Skip to content
  • MySensors
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Announcements
  3. 2.0 Discussion: Units, sensor types and protocol

2.0 Discussion: Units, sensor types and protocol

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Announcements
170 Posts 23 Posters 83.8k Views 7 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    marceloaqno
    Code Contributor
    wrote on last edited by
    #161

    There is a solution for multi-gateway that I'm working to port it to the development branch which could use the same radio channel and also to have sensors at gateway node.

    axillentA 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • M marceloaqno

      There is a solution for multi-gateway that I'm working to port it to the development branch which could use the same radio channel and also to have sensors at gateway node.

      axillentA Offline
      axillentA Offline
      axillent
      Mod
      wrote on last edited by
      #162

      @celonunes what kind of a solution it will be?
      will it be possible to route messages between nodes managed by different gateways?

      sense and drive

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • M Offline
        M Offline
        marceloaqno
        Code Contributor
        wrote on last edited by
        #163

        Gateway become normal node, with an id(1-254), like a repeater. Address 0 become like a virtual address which is used when a node wants to send a message to the controller.
        This solution will give more redundancy to the network but the same limitations apply, like the max of 254 per network.

        axillentA 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • M Offline
          M Offline
          marceloaqno
          Code Contributor
          wrote on last edited by marceloaqno
          #164

          In the case raised by @lunarok, I'm not sure it will fit.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • M marceloaqno

            Gateway become normal node, with an id(1-254), like a repeater. Address 0 become like a virtual address which is used when a node wants to send a message to the controller.
            This solution will give more redundancy to the network but the same limitations apply, like the max of 254 per network.

            axillentA Offline
            axillentA Offline
            axillent
            Mod
            wrote on last edited by
            #165

            @celonunes said:

            Gateway become normal node, with an id(1-254), like a repeater. Address 0 become like a virtual address which is used when a node wants to send a message to the controller.
            This solution will give more redundancy to the network but the same limitations apply, like the max of 254 per network.

            OK. But how this will prevent conflicts on the air between nodes connected to different gateways and having same radio channel and BASE_ADDRESS?

            sense and drive

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • M Offline
              M Offline
              marceloaqno
              Code Contributor
              wrote on last edited by
              #166

              Each node will continue to have a unique id in the network.
              The controller would have additional work to map nodes to their proper gateway, and this could make the whole idea into something impracticable depending on the controller software.

              axillentA 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • M marceloaqno

                Each node will continue to have a unique id in the network.
                The controller would have additional work to map nodes to their proper gateway, and this could make the whole idea into something impracticable depending on the controller software.

                axillentA Offline
                axillentA Offline
                axillent
                Mod
                wrote on last edited by
                #167

                @celonunes will you keep a limit 8 bit for ID?

                currently with multi-gateway setup I have N * 255 address space, where N is a number of gateways

                sense and drive

                M 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • axillentA axillent

                  @celonunes will you keep a limit 8 bit for ID?

                  currently with multi-gateway setup I have N * 255 address space, where N is a number of gateways

                  M Offline
                  M Offline
                  marceloaqno
                  Code Contributor
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #168

                  @axillent said:

                  @celonunes will you keep a limit 8 bit for ID?

                  currently with multi-gateway setup I have N * 255 address space, where N is a number of gateways

                  Yes.
                  Your solution seems interesting, do you have some published code of it?

                  axillentA 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • M marceloaqno

                    @axillent said:

                    @celonunes will you keep a limit 8 bit for ID?

                    currently with multi-gateway setup I have N * 255 address space, where N is a number of gateways

                    Yes.
                    Your solution seems interesting, do you have some published code of it?

                    axillentA Offline
                    axillentA Offline
                    axillent
                    Mod
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #169

                    @celonunes it is not my solution) it is a way of using 1.4.1 with multiple gateways

                    sense and drive

                    M 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • axillentA axillent

                      @celonunes it is not my solution) it is a way of using 1.4.1 with multiple gateways

                      M Offline
                      M Offline
                      marceloaqno
                      Code Contributor
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #170

                      @axillent said:

                      @celonunes it is not my solution) it is a way of using 1.4.1 with multiple gateways

                      I'm aware of this.

                      @lunarok your wish may become possible in future developments using MQTT

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      12

                      Online

                      11.7k

                      Users

                      11.2k

                      Topics

                      113.1k

                      Posts


                      Copyright 2025 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • MySensors
                      • OpenHardware.io
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular