Skip to content
  • MySensors
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Announcements
  3. 💬 Air Humidity Sensor - DHT

💬 Air Humidity Sensor - DHT

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Announcements
149 Posts 48 Posters 47.9k Views 38 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • J Offline
    J Offline
    jwosnick
    wrote on last edited by jwosnick
    #71

    I've made a bit of an unusual observation in relationship to this script. I am running a fairly stripped-down version of it, but with the "standard" (not MySensors-customized) DHT library and its associated functions.

    Here is the code:

    // Enable debug prints
    #define MY_DEBUG
    
    // Enable and select radio type attached 
    #define MY_RADIO_NRF24
    //#define MY_RADIO_RFM69
    //#define MY_RS485
    
    #define MY_NODE_ID 47
    
    #include <SPI.h>
    #include <MySensors.h>  
    #include <DHT.h>
    
    // Set this to the pin you connected the DHT's data pin to
    #define DHT_DATA_PIN 5
    
    // Set this offset if the sensor has a permanent small offset to the real temperatures
    #define SENSOR_TEMP_OFFSET 0
    
    // Sleep time between sensor updates (in milliseconds)
    // Must be >1000ms for DHT22 and >2000ms for DHT11
    static const uint64_t UPDATE_INTERVAL = 10000;
    
    #define CHILD_ID_HUM 0
    #define CHILD_ID_TEMP 1
    
    bool metric = true;
    
    MyMessage msgHum(CHILD_ID_HUM, V_HUM);
    MyMessage msgTemp(CHILD_ID_TEMP, V_TEMP);
    DHT dht(DHT_DATA_PIN, DHT22);
    float temperature;
    float humidity;
    
    void presentation()  
    { 
      // Send the sketch version information to the gateway
      sendSketchInfo("TemperatureAndHumidity", "1.1");
    
      // Register all sensors to gw (they will be created as child devices)
      present(CHILD_ID_HUM, S_HUM);
      present(CHILD_ID_TEMP, S_TEMP);
    
      metric = getControllerConfig().isMetric;
    }
    
    
    void setup()
    {
      delay(100);
    }
    
    
    void loop()      
    {  
      
      // Get temperature from DHT library
      temperature = dht.readTemperature();
      if (isnan(temperature))
      {
        Serial.println("Failed reading temperature from DHT!");
      }
        
      else
      {
        send(msgTemp.set(temperature,0));
        #ifdef MY_DEBUG
        Serial.print("T: ");
        Serial.println(temperature);
        #endif
      }  
    
      // Get humidity from DHT library
      
      humidity = dht.readHumidity();
      if (isnan(humidity))
      {
        Serial.println("Failed reading humidity from DHT!");
      }
        
      else 
      {
        send(msgHum.set(humidity,1));
        #ifdef MY_DEBUG
        Serial.print("H: ");
        Serial.println(humidity);
        #endif
      }
    
      // Sleep for a while to save energy
      sleep(UPDATE_INTERVAL); 
    }
    

    I find that if I leave the last line as
    sleep(UPDATE_INTERVAL);
    then the sensor node ends up sending the same temperature and humidity values, over and over again, even if the actual humidity and temperature change.

    However, if I change the last line to
    delay(UPDATE_INTERVAL);
    then everything works as expected.

    This is with known good DHT22 units, so I suspect there is something funny about the sleep() function and the operation of the standard (not customized) DHT library.

    It took a lot of poking around to discover this, but is this in fact the reason why the MySensors customized DHT library is required for this script? Is that library necessary to make sleep() and DHT temperature measurements play nicely together?

    mfalkviddM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • gohanG Offline
      gohanG Offline
      gohan
      Mod
      wrote on last edited by
      #72

      What libraries versions are you using?

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • J jwosnick

        I've made a bit of an unusual observation in relationship to this script. I am running a fairly stripped-down version of it, but with the "standard" (not MySensors-customized) DHT library and its associated functions.

        Here is the code:

        // Enable debug prints
        #define MY_DEBUG
        
        // Enable and select radio type attached 
        #define MY_RADIO_NRF24
        //#define MY_RADIO_RFM69
        //#define MY_RS485
        
        #define MY_NODE_ID 47
        
        #include <SPI.h>
        #include <MySensors.h>  
        #include <DHT.h>
        
        // Set this to the pin you connected the DHT's data pin to
        #define DHT_DATA_PIN 5
        
        // Set this offset if the sensor has a permanent small offset to the real temperatures
        #define SENSOR_TEMP_OFFSET 0
        
        // Sleep time between sensor updates (in milliseconds)
        // Must be >1000ms for DHT22 and >2000ms for DHT11
        static const uint64_t UPDATE_INTERVAL = 10000;
        
        #define CHILD_ID_HUM 0
        #define CHILD_ID_TEMP 1
        
        bool metric = true;
        
        MyMessage msgHum(CHILD_ID_HUM, V_HUM);
        MyMessage msgTemp(CHILD_ID_TEMP, V_TEMP);
        DHT dht(DHT_DATA_PIN, DHT22);
        float temperature;
        float humidity;
        
        void presentation()  
        { 
          // Send the sketch version information to the gateway
          sendSketchInfo("TemperatureAndHumidity", "1.1");
        
          // Register all sensors to gw (they will be created as child devices)
          present(CHILD_ID_HUM, S_HUM);
          present(CHILD_ID_TEMP, S_TEMP);
        
          metric = getControllerConfig().isMetric;
        }
        
        
        void setup()
        {
          delay(100);
        }
        
        
        void loop()      
        {  
          
          // Get temperature from DHT library
          temperature = dht.readTemperature();
          if (isnan(temperature))
          {
            Serial.println("Failed reading temperature from DHT!");
          }
            
          else
          {
            send(msgTemp.set(temperature,0));
            #ifdef MY_DEBUG
            Serial.print("T: ");
            Serial.println(temperature);
            #endif
          }  
        
          // Get humidity from DHT library
          
          humidity = dht.readHumidity();
          if (isnan(humidity))
          {
            Serial.println("Failed reading humidity from DHT!");
          }
            
          else 
          {
            send(msgHum.set(humidity,1));
            #ifdef MY_DEBUG
            Serial.print("H: ");
            Serial.println(humidity);
            #endif
          }
        
          // Sleep for a while to save energy
          sleep(UPDATE_INTERVAL); 
        }
        

        I find that if I leave the last line as
        sleep(UPDATE_INTERVAL);
        then the sensor node ends up sending the same temperature and humidity values, over and over again, even if the actual humidity and temperature change.

        However, if I change the last line to
        delay(UPDATE_INTERVAL);
        then everything works as expected.

        This is with known good DHT22 units, so I suspect there is something funny about the sleep() function and the operation of the standard (not customized) DHT library.

        It took a lot of poking around to discover this, but is this in fact the reason why the MySensors customized DHT library is required for this script? Is that library necessary to make sleep() and DHT temperature measurements play nicely together?

        mfalkviddM Offline
        mfalkviddM Offline
        mfalkvidd
        Mod
        wrote on last edited by
        #73

        @jwosnick the example sketch has this:

          // Force reading sensor, so it works also after sleep()
        dht.readSensor(true);
        

        which is missing in your sketch. The comment suggests that it might be relevant.

        J 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • mfalkviddM mfalkvidd

          @jwosnick the example sketch has this:

            // Force reading sensor, so it works also after sleep()
          dht.readSensor(true);
          

          which is missing in your sketch. The comment suggests that it might be relevant.

          J Offline
          J Offline
          jwosnick
          wrote on last edited by
          #74

          @mfalkvidd

          Yes, absolutely. But it appears that the dht.readSensor() function is not actually part of the standard DHT library, but rather something that only appears in the MySensors-customized version of it. I'm trying to get a handle on why there is a need for a customized library.

          mfalkviddM 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • J jwosnick

            @mfalkvidd

            Yes, absolutely. But it appears that the dht.readSensor() function is not actually part of the standard DHT library, but rather something that only appears in the MySensors-customized version of it. I'm trying to get a handle on why there is a need for a customized library.

            mfalkviddM Offline
            mfalkviddM Offline
            mfalkvidd
            Mod
            wrote on last edited by
            #75

            @jwosnick seems like the most recent version of the original library calls readSensor when getTemperature is called.

            Maybe the most recent version can be used if the MySensors example sketch is rewritten to just use getTemperature? Would it be possible for you to test this? It would be great if we could get rid of the MySensors-custimized version of the library and just let people install the standard DHT library.

            J 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • mfalkviddM mfalkvidd

              @jwosnick seems like the most recent version of the original library calls readSensor when getTemperature is called.

              Maybe the most recent version can be used if the MySensors example sketch is rewritten to just use getTemperature? Would it be possible for you to test this? It would be great if we could get rid of the MySensors-custimized version of the library and just let people install the standard DHT library.

              J Offline
              J Offline
              jwosnick
              wrote on last edited by
              #76

              @mfalkvidd said in 💬 Air Humidity Sensor:

              @jwosnick seems like the most recent version of the original library calls readSensor when getTemperature is called.

              Yes, it does... but somehow that function is not "exposed" to the outside world. With a standard DHT test sketch (nothing to do with MySensors) calling readSensor throws an error.

              mfalkviddM A 2 Replies Last reply
              0
              • J jwosnick

                @mfalkvidd said in 💬 Air Humidity Sensor:

                @jwosnick seems like the most recent version of the original library calls readSensor when getTemperature is called.

                Yes, it does... but somehow that function is not "exposed" to the outside world. With a standard DHT test sketch (nothing to do with MySensors) calling readSensor throws an error.

                mfalkviddM Offline
                mfalkviddM Offline
                mfalkvidd
                Mod
                wrote on last edited by
                #77

                @jwosnick yes. But since readSensor is called inside getTemperature, there should be no need to call it manually.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • J jwosnick

                  @mfalkvidd said in 💬 Air Humidity Sensor:

                  @jwosnick seems like the most recent version of the original library calls readSensor when getTemperature is called.

                  Yes, it does... but somehow that function is not "exposed" to the outside world. With a standard DHT test sketch (nothing to do with MySensors) calling readSensor throws an error.

                  A Offline
                  A Offline
                  avgays
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #78

                  @jwosnick

                  As your set sensor model

                  DHT dht(DHT_DATA_PIN, DHT22);
                  

                  it looks like you use "Adafruit DHT-sensor-library".
                  It's need dht.begin(); in setup(){ } which is missing in your sketch

                  J 2 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • A avgays

                    @jwosnick

                    As your set sensor model

                    DHT dht(DHT_DATA_PIN, DHT22);
                    

                    it looks like you use "Adafruit DHT-sensor-library".
                    It's need dht.begin(); in setup(){ } which is missing in your sketch

                    J Offline
                    J Offline
                    jwosnick
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #79

                    @avgays
                    Good catch -- thanks. Yes, that is the library I am using.

                    Despite omitting that line, the script above works fine as long as the last line is a delay() function and not sleep(). If I use sleep(), it in fact appears to work, but sends the same temperature and humidity over and over again. So it is something about the sleep() function.

                    I will add in the dht.begin() and then put sleep() back in and see what happens.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • A avgays

                      @jwosnick

                      As your set sensor model

                      DHT dht(DHT_DATA_PIN, DHT22);
                      

                      it looks like you use "Adafruit DHT-sensor-library".
                      It's need dht.begin(); in setup(){ } which is missing in your sketch

                      J Offline
                      J Offline
                      jwosnick
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #80

                      @avgays Confirmed that even with dht.begin(); the script still sends the same temp and humidity info, over and over again, as long as the sleep() function is in there. As soon as sleep() is replaced by delay() it all works properly.

                      So I conclude from this that the MySensors-customized version of the DHT library must have something in it to make sleep() play nicely with the DHT unit. I wish I knew what that was. It would be ideal if this sensor (and the Dallas Semiconductor one) could be used with the MySensors system with their standard libraries.

                      A 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • J jwosnick

                        @avgays Confirmed that even with dht.begin(); the script still sends the same temp and humidity info, over and over again, as long as the sleep() function is in there. As soon as sleep() is replaced by delay() it all works properly.

                        So I conclude from this that the MySensors-customized version of the DHT library must have something in it to make sleep() play nicely with the DHT unit. I wish I knew what that was. It would be ideal if this sensor (and the Dallas Semiconductor one) could be used with the MySensors system with their standard libraries.

                        A Offline
                        A Offline
                        avgays
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #81

                        @jwosnick
                        Very strange as in my case this library work well with sleep() on battery-powered node.

                        Look like it's nessesary to add delay(2000); before or after sleep() as sleep mode stops all timers, so
                        currenttime - _lastreadtime =0
                        and function returns with no new measurements.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • DigdoggerD Offline
                          DigdoggerD Offline
                          Digdogger
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #82

                          Hi,
                          I would like to use this example and reduce power consumtion by removing the regulator on the mini Pro and the power led.
                          If we remove the regulator, we can power the board with 3V on Vcc. It will be OK for the mini pro and the NRF but the DHT22 needs 3.3V minimum. The solution will consist to use a step up boost module. What is the current consumtion of the step up boost?

                          AWIA J 2 Replies Last reply
                          0
                          • gohanG Offline
                            gohanG Offline
                            gohan
                            Mod
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #83

                            I don't know about DHT22, but NRF24 can work down to 1.8 or 1.9V so you can connect it directly to battery (take a look ad EasyPCB)

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • DigdoggerD Digdogger

                              Hi,
                              I would like to use this example and reduce power consumtion by removing the regulator on the mini Pro and the power led.
                              If we remove the regulator, we can power the board with 3V on Vcc. It will be OK for the mini pro and the NRF but the DHT22 needs 3.3V minimum. The solution will consist to use a step up boost module. What is the current consumtion of the step up boost?

                              AWIA Offline
                              AWIA Offline
                              AWI
                              Hero Member
                              wrote on last edited by AWI
                              #84

                              @Digdogger it's better to get rid of the DHT and use something more reliable and operating at lower voltages. Like si7021, sht21 or Bme280

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • DigdoggerD Offline
                                DigdoggerD Offline
                                Digdogger
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #85

                                Thanx for your answers. @AWI, the BME280 looks great and not expansive i will replace the DHT by this one. Thank you.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • DigdoggerD Digdogger

                                  Hi,
                                  I would like to use this example and reduce power consumtion by removing the regulator on the mini Pro and the power led.
                                  If we remove the regulator, we can power the board with 3V on Vcc. It will be OK for the mini pro and the NRF but the DHT22 needs 3.3V minimum. The solution will consist to use a step up boost module. What is the current consumtion of the step up boost?

                                  J Offline
                                  J Offline
                                  jwosnick
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #86

                                  @Digdogger
                                  Out of curiosity, do you expect there to be a big savings in power consumption by removing the regulator and power LED? I've never used the Mini Pro (the smallest I get to is the Nano) but I understand it already is very efficient with power usage.

                                  gohanG mfalkviddM 2 Replies Last reply
                                  0
                                  • DigdoggerD Offline
                                    DigdoggerD Offline
                                    Digdogger
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #87

                                    @jwosnick: please take a look here: http://www.home-automation-community.com/arduino-low-power-how-to-run-atmega328p-for-a-year-on-coin-cell-battery/.
                                    You'll see that the current saving is significant (almost 40% saving)

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • J jwosnick

                                      @Digdogger
                                      Out of curiosity, do you expect there to be a big savings in power consumption by removing the regulator and power LED? I've never used the Mini Pro (the smallest I get to is the Nano) but I understand it already is very efficient with power usage.

                                      gohanG Offline
                                      gohanG Offline
                                      gohan
                                      Mod
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #88

                                      @jwosnick
                                      Arduino is efficient for a live node, but for a battery powered sleeping node voltage regulators have a small drain on battery; led also consumes some power. The Nano has also the usb chip that is powered but not used that also increases battery drain. So, as rule of thumb, everything that is not really used/necessary will drain some battery over time.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • J jwosnick

                                        @Digdogger
                                        Out of curiosity, do you expect there to be a big savings in power consumption by removing the regulator and power LED? I've never used the Mini Pro (the smallest I get to is the Nano) but I understand it already is very efficient with power usage.

                                        mfalkviddM Offline
                                        mfalkviddM Offline
                                        mfalkvidd
                                        Mod
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #89

                                        @jwosnick with the led and regulator, battery life on 2xAA is about three weeks. Removing them will usually give you 2-5 years.

                                        J 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • mfalkviddM mfalkvidd

                                          @jwosnick with the led and regulator, battery life on 2xAA is about three weeks. Removing them will usually give you 2-5 years.

                                          J Offline
                                          J Offline
                                          jwosnick
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #90

                                          @mfalkvidd

                                          Thank you. I didn't realize the differences were so stark.

                                          I have some Pro Mini 3.3V units on order and hope to convert my sensors to that platform, when they arrive.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          1
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          16

                                          Online

                                          11.7k

                                          Users

                                          11.2k

                                          Topics

                                          113.1k

                                          Posts


                                          Copyright 2025 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • MySensors
                                          • OpenHardware.io
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular