Skip to content
  • MySensors
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Troubleshooting
  3. [SOLVED] After upgrade to mysensors 2.1 problems with radio module might manifest itself more.

[SOLVED] After upgrade to mysensors 2.1 problems with radio module might manifest itself more.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Troubleshooting
23 Posts 4 Posters 6.5k Views 4 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • N Offline
    N Offline
    Nicklas Starkel
    wrote on last edited by Nicklas Starkel
    #1

    So I took the plunge and sent the same sketch as I had when using mysensors 2.0 to my Arduino Mega with w5100 ethernet shield.
    It is the MQTT sketch.

    After this I could not use any nodes with signing.

    LOGS as follow.

    Gateway:

    0;255;3;0;9;Attempting MQTT connection...
    0;255;3;0;9;MQTT connected
    0;255;3;0;9;Sending message on topic: MyMQTT/0/255/0/0/18
    0;255;3;0;9;TSF:MSG:READ,6-6-0,s=255,c=0,t=17,pt=0,l=5,sg=0:2.1.0
    0;255;3;0;9;!TSF:MSG:SIGN VERIFY FAIL
    0;255;3;0;9;TSF:MSG:READ,6-6-0,s=255,c=3,t=6,pt=1,l=1,sg=0:0
    0;255;3;0;9;!TSF:MSG:SIGN VERIFY FAIL
    0;255;3;0;9;TSF:MSG:READ,6-6-0,s=255,c=3,t=11,pt=0,l=17,sg=0:Sensebender Micro
    0;255;3;0;9;!TSF:MSG:SIGN VERIFY FAIL
    0;255;3;0;9;TSF:MSG:READ,6-6-0,s=255,c=3,t=26,pt=1,l=1,sg=0:2
    0;255;3;0;9;!TSF:MSG:SEND,0-0-6-6,s=255,c=3,t=16,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=NACK:
    0;255;3;0;9;!TSF:MSG:SIGN FAIL
    0;255;3;0;9;TSF:MSG:READ,6-6-0,s=255,c=3,t=26,pt=1,l=1,sg=0:2
    0;255;3;0;9;TSF:MSG:SEND,0-0-6-6,s=255,c=3,t=16,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
    0;255;3;0;9;TSF:MSG:READ,6-6-0,s=255,c=3,t=17,pt=6,l=25,sg=0:192E7CA3C75EA05198759BA9F6FF17532DA77693DED0692059
    0;255;3;0;9;!TSF:MSG:SEND,0-0-6-6,s=255,c=3,t=27,pt=1,l=1,sg=1,ft=0,st=NACK:1
    0;255;3;0;9;TSF:MSG:READ,6-6-0,s=255,c=3,t=26,pt=1,l=1,sg=0:2
    0;255;3;0;9;!TSF:MSG:SEND,0-0-6-6,s=255,c=3,t=16,pt=0,l=0,sg=1,ft=0,st=NACK:
    0;255;3;0;9;!TSF:MSG:SIGN FAIL
    0;255;3;0;9;TSF:MSG:READ,6-6-0,s=1,c=1,t=0,pt=7,l=5,sg=0:26.9
    0;255;3;0;9;!TSF:MSG:SIGN VERIFY FAIL
    0;255;3;0;9;TSF:MSG:READ,6-6-0,s=0,c=1,t=1,pt=2,l=2,sg=0:34
    0;255;3;0;9;!TSF:MSG:SIGN VERIFY FAIL
    

    And this is a NODE:

    0 MCO:BGN:INIT NODE,CP=RNNNAS-,VER=2.1.0
    3 TSM:INIT
    4 TSF:WUR:MS=0
    11 TSM:INIT:TSP OK
    13 TSM:INIT:STATID=6
    15 TSF:SID:OK,ID=6
    17 TSM:FPAR
    53 TSF:MSG:SEND,6-6-255-255,s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
    2060 !TSM:FPAR:NO REPLY
    2062 TSM:FPAR
    2105 TSF:MSG:SEND,6-6-255-255,s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
    4112 !TSM:FPAR:NO REPLY
    4114 TSM:FPAR
    4118 TSF:MSG:SEND,6-6-255-255,s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
    6125 !TSM:FPAR:NO REPLY
    6127 TSM:FPAR
    6130 TSF:MSG:SEND,6-6-255-255,s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
    8138 !TSM:FPAR:FAIL
    8139 TSM:FAIL:CNT=1
    8141 TSM:FAIL:PDT
    18144 TSM:FAIL:RE-INIT
    18146 TSM:INIT
    18153 TSM:INIT:TSP OK
    

    If I remove the below signing code in the GW it all works OK.

    #define MY_SIGNING_SOFT
    #define MY_SIGNING_SOFT_RANDOMSEED_PIN 7
    #define MY_SIGNING_REQUEST_SIGNATURES
    

    Anyone else with the same problem (ping @Anticimex )?
    I downgraded my arduino boards to 1.6.11 as per instructions in some other posts.
    I also ran the signing sketch again (software backend) on my nodes, but to no avail.

    //Nicklas

    AnticimexA 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • N Nicklas Starkel

      So I took the plunge and sent the same sketch as I had when using mysensors 2.0 to my Arduino Mega with w5100 ethernet shield.
      It is the MQTT sketch.

      After this I could not use any nodes with signing.

      LOGS as follow.

      Gateway:

      0;255;3;0;9;Attempting MQTT connection...
      0;255;3;0;9;MQTT connected
      0;255;3;0;9;Sending message on topic: MyMQTT/0/255/0/0/18
      0;255;3;0;9;TSF:MSG:READ,6-6-0,s=255,c=0,t=17,pt=0,l=5,sg=0:2.1.0
      0;255;3;0;9;!TSF:MSG:SIGN VERIFY FAIL
      0;255;3;0;9;TSF:MSG:READ,6-6-0,s=255,c=3,t=6,pt=1,l=1,sg=0:0
      0;255;3;0;9;!TSF:MSG:SIGN VERIFY FAIL
      0;255;3;0;9;TSF:MSG:READ,6-6-0,s=255,c=3,t=11,pt=0,l=17,sg=0:Sensebender Micro
      0;255;3;0;9;!TSF:MSG:SIGN VERIFY FAIL
      0;255;3;0;9;TSF:MSG:READ,6-6-0,s=255,c=3,t=26,pt=1,l=1,sg=0:2
      0;255;3;0;9;!TSF:MSG:SEND,0-0-6-6,s=255,c=3,t=16,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=NACK:
      0;255;3;0;9;!TSF:MSG:SIGN FAIL
      0;255;3;0;9;TSF:MSG:READ,6-6-0,s=255,c=3,t=26,pt=1,l=1,sg=0:2
      0;255;3;0;9;TSF:MSG:SEND,0-0-6-6,s=255,c=3,t=16,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
      0;255;3;0;9;TSF:MSG:READ,6-6-0,s=255,c=3,t=17,pt=6,l=25,sg=0:192E7CA3C75EA05198759BA9F6FF17532DA77693DED0692059
      0;255;3;0;9;!TSF:MSG:SEND,0-0-6-6,s=255,c=3,t=27,pt=1,l=1,sg=1,ft=0,st=NACK:1
      0;255;3;0;9;TSF:MSG:READ,6-6-0,s=255,c=3,t=26,pt=1,l=1,sg=0:2
      0;255;3;0;9;!TSF:MSG:SEND,0-0-6-6,s=255,c=3,t=16,pt=0,l=0,sg=1,ft=0,st=NACK:
      0;255;3;0;9;!TSF:MSG:SIGN FAIL
      0;255;3;0;9;TSF:MSG:READ,6-6-0,s=1,c=1,t=0,pt=7,l=5,sg=0:26.9
      0;255;3;0;9;!TSF:MSG:SIGN VERIFY FAIL
      0;255;3;0;9;TSF:MSG:READ,6-6-0,s=0,c=1,t=1,pt=2,l=2,sg=0:34
      0;255;3;0;9;!TSF:MSG:SIGN VERIFY FAIL
      

      And this is a NODE:

      0 MCO:BGN:INIT NODE,CP=RNNNAS-,VER=2.1.0
      3 TSM:INIT
      4 TSF:WUR:MS=0
      11 TSM:INIT:TSP OK
      13 TSM:INIT:STATID=6
      15 TSF:SID:OK,ID=6
      17 TSM:FPAR
      53 TSF:MSG:SEND,6-6-255-255,s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
      2060 !TSM:FPAR:NO REPLY
      2062 TSM:FPAR
      2105 TSF:MSG:SEND,6-6-255-255,s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
      4112 !TSM:FPAR:NO REPLY
      4114 TSM:FPAR
      4118 TSF:MSG:SEND,6-6-255-255,s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
      6125 !TSM:FPAR:NO REPLY
      6127 TSM:FPAR
      6130 TSF:MSG:SEND,6-6-255-255,s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
      8138 !TSM:FPAR:FAIL
      8139 TSM:FAIL:CNT=1
      8141 TSM:FAIL:PDT
      18144 TSM:FAIL:RE-INIT
      18146 TSM:INIT
      18153 TSM:INIT:TSP OK
      

      If I remove the below signing code in the GW it all works OK.

      #define MY_SIGNING_SOFT
      #define MY_SIGNING_SOFT_RANDOMSEED_PIN 7
      #define MY_SIGNING_REQUEST_SIGNATURES
      

      Anyone else with the same problem (ping @Anticimex )?
      I downgraded my arduino boards to 1.6.11 as per instructions in some other posts.
      I also ran the signing sketch again (software backend) on my nodes, but to no avail.

      //Nicklas

      AnticimexA Offline
      AnticimexA Offline
      Anticimex
      Contest Winner
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      @Nicklas-Starkel the log shows many NACKs. Signing require reliable message exchanges. This is also mentioned in the signing troubleshooting guide: https://ci.mysensors.org/job/Verifiers/job/MySensors/job/master/Doxygen_HTML/group__MySigningTroubleshootinggrp.html

      Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • N Offline
        N Offline
        Nicklas Starkel
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        @Anticimex

        I had built the NRF tester and had perfect coverage with no drops in my apartment before (with signing!) from any of my NRFs.

        To test further I even put one of those plateboards for testing NRF to my gateway. Added external power from another source.
        Did the same to my NRF tester but still it fails.
        Have put them close and also gone around in my apartment to eliminate distance signal error, still the same.
        So only difference is mysensors 2.1.
        However, since no one else is complaining then maybe the problem IS with my setup.
        Or could also be that no one else has updated ;)

        I'm using Arduino 1.6.11, maybe I should install 1.8.1?

        AnticimexA 1 Reply Last reply
        1
        • N Nicklas Starkel

          @Anticimex

          I had built the NRF tester and had perfect coverage with no drops in my apartment before (with signing!) from any of my NRFs.

          To test further I even put one of those plateboards for testing NRF to my gateway. Added external power from another source.
          Did the same to my NRF tester but still it fails.
          Have put them close and also gone around in my apartment to eliminate distance signal error, still the same.
          So only difference is mysensors 2.1.
          However, since no one else is complaining then maybe the problem IS with my setup.
          Or could also be that no one else has updated ;)

          I'm using Arduino 1.6.11, maybe I should install 1.8.1?

          AnticimexA Offline
          AnticimexA Offline
          Anticimex
          Contest Winner
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          @Nicklas-Starkel
          Well, I am not the right person to answer that as I have not been involved in the radio driver development but I believe @tekka could contribute with some statement whether there are known changes between the versions that could affect transmission quality.

          Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

          tekkaT 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • AnticimexA Anticimex

            @Nicklas-Starkel
            Well, I am not the right person to answer that as I have not been involved in the radio driver development but I believe @tekka could contribute with some statement whether there are known changes between the versions that could affect transmission quality.

            tekkaT Offline
            tekkaT Offline
            tekka
            Admin
            wrote on last edited by tekka
            #5

            @Anticimex @Nicklas-Starkel
            Soft- and ATSHA204A-based signing using RF24 were tested for the 2.1.0 release and are confirmed to work.
            Test setup:

            • Random HMAC key, stored in EEPROM and ATSHA204 using personalizer sketch.
            • Controller: MYSController build 3315
            • GW: ESP8266, soft signing, nRF24L01+PA
            • Node1: Arduino Uno, soft signing, nRF24L01+
            • Node2: Sensebender, ATSHA204 signing, nRF24L01+

            Result:
            ==> signing ok with matching HMAC keys
            ==> signing fails with scrambled HMAC keys

            N 1 Reply Last reply
            1
            • petewillP Offline
              petewillP Offline
              petewill
              Admin
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              @Nicklas-Starkel I recently updated my Mega sensor (that had been running for months without any issues) to 2.1 and experienced issues with NACKs too. It would work for a little while (half a day or so) then the NACKs would start appearing. A few hours after the NACKs showed up it would then only produce NACKs. I seemed to have finally resolved the issue by switching the 4.7uF capacitor with a 47uF on the NRF radio. It has been running for 3 days without a single NACK. I know it's not the same issue you're having but maybe something to try. By the way, the capacitor is soldered right to the radio pin headers.

              My "How To" home automation video channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCq_Evyh5PQALx4m4CQuxqkA

              1 Reply Last reply
              2
              • tekkaT tekka

                @Anticimex @Nicklas-Starkel
                Soft- and ATSHA204A-based signing using RF24 were tested for the 2.1.0 release and are confirmed to work.
                Test setup:

                • Random HMAC key, stored in EEPROM and ATSHA204 using personalizer sketch.
                • Controller: MYSController build 3315
                • GW: ESP8266, soft signing, nRF24L01+PA
                • Node1: Arduino Uno, soft signing, nRF24L01+
                • Node2: Sensebender, ATSHA204 signing, nRF24L01+

                Result:
                ==> signing ok with matching HMAC keys
                ==> signing fails with scrambled HMAC keys

                N Offline
                N Offline
                Nicklas Starkel
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                @tekka Im not saying it doesn't work, but it doesn't work ;)

                I have spent some hours yesterday and today testing different possibilities.
                However, as soon as I enable soft signing it just my nodes get no reply or partial reply sometimes.

                If I disable softsigning in GW, everything works perfect.

                I would guess that the problem could be with my hardware as everything except my ethernetshield is china clones.
                But since I had used everything and everything worked without a flaw (with signing) and the only thing I did was update library via arduino, and uploaded the same sketch (without editing it) to the GW.
                I would beg to differ that something is not broken with mysensors 2.1. Or atleast maybe compability has been lowered.
                Or mysensors 2.1 changed something in the use of the NRF chips (the + as well as PA with big antenna!).

                I uninstalled arduino completely, but had some problems installing 2.0 as it complained about some stuff about my arduino mega. But when I installed 2.1 it worked with mega which is also weird.

                It is no biggie that signing doesn't work for me, but It bugs me that this should be simple and it isn't.

                To sum up:
                My NRF works without signing. It even works behind steel heat radiators across my flat (yes, did that for testing purposes!)
                Switch on signing and I can barely connect to my GW.

                AnticimexA 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • N Nicklas Starkel

                  @tekka Im not saying it doesn't work, but it doesn't work ;)

                  I have spent some hours yesterday and today testing different possibilities.
                  However, as soon as I enable soft signing it just my nodes get no reply or partial reply sometimes.

                  If I disable softsigning in GW, everything works perfect.

                  I would guess that the problem could be with my hardware as everything except my ethernetshield is china clones.
                  But since I had used everything and everything worked without a flaw (with signing) and the only thing I did was update library via arduino, and uploaded the same sketch (without editing it) to the GW.
                  I would beg to differ that something is not broken with mysensors 2.1. Or atleast maybe compability has been lowered.
                  Or mysensors 2.1 changed something in the use of the NRF chips (the + as well as PA with big antenna!).

                  I uninstalled arduino completely, but had some problems installing 2.0 as it complained about some stuff about my arduino mega. But when I installed 2.1 it worked with mega which is also weird.

                  It is no biggie that signing doesn't work for me, but It bugs me that this should be simple and it isn't.

                  To sum up:
                  My NRF works without signing. It even works behind steel heat radiators across my flat (yes, did that for testing purposes!)
                  Switch on signing and I can barely connect to my GW.

                  AnticimexA Offline
                  AnticimexA Offline
                  Anticimex
                  Contest Winner
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  @Nicklas-Starkel
                  I can only repeat what I said earlier. You have NACKs. That indicate that messages are not coming through. It is NOT a signing issue but a rf issue. The only reason it looks like a signing issue is because when you use signing, messages are significantly longer and are therefore statistically more difficult to transmit/receive. Improve decoupling of your radios and you'll probably be fine like suggested by Pete. I also explained this in the signing troubleshooting guide I linked above.
                  In 2.x significant changes are made to the rf drivers. These are all for the better but could mean power consumption of the radio has a different profile which inadequate decoupling will have trouble dealing with.

                  Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

                  N 1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  • AnticimexA Anticimex

                    @Nicklas-Starkel
                    I can only repeat what I said earlier. You have NACKs. That indicate that messages are not coming through. It is NOT a signing issue but a rf issue. The only reason it looks like a signing issue is because when you use signing, messages are significantly longer and are therefore statistically more difficult to transmit/receive. Improve decoupling of your radios and you'll probably be fine like suggested by Pete. I also explained this in the signing troubleshooting guide I linked above.
                    In 2.x significant changes are made to the rf drivers. These are all for the better but could mean power consumption of the radio has a different profile which inadequate decoupling will have trouble dealing with.

                    N Offline
                    N Offline
                    Nicklas Starkel
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    @Anticimex I understand that the problem is not with signing itself.
                    I also understand that with longer messages with low power things it gets extra difficult.

                    What I am saying is mysensors 2.1 did something and my hardware can't cope with it.

                    I have tried socket adapters for NRF modules.
                    I have tried giving them external power.
                    I tried without socket adapters.
                    Giving external power as well.
                    I have tried 47uF capacitator.

                    Mind you, I have tried several different hardware pieces as well just to make sure.

                    I will redo everything above again just to make sure and report back.

                    AnticimexA 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • N Nicklas Starkel

                      @Anticimex I understand that the problem is not with signing itself.
                      I also understand that with longer messages with low power things it gets extra difficult.

                      What I am saying is mysensors 2.1 did something and my hardware can't cope with it.

                      I have tried socket adapters for NRF modules.
                      I have tried giving them external power.
                      I tried without socket adapters.
                      Giving external power as well.
                      I have tried 47uF capacitator.

                      Mind you, I have tried several different hardware pieces as well just to make sure.

                      I will redo everything above again just to make sure and report back.

                      AnticimexA Offline
                      AnticimexA Offline
                      Anticimex
                      Contest Winner
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      @Nicklas-Starkel
                      Then I suggest you rename the topic to draw more attention to the core issue so others who might have had similar problems with 2.x can share their experiences as well. All who don't use signing but might have radio troubles in 2.x won't realize that this is discussed here otherwise.

                      Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      • N Offline
                        N Offline
                        Nicklas Starkel
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        Well so I deleted whole Arduino to make sure I got everything fresh.
                        Installed arduino and mysensors 2.0 via library manager and also mysensors HW arduino manager in preferences.

                        Updated my gateway and all nodes work with signing ON.
                        The nodes are a mixture now with mysensors 2.0 as well as 2.1.

                        I updated library to 2.1 in my GW and instantly I have failed messages with Signing ON.

                        To make sure, I powered the GW from one source and NRF separately from external source (5v computer usb)
                        No changes. I tried different NRF as well as NRF PA with big antenna.
                        I even tried different antennas (used to other applications). With mysensors 2.0 they work, with 2.1 fails.

                        I took a node and powered it similar with external power source (3x1.5v AAA) for the NRF but it would still give me fails.

                        When I go back to mysensors 2.0 everything works great again.

                        I guess I'll stick with 2.0 and wait and see if other people upgrade their stuff and use signing might see the same problem with their hardware.

                        AnticimexA 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • N Nicklas Starkel

                          Well so I deleted whole Arduino to make sure I got everything fresh.
                          Installed arduino and mysensors 2.0 via library manager and also mysensors HW arduino manager in preferences.

                          Updated my gateway and all nodes work with signing ON.
                          The nodes are a mixture now with mysensors 2.0 as well as 2.1.

                          I updated library to 2.1 in my GW and instantly I have failed messages with Signing ON.

                          To make sure, I powered the GW from one source and NRF separately from external source (5v computer usb)
                          No changes. I tried different NRF as well as NRF PA with big antenna.
                          I even tried different antennas (used to other applications). With mysensors 2.0 they work, with 2.1 fails.

                          I took a node and powered it similar with external power source (3x1.5v AAA) for the NRF but it would still give me fails.

                          When I go back to mysensors 2.0 everything works great again.

                          I guess I'll stick with 2.0 and wait and see if other people upgrade their stuff and use signing might see the same problem with their hardware.

                          AnticimexA Offline
                          AnticimexA Offline
                          Anticimex
                          Contest Winner
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #12

                          @Nicklas-Starkel ok. Well like I already said, your problem (at least according to your logs) have nothing to do with signing, but with rf issues. If you were to send messages that were larger you most likely would have the same problem, signing on or off, so I can just stress that referencing signing just shadows the real issue. Signing is only a way of extending the message size to provoke the issue. Signing has been verified to work with 2.1 as @tekka stated, so I (as the security guy) consider the issue settled from a signing perspective.

                          Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

                          N 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • AnticimexA Anticimex

                            @Nicklas-Starkel ok. Well like I already said, your problem (at least according to your logs) have nothing to do with signing, but with rf issues. If you were to send messages that were larger you most likely would have the same problem, signing on or off, so I can just stress that referencing signing just shadows the real issue. Signing is only a way of extending the message size to provoke the issue. Signing has been verified to work with 2.1 as @tekka stated, so I (as the security guy) consider the issue settled from a signing perspective.

                            N Offline
                            N Offline
                            Nicklas Starkel
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #13

                            @Anticimex maybe I was not clear enough or used the wrong words?
                            I still understand that the problem is not with signing.
                            I pointed out that using signing provokes the error.
                            The error is still an underlying issue weather it be my hardware or it be NRF module code in mysensors 2.1.

                            tekkaT 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • N Nicklas Starkel

                              @Anticimex maybe I was not clear enough or used the wrong words?
                              I still understand that the problem is not with signing.
                              I pointed out that using signing provokes the error.
                              The error is still an underlying issue weather it be my hardware or it be NRF module code in mysensors 2.1.

                              tekkaT Offline
                              tekkaT Offline
                              tekka
                              Admin
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #14

                              @Nicklas-Starkel Did you also try with different GW hardware, i.e. ESP8266 or a regular Uno?

                              N 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • tekkaT tekka

                                @Nicklas-Starkel Did you also try with different GW hardware, i.e. ESP8266 or a regular Uno?

                                N Offline
                                N Offline
                                Nicklas Starkel
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #15

                                @tekka that was my next goal ;)

                                I just built an UNO with an ethernet shield and low and behold its working with 47uF capacitor.
                                Conclusion:
                                MEGA does not work with NRF plate adapter nor 47uF capacitor.
                                UNO works with 47uF capacitor only (not with plate).

                                All nodes are reporting in (mixed 2.0 and 2.1).
                                I use @AWI quality meter with NRF plate board to test as well and it is OK.

                                So same NRF hardware yields different results on UNO and MEGA for me.

                                AnticimexA 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • N Nicklas Starkel

                                  @tekka that was my next goal ;)

                                  I just built an UNO with an ethernet shield and low and behold its working with 47uF capacitor.
                                  Conclusion:
                                  MEGA does not work with NRF plate adapter nor 47uF capacitor.
                                  UNO works with 47uF capacitor only (not with plate).

                                  All nodes are reporting in (mixed 2.0 and 2.1).
                                  I use @AWI quality meter with NRF plate board to test as well and it is OK.

                                  So same NRF hardware yields different results on UNO and MEGA for me.

                                  AnticimexA Offline
                                  AnticimexA Offline
                                  Anticimex
                                  Contest Winner
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #16

                                  @Nicklas-Starkel
                                  Any difference in how you power the radio?

                                  Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

                                  N 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • AnticimexA Anticimex

                                    @Nicklas-Starkel
                                    Any difference in how you power the radio?

                                    N Offline
                                    N Offline
                                    Nicklas Starkel
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #17

                                    @Anticimex
                                    I power either with 3xAAA (4.5V) if I'm using the plate.
                                    If I'm using only capacitor I power with 2xAA (3.3V).
                                    Tried both versions with same results. Only difference is Arduino/MEGA.
                                    All batteries fresh and also checked with voltmeter ;)

                                    AnticimexA 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • N Nicklas Starkel

                                      @Anticimex
                                      I power either with 3xAAA (4.5V) if I'm using the plate.
                                      If I'm using only capacitor I power with 2xAA (3.3V).
                                      Tried both versions with same results. Only difference is Arduino/MEGA.
                                      All batteries fresh and also checked with voltmeter ;)

                                      AnticimexA Offline
                                      AnticimexA Offline
                                      Anticimex
                                      Contest Winner
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #18

                                      @Nicklas-Starkel
                                      I mean do you power the radio by dedicated regulator or directly from mcu?

                                      Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

                                      N 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • AnticimexA Anticimex

                                        @Nicklas-Starkel
                                        I mean do you power the radio by dedicated regulator or directly from mcu?

                                        N Offline
                                        N Offline
                                        Nicklas Starkel
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #19

                                        @Anticimex I not sure I follow you and perhaps I am doing it wrong :)
                                        I power my arduinos via their usb jacket, 5V/2.1A
                                        If I'm using the NRF plate it has its own dedicated regulator hence its getting 3xAAA 4.5V.
                                        Otherwise I am using 2xAA which is around 3.3V connected to VCC/GND of the radio module and GND is also connected to the arduino.

                                        AnticimexA 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • N Nicklas Starkel

                                          @Anticimex I not sure I follow you and perhaps I am doing it wrong :)
                                          I power my arduinos via their usb jacket, 5V/2.1A
                                          If I'm using the NRF plate it has its own dedicated regulator hence its getting 3xAAA 4.5V.
                                          Otherwise I am using 2xAA which is around 3.3V connected to VCC/GND of the radio module and GND is also connected to the arduino.

                                          AnticimexA Offline
                                          AnticimexA Offline
                                          Anticimex
                                          Contest Winner
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #20

                                          @Nicklas-Starkel
                                          I owe you an apology. It appears there for some configuration combinations does exist a bug for signing in 2.1. @tekka found a problem where the signing presentation in some situations would not be sent to the correct node.
                                          That said, you do appear to also have issues with the radio (the NACKs) but you are correct in that there is an issue with signing. It will be resolved in 2.1.1.
                                          Thank you for reporting, and again, please accept my sincere apology for failing to look more thoroughly through your logs.

                                          Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

                                          N 1 Reply Last reply
                                          3
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          14

                                          Online

                                          11.7k

                                          Users

                                          11.2k

                                          Topics

                                          113.1k

                                          Posts


                                          Copyright 2025 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • MySensors
                                          • OpenHardware.io
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular