Skip to content
  • MySensors
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Hardware
  3. Possible securiy breach in ESPS.

Possible securiy breach in ESPS.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
12 Posts 5 Posters 165 Views 5 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • TheoLT Offline
    TheoLT Offline
    TheoL
    Contest Winner
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Not sure if you guys watch or follow Kevin Darrah on YouTube but he found a way to clone the flash of the ESP, including wifi settings.

    How To Read from ESP32 - CLONE/BACKUP Everything

    He promised to post a follow up, with how to decrypt your flash.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • alexeliteA Offline
      alexeliteA Offline
      alexelite
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      I do not think it is a security breach, because ESP32 has AES256 encryption for flash data, if enabled.
      https://docs.espressif.com/projects/esp-idf/en/latest/esp32/security/flash-encryption.html

      AnticimexA 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • alexeliteA alexelite

        I do not think it is a security breach, because ESP32 has AES256 encryption for flash data, if enabled.
        https://docs.espressif.com/projects/esp-idf/en/latest/esp32/security/flash-encryption.html

        AnticimexA Offline
        AnticimexA Offline
        Anticimex
        Contest Winner
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        @alexelite they do not, however, state exactly which variant of AES they use. If they do not generate an initialization vector and are not using some block chaining variant, AES is quite weak.

        Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

        Jacky JoyJ skywatchS TheoLT 3 Replies Last reply
        1
        • AnticimexA Anticimex

          @alexelite they do not, however, state exactly which variant of AES they use. If they do not generate an initialization vector and are not using some block chaining variant, AES is quite weak.

          Jacky JoyJ Offline
          Jacky JoyJ Offline
          Jacky Joy
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          @Anticimex said in Possible securiy breach in ESPS.:

          @alexelite they do not, however, state exactly which variant of AES they use. If they do not generate an initialization vector and are not using some block chaining variant, AES is quite weak.

          thanks my issue has been fixed.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • AnticimexA Anticimex

            @alexelite they do not, however, state exactly which variant of AES they use. If they do not generate an initialization vector and are not using some block chaining variant, AES is quite weak.

            skywatchS Offline
            skywatchS Offline
            skywatch
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            @Anticimex said in Possible securiy breach in ESPS.:

            @Anticimex
            AES is quite weak.

            Probably why the NSA/CIA/FBI etc all recommended it! ;)

            AnticimexA 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • AnticimexA Anticimex

              @alexelite they do not, however, state exactly which variant of AES they use. If they do not generate an initialization vector and are not using some block chaining variant, AES is quite weak.

              TheoLT Offline
              TheoLT Offline
              TheoL
              Contest Winner
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              @Anticimex Don't think they use have encryption. It's just not powerful enough for that

              AnticimexA 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • TheoLT TheoL

                @Anticimex Don't think they use have encryption. It's just not powerful enough for that

                AnticimexA Offline
                AnticimexA Offline
                Anticimex
                Contest Winner
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                @TheoL AES is not complicated to implement in hardware and the docs suggest they have it but the technical detail is low.

                Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • skywatchS skywatch

                  @Anticimex said in Possible securiy breach in ESPS.:

                  @Anticimex
                  AES is quite weak.

                  Probably why the NSA/CIA/FBI etc all recommended it! ;)

                  AnticimexA Offline
                  AnticimexA Offline
                  Anticimex
                  Contest Winner
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  @skywatch are you implying they recommend AES without an IV or block chaining enhancement? I don't think so ;)

                  Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

                  skywatchS 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • AnticimexA Anticimex

                    @skywatch are you implying they recommend AES without an IV or block chaining enhancement? I don't think so ;)

                    skywatchS Offline
                    skywatchS Offline
                    skywatch
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    @Anticimex No, I am saying that they already had a way to get AES data so that is why rhey promoted it for use generally. They are always way ahead of what we are allowed to have!

                    AnticimexA 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • skywatchS skywatch

                      @Anticimex No, I am saying that they already had a way to get AES data so that is why rhey promoted it for use generally. They are always way ahead of what we are allowed to have!

                      AnticimexA Offline
                      AnticimexA Offline
                      Anticimex
                      Contest Winner
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      @skywatch that depend on the key size you choose, and how you deploy the implementation (like block chaining and random initialization).
                      Symmetric ciphers are even quite secure in the quantum world given large enough key sizes.

                      Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

                      skywatchS 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • AnticimexA Anticimex

                        @skywatch that depend on the key size you choose, and how you deploy the implementation (like block chaining and random initialization).
                        Symmetric ciphers are even quite secure in the quantum world given large enough key sizes.

                        skywatchS Offline
                        skywatchS Offline
                        skywatch
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        @Anticimex Surely in a quantum environment a key size is irrelevant?

                        AnticimexA 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • skywatchS skywatch

                          @Anticimex Surely in a quantum environment a key size is irrelevant?

                          AnticimexA Offline
                          AnticimexA Offline
                          Anticimex
                          Contest Winner
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #12

                          @skywatch not really, depending on the algorithm

                          Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          22

                          Online

                          11.7k

                          Users

                          11.2k

                          Topics

                          113.1k

                          Posts


                          Copyright 2025 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
                          • Login

                          • Don't have an account? Register

                          • Login or register to search.
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • MySensors
                          • OpenHardware.io
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular