Skip to content
  • MySensors
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. General Discussion
  3. Enable RF24 Encryption with mysensors V2.x

Enable RF24 Encryption with mysensors V2.x

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
21 Posts 7 Posters 6.3k Views 8 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • AnticimexA Anticimex

    @Nicklas-Starkel From the documentation:
    If a node does require signing, any unsigned message sent to the node will be rejected.
    This also applies to the gateway. However, the difference is that the gateway will only require signed messages from nodes it knows in turn require signed messages.

    N Offline
    N Offline
    Nicklas Starkel
    wrote on last edited by
    #11

    @Anticimex

    ahh, so basically the gateway will always accept everything, but nodes will not if signing is enabled.

    Maybe it's a longshot, but I was worried that if someone knows my MQTT pathways they would be able to
    1: Use a node and send information (ex MQTT/MyActuator/TurnON)
    2: The gateway picks it up and converts to MQTT information and publish to MQTT broker
    3: My actuator subscribes to this special channel and gets the "TurnON"
    And then for example turns on my lights or whatever.

    While I was writing this I realize more and more that the above is pretty far fetched :)
    Also, I have separated MySensors channel from other channels so they should be safe.

    But to be on the safe side and there seems not to be any apparent drawbacks, I will use Whitelisting as well.
    Thank you for the help @Anticimex !

    AnticimexA 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • N Nicklas Starkel

      @Anticimex

      ahh, so basically the gateway will always accept everything, but nodes will not if signing is enabled.

      Maybe it's a longshot, but I was worried that if someone knows my MQTT pathways they would be able to
      1: Use a node and send information (ex MQTT/MyActuator/TurnON)
      2: The gateway picks it up and converts to MQTT information and publish to MQTT broker
      3: My actuator subscribes to this special channel and gets the "TurnON"
      And then for example turns on my lights or whatever.

      While I was writing this I realize more and more that the above is pretty far fetched :)
      Also, I have separated MySensors channel from other channels so they should be safe.

      But to be on the safe side and there seems not to be any apparent drawbacks, I will use Whitelisting as well.
      Thank you for the help @Anticimex !

      AnticimexA Offline
      AnticimexA Offline
      Anticimex
      Contest Winner
      wrote on last edited by
      #12

      @Nicklas-Starkel you're welcome. This behaviour is because we did not want to turn a gw that require signatures useless to nodes that for any reason cannot use signing. It could be that this is changed at some point on the future so that a gw that require signatures does it for all nodes. But for now it doesn't for backwards compatibility. And it is considered that signing first of all is used for data going out to a node. Typically an actuator. And yes, whitelisting can also be added to further strengthen security if you fear nodes could be hijacked.
      I'm glad the features are being used :)

      Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

      1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • S Offline
        S Offline
        Sharath B Krishna
        wrote on last edited by
        #13

        Have one query... by just enabling the RF24 Encryption with the MY ENCRYPTION SIMPLE PASSWORD, is it required that all nodes have it set along with the gateway?

        can a non encryption enabled node communicate with the gateway(encryption enabled) ? like we have with the signing ?

        mfalkviddM 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • S Sharath B Krishna

          Have one query... by just enabling the RF24 Encryption with the MY ENCRYPTION SIMPLE PASSWORD, is it required that all nodes have it set along with the gateway?

          can a non encryption enabled node communicate with the gateway(encryption enabled) ? like we have with the signing ?

          mfalkviddM Offline
          mfalkviddM Offline
          mfalkvidd
          Mod
          wrote on last edited by
          #14

          Welcome to the MySensors community @sharath-b-krishna. Great to have you here.

          from the documentation:

          #define MY_RF24_ENABLE_ENCRYPTION
          Define this to enable software based AES encryption.

          All nodes and gateway must have this enabled, and all must be personalized with the same AES key.

          S 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • mfalkviddM mfalkvidd

            Welcome to the MySensors community @sharath-b-krishna. Great to have you here.

            from the documentation:

            #define MY_RF24_ENABLE_ENCRYPTION
            Define this to enable software based AES encryption.

            All nodes and gateway must have this enabled, and all must be personalized with the same AES key.

            S Offline
            S Offline
            Sharath B Krishna
            wrote on last edited by
            #15

            @mfalkvidd thanks , I understand its necessary since nodes with encryption need to communicate... but what is not clear is .....is it possible for nodes without encryption enabled also to communicate to gateway ?

            like how nodes without signing enabled can still communicate with the gateway ..

            AnticimexA 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • S Sharath B Krishna

              @mfalkvidd thanks , I understand its necessary since nodes with encryption need to communicate... but what is not clear is .....is it possible for nodes without encryption enabled also to communicate to gateway ?

              like how nodes without signing enabled can still communicate with the gateway ..

              AnticimexA Offline
              AnticimexA Offline
              Anticimex
              Contest Winner
              wrote on last edited by
              #16

              @sharath-b-krishna no, as encryption is done in the physical layer while signing is done in the routing layer.
              Encryption applies to ALL messages at ALL times so a gw has now way of distinguishing a node that encrypts messages from a node that doesn't.
              Signing is done conditionally depending on requirements exchanged between gw and node and also on certain types of messages.
              Security is guaranteed by persistent storage on the GW side of nodes that communicate certain signing requirements so rogue nodes cannot just tell the GW to reset the requirements for a node if signing has been enabled at any point in history without physical access to the gw.
              Encryption does not do any of this logic as it implies that certain messages has to be exchanged between gw and node which both need to "understand".

              Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • alowhumA Offline
                alowhumA Offline
                alowhum
                Plugin Developer
                wrote on last edited by
                #17

                @Sharath-B-Krishna In other words: it's all or nothing :-)

                AnticimexA 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • alowhumA alowhum

                  @Sharath-B-Krishna In other words: it's all or nothing :-)

                  AnticimexA Offline
                  AnticimexA Offline
                  Anticimex
                  Contest Winner
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #18

                  @alowhum @Sharath-B-Krishna yes, at least if we are talking a single gw setup. It is possible to use two gw:s to have two separate networks. One can be encrypted and the other plain.

                  Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  • S Offline
                    S Offline
                    Sharath B Krishna
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #19

                    @anticimex said in Enable RF24 Encryption with mysensors V2.x:

                    could

                    thanks @Anticimex ... also is the Encryption simple password stored in the eeprom? would be easily readable with a eeprom read program ?

                    AnticimexA 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • S Sharath B Krishna

                      @anticimex said in Enable RF24 Encryption with mysensors V2.x:

                      could

                      thanks @Anticimex ... also is the Encryption simple password stored in the eeprom? would be easily readable with a eeprom read program ?

                      AnticimexA Offline
                      AnticimexA Offline
                      Anticimex
                      Contest Winner
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #20

                      @sharath-b-krishna no, the simple options have all secrets stored in the sketch, so don't put your production code on github if you plan to use that :)

                      Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • S Offline
                        S Offline
                        Sharath B Krishna
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #21

                        thanks @Anticimex

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        22

                        Online

                        11.7k

                        Users

                        11.2k

                        Topics

                        113.1k

                        Posts


                        Copyright 2025 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • MySensors
                        • OpenHardware.io
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular