MySensors battey board revision 1.0
-
@Anticimex said:
In the future, I (and hopefully all of you) will push new FW to the board OTA so there will not be a need for holes in the case :)
For that, it's handy to have some extra flash on board. (Ref Moteino and anarduino)
-
Yep, extra flash for OTA would be nice! Great idea for the next revision.
Would we need extra hardware for this?
If so what is your suggestion?Fulltime Servoy Developer
Parttime Moderator MySensors boardI use Domoticz as controller for Z-Wave and MySensors (previously Indigo and OpenHAB).
I have a FABtotum to print cases. -
@marceltrapman said:
Would we need extra hardware for this?
The flash downloader + flash code could be stored as a bootloader, but that would drop Arduino bootloader compatibility and it will be a challenge to get a stripped MySensors implementation in the bootloader area.
Maybe we can add a small i2c or spi eeprom which is used for temporary storage of the new firmware, but then again, how to get the image data from the eeprom into the ATMega's flash?
-
@ToSa is working on it.
https://github.com/ToSa27/BootloaderReports of successful OTA flash yesterday. But work still remain to make it safer. An extra eeprom would probably help safing things up a bit.
-
@ToSa is working on it.
https://github.com/ToSa27/BootloaderReports of successful OTA flash yesterday. But work still remain to make it safer. An extra eeprom would probably help safing things up a bit.
-
@ToSa is working on it.
https://github.com/ToSa27/BootloaderReports of successful OTA flash yesterday. But work still remain to make it safer. An extra eeprom would probably help safing things up a bit.
@hek said:
Reports of successful OTA flash yesterday.
Nice :)
But work still remain to make it safer. An extra eeprom would probably help safing things up a bit.
I have started my own board design so it would be very interesting for me to know where this is heading at. Any idea what would be preferred to use?
-
In my opinion, keeping Arduino bootloader compatibility (or rather, supporting the Arduino IDE flash protocol) is a must for a OTA bootloader. Even if it would mean some more flash need to be reserved for the bootloader.
But that of course makes it even more interesting to have some external memory support. I2C based EEPROMS have been around for quite some time :) -
I mentioned the Moteino, which has an optional 8 pin 4 Mbit (512KByte) SPI flash chip.
Felix has a modified Uno class bootloader, the Dual Optiboot https://github.com/LowPowerLab/DualOptiboot which takes up 1KByte (vs 512 Bytes for normal OptiBoot).
As I understand it, you send the new code OTA where it's written to the external SPI Flash memory. Then when booting, Dual Optiboot looks for a signature in the Flash memory, and if it found, burns the code into application Flash on the ATMega chip (and it obviously removes that signature). If not signature found in SPI flash, it will boot normally as a normal OptiBoot system.
The Moteino uses the RF12B or RF69 sub-GHz radios. Another cool design. I however like the 2.4GHz nRF24L01+ because it's cheap and very fast, useful in controlling Christmas lights, which take much more bandwidth. I see periodically reporting MySensor style data as another option using the same nRF24L01+ hardware, either instead of the light control function, or in addition to it.
-
OTA is a very promising thing
for the battery board selecting any external chip is also a question of power consumedthe idea with flash is good because it builds the ability of transactional while you able to safely recover from any situation.
but from other hand. you can safely recover even without flash if your second party will take care
look how upload from USB is organized. It do not have a transactional mechanism, it cannot recover by itself
if upload failed the only way to recover is to upload again
why we need OTA to be more safe than regular USB update?but while you a thinking on this i found an issue in the board schematics. I have to add one diod and one 10k resistor to isolate D0 of the MCU from the parasite power coming from the external FTDI programmer. Otherwise the parasite power can destroy nordic chip
-
I have news
prototype of the board fully tested except radio
stepup is working fine, power switching is working
programming using external FTDI is working, schematics corrected to get rid from parasite power
al I/O is fine
battery and solar voltage measurement is working
temperature sensor is excellent
it was not simple to solder, the package is unbelievably small - 1.7 x 1.2 mm, 6 pinsnext and last is radio, going to solder it today
-
Interesting that you are choosing GROVE connectors. Are they easy to find (other than SEEEDStudio)?
This makes for an almost drop in alternative to the DevDuino's :http://www.seeedstudio.com/wiki/DevDuino_sensor_node
-
Interesting that you are choosing GROVE connectors. Are they easy to find (other than SEEEDStudio)?
This makes for an almost drop in alternative to the DevDuino's :http://www.seeedstudio.com/wiki/DevDuino_sensor_node
@Zeph said:
Interesting that you are choosing GROVE connectors. Are they easy to find (other than SEEEDStudio)?
GROVE is just a convention on pin assignment. The physical connectors are standard 4 pin 2.0mm pitch (arduino is using 2.54mm)
Two pins are used for GND + VCC and two pins for data/analogue arduino pins
I have them purchased from aliexpressThis makes for an almost drop in alternative to the DevDuino's :http://www.seeedstudio.com/wiki/DevDuino_sensor_node
we are different.we have compact, ready to use double power sensor node
devduino is using an external radio, v1 is using low capacity CR2032, v2 is using two AAA batteries
we are using radio on board, single AAA battery with step up and a solar connector with automatic switchCR2032 is just 80-120mAh
AAA alkiline is about 800-1000mAhtwo batteries on devduino is 1600-2000mAh but it will work until discharge of a cell to 0.9-1.65V (supplying 1.8-3.3 V) depending on the frequency used
we can run until discharge to 0.7V regardless frequency used. Single cell reduces space needed and stepup allows to draws a maximum -
Sorry, I by "almost a drop in replacement" I meant that somebody using a DevDuino could (almost) unplug it, plug in your board, upload the code, and go, if they use the same radio and connectors. (Or vice versa). That flexibility could be good.
I didn't mean that your design was the same or had no advantages! Thanks for listing the key differences, tho.
And - it's "almost" compatible, software wise. I think the data connector has different pin numbers. Not sure about the radio pins (other than dedicated SPI).
But I think that with a change in pin defs, most code could be moved between them, and with the same connectors, a physical switch could be simple.
-
Sorry, I by "almost a drop in replacement" I meant that somebody using a DevDuino could (almost) unplug it, plug in your board, upload the code, and go, if they use the same radio and connectors. (Or vice versa). That flexibility could be good.
I didn't mean that your design was the same or had no advantages! Thanks for listing the key differences, tho.
And - it's "almost" compatible, software wise. I think the data connector has different pin numbers. Not sure about the radio pins (other than dedicated SPI).
But I think that with a change in pin defs, most code could be moved between them, and with the same connectors, a physical switch could be simple.
@Zeph if you have developed a sketch for DevDuino you will just need to change a pin assignment to move it to MySensors board
it is a good practice to use #define for the definition of your hardware pins and move this to abstract level, for example:#define RADIO_CE 8 #define RADIO_CSN 9 #define PIR_SENSOR 3to change this assignment you just need to change this few lines
-
Yes, that's about what I thought. Thanks.
Looking forward to your board being available. I had ordered a couple DevDuinos, but now I'm holding off on ordering more since seeing yours - and for me the option of being able to swap out which is used could be handy.
Looking forward to hearing more about availability and final pricing, when you have it.
Oh, did you use the same temp sensor?
-
Yes, that's about what I thought. Thanks.
Looking forward to your board being available. I had ordered a couple DevDuinos, but now I'm holding off on ordering more since seeing yours - and for me the option of being able to swap out which is used could be handy.
Looking forward to hearing more about availability and final pricing, when you have it.
Oh, did you use the same temp sensor?
-
-
@axillent
I feel like the straight man, feeding you lines :-)Seriously, it's great to have the differences listed for everybody to see.
-
How's the progress with the radio?
I was thinking about the small stuff soldering, Me myself don't have that much trouble with the multi-pin chips.
For QFN (I hate them) I usually pre-solder the pads and use lot of flux and heat gun.
For TQFP I usually solder just one pin in 2 corners, and then I put a thin strip of solder along the pins and just drag my iron across. and if it's a mess, you used too much solder and to little flux :)
I hate soldering smd resistors and stuff, the smaller the more ass they get.. :P -
How's the progress with the radio?
I was thinking about the small stuff soldering, Me myself don't have that much trouble with the multi-pin chips.
For QFN (I hate them) I usually pre-solder the pads and use lot of flux and heat gun.
For TQFP I usually solder just one pin in 2 corners, and then I put a thin strip of solder along the pins and just drag my iron across. and if it's a mess, you used too much solder and to little flux :)
I hate soldering smd resistors and stuff, the smaller the more ass they get.. :P@Damme I get first success on testing soldered radio, but more tests are needed
I use similar technique for QFN and TQFP
goof flux is a mustAnd why you hate this little friendly SMD staff?) I like them. 0603 is optimal size, easy to solder, not too little.
0402 needs much more care
