Skip to content
  • MySensors
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Feature Requests
  3. ESP32 Support to enable the powerful ESP32 + RFM95/Lora + LiPo battery boards

ESP32 Support to enable the powerful ESP32 + RFM95/Lora + LiPo battery boards

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Feature Requests
42 Posts 7 Posters 13.8k Views 5 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • gohanG Offline
    gohanG Offline
    gohan
    Mod
    wrote on last edited by
    #25

    maybe he just needs some extra computing power. Isn't LoRa transmission time slower than regular radio modules?

    NeverDieN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • gohanG gohan

      maybe he just needs some extra computing power. Isn't LoRa transmission time slower than regular radio modules?

      NeverDieN Offline
      NeverDieN Offline
      NeverDie
      Hero Member
      wrote on last edited by
      #26

      @gohan said in ESP32 Support to enable the powerful ESP32 + RFM95/Lora + LiPo battery boards:

      Isn't LoRa transmission time slower than regular radio modules?

      Definitely yes. It's not without downsides.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • NeverDieN NeverDie

        All that said, I like LoRa a lot. Practically speaking, in a home environment the packets get to their destination virtually every time on the first try. That's big! I just don't see the "need" on a battery operated LoRa for an ESP32, that's all. But maybe that's just me, as I'm doing fairly simple stuff. Perhaps for the OP, the mere existence of off-the-shelf integrated boards makes them more convenient to acquire and use. At least I could imagine that being true for some people. That may be a not insubstantial market segment.

        H Offline
        H Offline
        heinzv
        wrote on last edited by heinzv
        #27

        @neverdie I have not yet measured the power consumption in deep sleep, but I will certainly verify it (I have ordered a multimeter with a 0-60uA rage). I 'll let you know.
        The battery powered wall mounted devices with e-paper is something I'll build. If the ESP32 Lora board is not what I expect, I need, what other choises do I have? Buying a nrf52 board (some have a battery management) with a RFM95? Do you think that is the better choice? The nrf52 board are not cheap.
        What combination would you recommend?
        I also have STM32F1 with 128kb flash, but the look also not so convient to me.
        I have gone through many articles and watched many videos and did not get the impression, that the ESP32 is wrong for efficient battery usage.
        Here is one video with an ESP32 board a guy measured with a Fluke 5.x uA in RTC timer deep sleep and 6.5uA in GPIO deep sleep. So in principal the ESP32 is the right choice but I believe you, that some the boards I have chosen are not the most energy efficient ones without tweaking. I have a couple of other ESP32 boards, maby I have to combine them with my RFM95 modules I also own to get down in the uA range.
        Here is the 5 to 6 uA measured ESP32 board
        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8NDq6hC9KJo

        scalzS NeverDieN mfalkviddM 3 Replies Last reply
        0
        • H heinzv

          @neverdie I have not yet measured the power consumption in deep sleep, but I will certainly verify it (I have ordered a multimeter with a 0-60uA rage). I 'll let you know.
          The battery powered wall mounted devices with e-paper is something I'll build. If the ESP32 Lora board is not what I expect, I need, what other choises do I have? Buying a nrf52 board (some have a battery management) with a RFM95? Do you think that is the better choice? The nrf52 board are not cheap.
          What combination would you recommend?
          I also have STM32F1 with 128kb flash, but the look also not so convient to me.
          I have gone through many articles and watched many videos and did not get the impression, that the ESP32 is wrong for efficient battery usage.
          Here is one video with an ESP32 board a guy measured with a Fluke 5.x uA in RTC timer deep sleep and 6.5uA in GPIO deep sleep. So in principal the ESP32 is the right choice but I believe you, that some the boards I have chosen are not the most energy efficient ones without tweaking. I have a couple of other ESP32 boards, maby I have to combine them with my RFM95 modules I also own to get down in the uA range.
          Here is the 5 to 6 uA measured ESP32 board
          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8NDq6hC9KJo

          scalzS Offline
          scalzS Offline
          scalz
          Hardware Contributor
          wrote on last edited by scalz
          #28

          @heinzv said in ESP32 Support to enable the powerful ESP32 + RFM95/Lora + LiPo battery boards:

          Here is one video with an ESP32 board a guy measured with a Fluke 5.x uA in RTC timer deep sleep and 6.5uA in GPIO deep sleep. So in principal the ESP32 is the right choice but I believe you, that some the boards I have chosen are not the most energy efficient ones without tweaking. I have a couple of other ESP32 boards, maby I have to combine them with my RFM95 modules I also own to get down in the uA range.

          That's exactly what I meant, I was just talking about the other boards.
          then, regarding the right choice, it all depends on the usecase I think, not so evident. but for your project sure it's a nice mcu, actually having fun with it too ;)

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • H heinzv

            @neverdie I have not yet measured the power consumption in deep sleep, but I will certainly verify it (I have ordered a multimeter with a 0-60uA rage). I 'll let you know.
            The battery powered wall mounted devices with e-paper is something I'll build. If the ESP32 Lora board is not what I expect, I need, what other choises do I have? Buying a nrf52 board (some have a battery management) with a RFM95? Do you think that is the better choice? The nrf52 board are not cheap.
            What combination would you recommend?
            I also have STM32F1 with 128kb flash, but the look also not so convient to me.
            I have gone through many articles and watched many videos and did not get the impression, that the ESP32 is wrong for efficient battery usage.
            Here is one video with an ESP32 board a guy measured with a Fluke 5.x uA in RTC timer deep sleep and 6.5uA in GPIO deep sleep. So in principal the ESP32 is the right choice but I believe you, that some the boards I have chosen are not the most energy efficient ones without tweaking. I have a couple of other ESP32 boards, maby I have to combine them with my RFM95 modules I also own to get down in the uA range.
            Here is the 5 to 6 uA measured ESP32 board
            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8NDq6hC9KJo

            NeverDieN Offline
            NeverDieN Offline
            NeverDie
            Hero Member
            wrote on last edited by NeverDie
            #29

            @heinzv You haven't really said what your requirements are. I'd say give it a try. It's not an expensive experiment. Then you'll know for sure. For all I know, maybe it's just what you're looking for. If not, there's always more and bigger batteries to make it last longer.

            As to alternatives, probably using a 3.3v Arduino Pro Mini, or equivalent, is what most would recommend. Here's one I posted:
            https://www.openhardware.io/view/395/LoRa-Ra-01-ATmega328P-Node
            If you go looking, I'm sure you can find lots of similar things. For instance: https://www.openhardware.io/view/534/Extremely-Simple-Arduino-Pro-Mini-LoRa-Water-Leak-Detector

            H 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • NeverDieN NeverDie

              @heinzv You haven't really said what your requirements are. I'd say give it a try. It's not an expensive experiment. Then you'll know for sure. For all I know, maybe it's just what you're looking for. If not, there's always more and bigger batteries to make it last longer.

              As to alternatives, probably using a 3.3v Arduino Pro Mini, or equivalent, is what most would recommend. Here's one I posted:
              https://www.openhardware.io/view/395/LoRa-Ra-01-ATmega328P-Node
              If you go looking, I'm sure you can find lots of similar things. For instance: https://www.openhardware.io/view/534/Extremely-Simple-Arduino-Pro-Mini-LoRa-Water-Leak-Detector

              H Offline
              H Offline
              heinzv
              wrote on last edited by
              #30

              @neverdie Thanks for the good hints. I also have a couple of 3.3v/8Mhz Arduino or a comparable ATmega32u4 pro mini boards, but not found the Lora RA-01 modules with 868MHz / SX1276 only the SX1278 with 433MHz, in Europe 868MHz is the better choice and my ESP32 have SX1276 with 868MHz. However I have 10 RFM95 modules with 868MHz I could use but I need to connect then two devices at the SPI bus, the RFM95 and the E-Paper.
              In addition, I also have 3,7 LiPo with 2200mAh batteries but they have 4,2V charged, so I would need a voltage regulator + charger or othe other batteries below 3,6V charged.
              I see, you making very nice HW projects and boards. I'm impressed :-)

              BTW: as you're also a HW expert, I have purchased a couple of the SP1 smart sockets from Gosund, Homecube and Coosa, they all have the same HW with an ESP8266EX and 1MB flash. They all need the Smart Life App and use a Chionese Cloud. I want to flash them with either Mysensors, Tasmota, ESPEasy or whatever, but then I loose the energy monitor.
              They have a chip which I don't find thus what driver/code should be used? I have posted a support request already in two projects (here and at Tasmota) not sure if anybody is smart enough to find a solution. Above I have posted two pictures of the inside of the Plug. Any idea what we can do?

              0_1522178794512_48339419-fd74-45c3-b3e7-15ea2ffe1988-grafik.png

              NeverDieN 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • H heinzv

                @neverdie Thanks for the good hints. I also have a couple of 3.3v/8Mhz Arduino or a comparable ATmega32u4 pro mini boards, but not found the Lora RA-01 modules with 868MHz / SX1276 only the SX1278 with 433MHz, in Europe 868MHz is the better choice and my ESP32 have SX1276 with 868MHz. However I have 10 RFM95 modules with 868MHz I could use but I need to connect then two devices at the SPI bus, the RFM95 and the E-Paper.
                In addition, I also have 3,7 LiPo with 2200mAh batteries but they have 4,2V charged, so I would need a voltage regulator + charger or othe other batteries below 3,6V charged.
                I see, you making very nice HW projects and boards. I'm impressed :-)

                BTW: as you're also a HW expert, I have purchased a couple of the SP1 smart sockets from Gosund, Homecube and Coosa, they all have the same HW with an ESP8266EX and 1MB flash. They all need the Smart Life App and use a Chionese Cloud. I want to flash them with either Mysensors, Tasmota, ESPEasy or whatever, but then I loose the energy monitor.
                They have a chip which I don't find thus what driver/code should be used? I have posted a support request already in two projects (here and at Tasmota) not sure if anybody is smart enough to find a solution. Above I have posted two pictures of the inside of the Plug. Any idea what we can do?

                0_1522178794512_48339419-fd74-45c3-b3e7-15ea2ffe1988-grafik.png

                NeverDieN Offline
                NeverDieN Offline
                NeverDie
                Hero Member
                wrote on last edited by NeverDie
                #31

                @heinzv Sorry, but I don't understand your question.

                Also, generally speaking, multimeters alone are the wrong tool for measuring microamp currents. As Scalz already mentioned, something like a uCurrent Gold would be a better choice.

                Good luck! Let us know how it goes.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • H heinzv

                  @neverdie I have not yet measured the power consumption in deep sleep, but I will certainly verify it (I have ordered a multimeter with a 0-60uA rage). I 'll let you know.
                  The battery powered wall mounted devices with e-paper is something I'll build. If the ESP32 Lora board is not what I expect, I need, what other choises do I have? Buying a nrf52 board (some have a battery management) with a RFM95? Do you think that is the better choice? The nrf52 board are not cheap.
                  What combination would you recommend?
                  I also have STM32F1 with 128kb flash, but the look also not so convient to me.
                  I have gone through many articles and watched many videos and did not get the impression, that the ESP32 is wrong for efficient battery usage.
                  Here is one video with an ESP32 board a guy measured with a Fluke 5.x uA in RTC timer deep sleep and 6.5uA in GPIO deep sleep. So in principal the ESP32 is the right choice but I believe you, that some the boards I have chosen are not the most energy efficient ones without tweaking. I have a couple of other ESP32 boards, maby I have to combine them with my RFM95 modules I also own to get down in the uA range.
                  Here is the 5 to 6 uA measured ESP32 board
                  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8NDq6hC9KJo

                  mfalkviddM Offline
                  mfalkviddM Offline
                  mfalkvidd
                  Mod
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #32

                  Buying a nrf52 board (some have a battery management) with a RFM95? Do you think that is the better choice? The nrf52 board are not cheap.

                  Not sure if you noticed, but nrf5x comes with a nrf24-compatible radio on the same chip. So it is similar to the esp32+lora board you linked to.

                  H 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • mfalkviddM mfalkvidd

                    Buying a nrf52 board (some have a battery management) with a RFM95? Do you think that is the better choice? The nrf52 board are not cheap.

                    Not sure if you noticed, but nrf5x comes with a nrf24-compatible radio on the same chip. So it is similar to the esp32+lora board you linked to.

                    H Offline
                    H Offline
                    heinzv
                    wrote on last edited by heinzv
                    #33

                    @mfalkvidd said in ESP32 Support to enable the powerful ESP32 + RFM95/Lora + LiPo battery boards:

                    nrf24

                    thanks for all your hints. I'll first continue with my ESP32 Lora board and see how far I come. I also have so many other boards like ESP8266, 8285, 328, 32u4, STM32L1 and a lot of RF modules (RFM69, 95 and CC1101) which I'm testing in parallel. Since I have now an intermediate repository with ESP32 + RFM95 support from tekka007, I continue first on that path and let you know if it fits or not and what results I have.
                    I hope though, that the tekka007 version makes it in the master branch (maybe in the 3.0 version).

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • mfalkviddM mfalkvidd

                      @heinzv excellent! Thanks for the feedback.

                      @tekka In your opinion, are there more tests you'd like to see before the esp32 support is merged? Any important features not yet implemented?

                      tekkaT Offline
                      tekkaT Offline
                      tekka
                      Admin
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #34

                      @mfalkvidd No, testing looks good and framework runs stable - I need to sort out some warnings I get with gitler/jenkins before merging.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      2
                      • R Offline
                        R Offline
                        ristomatti
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #35

                        Andreas Spiess just yesterday uploaded a very comprehensive comparison between the different LiPo powered ESP32 modules people on this thread might be interested about: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-769_YIeGmI

                        He has also posted a lot of other excellent ESP32 and LoRa videos. i highly recommend to check them out!

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • gohanG Offline
                          gohanG Offline
                          gohan
                          Mod
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #36

                          I watched it too and the result is that as usual the barebone solution is the most battery friendly :D

                          H 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • gohanG gohan

                            I watched it too and the result is that as usual the barebone solution is the most battery friendly :D

                            H Offline
                            H Offline
                            heinzv
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #37

                            @gohan at least my saying is confirmed, that the ESP32 is well suited for battery usage (has the ULP co-processor) and the ESP8266 is not better, rather worse. And you get many ESP32 boards with battery management. Of course, what all the analysis show is that if board design is bad, the battery consumption can be bad. But that would be the same for ESP8266.
                            Conclusion: ESP32 support and also RFM95 support makes sense :-)

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • NeverDieN Offline
                              NeverDieN Offline
                              NeverDie
                              Hero Member
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #38

                              A relevant question that you won't want to gloss over is how long does it take the ESP32 to re-acquire access to the WiFi router after it wakes from deep sleep? Potentially, a lot of power could vanish into that. More than anything, I think that may be why it so far hasn't proven as popular for battery operation.

                              H 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • NeverDieN NeverDie

                                A relevant question that you won't want to gloss over is how long does it take the ESP32 to re-acquire access to the WiFi router after it wakes from deep sleep? Potentially, a lot of power could vanish into that. More than anything, I think that may be why it so far hasn't proven as popular for battery operation.

                                H Offline
                                H Offline
                                heinzv
                                wrote on last edited by heinzv
                                #39

                                @neverdie Since the ESP32 (with the right board setup) and LoRA are both optimized for low power and battery saving and a sensor node would only wake-up max. every 60 secs and just reports temp, humidity, pressure and battery level, it shuld be fine.
                                That is only a small message and LoRA optimized for longer range and low power.
                                ESP8266 and RFM69 is supported and not better (I guess even worse). The important thing ist that the sensor nodes do not send date via WiFI AP, that consumes time to connect and thus energy. I don't use ESP32 WiFi on sensor nodes just the ULP deep sleep the RFM96 (could also use RFM69 non LoRa) but then I need to solder a lot.
                                But there is already a PR with supports both and my RFM96 gateway works, so I'm satisfied :-)

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • gohanG Offline
                                  gohanG Offline
                                  gohan
                                  Mod
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #40

                                  To report weather data as you said, you can get away with a simple pro mini, without the need to use a powerful esp32. The problem with the esp32 boards you find around are development boards, so are not really optimized for low power operations

                                  H 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • H Offline
                                    H Offline
                                    heinzv
                                    wrote on last edited by heinzv
                                    #41

                                    I have now tried to build an indoor sensor with Homematic protocol and an e-paper display using Pa-Pa's AsksinPP and GxEPD libs. Now I'm far beyond the Atmegas328p Flash and RAM and close to the limit of an STM32 maple. So I will go for the little ESP32 barebone boards and a RFM69 (LoRa or ESPNow). I'm very happy, that ESP32 and RFM95 are now supported thanks to tekka!

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    1
                                    • gohanG gohan

                                      To report weather data as you said, you can get away with a simple pro mini, without the need to use a powerful esp32. The problem with the esp32 boards you find around are development boards, so are not really optimized for low power operations

                                      H Offline
                                      H Offline
                                      heinzv
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #42

                                      @gohan I will use this barebone ESP32S module without LED, USW, Voltage Regulator etc.
                                      https://de.aliexpress.com/item/ESP32-ESP32S-WIFI-Bluetooth-Module-240MHz-Dual-Core-CPU-MCU-Wireless-Network-Board-ESP-WROOM-32/32817688406.html?spm=a2g0x.search0104.3.1.3bc34eb5tSg79z&ws_ab_test=searchweb0_0,searchweb201602_5_10152_10151_10065_10344_10068_5722815_10342_10547_10343_10340_5722915_10548_10341_5722615_10696_10084_10083_10618_10304_10307_10820_10821_10302_5722715_10059_100031_10103_10624_10623_10622_5722515_10621_10620,searchweb201603_2,ppcSwitch_3&algo_expid=499485e8-6df0-40d6-8033-c5497748adb9-0&algo_pvid=499485e8-6df0-40d6-8033-c5497748adb9&transAbTest=ae803_1&priceBeautifyAB=0

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      2
                                      Reply
                                      • Reply as topic
                                      Log in to reply
                                      • Oldest to Newest
                                      • Newest to Oldest
                                      • Most Votes


                                      16

                                      Online

                                      11.7k

                                      Users

                                      11.2k

                                      Topics

                                      113.1k

                                      Posts


                                      Copyright 2025 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
                                      • Login

                                      • Don't have an account? Register

                                      • Login or register to search.
                                      • First post
                                        Last post
                                      0
                                      • MySensors
                                      • OpenHardware.io
                                      • Categories
                                      • Recent
                                      • Tags
                                      • Popular