💬 Building a Raspberry Pi Gateway

mfalkvidd

@Sergio-Rius see https://forum.mysensors.org/post/72145 and https://github.com/mysensors/MySensors/issues/895

Sergio Rius

@mfalkvidd That was the culprit. Thanks.
But now... seems that the radio that is using channel 76 also get connections from nodes on channel 83, and the second radio, the 83 one doesn't pick anything.

Is there a way to confirm that gw and nodes are using one channel or other during the bootup?

gohan

@Sergio-Rius try increasing the distance between channels to at least 10 or more

Sergio Rius

@gohan Done. I've just burnt the node with channel 125 and it seems to have no effect. It registers on the 76 radio.

Does the #define MY_RF24_CHANNEL 125 has to be before or after the include of mysensors.h? I have it before.

Sergio Rius

Well, I've changed the channel for the 1st radio to 83 and left the second at 125.
If I burn the testing node for ch125 it doesn't receives reply from the gw. If I then burn it on ch83, it registers and comunicates with the first radio.

So I think the second radio does not work on the Raspberry Pi. The service communicates with the controller but does nothing for the network side.
Also on the second radio:

mysgw: Client 0: 0;0;3;0;18;PING
mysgw: Client 0: 0;0;3;0;18;PING
mysgw: Client 0: 0;0;3;0;18;PING
mysgw: !TSF:SAN:FAIL
mysgw: TSM:FAIL:CNT=1
mysgw: TSM:FAIL:DIS
mysgw: TSF:TDI:TSL
mysgw: Client 0: 0;0;3;0;18;PING
mysgw: TSM:FAIL:RE-INIT
mysgw: TSM:INIT
mysgw: TSM:INIT:TSP OK
mysgw: TSM:INIT:GW MODE
mysgw: TSM:READY:ID=0,PAR=0,DIS=0
mysgw: Client 0: 0;0;3;0;18;PING
mysgw: Client 0: 0;0;3;0;18;PING

mfalkvidd

@Sergio-Rius if you shut down mysgw for the first radio and restart mysgw for the second radio, does the second radio start to work?
And do you get the same debug output? The SPI message looks bad. Maybe the two gateways are conflicting.

Sergio Rius

@mfalkvidd Nope, the service seems to have stopped the SAN errors but still no communication:

pi@domo_testing:~/MySGW_RFM $ sudo ./bin/mysgw -d
mysgw: Starting gateway...
mysgw: Protocol version - 2.2.0-beta
 __  __       ____
|  \/  |_   _/ ___|  ___ _ __  ___  ___  _ __ ___
| |\/| | | | \___ \ / _ \ `_ \/ __|/ _ \| `__/ __|
| |  | | |_| |___| |  __/ | | \__ \  _  | |  \__ \
|_|  |_|\__, |____/ \___|_| |_|___/\___/|_|  |___/
        |___/                      2.2.0-beta

mysgw: MCO:BGN:INIT CP=RNNG--Q-
mysgw: TSF:LRT:OK
mysgw: TSM:INIT
mysgw: TSF:WUR:MS=0
mysgw: TSM:INIT:TSP OK
mysgw: TSM:INIT:GW MODE
mysgw: TSM:READY:ID=0,PAR=0,DIS=0
mysgw: MCO:REG:NOT NEEDED
mysgw: Listening for connections on 0.0.0.0:5004
mysgw: MCO:BGN:STP
mysgw: MCO:BGN:INIT OK,TSP=1
mysgw: New connection from 127.0.0.1
mysgw: Client 0 connected
mysgw: Client 0: 0;0;3;0;2;
mysgw: Client 0: 0;0;3;0;2;Get Version
mysgw: Client 0: 0;0;3;0;18;PING
mysgw: Client 0: 0;0;3;0;18;PING
mysgw: Client 0: 0;0;3;0;18;PING
mysgw: Client 0: 0;0;3;0;18;PING
mysgw: Client 0: 0;0;3;0;18;PING

0 MCO:BGN:INIT NODE,CP=RNNNA--,VER=2.1.1
4 TSM:INIT
4 TSF:WUR:MS=0
12 TSM:INIT:TSP OK
14 TSF:SID:OK,ID=1
16 TSM:FPAR
51 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-255-255,s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
2060 !TSM:FPAR:NO REPLY
2062 TSM:FPAR
2099 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-255-255,s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
4106 !TSM:FPAR:NO REPLY
4108 TSM:FPAR
4145 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-255-255,s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
6152 !TSM:FPAR:NO REPLY
6154 TSM:FPAR
6191 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-255-255,s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
8198 !TSM:FPAR:FAIL
8200 TSM:FAIL:CNT=1
8202 TSM:FAIL:PDT
18206 TSM:FAIL:RE-INIT
18208 TSM:INIT
18214 TSM:INIT:TSP OK
18219 TSF:SID:OK,ID=1
18221 TSM:FPAR
18257 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-255-255,s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
20267 !TSM:FPAR:NO REPLY
20269 TSM:FPAR
20305 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-255-255,s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
22315 !TSM:FPAR:NO REPLY
22317 TSM:FPAR
22353 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-255-255,s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
24363 !TSM:FPAR:NO REPLY
24365 TSM:FPAR
24401 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-255-255,s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
26411 !TSM:FPAR:FAIL
26413 TSM:FAIL:CNT=2
26415 TSM:FAIL:PDT
36419 TSM:FAIL:RE-INIT
36421 TSM:INIT
36427 TSM:INIT:TSP OK
36431 TSF:SID:OK,ID=1
36433 TSM:FPAR
36470 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-255-255,s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
38479 !TSM:FPAR:NO REPLY
38481 TSM:FPAR
38518 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-255-255,s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
40527 !TSM:FPAR:NO REPLY
40529 TSM:FPAR
40566 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-255-255,s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
42575 !TSM:FPAR:NO REPLY
42577 TSM:FPAR
42614 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-255-255,s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
44623 !TSM:FPAR:FAIL
44625 TSM:FAIL:CNT=3

You find the pinouts I send before are right to you?

mfalkvidd

MY_* defines need to be before #include MySensors.h so you're doing the right thing.
I don't know about the pins, have never used anything but the default wiring myself. But if the pins were wrong you should get TSM:INIT:TSP FAIL instead of TSM:INIT:TSP OK.

If you reconfigure the first mysgw (the one with the default pins) to use channel 83, does communication with the node on channel 83 work?

Sergio Rius

@mfalkvidd yeah, look three posts before.
I'll try to get mosi and miso from the default pin out sharing with the first radio. Now I'm using the ones marked as 1, when the default ones are marked 0.

mfalkvidd

@Sergio-Rius I see. Sorry. Then we know the channel parameter works. Good testing.
Strange problem. It looks from the threads I linked earlier that using the second SPI does indeed work (if the pin definition fix is applied). When the first mysgw is stopped, your second mysgw should behave just as it did for Velo17 and wergeld. Can you think of any difference in your setup?

Sergio Rius

@mfalkvidd I have the impression that if I stop the first service, the second picks the first radio.
I disconnected the power from the first radio and left the second all connected and I only got TSM errors and fails. As soon as I attached power to the first NRF it worked.
Perhaps the other users only used the configurable pins (CS/CE/IRQ) on the extended bank...

Sergio Rius

That's it. It doesn't use MOSI, MISO and SCLK from the SPI1. I removed the NRF1 and only connected those tree pins of NRF2 into SPI0 and service2 works with NRF2 at channel 125.

I've tried to share those pins (MOSI, MISO, SCLK) between both radios but as soon as I connect NRF1, 2 stops communicating. Same effect than connecting NRF2 to SPI1.

What a pity... #@%&!!! :grinning:

Edit: I finally tried a more "standard" configuration. Using only the first SPI bank and also doesn't work.

Roman

Hi!
I have a problem with the pseudo port. Node-serialport (v4.0.7) on the command serialport.list produces the result of the undefined.

Rpi3 and DietPi, nodejs 4.8.4

Matt

@mfalkvidd OK have attached the logfiles below.
No clues that I can see. At 1502 the NRF goes quiet. I have tried a different pi2, different NRF (PA/LNA) and am currently running the NRF off of 5V from the PI through one of those $1.00 regulator adapter things with built in caps and such. Have also tried different PSUs including a 2A one.
Only thing I can think left to try is reducing the power output in case the high output of the radio module is inducing transients in the cables...
Am kinda stumped here. I have an arduino NRF gateway that I will try via USB if low power does not work. I have tried setting up MYSGW as LAN and USB via ./configure but the same thing happens each time.
One thought just came to me, I AM using the pin15 IRQ option on the NRF now that is still experimental?
So next time will try without IRQ and low power...

Any help/suggestions greatly appreciated.
FYI I have had domoticz running on a lubuntu netbook with USB arduino NRF gateway that has been rock solid. Am trying the get a workable PI solution though, for myself and my father in law but not workable as yet sadly...

At 15:02:34 you can see the last incoming node message after that the only MYSGW activity is the PING thing... which seems to happen every 10S or so. This goes on for an hour after that with no more incomings. I have ~12 sensors around the place including a power meter one which reports every minute.

15:02:29 raspberrypi dhcpcd[734]: wlan0: Router Advertisement from fe80::260:64ff:fed7:f613
Aug  5 15:02:33 raspberrypi mysgw: TSF:MSG:READ,23-23-0,s=1,c=1,t=0,pt=7,l=5,sg=0:18.0
Aug  5 15:02:33 raspberrypi mysgw: TSF:MSG:READ,23-23-0,s=0,c=1,t=1,pt=7,l=5,sg=0:21.0
Aug  5 15:02:34 raspberrypi mysgw: TSF:MSG:READ,23-23-0,s=255,c=3,t=0,pt=1,l=1,sg=0:68
Aug  5 15:02:34 raspberrypi dhcpcd[734]: wlan0: Router Advertisement from fe80::260:64ff:fed7:f613
Aug  5 15:02:36 raspberrypi mysgw: Client 0: 0;0;3;0;18;PING
Aug  5 15:02:37 raspberrypi mysgw: TSF:MSG:READ,41-7-0,s=0,c=1,t=0,pt=7,l=5,sg=0:11.6
Aug  5 15:02:41 raspberrypi dhcpcd[734]: wlan0: Router Advertisement from fe80::260:64ff:fed7:f613
Aug  5 15:02:46 raspberrypi mysgw: Client 0: 0;0;3;0;18;PING
Aug  5 15:02:50 raspberrypi dhcpcd[734]: wlan0: Router Advertisement from fe80::260:64ff:fed7:f613
Aug  5 15:02:56 raspberrypi mysgw: Client 0: 0;0;3;0;18;PING
Aug  5 15:02:57 raspberrypi dhcpcd[734]: wlan0: Router Advertisement from fe80::260:64ff:fed7:f613
Aug  5 15:03:06 raspberrypi dhcpcd[734]: wlan0: Router Advertisement from fe80::260:64ff:fed7:f613
Aug  5 15:03:06 raspberrypi mysgw: Client 0: 0;0;3;0;18;PING
Aug  5 15:03:13 raspberrypi dhcpcd[734]: wlan0: Router Advertisement from fe80::260:64ff:fed7:f613
Aug  5 15:03:16 raspberrypi mysgw: Client 0: 0;0;3;0;18;PING

Also FWIW to log from domoticz below. Ignore FANFLAG thats just a blockly flag I use...

2017-08-05 15:01:18.936 (GW) General/Voltage (FanIntakeV)
2017-08-05 15:02:04.935 (GW) General/kWh (Meter)
2017-08-05 15:02:33.940 (GW) Temp + Humidity (Mitch2)
2017-08-05 15:02:33.945 (GW) Temp + Humidity (Mitch2)
2017-08-05 15:02:37.941 (GW) Temp (MBR Fan)
2017-08-05 15:50:02.678 Set UserVariable FanFlag = 1
2017-08-05 15:51:02.693 Set UserVariable FanFlag = 1
2017-08-05 15:52:02.703 Set UserVariable FanFlag = 1
2017-08-05 15:53:02.710 Set UserVariable FanFlag = 1
2017-08-05 15:54:00.037 Set UserVariable FanFlag = 1

Thanks,
Matt

mfalkvidd

@Matt I agree that power is the most likely cause. The nrf24 is very sensitive.

Before you recompile, add --extra-cxxflags=-DMY_DEBUG_VERBOSE_RF24 to the configure command and you'll get extra details on the radio status in the gateway's debug log.

Matt

@mfalkvidd Thankyou. Stable for now. Not sure if they are even genuine modules so... Can reach outside to my glasshouse even on low power setting.
If it starts playing up again I'll add verbose logging and have another look.

Oliviakrk

Anyone having issues with compilation of latest stable?

Looks like missing libraries... fatal error: SPI.h: No such file or directory

niehoff80

Yesterday I've tried compiling it also (first time for me) and I had same error.

mfalkvidd

@niehoff80 and/or @Oliviakrk can you run

sudo raspi-config

(install it using sudo apt-get install raspi-config if it isn't already installed)
Select

8 Advanced Options

and

A6 SPI

and

Yes

to all questions. Reboot the raspberry pi and try running make again. If that works I'll add it to the documentation.

niehoff80

@mfalkvidd

I was able to compile it after doing what you're suggesting. It's still have error message during communication with the gateway but that is probably a noobs-error in my config. so I have to investigate a bit more.

💬 Building a Raspberry Pi Gateway

17

11.7k

11.2k

113.0k