Skip to content
  • MySensors
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Hardware
  3. Arduino Pro Vs Nano

Arduino Pro Vs Nano

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
5 Posts 4 Posters 5.4k Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • N Offline
    N Offline
    NotYetRated
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Can one please help me to understand using a Pro vs using a Nano for a sensor network?

    After contemplating it, I see no reason to go with a Pro. If going pro, then you most likely need to step voltage up/down for your wireless card and/or your sensors. The additional cost here pretty much eats up the savings over the cost of the Nano, which has 3.3V and 5V built in.

    Is size much different? I did not see a drawing showing board size, for places with intense space constraints.

    Are there other considerations that I am missing? Or perhaps it is just me, willing to spend the extra buck or two, so that I don't have to deal with regulators or the USB connection cable.

    hekH wmylionelW 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • N NotYetRated

      Can one please help me to understand using a Pro vs using a Nano for a sensor network?

      After contemplating it, I see no reason to go with a Pro. If going pro, then you most likely need to step voltage up/down for your wireless card and/or your sensors. The additional cost here pretty much eats up the savings over the cost of the Nano, which has 3.3V and 5V built in.

      Is size much different? I did not see a drawing showing board size, for places with intense space constraints.

      Are there other considerations that I am missing? Or perhaps it is just me, willing to spend the extra buck or two, so that I don't have to deal with regulators or the USB connection cable.

      hekH Offline
      hekH Offline
      hek
      Admin
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      @NotYetRated
      I wouldn't use Nano for battery operated sensors. The other factor is price.

      N 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • hekH hek

        @NotYetRated
        I wouldn't use Nano for battery operated sensors. The other factor is price.

        N Offline
        N Offline
        NotYetRated
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        @hek Had not considered battery longevity. The sensors I am currently building are all wall wart powered.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • A Offline
          A Offline
          andriej
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          I have "nano's" all over my house and they're fine with ease of programming and being usb-powered.
          The only reason I'd like to try Pro's are battery powered sensors, which I plan to build later on.

          :-)

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • N NotYetRated

            Can one please help me to understand using a Pro vs using a Nano for a sensor network?

            After contemplating it, I see no reason to go with a Pro. If going pro, then you most likely need to step voltage up/down for your wireless card and/or your sensors. The additional cost here pretty much eats up the savings over the cost of the Nano, which has 3.3V and 5V built in.

            Is size much different? I did not see a drawing showing board size, for places with intense space constraints.

            Are there other considerations that I am missing? Or perhaps it is just me, willing to spend the extra buck or two, so that I don't have to deal with regulators or the USB connection cable.

            wmylionelW Offline
            wmylionelW Offline
            wmylionel
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            @NotYetRated Biggest difference I see is the USB FTDI onboard, good if your are connecting to a vera or something needing the comms. If it is going to be purely a sensor node, I don't see why u need this. The pro mini has 5v and 3.3v variations, or look for switchable ones, pro mini enhancements. If you are frequently reprogramming it, then easier with the nano, I'm fine using a separate ftdi board for programming purposes.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            Reply
            • Reply as topic
            Log in to reply
            • Oldest to Newest
            • Newest to Oldest
            • Most Votes


            26

            Online

            11.7k

            Users

            11.2k

            Topics

            113.1k

            Posts


            Copyright 2025 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
            • Login

            • Don't have an account? Register

            • Login or register to search.
            • First post
              Last post
            0
            • MySensors
            • OpenHardware.io
            • Categories
            • Recent
            • Tags
            • Popular