Skip to content
  • MySensors
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Hardware
  3. Which are the *best* NRF24L01+ modules?

Which are the *best* NRF24L01+ modules?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
310 Posts 42 Posters 259.2k Views 37 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • NeverDieN NeverDie

    @Sparkman said:

    My "regular" modules were bought from gc_supermarket and the NRF chips all have the following printing. There is no circle in the center of the +.

    .
    NRF  T
    24L01+
    1420JB
    

    My LNA/PA modules were bought from alice11011983 and the NRF chips have the following printing. There is a circle in the center of the + on the first set, but not the second set.

    .
    NRF  M
    24L01+
    1431FC
    
    .
    NRF  O
    24L01+
    1417GP
    

    I'll try to grab some pics this weekend.

    Cheers
    Al

    Hi Al,
    Funny that you happen to mention gc_supermarket, because just yesterday I was noticing that they had good pricing on blob modules. These visually resemble the two blob modules I have and which seem to perform quite well at 1mbps air datarate. Intriguingly, the listing title says "Power enhanced version Compatible NRF24L01" and in the description it says:
    "This module is design to solve the problem of small power in NRF24L01 module, its distance is far away than NRF24L01
    Please download the data in below link
    http://www.ai-thinker.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=411&extra=page%3D1 "

    It would be easy to dismiss this as gibberish or as a failed attempt at chinglish, except for the fact that my two blob modules do, in fact, seem to have much better range than any of the "regular" NRF24L01+ modules I've tried so far. So, whether deserved or not, that does seem to give gc_supermarket more credability in my eyes than a lot of other re-sellers. Also, whether by luck or intent, they referred to it as "NRF24L01", not "NRF24L01+", which is also closer to reality, as it doesn't support 250kbps. So, in my book they get some credibility points for that also.

    Have your transactions to date with gc_supermarket gone well?

    SparkmanS Offline
    SparkmanS Offline
    Sparkman
    Hero Member
    wrote on last edited by
    #55

    @NeverDie said:

    Have your transactions to date with gc_supermarket gone well?

    Overall yes. First shipment from them got lost, but they replaced the shipment right away without any argument and it showed up ok. The modules seem to be a good quality with nice soldering and the flux cleaned up properly. I haven't done any packet loss testing with them, but have had good range with them (@250kbps).

    Cheers
    Al

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • NeverDieN Offline
      NeverDieN Offline
      NeverDie
      Hero Member
      wrote on last edited by NeverDie
      #56

      Here's a link which lists chips similar to the NRF24L01+ (there are many more than I had supposed), and it also highlights some of their differences: http://sigrok.org/wiki/Protocol_decoder:Nrf24l01
      Especially useful is the mirror of the datasheets.

      I have a hunch that a simple way to differentiate among the various chips might be to measure the amount of current consumed in various modes (e.g. standby, powerdown, etc), because those numbers are also given in the datasheets. Anyone tried that?

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • NeverDieN Offline
        NeverDieN Offline
        NeverDie
        Hero Member
        wrote on last edited by NeverDie
        #57

        I just placed an order on Ali Express for four NRF24L01+ modules that look similar to the one Hek says is genuine: http://www.aliexpress.com/item/Free-shipping-Original-Genuine-NRF24L01-Wireless-Module-2-4G-wireless-communication-module-2-54mm-Interface-2/1781618813.html I mainly picked this seller because he will be sending by ePacket for only 4 cents extra, and that should mean much faster delivery (5 to 15 days). Also, the seller has decent feedback and is promising that the chips are "original" and "genuine." So, with shipping, the modules will be costing me an average of $2.82 each. I hope they're worth not just the money, but also the wait.

        I would have preferred to first receive and then test the modules I've already ordered to see if they are genuine, but given the shipping time from Asia, I'm doing parallel orders in the hope of getting at least one shipment of genuine NRF24l01+ modules up and working fairly soon. Doing the orders serially would have run the risk of the procurement process taking too long.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          Fabien
          wrote on last edited by
          #58

          @NeverDie : Can you please post the sketch you use to test your NRFs modules. I just recieve 10 today from Itead. Same packaging that the ones you recieve. I just want to compare result in same conditions.

          NeverDieN 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • OitzuO Offline
            OitzuO Offline
            Oitzu
            wrote on last edited by Oitzu
            #59

            I ordered some surface-mounted by accident.
            2015-07-29 10.04.56.jpg

            The reading say:
            NRF M
            24L01+
            1436AH

            They seem to work fine, but if somebody has an packet-loss testing sketch i would test it.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F Fabien

              @NeverDie : Can you please post the sketch you use to test your NRFs modules. I just recieve 10 today from Itead. Same packaging that the ones you recieve. I just want to compare result in same conditions.

              NeverDieN Offline
              NeverDieN Offline
              NeverDie
              Hero Member
              wrote on last edited by NeverDie
              #60

              @Fabien said:

              @NeverDie : Can you please post the sketch you use to test your NRFs modules. I just recieve 10 today from Itead. Same packaging that the ones you recieve. I just want to compare result in same conditions.

              OK, sure. It started out as RF toy code, and then I just evolved it. It contains a lot of commented out code that I haven't bothered to delete. If that gets in the way of your understanding, just delete the code that's commented out. Aside from that, it's straightforward.

              Here's the main transmitter code. After compiling and uploading, you should open a serial window on your computer to read the statistics it prints out:

              /*
               nRF24Sender Demo for RFToy
               
               This demo shows how to use RFToy to make a
               wireless temperature sensor. This is the
               sender module which transmits the current
               temperature value to a receiver module. The
               demo uses the Mirf library.
               
               This demo uses a 100K resistor and 100K
               thermistor to form a simple temperature 
               sensor. Pin A1 is used to read the value. 
               The connection is:
               VCC->100K->A1->thermistor->GND
                
               Written by Jonathan Goldin @ Rayshobby LLC
               Nov 2014
               For details, visit http://rayshobby.net/rftoy
              */
              
              #include <SPI.h>
              #include <Mirf.h>
              #include <nRF24L01.h>
              #include <MirfHardwareSpiDriver.h>
              #include <U8glib.h>
              
              U8GLIB_SSD1306_128X64 u8g(U8G_I2C_OPT_NONE);	// I2C / TWI 
              
              void setup(){
                Serial.begin(115200);
                Serial.println("Starting...");
                 
                /*
                 Set ce and csn pins
                 */
                
                Mirf.cePin = 17;
                Mirf.csnPin = 16;
                
                Mirf.spi = &MirfHardwareSpi;
                Mirf.init();
                
                /*
                 * Configure reciving address.
                 */
                 
                Mirf.setRADDR((byte *)"clie1");
                
                /*
                 * Set the payload length to sizeof(unsigned long) the
                 * return type of millis().
                 *
                 * NB: payload on client and server must be the same.
                 */
                 
                //Mirf.payload = sizeof(long);
                Mirf.payload = sizeof(long);  
                /*
                 * Write channel and payload config then power up reciver.
                 */
                 
                /*
                 * To change channel:
                 * 
                 * Mirf.channel = 10;
                 *
                 * NB: Make sure channel is legal in your area.
                 */
                 
                  // we use channel 90 as it is outside of WLAN bands 
                // or channels used by wireless surveillance cameras 
                //Mirf.channel = 90;
                
                Mirf.config();
                
                  
                //This register value is not remembered between power cycles.
                //It defaults to 0x0F.
                //It should be initialized each time if different than 0x0F.
                Mirf.configRegister(RF_SETUP,0x07); //0x0F is 2mbps, max Tx power 
                                                    //0x07 is 1mbps, max Tx power
                                                    //0x2F is 250kbps, max Tx power.
                Serial.println("OTA datarate set to  1Mbps.  Transmit Power set to Maximum.");
                
                // Read and print RF_SETUP
               byte rf_setup = 0;
               Mirf.readRegister( RF_SETUP, &rf_setup, sizeof(rf_setup) );
               Serial.print( "rf_setup = " );
               Serial.println( rf_setup, BIN );
                // OLED
                u8g.firstPage();
                do{
                  uint8_t h;
                  u8g.setFont(u8g_font_10x20);
                  u8g.setFontRefHeightText();
                  u8g.setFontPosTop();
                  h = u8g.getFontAscent()-u8g.getFontDescent();
                  u8g.drawStr(29,(u8g.getHeight()-h)/2,"Tx Sender");
                } 
                while(u8g.nextPage());
                Mirf.setTADDR((byte *)"serv1");
                
                Serial.write("Sending...\r\n"); 
                delay(200);
              } // End of *Setup*
              
              
              long temp;
                int temp1;
                int temp2;
                long timeTxSent;
                long timeRxReceived;
                long roundTrip;
                byte age1=52;
                byte age2=11;
                long txCounter=0;
                long matchCount=0;
                long differentCount=0;
                long lostCount=0;
                long cumulativeRoundTrip=0;
                long averageRoundTrip=0;
                boolean packetLost=false;
                float packetErrorRate=0;  //no errors yet, and maybe there never will be.
                float lostPacketRate=0;  //no packets lost yet.
                const int statusFrequency=500;  //How many iterations of main loop before printing status info.
                long minRoundTrip=9999; //value will be driven down when program runs
                long maxRoundTrip=0;  //value will be driven up when program runs
                
              void loop(){
                 
                
                
                  
                
               
                txCounter++;
                packetLost = false;  //It can't be lost, because it hasn't even been sent yet.
                
                temp = txCounter;  //getTemp(resistance);
                temp1=temp;
                
                timeTxSent=micros();
                Mirf.send((byte *)&temp);  
                
                
                
              
                while(Mirf.isSending()){
                }
              
                /*
                Serial.write("temp=");
                Serial.print(temp,DEC);
                Serial.write("\r\n");
                Serial.write("temp1=");
                Serial.print(temp1,DEC);
                Serial.write("\r\n");
                Serial.write("Finished sending.\r\n");
                */
                //delay(10);
                unsigned long time = millis();
                while ((!packetLost) && (!Mirf.dataReady())){
                  //Serial.println("Waiting");
                  if ( ( millis() - time ) > 8 ) {
                    //Serial.println("Timeout on response from Rx Echo Reflector!");
                    lostCount++;
                    packetLost=true;
                  }
                }
                
                if (!packetLost) {
                Mirf.getData((byte *) &temp);  
                timeRxReceived=micros();
                temp2 = temp;  
                roundTrip =  timeRxReceived - timeTxSent;
                if (roundTrip < minRoundTrip) {
                  minRoundTrip=roundTrip;
                }
                if (roundTrip > maxRoundTrip) {
                  maxRoundTrip = roundTrip;
                }
                if(temp1 == temp2){  
                  matchCount++;
                  cumulativeRoundTrip += roundTrip;
                  averageRoundTrip = cumulativeRoundTrip/(txCounter-lostCount-differentCount);
                } else {
                  differentCount++;
                  Serial.println("***DIFFERENT**");
                    Serial.write("temp1=");
                    Serial.println(temp1, BIN);
                    Serial.write("temp2=");
                    Serial.println(temp2, BIN);
                }
                
                if ((txCounter%statusFrequency)==0) {
                  /*
                  if(temp1 == temp2){  
                    Serial.print("Match");
                  } 
                  else {
                    Serial.println("***DIFFERENT**");
                  }
                  Serial.write(",");
                  */
                }
                }
                
                lostPacketRate = 100*((float)(lostCount))/((float)txCounter);
                
                if ((txCounter%statusFrequency)==0) {
                 
                  Serial.print(txCounter);
                  Serial.write(",lost=");
                  Serial.print(lostPacketRate);
                  /*
                  Serial.write("%,T=");
                  Serial.print(temp,DEC);
                  //Serial.write(".  ");
                  Serial.write(",T1=");
                  Serial.print(temp1,DEC);
                  //Serial.write(".  ");
                  Serial.write(",T2=");
                  Serial.print(temp2,DEC);
                  */
                  Serial.write("%,RT=");
                  Serial.print(roundTrip,DEC);
                  Serial.write(",minRT=");
                  Serial.print(minRoundTrip);
                  Serial.write(",maxRT=");
                  Serial.print(maxRoundTrip);
                  Serial.write(",aRT=");
                  Serial.print(averageRoundTrip,DEC);
                  Serial.print(",#lost=");
                  Serial.print(lostCount);
                  //Serial.write(",mat=");
                  //Serial.print(matchCount);
                  Serial.write(",diff=");
                  Serial.print(differentCount);
                  Serial.write("\r\n");
                  delay(100); //give time for it to print out
                  //txCounter = 0;  //restart gathering statistics
                }
              
                
                /*
                delay(1000);  // keep the 'sending' message displayed on OLED for 1 sec
                u8g.firstPage();
                do{
                } while(u8g.nextPage());
              
                delay(2000);  // wait for 2 seconds till next transmission
                */
              }  //End of main loop. 
              

              Here's the code for the receiver node. It doesn't need to be plugged into a computer:

              /*
               nRF24Receiver Demo for RFToy
               
               This demo shows how to use RFToy to make a
               wireless temperature sensor. This is the
               receiver module which displays the received
               temperature value to OLED. The demo uses
               the Mirf library.
               
               Written by Jonathan Goldin @ Rayshobby LLC
               Nov 2014
               For details, visit http://rayshobby.net/rftoy
              */
              
              #include <SPI.h>
              #include <Mirf.h>
              #include <nRF24L01.h>
              #include <MirfHardwareSpiDriver.h>
              #include "U8glib.h"
              
              
              U8GLIB_SSD1306_128X64 u8g(U8G_I2C_OPT_NONE);	// I2C / TWI 
              
              void setup(){
                Serial.begin(115200);
                Serial.println("Echo Receiver.  Listening");
              
                Mirf.cePin = 17;  //???
                Mirf.csnPin = 16;  //???
                /*
                 * Set the SPI Driver.
                 */
              
                Mirf.spi = &MirfHardwareSpi;
              
                /*
                 * Setup pins / SPI.
                 */
              
                Mirf.init();
              
                /*
                 * Configure reciving address.
                 */
              
                Mirf.setRADDR((byte *)"serv1");
              
                /*
                 * Set the payload length to sizeof(unsigned long) the
                 * return type of millis().
                 *
                 * NB: payload on client and server must be the same.
                 */
              
                Mirf.payload = sizeof(long);
              
                /*
                 * Write channel and payload config then power up reciver.
                 */
              
              
               // we use channel 90 as it is outside of WLAN bands 
                // or channels used by wireless surveillance cameras 
                //Mirf.channel = 90;
                
                Mirf.config();
                  //This register value is not remembered between power cycles.
                //It defaults to 0x0F.
                //It should be initialized each time if different than 0x0F.
                Mirf.configRegister(RF_SETUP,0x07); //0x0F is 2mbps, max Tx power 
                                                    //0x07 is 1mbps, max Tx power
                                                    //0x2F is 250kbps, max Tx power.
                Serial.println("OTA datarate set to 1Mbps.  Transmit Power set to Maximum.");
                
                // Read and print RF_SETUP
               byte rf_setup = 0;
               Mirf.readRegister( RF_SETUP, &rf_setup, sizeof(rf_setup) );
               Serial.print( "rf_setup = " );
               Serial.println( rf_setup, BIN );
              
                
                u8g.firstPage();
                do{
                  uint8_t h;
                  u8g.setFont(u8g_font_10x20);
                  u8g.setFontRefHeightText();
                  u8g.setFontPosTop();
                  h = u8g.getFontAscent()-u8g.getFontDescent();
                  u8g.drawStr(19,(u8g.getHeight()-h)/2,"Echo Rx");
                } 
                while(u8g.nextPage());
                
              }  //End of *Setup* procedure
              
              void loop(){
                /*
                 * A buffer to store the data.
                 */
              
                byte data[Mirf.payload];
              
                /*
                 * If a packet has been recived.
                 *
                 * isSending also restores listening mode when it 
                 * transitions from true to false.
                 */
              
                if(!Mirf.isSending() && Mirf.dataReady()){
                  //Serial.print("Got packet: ");
              
                  /*
                   * Get load the packet into the buffer.
                   */
              
                  Mirf.getData(data);
              
                  
                  // Set the send address.
                  Mirf.setTADDR((byte *)"clie1");
              
                  /*
                   * Send the data back to the client.
                   */
              
                  Mirf.send(data);
              
                  /*
                   * Wait untill sending has finished
                   *
                   * NB: isSending returns the chip to receving after returning true.
                   */
                   
                  
              
                  //Serial.println("Reply sent.");
                }
              }
              

              As background, here's a link to the RFToy:
              http://rayshobby.net/rftoy/
              Links to the RFToy library, as well as the hardware design, can be found there. It's all open source.

              This shows the pin assignments: https://github.com/rayshobby/rftoy-hw/blob/master/RFToy.png

              You'll need a pinout diagram to match-up those internal pins to the physical pins of whatever Arduino you're using. For instance, for an Uno, here's a pinout diagram which maps internal pins to physical pins:
              http://marcusjenkins.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ARDUINO_V2.png
              That way you'll know how to properly wire-up your NRF24L01+ so that it works properly with the library code.

              So, I did that just now and tested it on the UNO, and so for the UNO the simplified wiring directions are:
              NRF24L01+Pin --- --> Uno Female Header Pin
              GND (1) ----------------------------> GND
              VCC (2) -----------------------------> 3.3V
              CE (3) ------------------------------> A3
              CSN (4) -------------------------------> A2
              SCK (5) --------------------------------> D13
              MOSI (6) --------------------------------> D11
              MISO (7) --------------------------------> D12
              IRQ(8) ---------------------------------> n/a

              The RFToy has an OLED screen that gets written to. You can remove that code if you wish, but leaving it in does no harm, even if you don't have an OLED screen on your arduino. I modified the code so that it's only written to during the setup loop, so regardless it shouldn't interfere with any of the measurements taken in the main loop..

              Hope that helps!

              parachutesjP 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • F Offline
                F Offline
                Fabien
                wrote on last edited by
                #61

                I just finish some tests with your sketch. With ITead Modules, I have 0.05% packet loss at 1mbps and about 15 meters with 1 wall.
                aRT is 1700. With NRF from electrodragon, I have same results aRT is a bit higher eg 2000.
                But during my tests, I found some issues :

                • With UNO I have more lost packets without extra capacitor. I think 3.3V output is not enough good. With Arduino Nano, it's ok
                • Quite different results when touching my dupont wires ...
                • When I let temp1 and temp2 output, there's a bug with synchro. It says it's always different but it's only dure to a shift with comparaison. If i just comment serial.output of temp1 an temp2 diff is always equal to 0

                I will make a test with RF24 from TMRh20 (used in MySensors).
                About Mysensors, I have a question : is there a configuration to retry packet sending and delay bewteen resend like radio.setRetries(2,15); ?

                So for me the Itead modules are good and electrodragon too.

                NeverDieN 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • hekH Offline
                  hekH Offline
                  hek
                  Admin
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #62

                  @Fabien said:

                  is there a configuration to retry packet sending and delay bewteen resend like radio.setRetries(2,15); ?

                  No, there isn't currently. You can always run a gw.setRetries() after gw.setup() has been called,

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • F Offline
                    F Offline
                    Fabien
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #63

                    @hek : I just look in the library and see there is a retry RF24::setRetries(5,15); in MySensor::setupRadio and it is called by MySensor::begin

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • hekH Offline
                      hekH Offline
                      hek
                      Admin
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #64

                      Yes, thought you meant if there were any config options to set this...

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • F Fabien

                        I just finish some tests with your sketch. With ITead Modules, I have 0.05% packet loss at 1mbps and about 15 meters with 1 wall.
                        aRT is 1700. With NRF from electrodragon, I have same results aRT is a bit higher eg 2000.
                        But during my tests, I found some issues :

                        • With UNO I have more lost packets without extra capacitor. I think 3.3V output is not enough good. With Arduino Nano, it's ok
                        • Quite different results when touching my dupont wires ...
                        • When I let temp1 and temp2 output, there's a bug with synchro. It says it's always different but it's only dure to a shift with comparaison. If i just comment serial.output of temp1 an temp2 diff is always equal to 0

                        I will make a test with RF24 from TMRh20 (used in MySensors).
                        About Mysensors, I have a question : is there a configuration to retry packet sending and delay bewteen resend like radio.setRetries(2,15); ?

                        So for me the Itead modules are good and electrodragon too.

                        NeverDieN Offline
                        NeverDieN Offline
                        NeverDie
                        Hero Member
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #65

                        @Fabien said:

                        I just finish some tests with your sketch. With ITead Modules, I have 0.05% packet loss at 1mbps and about 15 meters with 1 wall.
                        aRT is 1700. With NRF from electrodragon, I have same results aRT is a bit higher eg 2000.
                        But during my tests, I found some issues :

                        • With UNO I have more lost packets without extra capacitor. I think 3.3V output is not enough good. With Arduino Nano, it's ok
                        • Quite different results when touching my dupont wires ...
                        • When I let temp1 and temp2 output, there's a bug with synchro. It says it's always different but it's only dure to a shift with comparaison. If i just comment serial.output of temp1 an temp2 diff is always equal to 0

                        I will make a test with RF24 from TMRh20 (used in MySensors).
                        About Mysensors, I have a question : is there a configuration to retry packet sending and delay bewteen resend like radio.setRetries(2,15); ?

                        So for me the Itead modules are good and electrodragon too.

                        Interesting! Thanks for reporting the results. I'm sure Itead will be happy to hear about it. :smile: BTW, what lettering is printed on the NRF24L01+ chips? Also, from where did you procure the modules (Itead headquarters?) and how long ago?

                        Prior to this morning, I had been using only an RFToy (which is effectively an 8Mhz 3.3V Arduino Mini Pro), and differences between the number transmitted (temp1) and the number echoed back (temp2) were fairly rare. Because probably no one but me has an RFToy, I setup and tested using an Uno this morning to verify that I was giving the correct wiring instructions (above). I did notice a much greater rate of differences reported by the Uno than the RFToy, but I didn't pay attention to the details. From what you're saying, it sounds like it hasn't finished shifting all the bits from the Rx buffer before comparing temp1 to temp2? Am I understanding you right? If so, you could try adding, say, a 2ms delay before doing the comparison to allow the received data to fully settle before the comparison. It wouldn't affect the roundtrip timing, because it would be happening after the elapsed microseconds had been recorded. Without looking into it, I had thought that my use on the Uno of fairly long dupont jumper cables was injecting noise. On the RFToy, the connections are shorter, and no jumper wires are used.

                        What size capacitor (how many Farads) have you found works best? What type (e.g. electrolytic, ceramic, film, etc.)?

                        If you move the code over to TMRh20, would you mind posting it back to this thread? I think more people will be familiar with it than with the Mirf library. I only used Mirf because the RFToy code used it, and for simplicity that was my starting point.

                        Is this the electrodragon NRF24L01+ module that you tested? http://www.electrodragon.com/product/nrf24l01/

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • F Offline
                          F Offline
                          Fabien
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #66

                          No I use this one : http://www.electrodragon.com/product/nrf24l01b-tw-si24ri-nrf24l01-fully-compatible/

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • hekH Offline
                            hekH Offline
                            hek
                            Admin
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #67

                            @Fabien
                            Gotta love their product description...

                            "The main advantage of it is cheap."

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • F Offline
                              F Offline
                              Fabien
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #68

                              @hek : Yes but I havn't notable difference with the one from itead ! And you know it is clone.
                              @NeverDie : The first 2 chip from Itead : 1443IA , not a dot but a square and too small to see if there is a hole inside the +. I think i don't investigate more with others sketch because with my dupont cable error rate can increase a lot when just touching a cable.
                              I just setup a Iboard with PA+LNA from electrodragon and all my sensebender with clone from electrodragon too, and everything is working fine, up 20 meters without any problems.
                              For security I will change my NRF with the ones from Itead and will keep my PA+LNA for milight gateway emulation.

                              NeverDieN 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • F Fabien

                                @hek : Yes but I havn't notable difference with the one from itead ! And you know it is clone.
                                @NeverDie : The first 2 chip from Itead : 1443IA , not a dot but a square and too small to see if there is a hole inside the +. I think i don't investigate more with others sketch because with my dupont cable error rate can increase a lot when just touching a cable.
                                I just setup a Iboard with PA+LNA from electrodragon and all my sensebender with clone from electrodragon too, and everything is working fine, up 20 meters without any problems.
                                For security I will change my NRF with the ones from Itead and will keep my PA+LNA for milight gateway emulation.

                                NeverDieN Offline
                                NeverDieN Offline
                                NeverDie
                                Hero Member
                                wrote on last edited by NeverDie
                                #69

                                @Fabien said:

                                @hek : Yes but I havn't notable difference with the one from itead ! And you know it is clone.

                                Move your test nodes further apart, and keep increasing the distance until you start losing a higher percentage of packets. Most likely, as the separation distance and/or RF impairments increase, at some point one module or the other is going to perform much better than the other--that is unless they're using the same type of NRF chip. At least to date that's been my experience with the very few datapoints I've collected so far.

                                Moshe LivneM 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • NeverDieN NeverDie

                                  @Fabien said:

                                  @hek : Yes but I havn't notable difference with the one from itead ! And you know it is clone.

                                  Move your test nodes further apart, and keep increasing the distance until you start losing a higher percentage of packets. Most likely, as the separation distance and/or RF impairments increase, at some point one module or the other is going to perform much better than the other--that is unless they're using the same type of NRF chip. At least to date that's been my experience with the very few datapoints I've collected so far.

                                  Moshe LivneM Offline
                                  Moshe LivneM Offline
                                  Moshe Livne
                                  Hero Member
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #70

                                  @NeverDie If/when you get contact with nordic rep, it would be great if they can provide a sketch that does the testing. they probably have one...

                                  NeverDieN 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • Moshe LivneM Moshe Livne

                                    @NeverDie If/when you get contact with nordic rep, it would be great if they can provide a sketch that does the testing. they probably have one...

                                    NeverDieN Offline
                                    NeverDieN Offline
                                    NeverDie
                                    Hero Member
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #71

                                    @Moshe-Livne said:

                                    @NeverDie If/when you get contact with nordic rep, it would be great if they can provide a sketch that does the testing. they probably have one...

                                    What kind of testing?

                                    Moshe LivneM 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • NeverDieN NeverDie

                                      @Moshe-Livne said:

                                      @NeverDie If/when you get contact with nordic rep, it would be great if they can provide a sketch that does the testing. they probably have one...

                                      What kind of testing?

                                      Moshe LivneM Offline
                                      Moshe LivneM Offline
                                      Moshe Livne
                                      Hero Member
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #72

                                      @NeverDie

                                      1. Authentic module testing (they might be reluctant to give something like this as it can probably be used to make the copies closer to the original - but worth the try)
                                      2. QA testing - packet drop, etc at different speeds
                                      NeverDieN 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • Moshe LivneM Moshe Livne

                                        @NeverDie

                                        1. Authentic module testing (they might be reluctant to give something like this as it can probably be used to make the copies closer to the original - but worth the try)
                                        2. QA testing - packet drop, etc at different speeds
                                        NeverDieN Offline
                                        NeverDieN Offline
                                        NeverDie
                                        Hero Member
                                        wrote on last edited by NeverDie
                                        #73

                                        @Moshe-Livne said:

                                        @NeverDie

                                        1. Authentic module testing (they might be reluctant to give something like this as it can probably be used to make the copies closer to the original - but worth the try)
                                        2. QA testing - packet drop, etc at different speeds

                                        OK. I haven't yet been contacted by Nordic, and I don't know how that conversation will unfold. If there' is room for Q&A, then I'll be sure to ask them your questions as well as relay their answers back to you.

                                        G 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • NeverDieN NeverDie

                                          @Moshe-Livne said:

                                          @NeverDie

                                          1. Authentic module testing (they might be reluctant to give something like this as it can probably be used to make the copies closer to the original - but worth the try)
                                          2. QA testing - packet drop, etc at different speeds

                                          OK. I haven't yet been contacted by Nordic, and I don't know how that conversation will unfold. If there' is room for Q&A, then I'll be sure to ask them your questions as well as relay their answers back to you.

                                          G Offline
                                          G Offline
                                          GIEL
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #74

                                          @NeverDie

                                          NORDIC has on their Website the option to raise questions (MyPage) which are handled by their Tech Support Team. Normally they reply fast.

                                          NeverDieN 2 Replies Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          13

                                          Online

                                          11.7k

                                          Users

                                          11.2k

                                          Topics

                                          113.0k

                                          Posts


                                          Copyright 2019 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • MySensors
                                          • OpenHardware.io
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular