The error says "Invalid Home". Please check the home page setting a little higher up on the settings page.

@mfalkvidd, I took the liberty to move the forked discussion from "OpenHardware" to the "Hardware" category.

Yes, as long as you distribute the source code for your device.

But the Swedish tax authority wants their taxes (even for a hobby income)

Hi @kalina,

Yeah, thought about it. Would have been fun to do something like this together with the manufacturers. e.g. They offer a price of board X assembled if we reach 100/1000/10000 orders.

What stopped me was the payment fees and hassle of handling/holding peoples money during the kickstarter period. A lot could go wrong... and as a hobbyist project, I don't have the resources to make any losses when things fail (people withdrawing etc.) or handle customer support.

I've found something similar on the market though, https://www.crowdsupply.com/, maybe you could check it out.

Yes, selling boards (none commercially) is ok.

@mfalkvidd
Sorry, can't find any way of setting default options this this for the Solr forum plugin.

Sure!

henrik.ekblad@mysensors.org

.. and any updates you want to see in the text as well.

Yes, maybe we could add a more prominent link in the article to the auto generated documentation. Right now the link easily missed in the ingress.... and it does not link directly to the overview documentation here:
https://www.mysensors.org/apidocs/group__MySigninggrpPub.html

I don't think we should scrap the page entirely as it contains the none API technical parts as a good overview.

The documentation at the time of the created revision is actually included in the zip as README.md (markdown).
You should be able to view the file properly formatted in an md-editor or online using I.e.. https://dillinger.io/

Uploaded images was never included in the revision dumps unfortunately.

Hmm.. That's exceptionally strange. I haven't heard of any other project losing uploaded files.

Have you seen anything similar in any of your other projects? Sure you really published them a year back?