Skip to content
  • MySensors
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Announcements
  3. 💬 Building a Raspberry Pi Gateway

💬 Building a Raspberry Pi Gateway

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Announcements
1.1k Posts 173 Posters 423.1k Views 131 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • P pandy

    the result of sudo ./bin/mysgw -d is :

    mysgw: Starting gateway...
    mysgw: Protocol version - 2.2.0-beta

    and it blocks..

    gohanG Offline
    gohanG Offline
    gohan
    Mod
    wrote on last edited by
    #543

    @pandy that's definitely a problem. What linux are you using?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • P pandy

      the result of sudo ./bin/mysgw -d is :

      mysgw: Starting gateway...
      mysgw: Protocol version - 2.2.0-beta

      and it blocks..

      S Offline
      S Offline
      sineverba
      Hardware Contributor
      wrote on last edited by
      #544

      @pandy Same my problem.
      @gohan I did try also the DIETPI, how you did suggest to me some days ago. Only to say to @pandy let down the idea to use PI1. Use arduino usb/serial with your PI1.
      I did use several nights.... :(

      P 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • P Offline
        P Offline
        pandy
        wrote on last edited by
        #545

        Thanks to everyone for the answers and suggestions...
        At this point I think the problem is the raspberry type..
        I will try the suggested solution above otherwise I will be forced to change raspberry ..
        Thanks to everyone for help

        gohanG 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • S sineverba

          @pandy Same my problem.
          @gohan I did try also the DIETPI, how you did suggest to me some days ago. Only to say to @pandy let down the idea to use PI1. Use arduino usb/serial with your PI1.
          I did use several nights.... :(

          P Offline
          P Offline
          pandy
          wrote on last edited by
          #546

          @sineverba thank you for your suggestion..Do you have a link where I can find a tutorial for this system?
          thank you so much

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • P pandy

            Thanks to everyone for the answers and suggestions...
            At this point I think the problem is the raspberry type..
            I will try the suggested solution above otherwise I will be forced to change raspberry ..
            Thanks to everyone for help

            gohanG Offline
            gohanG Offline
            gohan
            Mod
            wrote on last edited by
            #547

            @pandy go for a new rpi3 that works very well.

            1 Reply Last reply
            1
            • Velo17V Offline
              Velo17V Offline
              Velo17
              wrote on last edited by
              #548

              Hello everyone!

              I am trying to use a NRF24 module on the SPI1 of a Raspberry2 (so that I can also use a touch tft on SPI0).

              I enabled it in the config.txt so that is lists under /dev/spidev1.0 - for conveniency I configured the CS0 to be at GPIO16=Pin36 (by using dtoverlay=spi1-1cs,cs0_pin=16).

              I use the dev branch of MySensors.git as the master branch does not recognize my Pi. I used this configure line:

              ./configure --my-rf24-channel=124 --my-rf24-irq-pin=29 --my-rf24-ce-pin=31 --my-rf24-cs-pin=36 --spi-driver=SPIDEV --spi-spidev-device=/dev/spidev1.0
              

              successful make
              but when I run the gateway in the shell with sudo ./bin/mysgw -d, I get the following:

              mysgw: Starting gateway...
              mysgw: Protocol version - 2.2.0-beta
               __  __       ____
              |  \/  |_   _/ ___|  ___ _ __  ___  ___  _ __ ___
              | |\/| | | | \___ \ / _ \ `_ \/ __|/ _ \| `__/ __|
              | |  | | |_| |___| |  __/ | | \__ \  _  | |  \__ \
              |_|  |_|\__, |____/ \___|_| |_|___/\___/|_|  |___/
                      |___/                      2.2.0-beta
              
              mysgw: MCO:BGN:INIT CP=RNNG--Q-
              mysgw: TSF:LRT:OK
              mysgw: TSM:INIT
              mysgw: TSF:WUR:MS=0
              mysgw: pinMode: invalid pin: 29
              mysgw: pinMode: invalid pin: 31
              mysgw: pinMode: invalid pin: 36
              mysgw: digitalWrite: invalid pin: 31
              mysgw: digitalWrite: invalid pin: 36
              mysgw: digitalPinToInterrupt: invalid pin: 29
              mysgw: digitalPinToInterrupt: invalid pin: 29
              mysgw: digitalWrite: invalid pin: 36
              

              Any ideas what I can do to make it work?

              Velo17V 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • Velo17V Velo17

                Hello everyone!

                I am trying to use a NRF24 module on the SPI1 of a Raspberry2 (so that I can also use a touch tft on SPI0).

                I enabled it in the config.txt so that is lists under /dev/spidev1.0 - for conveniency I configured the CS0 to be at GPIO16=Pin36 (by using dtoverlay=spi1-1cs,cs0_pin=16).

                I use the dev branch of MySensors.git as the master branch does not recognize my Pi. I used this configure line:

                ./configure --my-rf24-channel=124 --my-rf24-irq-pin=29 --my-rf24-ce-pin=31 --my-rf24-cs-pin=36 --spi-driver=SPIDEV --spi-spidev-device=/dev/spidev1.0
                

                successful make
                but when I run the gateway in the shell with sudo ./bin/mysgw -d, I get the following:

                mysgw: Starting gateway...
                mysgw: Protocol version - 2.2.0-beta
                 __  __       ____
                |  \/  |_   _/ ___|  ___ _ __  ___  ___  _ __ ___
                | |\/| | | | \___ \ / _ \ `_ \/ __|/ _ \| `__/ __|
                | |  | | |_| |___| |  __/ | | \__ \  _  | |  \__ \
                |_|  |_|\__, |____/ \___|_| |_|___/\___/|_|  |___/
                        |___/                      2.2.0-beta
                
                mysgw: MCO:BGN:INIT CP=RNNG--Q-
                mysgw: TSF:LRT:OK
                mysgw: TSM:INIT
                mysgw: TSF:WUR:MS=0
                mysgw: pinMode: invalid pin: 29
                mysgw: pinMode: invalid pin: 31
                mysgw: pinMode: invalid pin: 36
                mysgw: digitalWrite: invalid pin: 31
                mysgw: digitalWrite: invalid pin: 36
                mysgw: digitalPinToInterrupt: invalid pin: 29
                mysgw: digitalPinToInterrupt: invalid pin: 29
                mysgw: digitalWrite: invalid pin: 36
                

                Any ideas what I can do to make it work?

                Velo17V Offline
                Velo17V Offline
                Velo17
                wrote on last edited by Velo17
                #549

                I think I might have found the root of the problem. The ./configure detects my Rpi2 as such (rpi2) but in the RPi.cpp in line 26 there is the pin to GPIO translation array and it is lacking translations for the high pin numbers - which is obviously wrong as on the RPi2 you have the extended GPIO connector with 40 pins...

                const static int pin_to_gpio_rev1[41] = {-1, -1, -1, 0, -1, 1, -1, 4, 14, -1, 15, 17, 18, 21, -1, 22, 23, -1, 24, 10, -1, 9, 25, 11, 8, -1, 7, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1 };
                const static int pin_to_gpio_rev2[41] = {-1, -1, -1, 2, -1, 3, -1, 4, 14, -1, 15, 17, 18, 27, -1, 22, 23, -1, 24, 10, -1, 9, 25, 11, 8, -1, 7, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1 };
                const static int pin_to_gpio_rev3[41] = {-1, -1, -1, 2, -1, 3, -1, 4, 14, -1, 15, 17, 18, 27, -1, 22, 23, -1, 24, 10, -1, 9, 25, 11, 8, -1, 7, -1, -1, 5, -1, 6, 12, 13, -1, 19, 16, 26, 20, -1, 21 };
                

                I copied the rev3 array to the rev2 array and compiled this and it seems to work in my case!

                W 1 Reply Last reply
                3
                • Velo17V Velo17

                  I think I might have found the root of the problem. The ./configure detects my Rpi2 as such (rpi2) but in the RPi.cpp in line 26 there is the pin to GPIO translation array and it is lacking translations for the high pin numbers - which is obviously wrong as on the RPi2 you have the extended GPIO connector with 40 pins...

                  const static int pin_to_gpio_rev1[41] = {-1, -1, -1, 0, -1, 1, -1, 4, 14, -1, 15, 17, 18, 21, -1, 22, 23, -1, 24, 10, -1, 9, 25, 11, 8, -1, 7, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1 };
                  const static int pin_to_gpio_rev2[41] = {-1, -1, -1, 2, -1, 3, -1, 4, 14, -1, 15, 17, 18, 27, -1, 22, 23, -1, 24, 10, -1, 9, 25, 11, 8, -1, 7, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1 };
                  const static int pin_to_gpio_rev3[41] = {-1, -1, -1, 2, -1, 3, -1, 4, 14, -1, 15, 17, 18, 27, -1, 22, 23, -1, 24, 10, -1, 9, 25, 11, 8, -1, 7, -1, -1, 5, -1, 6, 12, 13, -1, 19, 16, 26, 20, -1, 21 };
                  

                  I copied the rev3 array to the rev2 array and compiled this and it seems to work in my case!

                  W Offline
                  W Offline
                  wergeld
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #550

                  @Velo17 Thank you! I had been pulling my hair out over this issue on installing a new RPi2 setup.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • mfalkviddM Offline
                    mfalkviddM Offline
                    mfalkvidd
                    Mod
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #551

                    Adding link to the github issue (thanks for creating!) for future reference
                    https://github.com/mysensors/MySensors/issues/895

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • Velo17V Offline
                      Velo17V Offline
                      Velo17
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #552

                      I just noticed that mysgw is constantly consuming 95-100% CPU here. This even happens when I unplug the NRF24 module so that after starting mysgw basically nothing happens. Running development branch. Hmmmm. Any idea what to check?

                      mfalkviddM 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • Velo17V Velo17

                        I just noticed that mysgw is constantly consuming 95-100% CPU here. This even happens when I unplug the NRF24 module so that after starting mysgw basically nothing happens. Running development branch. Hmmmm. Any idea what to check?

                        mfalkviddM Offline
                        mfalkviddM Offline
                        mfalkvidd
                        Mod
                        wrote on last edited by mfalkvidd
                        #553

                        @Velo17 strace might be able to help:

                        sudo strace ./bin/mysgw -d
                        

                        Could you post your configure command? I'd like to try to reproduce the problem. I have a gateway with development from git as of about 2 weeks ago (a9418271) but I'm not using the nrf24. That gateway uses about 2% cpu on my Raspberry Pi 1. There have only been 6 commits since I built my gateway but I can update it and see if it starts acting up.

                        On my gateway, strace outputs loads and loads of these:

                        gettimeofday({1501098316, 668956}, NULL) = 0
                        ioctl(6, FIONREAD, [0])                 = 0
                        gettimeofday({1501098316, 671383}, NULL) = 0
                        gettimeofday({1501098316, 672447}, NULL) = 0
                        gettimeofday({1501098316, 673818}, NULL) = 0
                        nanosleep({0, 10000000}, NULL)          = 0
                        gettimeofday({1501098316, 685602}, NULL) = 0
                        getsockopt(6, SOL_TCP, TCP_INFO, "\1\0\0\0\0\7g\1P4\3\0@\234\0\0\250\5\0\0\30\2\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., [104]) = 0
                        getsockopt(6, SOL_TCP, TCP_INFO, "\1\0\0\0\0\7g\1P4\3\0@\234\0\0\250\5\0\0\30\2\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., [104]) = 0
                        gettimeofday({1501098316, 689179}, NULL) = 0
                        ioctl(6, FIONREAD, [0])                 = 0
                        

                        Also, which git hash are you using? (git log -1)

                        Another thing to try could be to enable all the debug flags in MyConfig.h and see if they give you something interesting.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • mfalkviddM Offline
                          mfalkviddM Offline
                          mfalkvidd
                          Mod
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #554

                          I updated my gateway to 10ef623 (latest from git). Still works ok.

                          Velo17V 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • mfalkviddM mfalkvidd

                            I updated my gateway to 10ef623 (latest from git). Still works ok.

                            Velo17V Offline
                            Velo17V Offline
                            Velo17
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #555

                            @mfalkvidd I make / make install a couple of times and maybe did a git pull inbetween as well - now everything is back to normal again. Thank you for giving me some dbug tips for the next issue :-)

                            My strace output looks similiar.

                            My configure line is

                            ./configure --my-rf24-channel=124 --my-rf24-irq-pin=29 --my-rf24-ce-pin=31 --my-rf24-cs-pin=36 --spi-driver=SPIDEV --spi-spidev-device=/dev/spidev1.0 --my-debug=disable
                            
                            1 Reply Last reply
                            1
                            • Sergio RiusS Offline
                              Sergio RiusS Offline
                              Sergio Rius
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #556

                              Should be possible to connect two radio modules and run two instances at the same time?
                              It could be interesting to have a hat with nrf+rfm, all in one.

                              mfalkviddM 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • Sergio RiusS Sergio Rius

                                Should be possible to connect two radio modules and run two instances at the same time?
                                It could be interesting to have a hat with nrf+rfm, all in one.

                                mfalkviddM Offline
                                mfalkviddM Offline
                                mfalkvidd
                                Mod
                                wrote on last edited by mfalkvidd
                                #557

                                @Sergio-Rius it would be great if you could contribute to making that a reality.
                                An earlier discussion on the same topic: https://forum.mysensors.org/topic/4151/nrf24l01-and-rfm69-on-one-gw/

                                So far, people have found it easier to add a separate gateway for each transport.

                                Sergio RiusS 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • mfalkviddM mfalkvidd

                                  @Sergio-Rius it would be great if you could contribute to making that a reality.
                                  An earlier discussion on the same topic: https://forum.mysensors.org/topic/4151/nrf24l01-and-rfm69-on-one-gw/

                                  So far, people have found it easier to add a separate gateway for each transport.

                                  Sergio RiusS Offline
                                  Sergio RiusS Offline
                                  Sergio Rius
                                  wrote on last edited by Sergio Rius
                                  #558

                                  @mfalkvidd thanks for guiding me on the starting point. Perhaps the raspberry can break the doble transport limitation.
                                  I'll investigate in how to install two services at once. But it'll would be nice any advice on the device virtualization part.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • mfalkviddM Offline
                                    mfalkviddM Offline
                                    mfalkvidd
                                    Mod
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #559

                                    Another thread: https://forum.mysensors.org/topic/2331/gateway-with-both-rfm69-and-nrf24l01/

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • mfalkviddM Offline
                                      mfalkviddM Offline
                                      mfalkvidd
                                      Mod
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #560

                                      Maybe it could be as simple as running two instances of mysgw, using different pins for the nrf and the rfm?

                                      Sergio RiusS 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • mfalkviddM mfalkvidd

                                        Maybe it could be as simple as running two instances of mysgw, using different pins for the nrf and the rfm?

                                        Sergio RiusS Offline
                                        Sergio RiusS Offline
                                        Sergio Rius
                                        wrote on last edited by Sergio Rius
                                        #561

                                        @mfalkvidd Maybe. I'm programmer, but not for Linux. My concern is the part of the service that creates the virtual device colliding between the instances.
                                        I'll do a test in a virtual machine as soon as I have some time.
                                        It should be something easy to test.

                                        mfalkviddM 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • Sergio RiusS Sergio Rius

                                          @mfalkvidd Maybe. I'm programmer, but not for Linux. My concern is the part of the service that creates the virtual device colliding between the instances.
                                          I'll do a test in a virtual machine as soon as I have some time.
                                          It should be something easy to test.

                                          mfalkviddM Offline
                                          mfalkviddM Offline
                                          mfalkvidd
                                          Mod
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #562

                                          @Sergio-Rius by "virtual device", do you mean the com port? If that's the caee, it can be specified with --my-serial-pty=

                                          Ot let one gateway be serial and the other ethernet.

                                          Sergio RiusS 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          16

                                          Online

                                          11.7k

                                          Users

                                          11.2k

                                          Topics

                                          113.0k

                                          Posts


                                          Copyright 2019 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • MySensors
                                          • OpenHardware.io
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular