Skip to content
  • MySensors
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Troubleshooting
  3. problems with RFM69_RFM95_ATC_SignalReport example

problems with RFM69_RFM95_ATC_SignalReport example

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Troubleshooting
3 Posts 2 Posters 56 Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • uwe tazU Offline
    uwe tazU Offline
    uwe taz
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Hello,

    I'm running since some weeks a serial GW (based on Nano) and some nodes (based on pro mini) with RFM69HW. I use lib version 2.3.2 and tried to get running the RFM69_RFM95_ATC_SignalReport.ino example. I only changed in the sketch the definition to RFM69HW (refer git diff report at the end) and put the sketch to a node. At the GW I additionally added #define MY_RFM69_NEW_DRIVER. The communication is working.

    The problem is that all 6 return values of transportGetSignalReport are always zero.

    Has anybody a hint for me what I do not in the right way?

    Thanks for an answer in advance.
    Uwe

     // RFM69
    -//#define MY_RADIO_RFM69
    -//#define MY_RFM69_NEW_DRIVER   // ATC on RFM69 works only with the new driver (not compatible with old=default driver)-//#define MY_RFM69_ATC_TARGET_RSSI_DBM (-70)  // target RSSI -70dBm
    -//#define MY_RFM69_MAX_POWER_LEVEL_DBM (10)   // max. TX power 10dBm = 10mW
    +#define MY_RADIO_RFM69
    +#define MY_IS_RFM69HW //only for high power version
    +#define MY_RFM69_NEW_DRIVER   // ATC on RFM69 works only with the new driver (not compatible with old=default driver)
    +#define MY_RFM69_ATC_TARGET_RSSI_DBM (-70)  // target RSSI -70dBm
    +#define MY_RFM69_MAX_POWER_LEVEL_DBM (10)   // max. TX power 10dBm = 10mW
    
     // RFM95
    -#define MY_RADIO_RFM95
    -#define MY_RFM95_ATC_TARGET_RSSI_DBM (-70)  // target RSSI -70dBm
    -#define MY_RFM95_MAX_POWER_LEVEL_DBM (10)   // max. TX power 10dBm = 10mW
    +//#define MY_RADIO_RFM95
    +//#define MY_RFM95_ATC_TARGET_RSSI_DBM (-70)  // target RSSI -70dBm
    +//#define MY_RFM95_MAX_POWER_LEVEL_DBM (10)   // max. TX power 10dBm = 10mW
    
    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • L Offline
      L Offline
      lood29
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      You should define MY_SIGNAL_REPORT_ENABLED

      1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • uwe tazU Offline
        uwe tazU Offline
        uwe taz
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Great, that was the right hint. Now I get values. Thanks!!!

        But should it included in the example code? I had a look in the development branch. There it was fixed. But in the development -3.0.0 branch not.

        1 Reply Last reply
        1
        Reply
        • Reply as topic
        Log in to reply
        • Oldest to Newest
        • Newest to Oldest
        • Most Votes


        12

        Online

        11.7k

        Users

        11.2k

        Topics

        113.1k

        Posts


        Copyright 2025 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
        • Login

        • Don't have an account? Register

        • Login or register to search.
        • First post
          Last post
        0
        • MySensors
        • OpenHardware.io
        • Categories
        • Recent
        • Tags
        • Popular