Skip to content
  • MySensors
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Development
  3. Are we initializing the nRF24L01+ correctly?

Are we initializing the nRF24L01+ correctly?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Development
16 Posts 8 Posters 9.5k Views 11 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    drock1985
    wrote on last edited by
    #5

    Hmm... that's funny. I get the occasional fail on a particular motion sensor node/MQTT broker gateway I have as well. In my case, when I want to see the serial output of the MQTT broker that is connected to my Pi, I will picocom in with SSH and view the output, which resets the gateway. When that happens, I get the occasional fail message and have to unplug the Gateway to get it to read right again.

    Same thing goes with a motion sensor node I have. If watching the output via Serial in Arduino IDE, and I close/open the console window a few times, I can get the fail message to come up on startup. Again, unplug and full power down brings it back. The reset switch on the Arduino itself has never been dependable to fix it.

    My Projects
    2 Door Chime Sensor
    Washing Machine Monitor

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • stevebusS Offline
      stevebusS Offline
      stevebus
      wrote on last edited by
      #6

      Have you guys been able to investigate a fix for this further? If you are looking for a Guinea Pig, I currently have two separate radios in this state. they both worked perfectly and then, sometime after a few hardware resets of the attached Arduino mini pro, they just stopped initializing ('radio init failed'). Would love to recover them if possible.

      Vera Edge/UI7; mysensors; Arduino's and RPIs; data posted to Azure for an IoT 'dashboard' of my house

      Opinions expressed here are my own and do not necessarily reflect Microsoft's feelings on a given topic :-)

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • tekkaT Offline
        tekkaT Offline
        tekka
        Admin
        wrote on last edited by tekka
        #7

        @stevebus I'm doing a major RF24 lib refactoring to fully meet the nRF24L01+ specs.
        Please feel free to test it, feedbacks are appreciated.

        YveauxY 1 Reply Last reply
        4
        • tekkaT tekka

          @stevebus I'm doing a major RF24 lib refactoring to fully meet the nRF24L01+ specs.
          Please feel free to test it, feedbacks are appreciated.

          YveauxY Offline
          YveauxY Offline
          Yveaux
          Mod
          wrote on last edited by Yveaux
          #8

          @tekka Good effort!
          I see you also start by setting PWR_UP flag to 0, as I suggested in this topic.
          I scanned your implementation and biggest changes compared to the current implementation (apart from the refactoring) are in the initialization code, correct?

          http://yveaux.blogspot.nl

          tekkaT 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • YveauxY Yveaux

            @tekka Good effort!
            I see you also start by setting PWR_UP flag to 0, as I suggested in this topic.
            I scanned your implementation and biggest changes compared to the current implementation (apart from the refactoring) are in the initialization code, correct?

            tekkaT Offline
            tekkaT Offline
            tekka
            Admin
            wrote on last edited by tekka
            #9

            @Yveaux The current implementation does not initialize all registers properly, or modifies single bits (thus, the possibility of undefined conditions). The major changes are not necessarily in the init code, but rather in the pipe handling (all active RX pipes have now unique addresses) and less frequent register reading/writing.
            Over all, the library is faster, optimized to the specs and uses ~2kb less flash. However, this is still WIP and a few more pending changes before PR to dev.

            1 Reply Last reply
            5
            • mfalkviddM Offline
              mfalkviddM Offline
              mfalkvidd
              Mod
              wrote on last edited by
              #10

              Awesome work @tekka !

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • stevebusS Offline
                stevebusS Offline
                stevebus
                wrote on last edited by
                #11

                Cool @tekka , I'll give it a try. Thanks for putting all the effort into it!

                Vera Edge/UI7; mysensors; Arduino's and RPIs; data posted to Azure for an IoT 'dashboard' of my house

                Opinions expressed here are my own and do not necessarily reflect Microsoft's feelings on a given topic :-)

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • stevebusS Offline
                  stevebusS Offline
                  stevebus
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #12

                  @tekka -- I downloaded the updated libraries and tried them. Still failed to initialize my "dead" radio..

                  from serial monitor:
                  Starting sensor (RNNNA-, 2.0.0-beta)
                  Radio init failed. Check wiring.

                  using MockSensor to test. Wiring is correct. It's certainly possible that the radio is truly 'dead', but I don't think so, as it was working fine before resets of the Arduino (and I have another in the same state.. and the same Arduino is currently being used in a sensor with a third radio).

                  thoughts? I know you said it was a WIP, so it could be that it's not supposed to work yet. LMK.

                  Vera Edge/UI7; mysensors; Arduino's and RPIs; data posted to Azure for an IoT 'dashboard' of my house

                  Opinions expressed here are my own and do not necessarily reflect Microsoft's feelings on a given topic :-)

                  tekkaT 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • stevebusS stevebus

                    @tekka -- I downloaded the updated libraries and tried them. Still failed to initialize my "dead" radio..

                    from serial monitor:
                    Starting sensor (RNNNA-, 2.0.0-beta)
                    Radio init failed. Check wiring.

                    using MockSensor to test. Wiring is correct. It's certainly possible that the radio is truly 'dead', but I don't think so, as it was working fine before resets of the Arduino (and I have another in the same state.. and the same Arduino is currently being used in a sensor with a third radio).

                    thoughts? I know you said it was a WIP, so it could be that it's not supposed to work yet. LMK.

                    tekkaT Offline
                    tekkaT Offline
                    tekka
                    Admin
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #13

                    @stevebus If they fail with both library versions - I assume they're dead if you can exclude wiring problems or wrong Vcc.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • stevebusS Offline
                      stevebusS Offline
                      stevebus
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #14

                      thanks @tekka... I fear you are right. The main thing that sucks is I don't know what killed them. Oh well. Such is life.

                      Vera Edge/UI7; mysensors; Arduino's and RPIs; data posted to Azure for an IoT 'dashboard' of my house

                      Opinions expressed here are my own and do not necessarily reflect Microsoft's feelings on a given topic :-)

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • davboeckiD Offline
                        davboeckiD Offline
                        davboecki
                        wrote on last edited by davboecki
                        #15

                        @tekka Your rewrite actually fixed a problem I was having. For what ever reason I could not send messages from my ESP8266 based gateway to my test node. At the same time acknowledgement worked.
                        Log of the original lib:

                        0;255;3;0;9;send: 0-0-1-1 s=1,c=1,t=2,pt=4,l=4,sg=0,st=fail:1
                        0;255;3;0;9;send: 0-0-1-1 s=1,c=1,t=2,pt=4,l=4,sg=0,st=fail:1
                        0;255;3;0;9;send: 0-0-1-1 s=1,c=1,t=2,pt=4,l=4,sg=0,st=fail:1
                        

                        Same sketch with just your commit added:

                        0;255;3;0;9;send: 0-0-1-1 s=1,c=1,t=2,pt=4,l=4,sg=0,st=ok:1
                        0;255;3;0;9;send: 0-0-1-1 s=1,c=1,t=2,pt=4,l=4,sg=0,st=ok:1
                        0;255;3;0;9;send: 0-0-1-1 s=1,c=1,t=2,pt=4,l=4,sg=0,st=ok:1
                        

                        Nothing else was changed.
                        I didn't do any extensive testing. Just a quick check to see if your commit fixed my problem.

                        tekkaT 1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        • davboeckiD davboecki

                          @tekka Your rewrite actually fixed a problem I was having. For what ever reason I could not send messages from my ESP8266 based gateway to my test node. At the same time acknowledgement worked.
                          Log of the original lib:

                          0;255;3;0;9;send: 0-0-1-1 s=1,c=1,t=2,pt=4,l=4,sg=0,st=fail:1
                          0;255;3;0;9;send: 0-0-1-1 s=1,c=1,t=2,pt=4,l=4,sg=0,st=fail:1
                          0;255;3;0;9;send: 0-0-1-1 s=1,c=1,t=2,pt=4,l=4,sg=0,st=fail:1
                          

                          Same sketch with just your commit added:

                          0;255;3;0;9;send: 0-0-1-1 s=1,c=1,t=2,pt=4,l=4,sg=0,st=ok:1
                          0;255;3;0;9;send: 0-0-1-1 s=1,c=1,t=2,pt=4,l=4,sg=0,st=ok:1
                          0;255;3;0;9;send: 0-0-1-1 s=1,c=1,t=2,pt=4,l=4,sg=0,st=ok:1
                          

                          Nothing else was changed.
                          I didn't do any extensive testing. Just a quick check to see if your commit fixed my problem.

                          tekkaT Offline
                          tekkaT Offline
                          tekka
                          Admin
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #16

                          @davboecki :+1:

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          16

                          Online

                          11.7k

                          Users

                          11.2k

                          Topics

                          113.1k

                          Posts


                          Copyright 2025 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
                          • Login

                          • Don't have an account? Register

                          • Login or register to search.
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • MySensors
                          • OpenHardware.io
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular