Skip to content
  • MySensors
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Hardware
  3. rfm69 network issue

rfm69 network issue

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
30 Posts 5 Posters 10.2k Views 4 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • scalzS Offline
    scalzS Offline
    scalz
    Hardware Contributor
    wrote on last edited by scalz
    #14

    @alexsh1 ok. i thought you were talking about something else. So to answer, it works the same for 328p, 1284p if irq and pin is right. for st fail, perhaps the adapter..it's a lot better when soldered directly on node pcb.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • alexsh1A Offline
      alexsh1A Offline
      alexsh1
      wrote on last edited by
      #15

      @scalz Sorted. One radio on the GW is with amplification so I had to add the following to the code:

      #define MY_IS_RFM69HW
      #define MY_RF69_IRQ_PIN 2 // not sure if this line makes any difference
      

      All works perfectly now.

      1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • alexsh1A Offline
        alexsh1A Offline
        alexsh1
        wrote on last edited by alexsh1
        #16

        Anyone knows how I can change the rfm69 speed within the sketch?
        Something like MY_RF69_DATARATE or something?

        Additionally, I'd like to use encryption, but no idea where to start. This is very easy with rf69 library, but not sure how to apply in MySensors.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • alexsh1A Offline
          alexsh1A Offline
          alexsh1
          wrote on last edited by alexsh1
          #17

          This is the final product - I am @GertSanders would appreciate it
          0_1467272357082_image.jpeg

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • scalzS Offline
            scalzS Offline
            scalz
            Hardware Contributor
            wrote on last edited by
            #18

            @alexsh1 cool :) for encryption this is done at radio init. You can enable/disable it by using MY_RFM69_ENABLE_ENCRYPTION
            And for the datarate, there is no var for this. it's done by using register in radio init. I could look at adding this as I have locally updated mys with the latest rfm69 features.

            alexsh1A 2 Replies Last reply
            0
            • scalzS scalz

              @alexsh1 cool :) for encryption this is done at radio init. You can enable/disable it by using MY_RFM69_ENABLE_ENCRYPTION
              And for the datarate, there is no var for this. it's done by using register in radio init. I could look at adding this as I have locally updated mys with the latest rfm69 features.

              alexsh1A Offline
              alexsh1A Offline
              alexsh1
              wrote on last edited by
              #19

              @scalz Thanks! Encryption - but how do I define the key?

              #define ENCRYPTKEY     "sampleEncryptKey"
              

              or something.

              Looking forward to your updates on rfm69!

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • scalzS Offline
                scalzS Offline
                scalz
                Hardware Contributor
                wrote on last edited by scalz
                #20

                @alexsh1 For the encrypt key...I'm not sure how this works in mysensors. I will look into this later today ;)
                Actually, it works like this : during radio init, encryption is enabled or not depending of the above define. For the key (which is stored in eeprom) it uses EEPROM_RF_ENCRYPTION_AES_KEY_ADDRESS which is related to signing defines..you can have more info on this in MyEepromAddresses.h . you will see how it is constructed.

                alexsh1A 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • scalzS scalz

                  @alexsh1 For the encrypt key...I'm not sure how this works in mysensors. I will look into this later today ;)
                  Actually, it works like this : during radio init, encryption is enabled or not depending of the above define. For the key (which is stored in eeprom) it uses EEPROM_RF_ENCRYPTION_AES_KEY_ADDRESS which is related to signing defines..you can have more info on this in MyEepromAddresses.h . you will see how it is constructed.

                  alexsh1A Offline
                  alexsh1A Offline
                  alexsh1
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #21

                  @scalz So they key is taken from EEPROM and I cannot define it in the sketch? I think this is similar how soft signing works on non-ATSHA204A nodes - they HMAC/AES key is stored in EEPROM

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • scalzS scalz

                    @alexsh1 cool :) for encryption this is done at radio init. You can enable/disable it by using MY_RFM69_ENABLE_ENCRYPTION
                    And for the datarate, there is no var for this. it's done by using register in radio init. I could look at adding this as I have locally updated mys with the latest rfm69 features.

                    alexsh1A Offline
                    alexsh1A Offline
                    alexsh1
                    wrote on last edited by alexsh1
                    #22

                    @scalz said:

                    And for the datarate, there is no var for this. it's done by using register in radio init. I could look at adding this as I have locally updated mys with the latest rfm69 features.

                    This is not working in MySensors sketch:

                    radio.writeReg(0x03,0x0D);
                    radio.writeReg(0x04,0x05);
                    

                    Where do I set the bitrate?

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • scalzS Offline
                      scalzS Offline
                      scalz
                      Hardware Contributor
                      wrote on last edited by scalz
                      #23

                      @alexsh1 i don't know if it's possible on the fly, just for knowledge i will look later if it's possible as rfm69 already works well for me. And for longer range and as i have some devices with RFM95, i've started to port radiohead rfm95 for mysensors but not finished yet
                      So, about your question, it's done at init. in rfm69 driver, initialize(), line 52-53. you can try with some presets defined in rfm69registers.h if you want.

                      alexsh1A 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • scalzS scalz

                        @alexsh1 i don't know if it's possible on the fly, just for knowledge i will look later if it's possible as rfm69 already works well for me. And for longer range and as i have some devices with RFM95, i've started to port radiohead rfm95 for mysensors but not finished yet
                        So, about your question, it's done at init. in rfm69 driver, initialize(), line 52-53. you can try with some presets defined in rfm69registers.h if you want.

                        alexsh1A Offline
                        alexsh1A Offline
                        alexsh1
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #24

                        @scalz thanks - as I said I am new to RFM69 and have to start from scratch (looking into the driver library) so apologies for asking noobs questions.
                        I did go through the driver and I see what you mean. Unfortunately those things like bidrate are not configurable from MySensors.h

                        I'm very much interested in RFM95 though the cost of a transmitter is prohibitively expensive (£7.5 for one on aliexpress vs £0.7 for nrf24l01+). I think I'll use it for some sensors outside of the house. Where do you stand with porting?

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • J Offline
                          J Offline
                          jpaulin
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #25
                          This post is deleted!
                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • scalzS Offline
                            scalzS Offline
                            scalz
                            Hardware Contributor
                            wrote on last edited by scalz
                            #26

                            @alexsh1 : just to say i have added the possibility to set datarate ;) you're right, that could be interesting to test.
                            that will be a simple define like
                            MY_RFM69_BITRATE_CUSTOM 4800
                            where 4800 in kbits. if not defined it takes default params.
                            And here few interesting comments about the datarate : https://openenergymonitor.org/emon/node/6178

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • chrilleC chrille

                              What kind of gateway are you using? I have seen similar issues with RFM69 on ESP8266 gateways (although my RFM69 modules are 868 MHz). The issue was present with a wire as an antenne, as well as with a rubber antenna connected to a SMA connector directly to the RFM. I was able to solve the issue in several ways:

                              1. Touching the antenna on the ESP8266 side with my fingers! (obviously a very temporary solution)
                              2. Connecting a ground plane to the rubber antenna (I used the lid from a can of beans)
                              3. Connecting a dipole antenna with a 1-2 meter cable

                              The easiest way to debug this is to load the Gateway and Node sketches from https://github.com/LowPowerLab/RFM69/tree/master/Examples on your sensor board and gateway, since these sketches provides instant feedback and tests in both directions.

                              Hopefully the RFM69 driver will get better debug output at some point.

                              frenchoF Offline
                              frenchoF Offline
                              frencho
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #27

                              @chrille I'm facing similar behavior with my setup, I get the st:fail but if I touch the antenna on the gateway side, it's working fine.

                              My setup is arduino 2.0, on the same node as @alexsh1 (the @GertSanders one) with the NRF2RFM69 adapter from @tbowmo. Antenna is wire lenght of 82.2 mm for the 868Mhz rfm69HW.

                              on the gateway side I did :
                              // Enable and select radio type attached
                              //#define MY_RADIO_NRF24
                              #define MY_RADIO_RFM69

                              I added a small capacitor on the VCC-GND of the radio, and I soldered the jumper 2 to connect IRQ

                              the inclusion mode is also fully commented (I don't have inclusion button on board)

                              and the config file also #define MY_IS_RFM69HW is uncommented as well as #define MY_RADIO_RFM69

                              Any idea where my st:fail could come from ?

                              Your second life begins when you understand you only have one !

                              chrilleC 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • frenchoF frencho

                                @chrille I'm facing similar behavior with my setup, I get the st:fail but if I touch the antenna on the gateway side, it's working fine.

                                My setup is arduino 2.0, on the same node as @alexsh1 (the @GertSanders one) with the NRF2RFM69 adapter from @tbowmo. Antenna is wire lenght of 82.2 mm for the 868Mhz rfm69HW.

                                on the gateway side I did :
                                // Enable and select radio type attached
                                //#define MY_RADIO_NRF24
                                #define MY_RADIO_RFM69

                                I added a small capacitor on the VCC-GND of the radio, and I soldered the jumper 2 to connect IRQ

                                the inclusion mode is also fully commented (I don't have inclusion button on board)

                                and the config file also #define MY_IS_RFM69HW is uncommented as well as #define MY_RADIO_RFM69

                                Any idea where my st:fail could come from ?

                                chrilleC Offline
                                chrilleC Offline
                                chrille
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #28

                                @frencho said:

                                Any idea where my st:fail could come from ?

                                No, I have only seen the issue with the combination of ESP866 and RFM69. I suggest you get the RFM69 library from lowpowerlabs and load the "Node" and "Gateway" sketches from https://github.com/LowPowerLab/RFM69/tree/master/Examples/

                                The sketches will send packets in both directions and it's very easy to see packet loss and also the RSSI (signal strenght) of the traffic on both sides. This is what I used to diagnose my issue. You can install the RFM69 library directly in your libraries folder without conflicting with mysensors.

                                frenchoF 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • chrilleC chrille

                                  @frencho said:

                                  Any idea where my st:fail could come from ?

                                  No, I have only seen the issue with the combination of ESP866 and RFM69. I suggest you get the RFM69 library from lowpowerlabs and load the "Node" and "Gateway" sketches from https://github.com/LowPowerLab/RFM69/tree/master/Examples/

                                  The sketches will send packets in both directions and it's very easy to see packet loss and also the RSSI (signal strenght) of the traffic on both sides. This is what I used to diagnose my issue. You can install the RFM69 library directly in your libraries folder without conflicting with mysensors.

                                  frenchoF Offline
                                  frenchoF Offline
                                  frencho
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #29

                                  @chrille working, the antenna was the problem. I ordered some small antenna on ebay, and it s fine now ^^

                                  Your second life begins when you understand you only have one !

                                  chrilleC 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • frenchoF frencho

                                    @chrille working, the antenna was the problem. I ordered some small antenna on ebay, and it s fine now ^^

                                    chrilleC Offline
                                    chrilleC Offline
                                    chrille
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #30

                                    @frencho said:

                                    @chrille working, the antenna was the problem. I ordered some small antenna on ebay, and it s fine now ^^

                                    Glad to hear it's working now. After creating a "real" PCB for my RFM69 gateway the issue went away - and it works reliable both with an external antenna and a small rubber antenna.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    Reply
                                    • Reply as topic
                                    Log in to reply
                                    • Oldest to Newest
                                    • Newest to Oldest
                                    • Most Votes


                                    21

                                    Online

                                    11.7k

                                    Users

                                    11.2k

                                    Topics

                                    113.1k

                                    Posts


                                    Copyright 2025 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
                                    • Login

                                    • Don't have an account? Register

                                    • Login or register to search.
                                    • First post
                                      Last post
                                    0
                                    • MySensors
                                    • OpenHardware.io
                                    • Categories
                                    • Recent
                                    • Tags
                                    • Popular