Navigation

    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • OpenHardware.io
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    1. Home
    2. lood29
    • Profile
    • Following
    • Followers
    • Topics
    • Posts
    • Best
    • Groups

    lood29

    @lood29

    5
    Reputation
    11
    Posts
    82
    Profile views
    0
    Followers
    0
    Following
    Joined Last Online
    lood29 Follow

    Best posts made by lood29

    • RE: Something's cooking in the MySensors labs...

      Well, i don't know if it is a timing issue or a hardware issue, but increasing the RFM95_POWERUP_DELAY_MS from 10 to 100ms solved the issue.
      Now testing range improvement over rfm69h, will report back.
      @tekka , Great work !

      posted in Announcements
      lood29
      lood29
    • RE: What's the best PIR sensor?

      @NeverDie
      Excelitas PYD1588/1598 are the best I've used, running now for years without a single false alert.
      Fully integrated, 1.8V and only 3uA

      posted in Hardware
      lood29
      lood29
    • RE: What's the best PIR sensor?

      @nagelc
      I kept all setting to default except the maintain window =8s
      So the SERIN reg is: 0x0031ED10

      @NeverDie
      With the fresnel and the wide angle 1598 it's ~ 7m

      posted in Hardware
      lood29
      lood29

    Latest posts made by lood29

    • RE: What's the best PIR sensor?

      @nagelc
      I kept all setting to default except the maintain window =8s
      So the SERIN reg is: 0x0031ED10

      @NeverDie
      With the fresnel and the wide angle 1598 it's ~ 7m

      posted in Hardware
      lood29
      lood29
    • RE: What's the best PIR sensor?

      @NeverDie
      Excelitas PYD1588/1598 are the best I've used, running now for years without a single false alert.
      Fully integrated, 1.8V and only 3uA

      posted in Hardware
      lood29
      lood29
    • RE: MQTT gateway - MQTT connection status

      If you are using pubsubclient, then

      bool PubSubClient::connected()

      should do the trick

      posted in My Project
      lood29
      lood29
    • RE: Delivery from PCBWay?

      I haven't ordered from them post covid-19 , but they used to be very reliable.

      posted in Hardware
      lood29
      lood29
    • RE: Something's cooking in the MySensors labs...

      Well, i don't know if it is a timing issue or a hardware issue, but increasing the RFM95_POWERUP_DELAY_MS from 10 to 100ms solved the issue.
      Now testing range improvement over rfm69h, will report back.
      @tekka , Great work !

      posted in Announcements
      lood29
      lood29
    • RE: Something's cooking in the MySensors labs...

      I'm trying to use the MY_RFM95_RFM69_COMPATIBILITY options but it does not pass the RFM95_sanityCheck.

      Code compile without warning, and gateway is working fine with simple RFM95 driver.
      Using esp8266 and arduino 1.8.13.

      Tue Aug 17 2020 10:48:50 GMT+0100 (CET) : 0;255;3;0;9;67 TSF:LRT:OK
Tue Aug 17 2020 10:48:50 GMT+0100 (CET) : 3;0;9;69 TSM:INIT
0;255;3;0;9;71
Tue Aug 17 2020 10:48:50 GMT+0100 (CET) : 0;255;3;0;9;69 TSM:INIT
Tue Aug 17 2020 10:48:50 GMT+0100 (CET) :  TSF:WUR:MS=0
Tue Aug 17 2020 10:48:50 GMT+0100 (CET) : 0;255;3;0;9;71 TSF:WUR:MS=0
Tue Aug 17 2020 10:48:50 GMT+0100 (CET) : 0;255;3;0;9;74 RFM95:INIT:PIN,CS
Tue Aug 17 2020 10:48:50 GMT+0100 (CET) : =15,IQP=4,IQN=4
0;255;3;0;9;78 R
Tue Aug 17 2020 10:48:50 GMT+0100 (CET) : 0;255;3;0;9;74 RFM95:INIT:PIN,CS=15,IQP=4,IQN=4
Tue Aug 17 2020 10:48:50 GMT+0100 (CET) : FM95:INIT:RFM69
Tue Aug 17 2020 10:48:50 GMT+0100 (CET) : 0;255;3;0;9;78 RFM95:INIT:RFM69
Tue Aug 17 2020 10:48:50 GMT+0100 (CET) : 0;255;3;0;9;86 RFM95:SRM:MODE=4
Tue Aug 17 2020 10:48:50 GMT+0100 (CET) : 0;255;3;0;9;86 RFM95:SRM:MODE=4
Tue Aug 17 2020 10:48:50 GMT+0100 (CET) : 0;255;3;0;9;220 RFM95:INIT:FREQ=868000000
Tue Aug 17 2020 10:48:50 GMT+0100 (CET) : 0;255;3;0;9;220 RFM95:INIT:FREQ=868000000
Tue Aug 17 2020 10:48:50 GMT+0100 (CET) : 0;255;3;0;9;254 RFM95:PTX:LEVEL=20
Tue Aug 17 2020 10:48:50 GMT+0100 (CET) : 0;255;3;0;9;254 RFM95:PTX:LEVEL=20
Tue Aug 17 2020 10:48:50 GMT+0100 (CET) : 0;255;3;0;9;273 !RFM95:INIT:SANC
Tue Aug 17 2020 10:48:50 GMT+0100 (CET) : HK FAIL
0;255;3;0;9;276 !TSM:INIT
Tue Aug 17 2020 10:48:50 GMT+0100 (CET) : 0;255;3;0;9;273 !RFM95:INIT:SANCHK FAIL
Tue Aug 17 2020 10:48:50 GMT+0100 (CET) : :TSP FAIL
0;255;3;0;9;279 TSM:FAI
Tue Aug 17 2020 10:48:50 GMT+0100 (CET) : 0;255;3;0;9;276 !TSM:INIT:TSP FAIL
Tue Aug 17 2020 10:48:50 GMT+0100 (CET) : L:CNT=1
0;255;3;0;9;282 TSM:FAIL:
Tue Aug 17 2020 10:48:50 GMT+0100 (CET) : 0;255;3;0;9;279 TSM:FAIL:CNT=1
Tue Aug 17 2020 10:48:50 GMT+0100 (CET) : DIS
0;255;3;0;9;285 TSF:TDI:TSL
Tue Aug 17 2020 10:48:50 GMT+0100 (CET) : 0;255;3;0;9;282 TSM:FAIL:DIS
Tue Aug 17 2020 10:48:50 GMT+0100 (CET) : 0;255;3;0;9;285 TSF:TDI:TSL
Tue Aug 17 2020 10:48:50 GMT+0100 (CET) : 0;255;3;0;9;287 RFM95:RSL
Tue Aug 17 2020 10:48:50 GMT+0100 (CET) : 0;255;3;0;9;287 RFM95:RSL
Tue Aug 17 2020 10:48:50 GMT+0100 (CET) : 0;255;3;0;9;295 RFM95:SRM:MODE=3
Tue Aug 17 2020 10:48:50 GMT+0100 (CET) : 0;255;3;0;9;295 RFM95:SRM:MODE=3
Tue Aug 17 2020 10:49:00 GMT+0100 (CET) : 0;255;3;0;9;10299 TSM:FAIL:RE-IN
Tue Aug 17 2020 10:49:00 GMT+0100 (CET) : IT
0;255;3;0;9;10302 TSM:INIT
0;
Tue Aug 17 2020 10:49:00 GMT+0100 (CET) : 0;255;3;0;9;10299 TSM:FAIL:RE-INIT
Tue Aug 17 2020 10:49:00 GMT+0100 (CET) : 0;255;3;0;9;10302 TSM:INIT
Tue Aug 17 2020 10:49:00 GMT+0100 (CET) : 255;3;0;9;10304 RFM95:INIT:PIN,C
Tue Aug 17 2020 10:49:00 GMT+0100 (CET) : S=15,IQP=4,IQN=4
0;255;3;0;9;103
Tue Aug 17 2020 10:49:00 GMT+0100 (CET) : 0;255;3;0;9;10304 RFM95:INIT:PIN,CS=15,IQP=4,IQN=4
Tue Aug 17 2020 10:49:00 GMT+0100 (CET) : 09 RFM95:INIT:RFM69
Tue Aug 17 2020 10:49:00 GMT+0100 (CET) : 0;255;3;0;9;10309 RFM95:INIT:RFM69
Tue Aug 17 2020 10:49:00 GMT+0100 (CET) : 0;255;3;0;9;10317 RFM95:SRM:MODE=4
Tue Aug 17 2020 10:49:00 GMT+0100 (CET) : 0;255;3;0;9;10317 RFM95:SRM:MODE=4
Tue Aug 17 2020 10:49:00 GMT+0100 (CET) : 0;255;3;0;9;10451 RFM95:INIT:FREQ=868000000
Tue Aug 17 2020 10:49:00 GMT+0100 (CET) : 0;255;3;0;9;10451 RFM95:INIT:FREQ=868000000
Tue Aug 17 2020 10:49:00 GMT+0100 (CET) : 0;255;3;0;9;10485 RFM95:PTX:LEVEL=20
Tue Aug 17 2020 10:49:00 GMT+0100 (CET) : 0;255;3;0;9;10485 RFM95:PTX:LEVEL=20
Tue Aug 17 2020 10:49:00 GMT+0100 (CET) : 0;255;3;0;9;10504 !RFM95:INIT:SA
Tue Aug 17 2020 10:49:00 GMT+0100 (CET) : NCHK FAIL
0;255;3;0;9;10507 !TSM
Tue Aug 17 2020 10:49:00 GMT+0100 (CET) : 0;255;3;0;9;10504 !RFM95:INIT:SANCHK FAIL
Tue Aug 17 2020 10:49:00 GMT+0100 (CET) : :INIT:TSP FAIL
0;255;3;0;9;10511
Tue Aug 17 2020 10:49:00 GMT+0100 (CET) : 0;255;3;0;9;10507 !TSM:INIT:TSP FAIL
Tue Aug 17 2020 10:49:00 GMT+0100 (CET) :  TSM:FAIL:CNT=2
0;255;3;0;9;10514
Tue Aug 17 2020 10:49:00 GMT+0100 (CET) : 0;255;3;0;9;10511 TSM:FAIL:CNT=2
Tue Aug 17 2020 10:49:00 GMT+0100 (CET) :  TSM:FAIL:DIS
0;255;3;0;9;10516 T
Tue Aug 17 2020 10:49:00 GMT+0100 (CET) : 0;255;3;0;9;10514 TSM:FAIL:DIS
Tue Aug 17 2020 10:49:00 GMT+0100 (CET) : SF:TDI:TSL
0;255;3;0;9;10519 RFM95:RSL
Tue Aug 17 2020 10:49:00 GMT+0100 (CET) : 0;255;3;0;9;10516 TSF:TDI:TSL
Tue Aug 17 2020 10:49:00 GMT+0100 (CET) : 0;255;3;0;9;10519 RFM95:RSL
Tue Aug 17 2020 10:49:00 GMT+0100 (CET) : 0;255;3;0;9;10527 RFM95:SRM:MODE=3
Tue Aug 17 2020 10:49:00 GMT+0100 (CET) : 0;255;3;0;9;10527 RFM95:SRM:MODE=3
      posted in Announcements
      lood29
      lood29
    • RE: Power decoupling capacitor caused high current consumption

      Switch to tantalum if you have space, much better for battery powered as a decoupling cap, low leakage.

      Choose a cap with voltage 3x to 4x of input voltage.

      posted in Hardware
      lood29
      lood29
    • RE: Power decoupling capacitor caused high current consumption

      MLCC or tantalum caps ?

      posted in Hardware
      lood29
      lood29
    • RE: Solar Energy Harvesting for wireless motes

      You can also go for the TI Bq25570 which has support to solar Panels, Thermal and Piezo Electric Generators and available to buy everywhere !

      posted in Hardware
      lood29
      lood29
    • Encryption and replay attack

      Hi
      According to wiki, using authentication prevent from delayed replay attack, but what about using only rfm69 hardware encryption, Isn't safe ?

      Regards

      posted in Development
      lood29
      lood29