Skip to content
  • MySensors
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. My Project
  3. Efergy e2 power meter

Efergy e2 power meter

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved My Project
33 Posts 9 Posters 12.7k Views 11 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • korttomaK Offline
    korttomaK Offline
    korttoma
    Hero Member
    wrote on last edited by korttoma
    #16

    Thanks @gtortone your formula seems to work. I just need to find a way to test higher values.

    I almost had the same formula but I did not have the "65535". Could you explain where you got this value from?

    -- S --
    9
    80
    46
    64
    76
    204
    254
    221
    -- E --
    abc_value = 19660current = 0.15A - power = 34.50 W
    23701 TSF:MSG:SEND,9-9-0-0,s=9,c=1,t=17,pt=2,l=2,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:34
    OK = 4 - short pk = 0 - long pk = 0 - crc bad = 0
    -- S --
    9
    80
    46
    64
    71
    173
    255
    186
    -- E --
    abc_value = 18349current = 0.28A - power = 64.40 W
    29693 TSF:MSG:SEND,9-9-0-0,s=9,c=1,t=17,pt=2,l=2,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:64
    OK = 5 - short pk = 0 - long pk = 0 - crc bad = 0
    -- S --
    9
    80
    46
    64
    115
    51
    255
    108
    -- E --
    abc_value = 29491current = 0.45A - power = 103.50 W
    35688 TSF:MSG:SEND,9-9-0-0,s=9,c=1,t=17,pt=2,l=2,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:103
    OK = 6 - short pk = 0 - long pk = 0 - crc bad = 0
    
    • Tomas
    G 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • korttomaK korttoma

      Thanks @gtortone your formula seems to work. I just need to find a way to test higher values.

      I almost had the same formula but I did not have the "65535". Could you explain where you got this value from?

      -- S --
      9
      80
      46
      64
      76
      204
      254
      221
      -- E --
      abc_value = 19660current = 0.15A - power = 34.50 W
      23701 TSF:MSG:SEND,9-9-0-0,s=9,c=1,t=17,pt=2,l=2,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:34
      OK = 4 - short pk = 0 - long pk = 0 - crc bad = 0
      -- S --
      9
      80
      46
      64
      71
      173
      255
      186
      -- E --
      abc_value = 18349current = 0.28A - power = 64.40 W
      29693 TSF:MSG:SEND,9-9-0-0,s=9,c=1,t=17,pt=2,l=2,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:64
      OK = 5 - short pk = 0 - long pk = 0 - crc bad = 0
      -- S --
      9
      80
      46
      64
      115
      51
      255
      108
      -- E --
      abc_value = 29491current = 0.45A - power = 103.50 W
      35688 TSF:MSG:SEND,9-9-0-0,s=9,c=1,t=17,pt=2,l=2,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:103
      OK = 6 - short pk = 0 - long pk = 0 - crc bad = 0
      
      G Offline
      G Offline
      gtortone
      wrote on last edited by
      #17

      Hi @korttoma,

      the value 65535 or 32768 often is used as multiplier from sensor that send metric;
      usually when you have to send a "small" float value (temperature, current) you can send it as integer
      multiplied by a big constant instead of sending it with a float value converted in binary...

      I just refined my formula with this that is more close to formula I found for my Efergy using a small
      constant:

      current = 18348 / 32768 / pow(2, 255-254 + 1) = 0.139 A
      current = 17693 / 32768 / pow(2, 255-255 + 1) = 0.269 A
      current = 28835 / 32768 / pow(2, 255-255 + 1) = 0.439 A

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • korttomaK Offline
        korttomaK Offline
        korttoma
        Hero Member
        wrote on last edited by
        #18

        Hi @gtortone I'm working on finalizing this node and I'm having some trouble with stability. The node stays alive from a few minutes to 30min and then stops communicating.

        What kind of decoupling capacitors are you using in your setup?
        I now have 2 pc 0.1uF, 2 pc 47uF and one 0.33uF.

        I use a HLK-PM03, a Pro Mini 3.3, and the NRF24L01+

        Debugging output don't give me much to go in since it just stops responding.

        • Tomas
        G 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • korttomaK korttoma

          Hi @gtortone I'm working on finalizing this node and I'm having some trouble with stability. The node stays alive from a few minutes to 30min and then stops communicating.

          What kind of decoupling capacitors are you using in your setup?
          I now have 2 pc 0.1uF, 2 pc 47uF and one 0.33uF.

          I use a HLK-PM03, a Pro Mini 3.3, and the NRF24L01+

          Debugging output don't give me much to go in since it just stops responding.

          G Offline
          G Offline
          gtortone
          wrote on last edited by
          #19

          @korttoma

          Hi,
          at the moment I'm defining some things in order to use RFM69 modules...
          in the past, on my NRF24L01+ I was using 10 uF capacitor but I had same problems of "stop responding"...

          korttomaK 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • G gtortone

            @korttoma

            Hi,
            at the moment I'm defining some things in order to use RFM69 modules...
            in the past, on my NRF24L01+ I was using 10 uF capacitor but I had same problems of "stop responding"...

            korttomaK Offline
            korttomaK Offline
            korttoma
            Hero Member
            wrote on last edited by korttoma
            #20

            @gtortone My node has now been running for more then 40min since I added the 0.1uF and 0.33uF tantalum caps. I'm hoping this will be the solution for me since I have no tools to debug any disturbance like this.

            EDIT: It failed again :(

            • Tomas
            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • korttomaK Offline
              korttomaK Offline
              korttoma
              Hero Member
              wrote on last edited by
              #21

              Tried exchanging the NRF24L01+ with an RFM69 but it does not seem to work at all with this setup. Might be because the RFM69 is using the same frequency as the RFM12B or maybe I can not have the 2 in the same node because they are related.

              • Tomas
              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • G gtortone

                @korttoma

                Hi,
                at the moment I'm defining some things in order to use RFM69 modules...
                in the past, on my NRF24L01+ I was using 10 uF capacitor but I had same problems of "stop responding"...

                korttomaK Offline
                korttomaK Offline
                korttoma
                Hero Member
                wrote on last edited by
                #22

                @gtortone did you have any chance to look at the "stop responding" issue of this device?

                I tried to add some more debug prints to your code today but if I add them to the wrong places the efergy receive function stops working and receives only 0 value. I guess it messes with the timing.

                • Tomas
                G 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • korttomaK korttoma

                  @gtortone did you have any chance to look at the "stop responding" issue of this device?

                  I tried to add some more debug prints to your code today but if I add them to the wrong places the efergy receive function stops working and receives only 0 value. I guess it messes with the timing.

                  G Offline
                  G Offline
                  gtortone
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #23

                  @korttoma Hi, I just returned to play with Efergy and Arduino. I realized that debug messages on UART reset the micro. Now I'm skipping (with a #define DEBUG and #ifdef) all debug messages and it seems to work fine. But take into account that now I'm not using any radio module... just to test the firmware.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • korttomaK Offline
                    korttomaK Offline
                    korttoma
                    Hero Member
                    wrote on last edited by korttoma
                    #24

                    :D What a coincidence. I returned to this project today also. Now trying to set this up as an Ethernet GW with local sensor without NRF radio. I still have to share the SPI bus with the Ethernet module though. I'll let you know how it goes.

                    I think I did try removing the serial prints earlier but I'm not sure..

                    • Tomas
                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • korttomaK Offline
                      korttomaK Offline
                      korttoma
                      Hero Member
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #25

                      The ethernet GW approach performs even worse than your original solution. I get one or 2 measurements and then nothing. Still responds to ping but no communication with the controller.
                      I don't know how to debug this since it just stops working. Is there by any chance anything in the code that consumes memory?

                      • Tomas
                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • A Offline
                        A Offline
                        ailiev
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #26

                        Hi All,

                        First of all, great work man!

                        I was wondering do you know if we need to have established link between the wireless sensor and the receiver?

                        I only have the wireless sensor so I was wondering if I can use this without the receiver?

                        Any thoughts?

                        korttomaK 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • A ailiev

                          Hi All,

                          First of all, great work man!

                          I was wondering do you know if we need to have established link between the wireless sensor and the receiver?

                          I only have the wireless sensor so I was wondering if I can use this without the receiver?

                          Any thoughts?

                          korttomaK Offline
                          korttomaK Offline
                          korttoma
                          Hero Member
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #27

                          @ailiev it "works" without the receiver but for me the node fails after about 1h so I gave up. I could try again now with the new MySensors 2.2.0 lib to see if it makes any difference (when I find some time).

                          • Tomas
                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • S Offline
                            S Offline
                            shifaz
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #28

                            Hi,

                            I have been trying to receive the efergy signal using RFM69 and so far it's a dead end. I'm unable to receive any data on the RFM69 module.

                            Since you guys talked about RFM69 module here, I thought you might have some insight to share.

                            gohanG 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • S shifaz

                              Hi,

                              I have been trying to receive the efergy signal using RFM69 and so far it's a dead end. I'm unable to receive any data on the RFM69 module.

                              Since you guys talked about RFM69 module here, I thought you might have some insight to share.

                              gohanG Offline
                              gohanG Offline
                              gohan
                              Mod
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #29

                              @shifaz I think you need the RFM12B to receive the data you want

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • J Offline
                                J Offline
                                Jens Lauridsen
                                wrote on last edited by Jens Lauridsen
                                #30

                                @gtortone

                                Any chance that I can see how you wired up the NRF24L01+? I bought the parts back in January 2017 and just found it in a drawer this evening. I assembled everything but the NRF24L01+ and I am a bit stuck right now.

                                BTW: Great build - I really hope that I will get mine up and running :)

                                /Jens

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • B Offline
                                  B Offline
                                  banda banda
                                  Banned
                                  wrote on last edited by mfalkvidd
                                  #31

                                  Since you guys talked about RFM69 module here, I thought you might have some insight to share. (spam links removed by moderator)

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • korttomaK korttoma

                                    @gtortone that is the same useless junk I got from e-bay at first, range is terrible.

                                    This gives me some hope to get this working with the RXB6. I will test this as son as I can (might be a few weeks until I can).

                                    M Offline
                                    M Offline
                                    MaurettoFarmer
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #32

                                    @korttoma
                                    I resume an old topic: i'm trying to receive data from Energy2 whith arduino connected to an RXB6. I can't receive any data, and i don't know how to substitute the code block related to RF12 with a correct one for my receiver. Can someone help me? Thanks in advance, Mauro

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • M Offline
                                      M Offline
                                      mrives
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #33

                                      Long story short, try 433.55 MHz

                                      I tried for years to received my Chacon Ecowatt 800 (a rebranded Efergy 2 classic) data. I knew the frequency wasn't 433.92 MHz.
                                      I lastly opened transmitter case to find which RF chip was used ... but I didn't get any datasheet for the "A71C03AUF" I found :(

                                      On last resort, I sought a signal on all "433.92MHz" ISM band (433.05~434.79 MHz, with sdr-sharp). I did find something centered on 433.51 (433.47 and 433.56, FSK?) MHz.
                                      As for Somfy stuff (which uses 433.42 MHz), many generic receiver can't work with those *special" 433MHz frequencies.

                                      In the end, I tested this new frequency using rtl-433 and guess what, there's a working Efergy module ! Moreover, I did not make a great discover, 433.55MHz is well precised in the "efergy_e2_classic.c" module comments...

                                      RFM69 or NRF24L01 may be frequency ajustable!

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      Reply
                                      • Reply as topic
                                      Log in to reply
                                      • Oldest to Newest
                                      • Newest to Oldest
                                      • Most Votes


                                      14

                                      Online

                                      11.7k

                                      Users

                                      11.2k

                                      Topics

                                      113.1k

                                      Posts


                                      Copyright 2025 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
                                      • Login

                                      • Don't have an account? Register

                                      • Login or register to search.
                                      • First post
                                        Last post
                                      0
                                      • MySensors
                                      • OpenHardware.io
                                      • Categories
                                      • Recent
                                      • Tags
                                      • Popular