[newbie] Using nRF24L0 (2,4Ghz) or RFM69 (433Mhz)?



  • Hi!

    I'm just starting with Arduino and was hoping to build some own sensors to use with my smart home-system.

    I am using a Vera Edge with an additional RFXtrx433 transceiver (for 433Mhz devices like temperature sensors and Nexa light switches).

    If I want to start building MySensors, it seems I would have to build a serial gateway using a Nano. The gateway seems to keep in touch with the DIY sensors using 2,4Ghz (using nRF24L0+ radio modules).

    However, the instructions it also mentions a different radio, RFM69, that transmit on 433Mhz.

    My two questions:

    1. Are there any pros and cons using nRF24L0 (2,4Ghz) or RFM69 (433Mhz)?

    2. Can I build sensors using the RFM69 (433Mhz) that my RFXtrx433 transceiver can work with? If yes, do I then need a serial gateway?


  • Mod

    @Aron-Sjöberg welcome to the MySensors community!

    1. Nrf is cheaper. 433 generally has better range.
    2. You might be able to, but you wouldn't be able to use MySensors


  • Thanks mfalkvidd!

    RFM69 seems the way to go. I'm living in the countryside so distance is a issue...

    I ordered some $100 worth of components. If nothing else it will be a fun learning experience. I have also ordered a Z-Uno, so it will be fun to compare the two approaches communicating with Vera.



  • +1 for RFM(433Mhz)
    I´m already running NRF and keeping it (have build many nodes on it). But, for example I have a garage (steel structure with sheet-metal paneling) and its ca.6 meters from NRF gateway - no signal! Same distance RFlink (433Mhz) works just fine.


Log in to reply
 

303
Online

6.7k
Users

7.6k
Topics

80.5k
Posts

Looks like your connection to MySensors Forum was lost, please wait while we try to reconnect.