Skip to content
  • MySensors
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Hardware
  3. Air Quality Sensor

Air Quality Sensor

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
calibrationaqigas sensorhchoair quality
270 Posts 46 Posters 308.8k Views 35 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • epierreE epierre

    Hello,

    sadly the discussions were lost...

    So let's start again on the subject:

    https://github.com/empierre/arduino

    Here is the list of my current experimentations:

    • MQ135.ino : for CO2/COV ... validated
      
    • MQ2.ino : for ethanol... needs pre-heat : ongoing
    • MQ6 sensor : just received
    • MQ131 sensor : just received
    • TGS2600 sensor : just received

    I'm getting serious a with a mega and a sensor board, 4 of them are connected together !

    The MQ135 is not on the list, I use it to measure CO2 in children's room...
    Values:

    • MQ2: 85 - Combustible gas and smoke
    • MQ6: 25 - Isobutane, Butane, LPG
    • MQ131: 57 - O3, CL2
    • TGS2600: 943 - ethanol, hydrogen, iso-butane, CO, Methane

    As discussed before, I would appreciate someone helping me reading the logarithmic curves in the datasheet (link on each sensor name above) to get the linear value based on analog reading. I need to learn reading it... thanks!

    as an example here in sandboxelectronics we saw that several values could be read from the datasheet:

    float           LPGCurve[3]  =  {2.3,0.21,-0.47};   //two points are taken from the curve.
                                                        //with these two points, a line is formed which is "approximately equivalent"
                                                     //to the original curve.
                                                    //data format:{ x, y, slope}; point1: (lg200, 0.21), point2: (lg10000, -0.59)
    float           COCurve[3]  =  {2.3,0.72,-0.34};    //two points are taken from the curve.
                                                    //with these two points, a line is formed which is "approximately equivalent"
                                                    //to the original curve.
                                                    //data format:{ x, y, slope}; point1: (lg200, 0.72), point2: (lg10000,  0.15)
    float           SmokeCurve[3] ={2.3,0.53,-0.44};    //two points are taken from the curve.
                                                    //with these two points, a line is formed which is "approximately equivalent"
                                                    //to the original curve.
                                                    //data format:{ x, y, slope}; point1: (lg200, 0.53), point2: (lg10000,  -0.22)                                                    
    float           Ro           =  10;                 //Ro is initialized to 10 kilo ohms
    
    AnneFRA Offline
    AnneFRA Offline
    AnneFR
    wrote on last edited by
    #189

    @epierre hi, could remove some doubts regarding the mq131 sensor?
    thanks,
    Anne

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • epierreE Offline
      epierreE Offline
      epierre
      Hero Member
      wrote on last edited by
      #190

      @alexsh1 said:

      (shinyei ppd42ns)

      I corrected the following sketch which had bad yg/m3 to ppm conversion thanks to LouiS22 from Domoticz forum remark (type conversion errors leading to 0 values).

      https://github.com/empierre/arduino/blob/master/DustSensor_SamYoung_DSM501.ino

      I guess I'll have to do the same here (but I lack time...):
      DustSensor_Shinyei_PPD42NS.ino

      z-wave - Vera -> Domoticz
      rfx - Domoticz <- MyDomoAtHome <- Imperihome
      mysensors -> mysensors-gw -> Domoticz

      alexsh1A 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • epierreE epierre

        @alexsh1 said:

        (shinyei ppd42ns)

        I corrected the following sketch which had bad yg/m3 to ppm conversion thanks to LouiS22 from Domoticz forum remark (type conversion errors leading to 0 values).

        https://github.com/empierre/arduino/blob/master/DustSensor_SamYoung_DSM501.ino

        I guess I'll have to do the same here (but I lack time...):
        DustSensor_Shinyei_PPD42NS.ino

        alexsh1A Offline
        alexsh1A Offline
        alexsh1
        wrote on last edited by
        #191

        @epierre Thanks - I'll have another go at Shinyei PPD42NS sketch once I have time. Ideally, I'd like to combine it with MH-Z14A sketch.

        epierreE 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • alexsh1A alexsh1

          @epierre Thanks - I'll have another go at Shinyei PPD42NS sketch once I have time. Ideally, I'd like to combine it with MH-Z14A sketch.

          epierreE Offline
          epierreE Offline
          epierre
          Hero Member
          wrote on last edited by
          #192

          @alexsh1 which is a good idea, also a temp/him is quite usefull though I didn't added the impact in the formulas so far.

          z-wave - Vera -> Domoticz
          rfx - Domoticz <- MyDomoAtHome <- Imperihome
          mysensors -> mysensors-gw -> Domoticz

          alexsh1A 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • epierreE epierre

            @alexsh1 which is a good idea, also a temp/him is quite usefull though I didn't added the impact in the formulas so far.

            alexsh1A Offline
            alexsh1A Offline
            alexsh1
            wrote on last edited by alexsh1
            #193

            @epierre I have combined the two sketches - works just fine, but need to find a spare temp sensor.The hardware setup looks messy so adding an extra i2c sensor will complicate it even more. I'll come back with the combined three-in-one sketch shortly.

            BTW, this

            gw.send(msgPM25.set("ppm"));
            

            still throws the following error. What version MySensors are you using?

             MySensors: Unknown/Invalid sensor type (43)
            
            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • epierreE epierre

              @alexsh1 which is a good idea, also a temp/him is quite usefull though I didn't added the impact in the formulas so far.

              alexsh1A Offline
              alexsh1A Offline
              alexsh1
              wrote on last edited by alexsh1
              #194

              @epierre I started looking at the formula you have used in ppmv calculation. Why do you need ppmv? All values in EPA or Europe are in μg/m3.

              The ppmv equation is:

              ppmv = mg/m^3 * (0.08205*T)/M 
              

              T = atmospheric temperature in kelvins = 273.15 + °C
              M = molecular weight of the air pollutant = 28.97
              (http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/molecular-mass-air-d_679.html - this is a good link)
              0.08205 = Universal Gas Law constant in atm·l/(mol·K)

              Your code for this equation is:

              ppmv=(float)(((concentrationPM25*0.0283168)/100) * ((0.08205*temp)/0.01))/1000;
              

              Now, I think it should be as follows:

              1. temp = °C + 273.15
              int temp=273.15 + 22;
              
              

              22C - is a typical temp inside though the intention is to use a sensor

              1. The amended ppmv equation is going to be:
              ppmv=(((concentrationPM25*0.0283168)/100) * ((0.08205*temp)/28.97))/1000;
              

              I have not changed 0.0283168 /100 - not sure that this is. And the whole thing is divided by 1000? why?

              IMPORTANT UPDATE:

              I have just received the following result:

              
              PM10: 7373
              
              send: 11-11-0-0 s=0,c=1,t=37,pt=7,l=5,sg=0,st=ok:1.744
              
              

              If I use the following web-site http://www.herramientasingenieria.com/onlinecalc/ppm-mg_m3.php and the result is
              mg/m3 = 7373 * 0.283168/100 = 2.08 mg/m3
              The molecular weight is 28.97 for dry air

              2.08 mg/m3 is equivalent to 1.74ppm for a gas with molecular weight=28.97 Pressure=1013.25, Temperature=22C 
              

              Success!
              Now I have found a spare BMP280 (temp and pressure sensor) which I can use here.
              Additionally, I need to use 24-h and 1 year averages - https://www3.epa.gov/airquality/particlepollution/2012/decfsstandards.pdf

              Stay tuned!

              epierreE 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • alexsh1A alexsh1

                @epierre I started looking at the formula you have used in ppmv calculation. Why do you need ppmv? All values in EPA or Europe are in μg/m3.

                The ppmv equation is:

                ppmv = mg/m^3 * (0.08205*T)/M 
                

                T = atmospheric temperature in kelvins = 273.15 + °C
                M = molecular weight of the air pollutant = 28.97
                (http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/molecular-mass-air-d_679.html - this is a good link)
                0.08205 = Universal Gas Law constant in atm·l/(mol·K)

                Your code for this equation is:

                ppmv=(float)(((concentrationPM25*0.0283168)/100) * ((0.08205*temp)/0.01))/1000;
                

                Now, I think it should be as follows:

                1. temp = °C + 273.15
                int temp=273.15 + 22;
                
                

                22C - is a typical temp inside though the intention is to use a sensor

                1. The amended ppmv equation is going to be:
                ppmv=(((concentrationPM25*0.0283168)/100) * ((0.08205*temp)/28.97))/1000;
                

                I have not changed 0.0283168 /100 - not sure that this is. And the whole thing is divided by 1000? why?

                IMPORTANT UPDATE:

                I have just received the following result:

                
                PM10: 7373
                
                send: 11-11-0-0 s=0,c=1,t=37,pt=7,l=5,sg=0,st=ok:1.744
                
                

                If I use the following web-site http://www.herramientasingenieria.com/onlinecalc/ppm-mg_m3.php and the result is
                mg/m3 = 7373 * 0.283168/100 = 2.08 mg/m3
                The molecular weight is 28.97 for dry air

                2.08 mg/m3 is equivalent to 1.74ppm for a gas with molecular weight=28.97 Pressure=1013.25, Temperature=22C 
                

                Success!
                Now I have found a spare BMP280 (temp and pressure sensor) which I can use here.
                Additionally, I need to use 24-h and 1 year averages - https://www3.epa.gov/airquality/particlepollution/2012/decfsstandards.pdf

                Stay tuned!

                epierreE Offline
                epierreE Offline
                epierre
                Hero Member
                wrote on last edited by
                #195

                @alexsh1 said:

                @epierre I started looking at the formula you have used in ppmv calculation. Why do you need ppmv? All values in EPA or Europe are in μg/m3.

                because domoticz only knows ppm... and many AIQ like use only that except for particles.

                1. temp = °C + 273.15
                  int temp=273.15 + 22;
                  22C - is a typical temp inside though the intention is to use a sensor

                not for me ;-)

                1. The amended ppmv equation is going to be:
                  ppmv=(((concentrationPM250.0283168)/100) * ((0.08205temp)/28.97))/1000;
                I have not changed 0.0283168 /100 - not sure that this is. And the whole thing is divided by 1000? why?
                

                was a volume conversion

                The molecular weight is 28.97 for dry air

                2.08 mg/m3 is equivalent to 1.74ppm for a gas with molecular weight=28.97 Pressure=1013.25, Temperature=22C 
                

                Success!

                success for the mysensors value ?

                MySensors: Unknown/Invalid sensor type (43)
                

                Domoticz doesn't recognize this command... I use 1.5.x but I have my own gateway to domoticz

                z-wave - Vera -> Domoticz
                rfx - Domoticz <- MyDomoAtHome <- Imperihome
                mysensors -> mysensors-gw -> Domoticz

                alexsh1A bezeeflyB 2 Replies Last reply
                0
                • epierreE epierre

                  @alexsh1 said:

                  @epierre I started looking at the formula you have used in ppmv calculation. Why do you need ppmv? All values in EPA or Europe are in μg/m3.

                  because domoticz only knows ppm... and many AIQ like use only that except for particles.

                  1. temp = °C + 273.15
                    int temp=273.15 + 22;
                    22C - is a typical temp inside though the intention is to use a sensor

                  not for me ;-)

                  1. The amended ppmv equation is going to be:
                    ppmv=(((concentrationPM250.0283168)/100) * ((0.08205temp)/28.97))/1000;
                  I have not changed 0.0283168 /100 - not sure that this is. And the whole thing is divided by 1000? why?
                  

                  was a volume conversion

                  The molecular weight is 28.97 for dry air

                  2.08 mg/m3 is equivalent to 1.74ppm for a gas with molecular weight=28.97 Pressure=1013.25, Temperature=22C 
                  

                  Success!

                  success for the mysensors value ?

                  MySensors: Unknown/Invalid sensor type (43)
                  

                  Domoticz doesn't recognize this command... I use 1.5.x but I have my own gateway to domoticz

                  alexsh1A Offline
                  alexsh1A Offline
                  alexsh1
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #196

                  @epierre Yes, all works fine now. I modified the combined sketch and here is the final result.

                  0_1463152922051_Screenshot (21).jpg

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • M Offline
                    M Offline
                    moskovskiy82
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #197

                    Which one to use for detection of fire smoke? Currently have got several MQ-7 but they don't seem so good at it

                    epierreE 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • M moskovskiy82

                      Which one to use for detection of fire smoke? Currently have got several MQ-7 but they don't seem so good at it

                      epierreE Offline
                      epierreE Offline
                      epierre
                      Hero Member
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #198

                      @moskovskiy82 said:

                      Which one to use for detection of fire smoke? Currently have got several MQ-7 but they don't seem so good at it

                      as discussed just above, a particle sensor could be good for smoke is a particle concentration, coupled with heat this would be a good indicator

                      if (concentration > 315000) {
                           Serial.println("Smokes from cigarettes detected! Or It might be a huge fire! Beware!"); 
                      

                      z-wave - Vera -> Domoticz
                      rfx - Domoticz <- MyDomoAtHome <- Imperihome
                      mysensors -> mysensors-gw -> Domoticz

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • M Offline
                        M Offline
                        moskovskiy82
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #199

                        What about mq2 or mq135? Any experience? As a gas sensor will be more suitable detecting early fire

                        epierreE 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • M moskovskiy82

                          What about mq2 or mq135? Any experience? As a gas sensor will be more suitable detecting early fire

                          epierreE Offline
                          epierreE Offline
                          epierre
                          Hero Member
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #200

                          @moskovskiy82 said:

                          What about mq2 or mq135? Any experience? As a gas sensor will be more suitable detecting early fire

                          please see what it does, this is not a gas sensor this only detect particle size whatever the gas...

                          z-wave - Vera -> Domoticz
                          rfx - Domoticz <- MyDomoAtHome <- Imperihome
                          mysensors -> mysensors-gw -> Domoticz

                          M 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • epierreE epierre

                            @moskovskiy82 said:

                            What about mq2 or mq135? Any experience? As a gas sensor will be more suitable detecting early fire

                            please see what it does, this is not a gas sensor this only detect particle size whatever the gas...

                            M Offline
                            M Offline
                            moskovskiy82
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #201

                            @epierre
                            It still detects concentration. Both state CO detection. So in case of fire won't they detect the increase in concentration much faster that the particle sensor like Sharp’s GP2Y1010AU0F or alternative?

                            alexsh1A 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • M moskovskiy82

                              @epierre
                              It still detects concentration. Both state CO detection. So in case of fire won't they detect the increase in concentration much faster that the particle sensor like Sharp’s GP2Y1010AU0F or alternative?

                              alexsh1A Offline
                              alexsh1A Offline
                              alexsh1
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #202

                              @moskovskiy82 For a fire smoke, you can use pretty much any gas or particle sensor - there are a quite few gases formed during the burning process. MQ2 is highly sensitivity and has a fast response time. I can recommend it for a fire detection usage. However, I have been disappointed in MQ* sensors in general - there are not accurate, require 24h heat-up time, consume a lot of power etc. The only advantage is the price.

                              To detect fire to can use a flame sensor - http://www.instructables.com/id/Flame-detection-using-Arduino-and-flame-sensor/

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              1
                              • rollercontainerR Offline
                                rollercontainerR Offline
                                rollercontainer
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #203

                                Can someone tell me how to read this line?

                                float mq135_ro = 10000.0;    // this has to be tuned 10K Ohm
                                

                                Do I have to messure the sensor and adjust the variable or do I have to tune the resistance? If I have to do the first thing, when do I have to messure it? In warm state and clean air with a multimeter?

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • alexsh1A Offline
                                  alexsh1A Offline
                                  alexsh1
                                  wrote on last edited by alexsh1
                                  #204

                                  @epierre Did you check out the airbeam, which is based on a more expensive sensor Shinyei PPD60PV?
                                  http://www.takingspace.org/airbeam-technical-specifications-operation-performance/

                                  They made a step-by-step manual about building the same on Shinyei PPD42NS. I took their code and stripped a few parts and this is what I am left with:

                                  #include  <SoftwareSerial.h>
                                  #include  <FlexiTimer2.h>
                                  
                                  int pin = 3;
                                  
                                  volatile  double  rawParticalCount;
                                  volatile  double  totalParticles  = 0;
                                  volatile  double  particleCountToDisplay  = 0;
                                  volatile  double  ratio = 0;
                                  volatile  uint16_t  timeCounter = 0;
                                  
                                  #define         numberOfPeaksRecording                            5
                                  volatile        uint32_t        previousPeaks[numberOfPeaksRecording];
                                  volatile        uint32_t        sumOfPreviousPeaks          = 0;
                                  volatile        uint32_t        instantGoal                         = 0;
                                  volatile        int32_t         delta                                     = 0;
                                  volatile        uint32_t        slowMovingAverage             = 0;
                                  volatile  boolean readyToSendData = false;
                                  
                                  void  setup() {
                                      Serial.begin(115200);
                                      pinMode(pin,INPUT);
                                      
                                      FlexiTimer2::set(1,1.0/10000,readPin);
                                      FlexiTimer2::start();
                                      
                                  }
                                  void  loop()  {
                                     
                                      
                                      if(readyToSendData){
                                                  Serial.print(rawParticalCount,  DEC);
                                                  Serial.print("  Raw Particle  Count (0-10000) ");
                                                  Serial.print(ratio, DEC);
                                                  Serial.print("  Ratio (0-100%)  ");
                                                  Serial.print(particleCountToDisplay,  DEC); 
                                                  Serial.print("  Particle  Count");
                                                  Serial.println("");
                                                               
                                                  readyToSendData = false;
                                      }
                                      
                                  }
                                  
                                  void  readPin(){
                                      if(digitalRead(pin) ==  LOW){
                                          rawParticalCount++;
                                      }    
                                      timeCounter++;
                                      if  (timeCounter  ==  10000)
                                      {
                                          timeCounter=0;
                                             
                                          //Changes are made  here  based on  Chris Nafis's code: http://www.howmuchsnow.com/arduino/airquality/grovedust/
                                          ratio = rawParticalCount/100.0; 
                                          //Convert to  percentage, the shinyei reads 10milliseconds  to  90milliseconds  duration  for particles.  Basing on 10milliseconds, smallest  particle  assumingly  from  specification sheet.
                                          //FlexiTimer2,  reads 10,000  readings  per second, which would be  1 reading per 100 microseconds. 100 readings  would be  10  milliseconds. Since Shinyei runs  at minimal 10  millisecond range.  I divided 10,000  readings  by  100 to  get 100.
                                          //Good  example would be  rawPArticalCount  is  5000  half  of  the 10,000  readings were  active. 5000/100  would be  50  which translate to  50% low pulse occupancy.
                                          totalParticles  = (1.1*pow(ratio,3)-3.8*pow(ratio,2)+520*ratio+0.62);
                                          rawParticalCount  = 0;
                                            
                                                  //  shift counters  over, code  adapted from  template  provided  by  Mike  Taylor  and Joshua  Schapiro  from  Carnegie  Mellon  University's  CREATE  Lab
                                                  for (uint8_t  i = 0;  i < (numberOfPeaksRecording-1); i++)  {
                                                          previousPeaks[i]  = previousPeaks[i+1];
                                                  }
                                                  previousPeaks[numberOfPeaksRecording  - 1]  = totalParticles;
                                                  sumOfPreviousPeaks  = 0;
                                                  for (uint8_t  i = 0;  i < numberOfPeaksRecording; i++)  {
                                                          sumOfPreviousPeaks  +=  previousPeaks[i];
                                                  }
                                                  instantGoal = 2*sumOfPreviousPeaks;
                                                  
                                                  delta = instantGoal - slowMovingAverage;
                                                  
                                                  if  (delta  < -5000){
                                                          slowMovingAverage = slowMovingAverage - 250;
                                                  } else  if  (delta  < -2500){
                                                          slowMovingAverage = slowMovingAverage - 120;
                                                  } else  if(delta  < -1200){
                                                          slowMovingAverage = slowMovingAverage - 60;
                                                  } else  if(delta  < -500){
                                                          slowMovingAverage = slowMovingAverage - 25;
                                                  } else  if(delta  < -5){
                                                          slowMovingAverage = slowMovingAverage - 5;
                                                  } else  if(delta  < -1){
                                                          slowMovingAverage = slowMovingAverage - 1;
                                                  } else  if(delta  > 5000) {
                                                          slowMovingAverage = slowMovingAverage + 500;
                                                  } else  if(delta  > 2500){
                                                          slowMovingAverage = slowMovingAverage + 250;
                                                  } else  if(delta  > 1200){
                                                          slowMovingAverage = slowMovingAverage + 120;
                                                  } else  if(delta  > 500){
                                                          slowMovingAverage = slowMovingAverage + 50;
                                                  } else  if(delta  > 5){
                                                          slowMovingAverage = slowMovingAverage + 5;
                                                  } else  if(delta  > 1){
                                                          slowMovingAverage = slowMovingAverage + 1;
                                                  }
                                                  
                                                  particleCountToDisplay  = slowMovingAverage;
                                          readyToSendData = true;
                                      }
                                  }
                                  

                                  I have not adopted it for MySensors yet.
                                  I like moving average they use, but the values do not make sense to me:

                                  0.0000000000  Raw Particle  Count (0-10000) 0.0000000000  Ratio (0-100%)  53470.0000000000  Particle  Count
                                  0.0000000000  Raw Particle  Count (0-10000) 27.0000000000  Ratio (0-100%)  53970.0000000000  Particle  Count
                                  0.0000000000  Raw Particle  Count (0-10000) 0.0000000000  Ratio (0-100%)  54470.0000000000  Particle  Count
                                  0.0000000000  Raw Particle  Count (0-10000) 21.6200008392  Ratio (0-100%)  54970.0000000000  Particle  Count
                                  0.0000000000  Raw Particle  Count (0-10000) 0.0000000000  Ratio (0-100%)  55470.0000000000  Particle  Count
                                  0.0000000000  Raw Particle  Count (0-10000) 24.2800006866  Ratio (0-100%)  55970.0000000000  Particle  Count
                                  0.0000000000  Raw Particle  Count (0-10000) 0.0000000000  Ratio (0-100%)  56470.0000000000  Particle  Count
                                  0.0000000000  Raw Particle  Count (0-10000) 24.1200008392  Ratio (0-100%)  56970.0000000000  Particle  Count
                                  0.0000000000  Raw Particle  Count (0-10000) 0.0000000000  Ratio (0-100%)  57470.0000000000  Particle  Count
                                  0.0000000000  Raw Particle  Count (0-10000) 22.3199996948  Ratio (0-100%)  57970.0000000000  Particle  Count
                                  0.0000000000  Raw Particle  Count (0-10000) 0.0000000000  Ratio (0-100%)  58470.0000000000  Particle  Count
                                  0.0000000000  Raw Particle  Count (0-10000) 20.3600006103  Ratio (0-100%)  58970.0000000000  Particle  Count
                                  0.0000000000  Raw Particle  Count (0-10000) 0.0000000000  Ratio (0-100%)  59470.0000000000  Particle  Count
                                  0.0000000000  Raw Particle  Count (0-10000) 17.6299991607  Ratio (0-100%)  59970.0000000000  Particle  Count
                                  0.0000000000  Raw Particle  Count (0-10000) 0.0000000000  Ratio (0-100%)  60220.0000000000  Particle  Count
                                  0.0000000000  Raw Particle  Count (0-10000) 19.0499992370  Ratio (0-100%)  60720.0000000000  Particle  Count
                                  0.0000000000  Raw Particle  Count (0-10000) 0.0000000000  Ratio (0-100%)  60715.0000000000  Particle  Count
                                  0.0000000000  Raw Particle  Count (0-10000) 20.6599998474  Ratio (0-100%)  61215.0000000000  Particle  Count
                                  
                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • epierreE Offline
                                    epierreE Offline
                                    epierre
                                    Hero Member
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #205

                                    @alexsh1 said:

                                    I took their code and stripped a few parts and this is what I am left with:

                                    @alexsh1 the PPDN42 is for 1 micron and 2.5 micron , this one is for 0.5 micron

                                    airbeam has standard code: https://github.com/HabitatMap/AirCastingAndroidClient/blob/master/arduino/aircasting/aircasting_shinyeiPPD42NS.ino

                                    or I've not seen ?

                                    z-wave - Vera -&gt; Domoticz
                                    rfx - Domoticz &lt;- MyDomoAtHome &lt;- Imperihome
                                    mysensors -&gt; mysensors-gw -&gt; Domoticz

                                    alexsh1A 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • epierreE epierre

                                      @alexsh1 said:

                                      I took their code and stripped a few parts and this is what I am left with:

                                      @alexsh1 the PPDN42 is for 1 micron and 2.5 micron , this one is for 0.5 micron

                                      airbeam has standard code: https://github.com/HabitatMap/AirCastingAndroidClient/blob/master/arduino/aircasting/aircasting_shinyeiPPD42NS.ino

                                      or I've not seen ?

                                      alexsh1A Offline
                                      alexsh1A Offline
                                      alexsh1
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #206

                                      @epierre this is not the air beam code. They introduced "do it yourself" consept similar to the airbeam but with a different sensor (shinyei ppd42ns)

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • rollercontainerR Offline
                                        rollercontainerR Offline
                                        rollercontainer
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #207

                                        Hey guys, I am struggeling to get the MQ135 to work. Is there a step by step howto? Or can someone answer my question from 3 days ago?
                                        I would appreciate it very much.

                                        alexsh1A 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • rollercontainerR rollercontainer

                                          Hey guys, I am struggeling to get the MQ135 to work. Is there a step by step howto? Or can someone answer my question from 3 days ago?
                                          I would appreciate it very much.

                                          alexsh1A Offline
                                          alexsh1A Offline
                                          alexsh1
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #208

                                          @rollercontainer I followed David Gironi method to calibrate - it is described as follows:

                                          Before you can use the sensor, it has to be calibrated. For this, connect the sensor to your circuit and leave it powered on for 12-24 h to burn it in. Then put it into outside air, preferably at 20°C/35% rel. hum. (humidity is not so crucial). Read out the calibration value as such

                                          float rzero = gasSensor.getRZero();
                                          Wait until the value has somewhat settled (30min-1h). Remember, this is an ADC measurement so you might not want to wait some time between reading the sensor and also do some averaging. Once you have determined your RZero, put it into the MQ135.h. Note: Different sensors will likely have different RZero!

                                          #define RZERO 76.63

                                          Congrats, you have calibrated the sensor and can now read the CO2 ppm value in your sketch

                                          float ppm = gasSensor.getPPM();

                                          rollercontainerR 1 Reply Last reply
                                          1
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          17

                                          Online

                                          11.7k

                                          Users

                                          11.2k

                                          Topics

                                          113.0k

                                          Posts


                                          Copyright 2019 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • MySensors
                                          • OpenHardware.io
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular