.228", tcpPort=5003, sendDelay=200 ]
                                        door    frontDoor       [ nodeId="102", childId="4" ]
                                }
                                

                                Items

                                Text    frontDoor       "Door"  { channel="mysensors:door:gateway:frontDoor:tripped" }
                                

                                Sitemap

                                sitemap MySitemap label="Main Menu" {
                                        Frame {
                                                Text item=frontDoor
                                        }
                                }
                                

                                This is how everything looks like now. I get the door item green in habmin but still the red cross on the gateway. The door item dosn't show me if it's open or closed.

                                G Offline
                                G Offline
                                gonzalonal
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #259

                                @Gustafsson

                                You are missing the opening brackets

                                Bridge mysensors:bridge-eth:gateway [ ipAddress="192.168.254.228", tcpPort=5003, sendDelay=200 ] {
                                door frontDoor [ nodeId="102", childId="4" ]
                                }

                                G 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • G gonzalonal

                                  @Gustafsson

                                  You are missing the opening brackets

                                  Bridge mysensors:bridge-eth:gateway [ ipAddress="192.168.254.228", tcpPort=5003, sendDelay=200 ] {
                                  door frontDoor [ nodeId="102", childId="4" ]
                                  }

                                  G Offline
                                  G Offline
                                  Gustafsson
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #260

                                  @gonzalonal sorry, I missed it when I pasted in my code here, so there is in fact a { in my code. Any other ideas?

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • FutureCowF Offline
                                    FutureCowF Offline
                                    FutureCow
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #261

                                    I have a problem with adding one of my nodes.
                                    My temp en hum nodes are working perfectly, but i try to add a Light Level node. The sensor is sending the amount of Lux and not the percentage:

                                    18:14:59.572 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.protocol.MySensorsReader] - 0;255;3;0;9;TSP:MSG:READ 1-1-0 s=0,c=1,t=23,pt=3,l=2,sg=0:3
                                    18:14:59.572 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.protocol.MySensorsReader] - 1;0;1;0;23;3
                                    18:14:59.574 [ERROR] [g.mysensors.protocol.MySensorsReader] - (java.lang.IllegalStateException: Could not update state, because callback is missing) on reading from serial port, message: class org.openhab.binding.mysensors.protocol.serial.MySensorsSerialReader
                                    

                                    It is using CHILD_ID_LIGHT inside the skechts. Is this light level node supported?

                                    T 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • FutureCowF FutureCow

                                      I have a problem with adding one of my nodes.
                                      My temp en hum nodes are working perfectly, but i try to add a Light Level node. The sensor is sending the amount of Lux and not the percentage:

                                      18:14:59.572 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.protocol.MySensorsReader] - 0;255;3;0;9;TSP:MSG:READ 1-1-0 s=0,c=1,t=23,pt=3,l=2,sg=0:3
                                      18:14:59.572 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.protocol.MySensorsReader] - 1;0;1;0;23;3
                                      18:14:59.574 [ERROR] [g.mysensors.protocol.MySensorsReader] - (java.lang.IllegalStateException: Could not update state, because callback is missing) on reading from serial port, message: class org.openhab.binding.mysensors.protocol.serial.MySensorsSerialReader
                                      

                                      It is using CHILD_ID_LIGHT inside the skechts. Is this light level node supported?

                                      T Offline
                                      T Offline
                                      TimO
                                      Hero Member
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #262

                                      @FutureCow said:

                                      18:14:59.572 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.protocol.MySensorsReader] - 1;0;1;0;23;3
                                      

                                      According to this: https://www.mysensors.org/download/serial_api_20

                                      V_LIGHT_LEVEL	23	Uncalibrated light level. 0-100%. Use V_LEVEL for light level in lux.	S_LIGHT_LEVEL
                                      V_LEVEL	37	Used for sending level-value	S_DUST, S_AIR_QUALITY, S_SOUND (dB), S_VIBRATION (hz), S_LIGHT_LEVEL (lux)
                                      

                                      Your node should send "1;0;1;0;37;3 if I'm not mistaken.

                                      The light level message is supported by the binding.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • T Offline
                                        T Offline
                                        TimO
                                        Hero Member
                                        wrote on last edited by TimO
                                        #263

                                        Small update to the progress:

                                        1. Expert mode: I've added a special thing that will allow rule based parsing and sending of MySensors messages. If the binding is limiting your creativity you are now free to go. ;-) You are now able to combine/adapt rules like in this Thread with the easy process of thing/item/sensor configuration. I've added a description to the Wiki. This may solve some problems mentioned above with sensors requesting information like pulse count.

                                        2. Last week the OH2 core team has released beta4 of OH2. I've tested the binding against the current beta and it is working fine.

                                        3. I've created a PR against the official openhab2-addons repository. I'm now awaiting feedback and hope to introduce the MySensors binding as part of OH2.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        1
                                        • hekH Offline
                                          hekH Offline
                                          hek
                                          Admin
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #264

                                          Great job @Timo!

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          16

                                          Online

                                          11.7k

                                          Users

                                          11.2k

                                          Topics

                                          113.0k

                                          Posts


                                          Copyright 2019 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • MySensors
                                          • OpenHardware.io
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular