Node's becoming unreachable
-
I don't have a good experience with the shielded radio's. Also with these there are many variations. The shielding of the 3 (different) shielded nodes I have is grounded. Which is what it should be.
Much has been written about it on this forum I.e -
I think I have to replace the shed-node. This Arduino Mega just stops in its loops and last night it just hangs. No more fast blinking led.
Will convert it to a Nano but have to figure out how because of the many childs. -
Ok! So I found some issues but not fixed completely...
What I found out is that my Shed node is sending through my attic-node. Why? I dont know but parent was 1 and distance 2.
After a Clear EEPROM on the Shed-node and disconnected the Attic-node, re'-uploaded the original sketch and voila a few Find parents and Fails but then I saw 4-4-0-0 instead of 4-4-1-0.
So that was one problem fixed. The attic-node was not isolated with foil so now most of the time the Shed-node is sending OK and not so many Fails.
I've ordered a new type of radio with a shield and a external antenna as some may know from the comparison video of the NRF24's on youtube.Is there a way to make the parent (0) static to prevent node's from seeking and broadcasting?
So that I can force my Shed-node to always contact the parent 0 instead of roaming towards the strongest link.
I know that I can redirect node's to use a specific repeater node but not a parent node.So far this update. When the kids are not in sleeping I will check their node's to find out if there is something wrong.
Keep you all posted!
@Sander-Stolk said:
Is there a way to make the parent (0) static to prevent node's from seeking and broadcasting?
#define MY_PARENT_NODE_ID 0(For 2.0.0) -
I don't have a good experience with the shielded radio's. Also with these there are many variations. The shielding of the 3 (different) shielded nodes I have is grounded. Which is what it should be.
Much has been written about it on this forum I.e@AWI ok, I guess you are right. I will do some more tests with grounded foil.
Actually I have some really nice and thick Al metal. I could use it to build some better permanent shielding of the module.
Actually I would like to give my repeater a metal enclosure. But it is built in a way that inside its case the 220 V are converted to 5 V. So I prefer the plastic case. I am too afraid that by some stupid failure there are 220 V on the case and somebody touching it. Hm, so maybe I should rebuilt the repeater with an external 5 V supply and a metal case.
I am totally sick of these NRFs that all perform differently. 😉
-
@AWI ok, I guess you are right. I will do some more tests with grounded foil.
Actually I have some really nice and thick Al metal. I could use it to build some better permanent shielding of the module.
Actually I would like to give my repeater a metal enclosure. But it is built in a way that inside its case the 220 V are converted to 5 V. So I prefer the plastic case. I am too afraid that by some stupid failure there are 220 V on the case and somebody touching it. Hm, so maybe I should rebuilt the repeater with an external 5 V supply and a metal case.
I am totally sick of these NRFs that all perform differently. 😉
@karl261 said:
I am totally sick of these NRFs that all perform differently. 😉
Same here! So I radically solved my problems with connectivity by moving to rfm69 radios. It took some time and effort to make 'adaptor' pcbs to connect rfm's to my existing nodes, especially for 5v nodes, as rfm's are not 5v tolerant and require voltage level converter. I don't have comprehensive statistics for now (finished switching only a few days ago), but even first tests gave stable communication range far beyond that I ever saw with nrf's
