Skip to content
  • MySensors
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Controllers
  3. OpenHAB
  4. Ethernet GW vs MQTT

Ethernet GW vs MQTT

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved OpenHAB
10 Posts 8 Posters 3.3k Views 6 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • SoloamS Offline
    SoloamS Offline
    Soloam
    Hardware Contributor
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Hello all, from your point of view whats is the best approach? To use OpenHab2.2 with a MySensors MQTT GW or a Ethernet GW? And way?

    Currently I have my system working with MQTT, but I'm considering switching to Ethernet, one less layer to go wrong (The MQTT Broker) and the ability to use the Biding with OpenHab and FOTA with Myscontroller.

    ร 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • gohanG Offline
      gohanG Offline
      gohan
      Mod
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Ethernet for ease of use and configuration, it works with myscontroller.

      MQTT for better security, you can still use FOTA with MyController, once data is published to MQTT you can do lot's of things.

      X 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • gohanG gohan

        Ethernet for ease of use and configuration, it works with myscontroller.

        MQTT for better security, you can still use FOTA with MyController, once data is published to MQTT you can do lot's of things.

        X Offline
        X Offline
        xefil
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        @gohan said in Ethernet GW vs MQTT:

        Ethernet for ease of use and configuration, it works with myscontroller.

        MQTT for better security, you can still use FOTA with MyController, once data is published to MQTT you can do lot's of things.

        Hello (again ;-) )
        Why is MQTT better for security?

        Thanks,

        simon

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • gohanG Offline
          gohanG Offline
          gohan
          Mod
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          First you can set username and password, second the gateway is connecting to a broker while ethernet is accepting incoming connections in clear text and no security of any kind ; also if you are accepting connections it is more likely to have a security risk than only outgoing connections

          X 1 Reply Last reply
          2
          • gohanG gohan

            First you can set username and password, second the gateway is connecting to a broker while ethernet is accepting incoming connections in clear text and no security of any kind ; also if you are accepting connections it is more likely to have a security risk than only outgoing connections

            X Offline
            X Offline
            xefil
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            @gohan said in Ethernet GW vs MQTT:

            First you can set username and password, second the gateway is connecting to a broker while ethernet is accepting incoming connections in clear text and no security of any kind ; also if you are accepting connections it is more likely to have a security risk than only outgoing connections

            Thanks!

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • D Offline
              D Offline
              diogoc
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              It is possible to have both of them in a ESP8266 gateway?
              I want to use MQTT to control the nodes but I need too the ethernet to update FOTA nodes with Myscontroller.

              rozpruwaczR 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • D diogoc

                It is possible to have both of them in a ESP8266 gateway?
                I want to use MQTT to control the nodes but I need too the ethernet to update FOTA nodes with Myscontroller.

                rozpruwaczR Offline
                rozpruwaczR Offline
                rozpruwacz
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                @diogoc AFAIK no. I'm using mqtt with MyController (not Myscontroller) and it works great.

                1 Reply Last reply
                1
                • SoloamS Soloam

                  Hello all, from your point of view whats is the best approach? To use OpenHab2.2 with a MySensors MQTT GW or a Ethernet GW? And way?

                  Currently I have my system working with MQTT, but I'm considering switching to Ethernet, one less layer to go wrong (The MQTT Broker) and the ability to use the Biding with OpenHab and FOTA with Myscontroller.

                  ร Offline
                  ร Offline
                  รอเรือ
                  wrote on last edited by รอเรือ
                  #8

                  @soloam said in Ethernet GW vs MQTT:

                  MySensors MQTT GW

                  I would vote for MQTT serial gateway but there is no option for that. That's what I use for openHAB 2.3. Works like a charm. I'm not dependent of any special MySensors binding for openHAB. MQTT is the way to go! Serial binding is for people who doesn't like to spend time debugging hardware issues.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • G Offline
                    G Offline
                    Guillermo Schimmel
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    MQTT is the way to go. No special mysensors binding, pure old mqtt.

                    Easy to troubleshoot and diagnostic, compatible, etc.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • alowhumA Offline
                      alowhumA Offline
                      alowhum
                      Plugin Developer
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      Actually, in my experience plain old MQTT is difficult to connect to. There is a Git issue to create (also) an MQTT output that is simplified or follows standards.

                      https://github.com/mysensors/MySensors/issues/1212

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      31

                      Online

                      11.7k

                      Users

                      11.2k

                      Topics

                      113.1k

                      Posts


                      Copyright 2025 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • MySensors
                      • OpenHardware.io
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular