Skip to content
  • MySensors
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Development
  3. NodeManager
  4. NodeManager: plugin for a rapid development of battery-powered sensors

NodeManager: plugin for a rapid development of battery-powered sensors

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved NodeManager
223 Posts 23 Posters 72.9k Views 26 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • gohanG gohan

    There is a risk of damaging the radio module if you don't use an antenna. Also a wrong tuned antenna will make transmitting more difficult.

    mar.conteM Offline
    mar.conteM Offline
    mar.conte
    wrote on last edited by
    #119

    @gohan
    Ok Tanks, but the 86 mm wire for 868 what is Ideal diameter and thread type for simple antenna no dipole e non ground ant?

    M.C.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • gohanG Offline
      gohanG Offline
      gohan
      Mod
      wrote on last edited by gohan
      #120

      Found in another forum

      433 1/4 wave = 164.7mm
      433 1/2 wave = 329.4mm
      433 full wave = 692.7mm

      868 1/4 wave = 82.2mm
      868 1/2 wave = 164.3mm
      868 full wave = 345.5mm

      915 1/4 wave = 77.9mm
      915 1/2 wave = 155.9mm
      915 full wave = 327.8mm

      Try shortening a little bit. What kind of wire are you using?

      mar.conteM 2 Replies Last reply
      1
      • gohanG gohan

        Found in another forum

        433 1/4 wave = 164.7mm
        433 1/2 wave = 329.4mm
        433 full wave = 692.7mm

        868 1/4 wave = 82.2mm
        868 1/2 wave = 164.3mm
        868 full wave = 345.5mm

        915 1/4 wave = 77.9mm
        915 1/2 wave = 155.9mm
        915 full wave = 327.8mm

        Try shortening a little bit. What kind of wire are you using?

        mar.conteM Offline
        mar.conteM Offline
        mar.conte
        wrote on last edited by
        #121

        @gohan
        Wery good Tanks gohan

        M.C.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • gohanG gohan

          Found in another forum

          433 1/4 wave = 164.7mm
          433 1/2 wave = 329.4mm
          433 full wave = 692.7mm

          868 1/4 wave = 82.2mm
          868 1/2 wave = 164.3mm
          868 full wave = 345.5mm

          915 1/4 wave = 77.9mm
          915 1/2 wave = 155.9mm
          915 full wave = 327.8mm

          Try shortening a little bit. What kind of wire are you using?

          mar.conteM Offline
          mar.conteM Offline
          mar.conte
          wrote on last edited by
          #122

          @gohan
          Normal wire electric 1 mm diameter

          M.C.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • gohanG Offline
            gohanG Offline
            gohan
            Mod
            wrote on last edited by
            #123

            Single core or threaded?

            mar.conteM 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • gohanG gohan

              Single core or threaded?

              mar.conteM Offline
              mar.conteM Offline
              mar.conte
              wrote on last edited by
              #124

              @gohan
              Threaded

              M.C.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • gohanG Offline
                gohanG Offline
                gohan
                Mod
                wrote on last edited by
                #125

                You need to use single core, that's why it is not working well

                mar.conteM 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • gohanG gohan

                  You need to use single core, that's why it is not working well

                  mar.conteM Offline
                  mar.conteM Offline
                  mar.conte
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #126

                  @gohan
                  Should it be isolated or even without a sheath?

                  M.C.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • gohanG Offline
                    gohanG Offline
                    gohan
                    Mod
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #127

                    I think you can leave insulation on; there are some guides on how to make antennas for rfm69,just Google it. In addition there are also spring single wire antennas for different frequencies you can buy.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • mar.conteM mar.conte

                      Then solved the problem of the accuracy of the battery report: basically I did not realize that the sleep wait time started from the last pir movement then if i put an hour of sleep and during this active time the pir time resumes; The communication problems I solved them by letting antenna from rfm69 so every hour the battery report does not even send pir moviment
                      ....Very strange my rfm69 modules communicate better without an antenna even at a distance of 10 meters with a wall

                      U Offline
                      U Offline
                      user2684
                      Contest Winner
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #128

                      @mar.conte said in NodeManager: plugin for a rapid development of battery-powered sensors:

                      I did not realize that the sleep wait time started from the last pir movement then if i put an hour of sleep and during this active time the pir time resumes

                      Yes, when the pir wakes the node up, the sleep is aborted and when going back to sleep, it starts from scratch without resuming it. If this is not creating an issue, I'll keep the current behavior. Regarding the antenna, I'm using the small antennas from the store for my RFM69 and have a decent range without big issues.

                      mar.conteM 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • U user2684

                        @mar.conte said in NodeManager: plugin for a rapid development of battery-powered sensors:

                        I did not realize that the sleep wait time started from the last pir movement then if i put an hour of sleep and during this active time the pir time resumes

                        Yes, when the pir wakes the node up, the sleep is aborted and when going back to sleep, it starts from scratch without resuming it. If this is not creating an issue, I'll keep the current behavior. Regarding the antenna, I'm using the small antennas from the store for my RFM69 and have a decent range without big issues.

                        mar.conteM Offline
                        mar.conteM Offline
                        mar.conte
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #129

                        @user2684
                        Tanks of course bye

                        M.C.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • B Offline
                          B Offline
                          bilbolodz
                          wrote on last edited by gohan
                          #130

                          I'm trying to build sensor to drive 3 relays and connect it to Domoticz. Simple sketch:

                          // before
                          void before() {
                            // setup the serial port baud rate
                            Serial.begin(MY_BAUD_RATE);  
                            /*
                             * Register below your sensors
                            */
                          int przek1 = nodeManager.registerSensor(SENSOR_RELAY,3);
                          int przek2 = nodeManager.registerSensor(SENSOR_RELAY,4);
                            /*
                             * Register above your sensors
                            */
                            nodeManager.before();
                          }
                          

                          sensors are visible into Domoticz as switches but It's not possible to turn it on/off from Domoticz. It looks that Nodemanager expect REQ message to change state of relay but Domoticz sends SET message to change state:

                          RECV S=0 I=3 C=1 T=2 D=1
                          RECV S=0 I=3 C=1 T=2 D=0

                          When I've used MYSController and send C_REQ message all is working fine.

                          I think that in case of "output" sensors logic of getting/setting should be reversed.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • U Offline
                            U Offline
                            user2684
                            Contest Winner
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #131

                            Hello, I think I was able to implement most of the requests discussed here during the last few weeks in a pre-release v1.5 version. Please consider it still as a dev release which gone through very limited testing but since I had to make quite a few changes to core code, would be great to start collecting some feedback now.

                            Is is available here: https://github.com/mysensors/NodeManager/tree/9a485cdcaf8e9856219338553335e2dce7253eb3

                            It is complicated to reference each of you who requested something so please whoever is interested the full list of new additions/fixes is available here https://github.com/mysensors/NodeManager/milestone/5?closed=1. I did my best to add verbose comments so you should find all the details there. Please add any comment and report any problem directly to the existing issues on github so I can better understand the context. The documentation has been updated as well.
                            Thanks

                            mar.conteM 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • U user2684

                              Hello, I think I was able to implement most of the requests discussed here during the last few weeks in a pre-release v1.5 version. Please consider it still as a dev release which gone through very limited testing but since I had to make quite a few changes to core code, would be great to start collecting some feedback now.

                              Is is available here: https://github.com/mysensors/NodeManager/tree/9a485cdcaf8e9856219338553335e2dce7253eb3

                              It is complicated to reference each of you who requested something so please whoever is interested the full list of new additions/fixes is available here https://github.com/mysensors/NodeManager/milestone/5?closed=1. I did my best to add verbose comments so you should find all the details there. Please add any comment and report any problem directly to the existing issues on github so I can better understand the context. The documentation has been updated as well.
                              Thanks

                              mar.conteM Offline
                              mar.conteM Offline
                              mar.conte
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #132

                              @user2684
                              👍🏾

                              M.C.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • U Offline
                                U Offline
                                user2684
                                Contest Winner
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #133

                                I've just pushed out 1.5-dev3 on https://github.com/mysensors/NodeManager/tree/702a05c7e2f4425c188d5abf62b4a119fea29bc8 fixing a critical bug for the BME280 sensor and providing a way to automatically detect which i2c address the sensor is on for both BME280 and BMP085/BMP180 if anybody is interested.

                                I'm planning some additional tests so to release a stable v1.5 in a week or two (unfortunately starting from June the real life will become very demanding with me). So please share any feedback by then in case you will have the chance to test the latest dev release. Thanks

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • gohanG Offline
                                  gohanG Offline
                                  gohan
                                  Mod
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #134

                                  Just in time, I am going to get my BME280 sensor soon :D

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • gohanG Offline
                                    gohanG Offline
                                    gohan
                                    Mod
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #135

                                    May I ask you a favor? Could you add also the MCP9808 I2C sensor?

                                    U 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • gohanG gohan

                                      May I ask you a favor? Could you add also the MCP9808 I2C sensor?

                                      U Offline
                                      U Offline
                                      user2684
                                      Contest Winner
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #136

                                      @gohan done but I don't have such a sensor to test the code so if you could give it a try I'd really appreciate it. Available in v1.5-dev4 you can get from here: https://github.com/mysensors/NodeManager/tree/38fd51c99e47b6ec90f4885ff1cb0cfe33857ab4.
                                      Instructions on https://github.com/mysensors/NodeManager/issues/87
                                      Thanks!

                                      gohanG 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • V Offline
                                        V Offline
                                        vikasjee
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #137

                                        Can you please consider support for MCP23017 IO-Expander And TTP226/TTP229 Touch control sensor modules in I2C mode?

                                        V U 2 Replies Last reply
                                        0
                                        • V vikasjee

                                          Can you please consider support for MCP23017 IO-Expander And TTP226/TTP229 Touch control sensor modules in I2C mode?

                                          V Offline
                                          V Offline
                                          vikasjee
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #138

                                          I can help test them both for sure... 😈 😇

                                          Will it be a good idea to have external file based extension to Node Manager?

                                          I will like to extend the configuration child and probably add node authentication through another security-child. Self Healing Network capabilities are next on my list.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          11

                                          Online

                                          11.7k

                                          Users

                                          11.2k

                                          Topics

                                          113.0k

                                          Posts


                                          Copyright 2019 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • MySensors
                                          • OpenHardware.io
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular