Skip to content
  • MySensors
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Announcements
  3. 💬 Advanced Gateway Options

💬 Advanced Gateway Options

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Announcements
59 Posts 16 Posters 8.2k Views 13 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • mntlvrM Offline
    mntlvrM Offline
    mntlvr
    wrote on last edited by
    #48

    okay thanks

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • mntlvrM Offline
      mntlvrM Offline
      mntlvr
      wrote on last edited by
      #49

      @dbemowsk
      No the gw is the like the host and the Controller is like the client so If you look into the Ethernet or WiFi sketches it will explain that you must use the Controller's ip address so the gw knows where to send the information to and the Vera is the one that is listening so it has to have a port open not the gw. the sensors send the info to the gw and the gw acknowledges it received the message then passing that message on to the controller thru the plugin

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • Nick WillisN Offline
        Nick WillisN Offline
        Nick Willis
        wrote on last edited by
        #50

        What does the red error LED indicate? I'm seeing reds on my gateway sometimes.

        mfalkviddM 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • Nick WillisN Nick Willis

          What does the red error LED indicate? I'm seeing reds on my gateway sometimes.

          mfalkviddM Offline
          mfalkviddM Offline
          mfalkvidd
          Mod
          wrote on last edited by mfalkvidd
          #51

          @nick-willis it indicates an error ;-) The list of possible errors is available at https://github.com/mysensors/MySensors/blob/121648f34bb45ab0e21fc4b4835959d27b28a9c6/core/MyIndication.h#L49
          Most common reason is probably transmit failure.
          The gateway debug log will provide more details.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • sundberg84S Offline
            sundberg84S Offline
            sundberg84
            Hardware Contributor
            wrote on last edited by sundberg84
            #52

            Hi all!

            Im building myself a network rack which will house all gateways and other network equipment. This is a steal frame (ie true faradays cage). I will run the antennas outside with a magnetic base and these antennas with "extension" has worked fine for my 433mhz equipment.

            For the main 2.4ghz gateway im lookning at this:

            0_1551615916119_b118e965-1818-4ea7-b798-257ed351cadd-image.png

            I guess its just a matter of buy and try, but I know there are some antenna nerds in here so a couple of questions.

            • Even if it says wifi, i guess it works just as great for MySensors since its the same freq?
            • Will the extension cord impact the performance in any way?
            • It say 5dBi, what does this correspond to setting MySensors setting? (Ie. how would you config the gateway settings?)

            From MyConfig:

            /**
             * @def MY_RF24_PA_LEVEL
             * @brief Default RF24 PA level. Override in sketch if needed.
             * - RF24_PA_LOW = -12dBm
             * - RF24_PA_HIGH = -6dBm
             * - RF24_PA_MAX = 0dBm
             */```

            Controller: Proxmox VM - Home Assistant
            MySensors GW: Arduino Uno - W5100 Ethernet, Gw Shield Nrf24l01+ 2,4Ghz
            MySensors GW: Arduino Uno - Gw Shield RFM69, 433mhz
            RFLink GW - Arduino Mega + RFLink Shield, 433mhz

            mfalkviddM 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • sundberg84S sundberg84

              Hi all!

              Im building myself a network rack which will house all gateways and other network equipment. This is a steal frame (ie true faradays cage). I will run the antennas outside with a magnetic base and these antennas with "extension" has worked fine for my 433mhz equipment.

              For the main 2.4ghz gateway im lookning at this:

              0_1551615916119_b118e965-1818-4ea7-b798-257ed351cadd-image.png

              I guess its just a matter of buy and try, but I know there are some antenna nerds in here so a couple of questions.

              • Even if it says wifi, i guess it works just as great for MySensors since its the same freq?
              • Will the extension cord impact the performance in any way?
              • It say 5dBi, what does this correspond to setting MySensors setting? (Ie. how would you config the gateway settings?)

              From MyConfig:

              /**
               * @def MY_RF24_PA_LEVEL
               * @brief Default RF24 PA level. Override in sketch if needed.
               * - RF24_PA_LOW = -12dBm
               * - RF24_PA_HIGH = -6dBm
               * - RF24_PA_MAX = 0dBm
               */```
              mfalkviddM Offline
              mfalkviddM Offline
              mfalkvidd
              Mod
              wrote on last edited by
              #53

              Even if it says wifi, i guess it works just as great for MySensors since its the same freq?

              Exactly

              Will the extension cord impact the performance in any way?

              Yes. There will be some attenuation in the cable. Cables have different attenuation at different frequencies, and there are different cables. Hopefully this cable works well with 2.4GHz but it would be hard to tell without a datasheet or by measuring the cable.

              It say 5dBi, what does this correspond to setting MySensors setting? (Ie. how would you config the gateway settings?)

              The antenna (or maybe the antenna + cable, depending on what the specification includes) has 5dBi gain. This means that you'll have to lower the tx power by 5dB to stay within legal limits, compared with an isotropic antenna.

              sundberg84S 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • mfalkviddM mfalkvidd

                Even if it says wifi, i guess it works just as great for MySensors since its the same freq?

                Exactly

                Will the extension cord impact the performance in any way?

                Yes. There will be some attenuation in the cable. Cables have different attenuation at different frequencies, and there are different cables. Hopefully this cable works well with 2.4GHz but it would be hard to tell without a datasheet or by measuring the cable.

                It say 5dBi, what does this correspond to setting MySensors setting? (Ie. how would you config the gateway settings?)

                The antenna (or maybe the antenna + cable, depending on what the specification includes) has 5dBi gain. This means that you'll have to lower the tx power by 5dB to stay within legal limits, compared with an isotropic antenna.

                sundberg84S Offline
                sundberg84S Offline
                sundberg84
                Hardware Contributor
                wrote on last edited by sundberg84
                #54

                @mfalkvidd - thanks, very good information!
                So to be legal I must go RF24_PA_HIGH = -6dBm (which is default?).

                No datasheet found, i guess I have to buy and try.

                Controller: Proxmox VM - Home Assistant
                MySensors GW: Arduino Uno - W5100 Ethernet, Gw Shield Nrf24l01+ 2,4Ghz
                MySensors GW: Arduino Uno - Gw Shield RFM69, 433mhz
                RFLink GW - Arduino Mega + RFLink Shield, 433mhz

                zboblamontZ 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • sundberg84S sundberg84

                  @mfalkvidd - thanks, very good information!
                  So to be legal I must go RF24_PA_HIGH = -6dBm (which is default?).

                  No datasheet found, i guess I have to buy and try.

                  zboblamontZ Offline
                  zboblamontZ Offline
                  zboblamont
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #55

                  @sundberg84 Further to what @mfalkvidd said, please note that most manufacturers state dBi figures as comparatives for the marketplace, rarely do they test them to verify the value and predominantly quote theoretical values instead.
                  A claimed 5dBi it is likely a 1/4 wave whip ONLY on an infinite ground plane, your actual gain will be less than this depending on attached surface, gain reducing as the area reduces, and the cable attenuating it further depending on the cable used.
                  i.e. It works, it don't, adjust ;)

                  sundberg84S 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • zboblamontZ zboblamont

                    @sundberg84 Further to what @mfalkvidd said, please note that most manufacturers state dBi figures as comparatives for the marketplace, rarely do they test them to verify the value and predominantly quote theoretical values instead.
                    A claimed 5dBi it is likely a 1/4 wave whip ONLY on an infinite ground plane, your actual gain will be less than this depending on attached surface, gain reducing as the area reduces, and the cable attenuating it further depending on the cable used.
                    i.e. It works, it don't, adjust ;)

                    sundberg84S Offline
                    sundberg84S Offline
                    sundberg84
                    Hardware Contributor
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #56

                    @zboblamont thanks!

                    The "try, repeat" method was something i was expecting but always good to have the theory behind. But im still not quite understanding this with gain and the MySensors settings (which seems to be negative gain?)

                    Controller: Proxmox VM - Home Assistant
                    MySensors GW: Arduino Uno - W5100 Ethernet, Gw Shield Nrf24l01+ 2,4Ghz
                    MySensors GW: Arduino Uno - Gw Shield RFM69, 433mhz
                    RFLink GW - Arduino Mega + RFLink Shield, 433mhz

                    mfalkviddM zboblamontZ 2 Replies Last reply
                    0
                    • sundberg84S sundberg84

                      @zboblamont thanks!

                      The "try, repeat" method was something i was expecting but always good to have the theory behind. But im still not quite understanding this with gain and the MySensors settings (which seems to be negative gain?)

                      mfalkviddM Offline
                      mfalkviddM Offline
                      mfalkvidd
                      Mod
                      wrote on last edited by mfalkvidd
                      #57

                      @sundberg84 dBm is just a different way to state output power. Often milliwatts is used. The neat thing with dB is that they can be added and subtracted easily, which cannot be done with milliwatts.

                      Conversion table: https://www.rfcables.org/dbm-to-milli-watts-table.html

                      Iirc, the max radiated ouput power for the 433MHz band in EU is 100mW which is 20dB.

                      The max power for MySensors is 0dBwhich is 1 milliwatt.

                      With 5dB gain from the antenna, the radiated output power will be 0dB+5dB=5dB which is sligthly above 3 milliwatt (the antenna "focuses" the signal so the signal becomes stronger). So you can use the max output power and still be below 100mW, no worries.

                      Let's say you had an antenna with 25dB gain. Then you would have to use a max output power of -5dB from MySensors to be within legal limits (25-5=20).

                      For reference, this is what a 25dB antenna looks like https://www.aliexpress.com/item/YAGI-25DB-2-4G-WiFi-Booster-Antenna-for-Wireless-IP-Camera-or-Router/1886239710.html

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      • sundberg84S sundberg84

                        @zboblamont thanks!

                        The "try, repeat" method was something i was expecting but always good to have the theory behind. But im still not quite understanding this with gain and the MySensors settings (which seems to be negative gain?)

                        zboblamontZ Offline
                        zboblamontZ Offline
                        zboblamont
                        wrote on last edited by zboblamont
                        #58

                        @sundberg84 I see @mfalkvidd has already covered dBm and strangely a thong, presumably a typo rather than domestic distraction ;)
                        The point I was driving at is you can largely ignore dBi, it is a theoretical isotropic radiation. Beyond the ERP limitations, a touch up or down on power nobody will be screaming at, but it is pointless burning energy for no purpose, you will arrive at a reliable Gateway ERP by experimentation. I very much doubt it will exceed limitations with existing Nodes in any case if your previous antenna was lower gain of any order.
                        Do the maths by all means, just don't get hung up on it. The thing to remember is that total power remains essentially constant, the lobe formation only squeezes it more tightly with higher gain. A 1/4 lambda is not a high gain antenna...

                        mfalkviddM 1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        • zboblamontZ zboblamont

                          @sundberg84 I see @mfalkvidd has already covered dBm and strangely a thong, presumably a typo rather than domestic distraction ;)
                          The point I was driving at is you can largely ignore dBi, it is a theoretical isotropic radiation. Beyond the ERP limitations, a touch up or down on power nobody will be screaming at, but it is pointless burning energy for no purpose, you will arrive at a reliable Gateway ERP by experimentation. I very much doubt it will exceed limitations with existing Nodes in any case if your previous antenna was lower gain of any order.
                          Do the maths by all means, just don't get hung up on it. The thing to remember is that total power remains essentially constant, the lobe formation only squeezes it more tightly with higher gain. A 1/4 lambda is not a high gain antenna...

                          mfalkviddM Offline
                          mfalkviddM Offline
                          mfalkvidd
                          Mod
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #59

                          must have been a freudian slip ;-)

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          2
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          17

                          Online

                          11.7k

                          Users

                          11.2k

                          Topics

                          113.1k

                          Posts


                          Copyright 2025 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
                          • Login

                          • Don't have an account? Register

                          • Login or register to search.
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • MySensors
                          • OpenHardware.io
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular