Skip to content
  • MySensors
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Hardware
  3. Nordic or HopeRF radio

Nordic or HopeRF radio

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
22 Posts 12 Posters 6.0k Views 12 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • scalzS Offline
    scalzS Offline
    scalz
    Hardware Contributor
    wrote on last edited by scalz
    #7

    I agree on some points too :)
    I would add about rfm69:

    • rfm69 (not the high power one) has better range than basic nrf.
    • you can use listenmode (not in mysensors yet) which means waking up your deep sleep node by interrupt. And that's a very nice feature.
    • I think (perhaps I'm wrong) a little bit better noise immune against some switching regulator...even it does not hurt to filter things a bit..
    • etc

    Some downside of rfm69:

    • footprint a little bit bigger but you will never have a 1x1cm node lol
    • price...but less clones..
    • antenna not integrated. too bad
    NeverDieN C 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • scalzS scalz

      I agree on some points too :)
      I would add about rfm69:

      • rfm69 (not the high power one) has better range than basic nrf.
      • you can use listenmode (not in mysensors yet) which means waking up your deep sleep node by interrupt. And that's a very nice feature.
      • I think (perhaps I'm wrong) a little bit better noise immune against some switching regulator...even it does not hurt to filter things a bit..
      • etc

      Some downside of rfm69:

      • footprint a little bit bigger but you will never have a 1x1cm node lol
      • price...but less clones..
      • antenna not integrated. too bad
      NeverDieN Offline
      NeverDieN Offline
      NeverDie
      Hero Member
      wrote on last edited by
      #8

      @scalz

      I mainly should have emphasized the compactness rather than the footprint of the SMD (since it's small and includes a PCB antenna), as compared to the RFM69, which has a comparable footprint to the SMD but which still needs an antenna.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • scalzS scalz

        I agree on some points too :)
        I would add about rfm69:

        • rfm69 (not the high power one) has better range than basic nrf.
        • you can use listenmode (not in mysensors yet) which means waking up your deep sleep node by interrupt. And that's a very nice feature.
        • I think (perhaps I'm wrong) a little bit better noise immune against some switching regulator...even it does not hurt to filter things a bit..
        • etc

        Some downside of rfm69:

        • footprint a little bit bigger but you will never have a 1x1cm node lol
        • price...but less clones..
        • antenna not integrated. too bad
        C Offline
        C Offline
        cablesky
        wrote on last edited by cablesky
        #9

        @scalz

        you can use listenmode (not in mysensors yet) which means waking up your deep sleep node by interrupt. And that's a very nice feature.

        Do you know, when it works in mysensors?? Its very interesting!

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • scalzS Offline
          scalzS Offline
          scalz
          Hardware Contributor
          wrote on last edited by
          #10

          @cablesky
          yep I have it working in mysensors dev ;) locally, not released, i just need to look at an howto PR (pull request to mysensors lib). not done yet..
          i will give news here https://forum.mysensors.org/topic/3483/rfm69-and-atc/23 when the PR will be ok.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • NeverDieN Offline
            NeverDieN Offline
            NeverDie
            Hero Member
            wrote on last edited by
            #11

            ListenMode is one of the things that originally attracted me to the RFM69. However, it's not as big a deal as I had originally thought. With an atmega328p you can approximate it quite easily on almost any radio.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • joaoabsJ Offline
              joaoabsJ Offline
              joaoabs
              wrote on last edited by
              #12

              I see this topic is about 2 years old.

              I'm wondering about improvements in the mentioned CONs of the RFM69.
              Security is a concern for myself, so I'm testing the NRFs with signing (that don't allow encription).

              Eventhough I'm a big fan of mysensors for over 3 years or so, I believe this is the year that I'm going to really implement it on my house!

              Aspects that I care are security, reliability (ack's & retransmits), and range.
              For instance, footprint isn't a concern for me.

              So my question is: Should I re-use the good-old NRFs I have lying around, or should I invest now in the RFM69's and therefore have an improved future-proofness?

              What would be the plan of mysensors initiative in the future? To focus on the RFM69's ?

              The listenmode feature seems great... Have it been included in mysensors already?

              Thanks,

              AnticimexA alexsh1A 2 Replies Last reply
              0
              • joaoabsJ joaoabs

                I see this topic is about 2 years old.

                I'm wondering about improvements in the mentioned CONs of the RFM69.
                Security is a concern for myself, so I'm testing the NRFs with signing (that don't allow encription).

                Eventhough I'm a big fan of mysensors for over 3 years or so, I believe this is the year that I'm going to really implement it on my house!

                Aspects that I care are security, reliability (ack's & retransmits), and range.
                For instance, footprint isn't a concern for me.

                So my question is: Should I re-use the good-old NRFs I have lying around, or should I invest now in the RFM69's and therefore have an improved future-proofness?

                What would be the plan of mysensors initiative in the future? To focus on the RFM69's ?

                The listenmode feature seems great... Have it been included in mysensors already?

                Thanks,

                AnticimexA Offline
                AnticimexA Offline
                Anticimex
                Contest Winner
                wrote on last edited by
                #13

                @joaoabs encryption is available for all radios, in hardware and if not supported, in software.
                But if you want something future proof, go for nrf52.

                Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • dbemowskD Offline
                  dbemowskD Offline
                  dbemowsk
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #14

                  Is the pin 2 interrupt working for nRF? That too would be nice in places.

                  Vera Plus running UI7 with MySensors, Sonoffs and 1-Wire devices
                  Visit my website for more Bits, Bytes and Ramblings from me: http://dan.bemowski.info/

                  YveauxY 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • dbemowskD dbemowsk

                    Is the pin 2 interrupt working for nRF? That too would be nice in places.

                    YveauxY Offline
                    YveauxY Offline
                    Yveaux
                    Mod
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #15

                    @dbemowsk Yes, see e.g. here https://forum.mysensors.org/topic/7190/irq-pin-for-nrf24l01

                    http://yveaux.blogspot.nl

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • joaoabsJ joaoabs

                      I see this topic is about 2 years old.

                      I'm wondering about improvements in the mentioned CONs of the RFM69.
                      Security is a concern for myself, so I'm testing the NRFs with signing (that don't allow encription).

                      Eventhough I'm a big fan of mysensors for over 3 years or so, I believe this is the year that I'm going to really implement it on my house!

                      Aspects that I care are security, reliability (ack's & retransmits), and range.
                      For instance, footprint isn't a concern for me.

                      So my question is: Should I re-use the good-old NRFs I have lying around, or should I invest now in the RFM69's and therefore have an improved future-proofness?

                      What would be the plan of mysensors initiative in the future? To focus on the RFM69's ?

                      The listenmode feature seems great... Have it been included in mysensors already?

                      Thanks,

                      alexsh1A Offline
                      alexsh1A Offline
                      alexsh1
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #16

                      @joaoabs I have both nrf24l01+ and rfm69w
                      My recommendation is rfm69w. Yes a bit more expensive but the amount of time I spent troubleshooting nrf clones could have been used elsewhere. Rfm69w just works out of the box in 98%. No clones and that means you won’t have strange NACKs and do not have to call for a shaman to make it work 🤣

                      gohanG 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • alexsh1A alexsh1

                        @joaoabs I have both nrf24l01+ and rfm69w
                        My recommendation is rfm69w. Yes a bit more expensive but the amount of time I spent troubleshooting nrf clones could have been used elsewhere. Rfm69w just works out of the box in 98%. No clones and that means you won’t have strange NACKs and do not have to call for a shaman to make it work 🤣

                        gohanG Offline
                        gohanG Offline
                        gohan
                        Mod
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #17

                        @alexsh1 and don't forget signal RSSI values

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • AnticimexA Offline
                          AnticimexA Offline
                          Anticimex
                          Contest Winner
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #18

                          I know this might be considered off topic, but if you want future proofing, make sure you run on a platform with more memory than atmega328p. As for what radio to use, there is nothing in the roadmap that hints at any existing radio being dropped from the supported list. That said, nrf24 does carry a bunch of issues with it with respect to counterfeit chips.

                          Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • JohnRobJ Offline
                            JohnRobJ Offline
                            JohnRob
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #19

                            I recently started with MySensors. I chose the RFM69W radio over the nrf24 due to posts complaining about range issues with the nrf24. That said I can tell I can tell you the range of my RFM69W is excellent. From my basement (concrete foundation) to the other side of my neighbors house ~75 meters with no issues.

                            The only drawback I see is the voltage limit of 3.3Vdc. This precludes using some batteries without a regulator.

                            I also found the external antenna could be a + or -. Currently I'm using a coil / spring type antenna mounted on the board.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • gohanG Offline
                              gohanG Offline
                              gohan
                              Mod
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #20

                              If you use LiFePO4 batteries you don't need any regulator

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • JohnRobJ Offline
                                JohnRobJ Offline
                                JohnRob
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #21

                                @gohan

                                Thank you for the comment. Somehow I was under the impression the NRF24 would accept a 5V for power. However now I see only the inputs are 5V tolerant.

                                dbemowskD 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • JohnRobJ JohnRob

                                  @gohan

                                  Thank you for the comment. Somehow I was under the impression the NRF24 would accept a 5V for power. However now I see only the inputs are 5V tolerant.

                                  dbemowskD Offline
                                  dbemowskD Offline
                                  dbemowsk
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #22

                                  @johnrob Be careful. nRF24 radios are easy to blow if you feed them 5V for power.

                                  Vera Plus running UI7 with MySensors, Sonoffs and 1-Wire devices
                                  Visit my website for more Bits, Bytes and Ramblings from me: http://dan.bemowski.info/

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  Reply
                                  • Reply as topic
                                  Log in to reply
                                  • Oldest to Newest
                                  • Newest to Oldest
                                  • Most Votes


                                  11

                                  Online

                                  11.7k

                                  Users

                                  11.2k

                                  Topics

                                  113.1k

                                  Posts


                                  Copyright 2025 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
                                  • Login

                                  • Don't have an account? Register

                                  • Login or register to search.
                                  • First post
                                    Last post
                                  0
                                  • MySensors
                                  • OpenHardware.io
                                  • Categories
                                  • Recent
                                  • Tags
                                  • Popular