Skip to content
  • MySensors
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Controllers
  3. OpenHAB
  4. openHAB 2.2 binding

openHAB 2.2 binding

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved OpenHAB
132 Posts 32 Posters 58.2k Views 34 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • andreacioniA Offline
    andreacioniA Offline
    andreacioni
    wrote on last edited by
    #40

    @philro @nofox
    We are discussing this issue on GitHub. Probably we have found the problem and a possible, temporary, solution. If you can try it it would be useful, thanks! :blush:

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
    • L Offline
      L Offline
      LastSamurai
      Hardware Contributor
      wrote on last edited by
      #41

      I have added 2 more issues in github. Most importantly there seems to be an issue with ACK right now. So if you have enabled acknowledgment on one of your things and sometimes see no reactions from your leds (or whatever you are using) try disabling ACK. I helped in my case.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • K Offline
        K Offline
        krejcarek
        wrote on last edited by
        #42

        Hello,
        Not sure if it is related to the above mentioned ACK issue... I have some distanced actuators, and was heavily relying on the repeated message send if no ACK. I habe the impression with this upgrade, it does not work as before. Can it be the case?

        L 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • K krejcarek

          Hello,
          Not sure if it is related to the above mentioned ACK issue... I have some distanced actuators, and was heavily relying on the repeated message send if no ACK. I habe the impression with this upgrade, it does not work as before. Can it be the case?

          L Offline
          L Offline
          LastSamurai
          Hardware Contributor
          wrote on last edited by
          #43

          @krejcarek I haven't heard anything from @TimO recently but have you tried it without ACK enabled? In my case the rate of success increased visibly. There are still some cases where the message doesn't get send successfully though, so I am still waiting for the working ACK feature ;)

          T 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • L LastSamurai

            @krejcarek I haven't heard anything from @TimO recently but have you tried it without ACK enabled? In my case the rate of success increased visibly. There are still some cases where the message doesn't get send successfully though, so I am still waiting for the working ACK feature ;)

            T Offline
            T Offline
            TimO
            Hero Member
            wrote on last edited by
            #44

            @LastSamurai I haven't found the time to look at the issues lately, I'm sorry. :-/
            I'm on vacation for the next 10 days and will continue my work after after that. :)

            1 Reply Last reply
            1
            • F Offline
              F Offline
              Fabien
              wrote on last edited by
              #45

              @TimO enjoy your holidays ;)

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • gahlawathomeG Offline
                gahlawathomeG Offline
                gahlawathome
                wrote on last edited by
                #46

                Hi TimO, I am interested in Mqtt version of binding as I like the flexibility of my system with Mqtt. I see that Sean has already a PR open for this quite some time and I do not see any reason why his changes would break things. Any idea when can we expect this to be merged. Also I have just started getting involved in things and although don't have much time but will try to contribute around this area.

                T 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • gahlawathomeG gahlawathome

                  Hi TimO, I am interested in Mqtt version of binding as I like the flexibility of my system with Mqtt. I see that Sean has already a PR open for this quite some time and I do not see any reason why his changes would break things. Any idea when can we expect this to be merged. Also I have just started getting involved in things and although don't have much time but will try to contribute around this area.

                  T Offline
                  T Offline
                  TimO
                  Hero Member
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #47

                  Hi @gahlawathome !

                  The code for the MQTT support is only working within the development environment. If I try to compile a jar, there is a dependency problem which I was not yet able to solve. There is MQTT support in ESH and in OpenHAB. The MQTT binding needs the one from Openhab because it is still based on Openhab 1. The MQTT support in the binding needs to be based on ESH, but you can't fulfill both dependencies because only one library at a time is allowed.

                  I need to check if there has been some development on a MQTT 2.x binding, that would solve the problem.

                  gahlawathomeG 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • T TimO

                    Hi @gahlawathome !

                    The code for the MQTT support is only working within the development environment. If I try to compile a jar, there is a dependency problem which I was not yet able to solve. There is MQTT support in ESH and in OpenHAB. The MQTT binding needs the one from Openhab because it is still based on Openhab 1. The MQTT support in the binding needs to be based on ESH, but you can't fulfill both dependencies because only one library at a time is allowed.

                    I need to check if there has been some development on a MQTT 2.x binding, that would solve the problem.

                    gahlawathomeG Offline
                    gahlawathomeG Offline
                    gahlawathome
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #48

                    @TimO Thank you very much for a very clear explanation. I will also search around MQTT 2.x on OpenHAB and post here if I find something relevant.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • L Offline
                      L Offline
                      LastSamurai
                      Hardware Contributor
                      wrote on last edited by LastSamurai
                      #49

                      @TimO Hope you had a nice vacation!
                      Is there already some new version of the binding to test?

                      I was on vacation too lately and when I powered my openhab system back on I got lots of problems with my gateway and sensor connections. First I got a never ending circle of failing startup checks (although I could already switch lights). After I disabled the check it seemed to work. But when restarting a sensor node (that did not send any values after the controller restart) I got this error:

                      16:55:54.552 [DEBUG] [rsAbstractConnection$MySensorsReader] - Message from gateway received: 0;255;3;0;9;159004 Skipping security for command 3 type 16
                      16:55:54.604 [DEBUG] [rsAbstractConnection$MySensorsReader] - Message from gateway received: 0;255;3;0;9;159011 TSF:MSG:SEND,0-0-1-1,s=255,c=3,t=16,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
                      16:55:54.747 [WARN ] [rsAbstractConnection$MySensorsReader] - Exception on reading from connection
                      java.io.IOException: Underlying input stream returned zero bytes
                              at sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.readBytes(StreamDecoder.java:288)[:1.8.0_144]
                              at sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.implRead(StreamDecoder.java:326)[:1.8.0_144]
                              at sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.read(StreamDecoder.java:178)[:1.8.0_144]
                              at java.io.InputStreamReader.read(InputStreamReader.java:184)[:1.8.0_144]
                              at java.io.BufferedReader.fill(BufferedReader.java:161)[:1.8.0_144]
                              at java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:324)[:1.8.0_144]
                              at java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:389)[:1.8.0_144]
                              at org.openhab.binding.mysensors.internal.protocol.MySensorsAbstractConnection$MySensorsReader.run(MySensorsAbstractConnection.java:335)[205:org.openhab.binding.mysensors:2.2.0.201707241115]
                              at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511)[:1.8.0_144]
                              at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)[:1.8.0_144]
                              at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)[:1.8.0_144]
                              at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)[:1.8.0_144]
                              at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)[:1.8.0_144]
                      

                      Any idea why or how to fix this? Everything was working fine before

                      PS I also just got another error while switching a light (the light still worked though):

                      
                      17:08:31.549 [WARN ] [rsAbstractConnection$MySensorsReader] - Exception on reading from connection
                      java.text.ParseException: class java.text.ParseException : Message length is not > 4
                              at org.openhab.binding.mysensors.internal.protocol.message.MySensorsMessage.parse(MySensorsMessage.java:337)[205:org.openhab.binding.mysensors:2.2.0.201707241115]
                              at org.openhab.binding.mysensors.internal.protocol.MySensorsAbstractConnection$MySensorsReader.run(MySensorsAbstractConnection.java:345)[205:org.openhab.binding.mysensors:2.2.0.201707241115]
                              at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511)[:1.8.0_144]
                              at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)[:1.8.0_144]
                              at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)[:1.8.0_144]
                              at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)[:1.8.0_144]
                              at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)[:1.8.0_144]
                      17:08:31.678 [WARN ] [rsAbstractConnection$MySensorsReader] - Exception on reading from connection
                      java.io.IOException: Underlying input stream returned zero bytes
                              at sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.readBytes(StreamDecoder.java:288)[:1.8.0_144]
                              at sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.implRead(StreamDecoder.java:326)[:1.8.0_144]
                              at sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.read(StreamDecoder.java:178)[:1.8.0_144]
                              at java.io.InputStreamReader.read(InputStreamReader.java:184)[:1.8.0_144]
                              at java.io.BufferedReader.fill(BufferedReader.java:161)[:1.8.0_144]
                              at java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:324)[:1.8.0_144]
                              at java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:389)[:1.8.0_144]
                              at org.openhab.binding.mysensors.internal.protocol.MySensorsAbstractConnection$MySensorsReader.run(MySensorsAbstractConnection.java:335)[205:org.openhab.binding.mysensors:2.2.0.201707241115]
                              at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511)[:1.8.0_144]
                              at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)[:1.8.0_144]
                              at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)[:1.8.0_144]
                              at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)[:1.8.0_144]
                              at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)[:1.8.0_144]
                      
                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • L Offline
                        L Offline
                        LastSamurai
                        Hardware Contributor
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #50

                        Ok I reflashed the gateway and it's gotten a little better. Still have some errors though.

                        T 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • L LastSamurai

                          Ok I reflashed the gateway and it's gotten a little better. Still have some errors though.

                          T Offline
                          T Offline
                          TimO
                          Hero Member
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #51

                          Hi @LastSamurai !

                          You've debug enabled on the gateway, have you? Looks like the binding does not like the (debug) output from the gateway.
                          But the binding should recover just fine from the exception, only the (debug) message that has lead to this exception won't be parsed.

                          L 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • T TimO

                            Hi @LastSamurai !

                            You've debug enabled on the gateway, have you? Looks like the binding does not like the (debug) output from the gateway.
                            But the binding should recover just fine from the exception, only the (debug) message that has lead to this exception won't be parsed.

                            L Offline
                            L Offline
                            LastSamurai
                            Hardware Contributor
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #52

                            Wow, you are right of course. Debugging is indeed enabled... but than I can just ignore the errors, thank you.
                            @TimO said in openHAB 2.2 binding:

                            Hi @LastSamurai !

                            You've debug enabled on the gateway, have you? Looks like the binding does not like the (debug) output from the gateway.
                            But the binding should recover just fine from the exception, only the (debug) message that has lead to this exception won't be parsed.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • L Offline
                              L Offline
                              LastSamurai
                              Hardware Contributor
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #53

                              So I disabled debug output on the gateway to avoid the error messages but I still have problems with my setup. I used to have a motion sensor that worked with openhab. Now when the sensor sends a motion event to the gateway nothing happens in openhab.

                              Part of the log of the motion sensor:

                              6236 TSF:MSG:SEND,11-11-0-0,s=1,c=1,t=16,pt=1,l=1,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:1
                              6307 MCO:SLP:MS=30000,SMS=0,I1=255,M1=255,I2=255,M2=255
                              6367 TSF:TDI:TSL
                              6385 MCO:SLP:WUP=-1
                              6406 TSF:TRI:TSB
                              6424 MCO:SLP:MS=86400000,SMS=0,I1=1,M1=1,I2=255,M2=255
                              6481 TSF:TDI:TSL
                              6500 MCO:SLP:WUP=1
                              6520 TSF:TRI:TSB
                              6541 TSF:MSG:SEND,11-11-0-0,s=1,c=1,t=16,pt=1,l=1,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:1
                              6612 MCO:SLP:MS=30000,SMS=0,I1=255,M1=255,I2=255,M2=255
                              6670 TSF:TDI:TSL
                              

                              So it seems like the message gets send succesfully but on the openhab log I see no mentioning of that (although I enable debug output for mysensors and I can switch on/off some led nodes). Any ideas why? I really want to get this working again.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • L Offline
                                L Offline
                                LastSamurai
                                Hardware Contributor
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #54

                                Sorry for bothering you guys, I figured out the problem: I have installed domoticz on the same raspberry and after a restart I forgot to turn it off. So all the missing data was "hidden" away by domoticz instead of openhab.

                                T 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • L LastSamurai

                                  Sorry for bothering you guys, I figured out the problem: I have installed domoticz on the same raspberry and after a restart I forgot to turn it off. So all the missing data was "hidden" away by domoticz instead of openhab.

                                  T Offline
                                  T Offline
                                  TimO
                                  Hero Member
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #55

                                  @LastSamurai :smile:
                                  I'm glad you've found the problem, I was out of ideas. ;-)

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • L Offline
                                    L Offline
                                    LastSamurai
                                    Hardware Contributor
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #56

                                    The problem is that the motion sensor still doesn't show up at the gateway although it gets an answer from it. I disabled domoticz though so I need to find another reason ;( Earlier it showed up in domoticz ... strange. I will try to change the id and see if OH picks it up then.
                                    Btw @TimO Any idea yet when you will be able to work on the github issues I posted?

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • G Offline
                                      G Offline
                                      gonzalonal
                                      wrote on last edited by gonzalonal
                                      #57

                                      Hi @TimO and @andreacioni.
                                      Back in the day link we discussed about request type of messages being supported by the binding and the complex scenario it created.
                                      Are there any plans to continue developing this feature?

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • T Offline
                                        T Offline
                                        TimO
                                        Hero Member
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #58

                                        @LastSamurai I can't say when I'm able to solve those issues.

                                        According the ACK problem I need to enable ACK support in my network at home, which was something I already wanted to do a long time ago but haven't found the time yet.

                                        The RGBW is a tough nut for me. I don't have a RGBW node to test with and the conversion HSB <=> RGBW is driving me crazy. The algorithm for the conversion can be found here: https://github.com/tobof/openhab2-addons/blob/MySensors_Binding/addons/binding/org.openhab.binding.mysensors/src/main/java/org/openhab/binding/mysensors/converter/MySensorsRGBWTypeConverter.java

                                        @gonzalonal May I ask you to add an issue on github? This would allow me track those enhancement requests. Thank you!

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        1
                                        • G Offline
                                          G Offline
                                          gonzalonal
                                          wrote on last edited by gonzalonal
                                          #59

                                          Yes, sure. I'll do that to keep track.

                                          By the way, I have RGBW led strip and I am using it with mysensors with no issues. Would you mind telling me what's wrong so I can recreate the scenario?

                                          L 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          15

                                          Online

                                          11.7k

                                          Users

                                          11.2k

                                          Topics

                                          113.0k

                                          Posts


                                          Copyright 2019 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • MySensors
                                          • OpenHardware.io
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular