Skip to content
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Hardware
  3. PIR am312
  • Getting Started
  • Controller
  • Build
  • Hardware
  • Download/API
  • Forum
  • Store

PIR am312

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
96 Posts 13 Posters 45.6k Views 10 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • NeverDieN Offline
    NeverDieN Offline
    NeverDie
    Hero Member
    wrote on last edited by NeverDie
    #52

    Nice!

    On my holder, the sensor depth is presumably wrong from a focusing point of view--at least if the SR501 is a proper guide for how it should be done. The sensor should really be deeper into the cavity. I suppose that alone might make a meaningful improvement. Alas, I think that may call for mounting the sensor element onto a PCB, so that it sits flush on top.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • NeverDieN Offline
      NeverDieN Offline
      NeverDie
      Hero Member
      wrote on last edited by
      #53

      @Nca78
      Have you worked out the dimensions for the four holes that the SR501 lens fits into? I'm guessing so, given your shield above. I could of course try measuring the distances with a micrometer and the hole diameters with some gauged wire, but it might take a few PCB iterations to get it right. However, if you know the exact hole diameter and distance between the holes, it would be helpful if you shared that info so that we can get cracking on making custom PCB's that incorporate it.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • scalzS Offline
        scalzS Offline
        scalz
        Hardware Contributor
        wrote on last edited by scalz
        #54

        @NeverDie
        This is what i'm using here for my boards, and fits ok
        0_1495621609523_holes pitch for sr501 lens.png

        1 Reply Last reply
        2
        • Nca78N Offline
          Nca78N Offline
          Nca78
          Hardware Contributor
          wrote on last edited by
          #55

          Searched a bit and found this. Guess my measurements were a bit off, hope it will fit with 17.4 and a bit over 22...
          I should have searched while doing the PCB :D

          Real measurements are 17.5mm and 23.3-1.45 = 21.85

          0_1495624530497_8002-2-human-body-infrared-sensor-switch-lens-Fresnel-lens-PIR-series-of-Fresnel-lens.jpg

          NeverDieN 1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • Nca78N Nca78

            Searched a bit and found this. Guess my measurements were a bit off, hope it will fit with 17.4 and a bit over 22...
            I should have searched while doing the PCB :D

            Real measurements are 17.5mm and 23.3-1.45 = 21.85

            0_1495624530497_8002-2-human-body-infrared-sensor-switch-lens-Fresnel-lens-PIR-series-of-Fresnel-lens.jpg

            NeverDieN Offline
            NeverDieN Offline
            NeverDie
            Hero Member
            wrote on last edited by
            #56

            I ran a banggood PIR sensor off my 3.3v boosted 10F supercap solar node last night and, as you would expect, the extra load was so low that it's practically a rounding error. :) These PIR's would have no problem being powered for days from a supercap.

            @Nca78 I guess what you're calling "sensibility" on your board above is another name for sensitivity? i.e. you figured out how to adjust the sensitivity of the PIR detector? That's something not obviously accessible on the banggood PIR's, as they don't seem to come with a sensitivity adjustment. If you've already figured out how to adjust the sensitivity, would you mind sharing the schematic? It might help us avoid re-inventing the wheel if we were to follow the path you've already blazed.

            Nca78N 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • NeverDieN NeverDie

              I ran a banggood PIR sensor off my 3.3v boosted 10F supercap solar node last night and, as you would expect, the extra load was so low that it's practically a rounding error. :) These PIR's would have no problem being powered for days from a supercap.

              @Nca78 I guess what you're calling "sensibility" on your board above is another name for sensitivity? i.e. you figured out how to adjust the sensitivity of the PIR detector? That's something not obviously accessible on the banggood PIR's, as they don't seem to come with a sensitivity adjustment. If you've already figured out how to adjust the sensitivity, would you mind sharing the schematic? It might help us avoid re-inventing the wheel if we were to follow the path you've already blazed.

              Nca78N Offline
              Nca78N Offline
              Nca78
              Hardware Contributor
              wrote on last edited by
              #57

              @NeverDie haha yes it's the sensitivity sorry sometimes my English fails and I mix with French words :D
              I will fix on the PCB.

              This can be set only on am612, I bought the sensor only (no breakout board) on AliExpress. It has 6 pins for the extra settings instead of the 3 of the am312.

              NeverDieN 1 Reply Last reply
              1
              • Nca78N Nca78

                @NeverDie haha yes it's the sensitivity sorry sometimes my English fails and I mix with French words :D
                I will fix on the PCB.

                This can be set only on am612, I bought the sensor only (no breakout board) on AliExpress. It has 6 pins for the extra settings instead of the 3 of the am312.

                NeverDieN Offline
                NeverDieN Offline
                NeverDie
                Hero Member
                wrote on last edited by
                #58

                @Nca78 said in PIR am312:

                @NeverDie haha yes it's the sensitivity sorry sometimes my English fails and I mix with French words :D
                I will fix on the PCB.

                This can be set only on am612, I bought the sensor only (no breakout board) on AliExpress. It has 6 pins for the extra settings instead of the 3 of the am312.

                Good to know. Does it draw the same or comparable amount of current as the am312? If so, you've just saved me from ordering the wrong sensor! :)

                Nca78N 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • NeverDieN NeverDie

                  @Nca78 said in PIR am312:

                  @NeverDie haha yes it's the sensitivity sorry sometimes my English fails and I mix with French words :D
                  I will fix on the PCB.

                  This can be set only on am612, I bought the sensor only (no breakout board) on AliExpress. It has 6 pins for the extra settings instead of the 3 of the am312.

                  Good to know. Does it draw the same or comparable amount of current as the am312? If so, you've just saved me from ordering the wrong sensor! :)

                  Nca78N Offline
                  Nca78N Offline
                  Nca78
                  Hardware Contributor
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #59

                  @NeverDie said in PIR am312:

                  Good to know. Does it draw the same or comparable amount of current as the am312? If so, you've just saved me from ordering the wrong sensor! :)

                  The datasheets are similar for everything that is not related to the extra pins of course: same electrical specs, same detection profile, ... My guess is it's the same PIR sensor but on am312 some of the settings are just hardwired inside the "can".

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  • NeverDieN Offline
                    NeverDieN Offline
                    NeverDie
                    Hero Member
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #60

                    Cool! I'm going to follow your lead and order some of the am612's then. Thanks for the heads up!

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • scalzS Offline
                      scalzS Offline
                      scalz
                      Hardware Contributor
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #61

                      sensitivity can be adapted in sw

                      Nca78N 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • scalzS scalz

                        sensitivity can be adapted in sw

                        Nca78N Offline
                        Nca78N Offline
                        Nca78
                        Hardware Contributor
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #62

                        @scalz said in PIR am312:

                        sensitivity can be adapted in sw

                        For am312 ? How would you do that when all you have are Vcc, GND and signal pin ?

                        scalzS 1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        • NeverDieN Offline
                          NeverDieN Offline
                          NeverDie
                          Hero Member
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #63

                          I ordered these:
                          https://www.aliexpress.com/item/10pcs-AM612-DIP6-human-infrared-sensor-module-pyroelectric-infrared-sensors-Sensor/32604041429.html?spm=2114.01010208.3.15.vPmcAS&ws_ab_test=searchweb0_0,searchweb201602_5_10152_10065_10151_10130_10068_5010014_10136_10157_10137_10060_10138_10155_10062_10156_437_10154_10056_10055_10054_10059_303_100031_10099_10103_10102_10096_5170015_10147_10052_10053_10107_10050_10142_10051_5190015_10084_10083_10119_10080_10082_10081_10178_10110_519_10111_10112_10113_10114_10037_10183_10182_10185_10033_10032_10078_10079_10077_10073_10123_10120_142,searchweb201603_4,ppcSwitch_4&btsid=99796fa2-b6d9-451b-89ee-c690f3ec0542&algo_expid=357f8654-d7b8-423c-8af7-8a8a924a49a5-2&algo_pvid=357f8654-d7b8-423c-8af7-8a8a924a49a5

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • NeverDieN Offline
                            NeverDieN Offline
                            NeverDie
                            Hero Member
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #64

                            Not sure if this is the same as the SR501 lens. Really hard to tell from the photo:
                            https://www.aliexpress.com/item-img/5Pcs-Lot-PIR-human-body-infrared-sensor-lens-Mini-lens-high-quality/32563535500.html?spm=2114.10010108.1000017.1.oavh25
                            If anyone finds a confirmed source for SR501 lenses, please post.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • Nca78N Offline
                              Nca78N Offline
                              Nca78
                              Hardware Contributor
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #65

                              SR501 lens is referenced as 8002-2. But it seems all those big fresnel lenses with 4 pins are the same, I suppose one original maker and a bunch of copycats.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              1
                              • Nca78N Nca78

                                @scalz said in PIR am312:

                                sensitivity can be adapted in sw

                                For am312 ? How would you do that when all you have are Vcc, GND and signal pin ?

                                scalzS Offline
                                scalzS Offline
                                scalz
                                Hardware Contributor
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #66

                                @Nca78 said in PIR am312:

                                @scalz said in PIR am312:

                                sensitivity can be adapted in sw

                                For am312 ? How would you do that when all you have are Vcc, GND and signal pin ?

                                with timers. but, it's a bit more power hungry if using simple 8bits mcu, not a problem with more powerful mcus like ARM etc. which have more low power features.

                                Nca78N 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • scalzS scalz

                                  @Nca78 said in PIR am312:

                                  @scalz said in PIR am312:

                                  sensitivity can be adapted in sw

                                  For am312 ? How would you do that when all you have are Vcc, GND and signal pin ?

                                  with timers. but, it's a bit more power hungry if using simple 8bits mcu, not a problem with more powerful mcus like ARM etc. which have more low power features.

                                  Nca78N Offline
                                  Nca78N Offline
                                  Nca78
                                  Hardware Contributor
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #67

                                  @scalz said in PIR am312:

                                  with timers. but, it's a bit more power hungry if using simple 8bits mcu, not a problem with more powerful mcus like ARM etc. which have more low power features.

                                  Still not getting it :)
                                  This sounds more like a solution to manage "on" time when triggered but I don't get how this could make your sensor detect at 5m instead of 3m ?

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • scalzS Offline
                                    scalzS Offline
                                    scalz
                                    Hardware Contributor
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #68

                                    @Nca78
                                    oki. lol i messed a bit with terms too :blush: yes for "on" time.
                                    for 5m instead of 3m, this will depends of sensor quality and its lens. I think in datasheet they give a max range for an ideal lens, or that wouldn't make sense to get long range with a crappy lens..

                                    NeverDieN 1 Reply Last reply
                                    1
                                    • scalzS scalz

                                      @Nca78
                                      oki. lol i messed a bit with terms too :blush: yes for "on" time.
                                      for 5m instead of 3m, this will depends of sensor quality and its lens. I think in datasheet they give a max range for an ideal lens, or that wouldn't make sense to get long range with a crappy lens..

                                      NeverDieN Offline
                                      NeverDieN Offline
                                      NeverDie
                                      Hero Member
                                      wrote on last edited by NeverDie
                                      #69

                                      @scalz said in PIR am312:

                                      @Nca78
                                      oki. lol i messed a bit with terms too :blush: yes for "on" time.
                                      for 5m instead of 3m, this will depends of sensor quality and its lens. I think in datasheet they give a max range for an ideal lens, or that wouldn't make sense to get long range with a crappy lens..

                                      So, Scalz, are you saying that out of the box, the am312 is hard-wired for max sensitivity, and then to get lower sensitivity, you add impairments, such as a lower duty cycle (less "ON" time) and/or a crappier lens? Wow, is that how this stuff is actually meant to work? I was hoping that maybe the am612 could be optionally tweaked for more sensitivity than the am312. If I'm understanding you (and if you're right), though, then I guess that won't be possible. I had assumed (perhaps wrongly) that the am312 defaulted to a "medium" amount of sensitivity, not a maximum amount of sensitivity. Do you happen to know whether am312 defaults to maximum sensitivity or not?

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • NeverDieN Offline
                                        NeverDieN Offline
                                        NeverDie
                                        Hero Member
                                        wrote on last edited by NeverDie
                                        #70

                                        Anyhow, looking at the reference circuit design in the am612 "sensor manual" (see page 7 of http://akizukidenshi.com/download/ds/senba/Pir-Am612.pdf), I see that there is a photoresistor (a GL5528) there. Is it somehow adjusting the sensitivity based on the ambient light level? The GL5528 appears to be sensitive to 540nm light (i.e. green light) according to its datasheet
                                        (http://akizukidenshi.com/download/ds/senba/GL55 Series Photoresistor.pdf). I'm not sure that's a trick that the am312 can do. Can it?

                                        I just love these Ford vs. Chevy debates. :)

                                        By the way, where should that photoresistor be positioned? Under the IR lens, or should it have its own window? I'm guessing under the IR lens to keep things "tidy".

                                        Nca78N 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • NeverDieN NeverDie

                                          Anyhow, looking at the reference circuit design in the am612 "sensor manual" (see page 7 of http://akizukidenshi.com/download/ds/senba/Pir-Am612.pdf), I see that there is a photoresistor (a GL5528) there. Is it somehow adjusting the sensitivity based on the ambient light level? The GL5528 appears to be sensitive to 540nm light (i.e. green light) according to its datasheet
                                          (http://akizukidenshi.com/download/ds/senba/GL55 Series Photoresistor.pdf). I'm not sure that's a trick that the am312 can do. Can it?

                                          I just love these Ford vs. Chevy debates. :)

                                          By the way, where should that photoresistor be positioned? Under the IR lens, or should it have its own window? I'm guessing under the IR lens to keep things "tidy".

                                          Nca78N Offline
                                          Nca78N Offline
                                          Nca78
                                          Hardware Contributor
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #71

                                          @NeverDie said in PIR am312:

                                          I just love these Ford vs. Chevy debates. :)

                                          We are French, we only have Peugeot vs Citroën debates, or Renault vs Peugeot :D

                                          Else @scalz misunderstood what we were talking about, he was just talking about changing the "on" duration of the sensor by software (as it's fixed on the am312). No the sensitivity.

                                          About the photoresistor in the doc is connected to the OEN pin (Output ENable) of the AM612 (one more pin the am312 doesn't have), so that with the reference design it will only trigger and switch on the light when it's dark.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          2
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          12

                                          Online

                                          11.7k

                                          Users

                                          11.2k

                                          Topics

                                          113.0k

                                          Posts


                                          Copyright 2019 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • OpenHardware.io
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular