Skip to content
  • MySensors
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Development
  3. [security] Introducing signing support to MySensors

[security] Introducing signing support to MySensors

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Development
security
491 Posts 48 Posters 334.1k Views 30 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • mfalkviddM Offline
    mfalkviddM Offline
    mfalkvidd
    Mod
    wrote on last edited by
    #176

    Great work @fleinze and @Anticimex !
    Reading this thread (yes, all of it) has made me ready to start configuring my nodes to use signing. Better start now, while my sensor network is still small :)

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • FotoFieberF Offline
      FotoFieberF Offline
      FotoFieber
      Hardware Contributor
      wrote on last edited by
      #177

      Compiling with the latest dev branch SecureActuator example

      #define MY_SIGNING_REQUEST_SIGNATURES

      I get following error:

      In file included from /Users/mm/Documents/Arduino165/libraries/MySensors/MySensor.h:157:0,
                       from SecureActuator.ino:58:
      /Users/mm/Documents/Arduino165/libraries/MySensors/core/MyTransport.cpp: In function 'void transportProcess()':
      /Users/mm/Documents/Arduino165/libraries/MySensors/core/MyTransport.cpp:92:10: error: 'MY_IS_GATEWAY' was not declared in this scope
          if ((!MY_IS_GATEWAY || DO_SIGN(sender)) &&
                ^
      /Users/mm/Documents/Arduino165/libraries/MySensors/core/MyTransport.cpp:93:20: error: 'nc' was not declared in this scope
           destination == nc.nodeId &&
                          ^
      Fehler beim Kompilieren.```
      
      Is this a problem of the code or of my setup?
      AnticimexA 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • FotoFieberF FotoFieber

        Compiling with the latest dev branch SecureActuator example

        #define MY_SIGNING_REQUEST_SIGNATURES

        I get following error:

        In file included from /Users/mm/Documents/Arduino165/libraries/MySensors/MySensor.h:157:0,
                         from SecureActuator.ino:58:
        /Users/mm/Documents/Arduino165/libraries/MySensors/core/MyTransport.cpp: In function 'void transportProcess()':
        /Users/mm/Documents/Arduino165/libraries/MySensors/core/MyTransport.cpp:92:10: error: 'MY_IS_GATEWAY' was not declared in this scope
            if ((!MY_IS_GATEWAY || DO_SIGN(sender)) &&
                  ^
        /Users/mm/Documents/Arduino165/libraries/MySensors/core/MyTransport.cpp:93:20: error: 'nc' was not declared in this scope
             destination == nc.nodeId &&
                            ^
        Fehler beim Kompilieren.```
        
        Is this a problem of the code or of my setup?
        AnticimexA Offline
        AnticimexA Offline
        Anticimex
        Contest Winner
        wrote on last edited by
        #178

        @FotoFieber @hek something related to the recent refactoring? I have not had the opportunity to evaluate the effects on signing myself.

        Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • hekH Offline
          hekH Offline
          hek
          Admin
          wrote on last edited by
          #179

          @FotoFieber said:

          MY_SIGNING_REQUEST_SIGNATURES

          Let's see how Jenkins feels about this
          https://github.com/mysensors/Arduino/pull/231

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • A Offline
            A Offline
            Avamander
            wrote on last edited by
            #180

            @Anticimex Hello, I found this thread now. I'll ask a few more questions, sorry. This all seems really-really great.

            1. If someone wishes to use TMRh20's RF24Mesh instead of MySensors how would one sign the messages sent with that library? Is is even possible? What should be done to use that functionality?

            2. Also, as I understand it is possible to emulate the ATSHA204A, on what hardware is is possible (on Uno's ATMega too?)?

            3. Is it also possible to use whitelisting with RF24Mesh somehow?

            Again, sorry for any dumb questions and my poor English.

            AnticimexA 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • A Avamander

              @Anticimex Hello, I found this thread now. I'll ask a few more questions, sorry. This all seems really-really great.

              1. If someone wishes to use TMRh20's RF24Mesh instead of MySensors how would one sign the messages sent with that library? Is is even possible? What should be done to use that functionality?

              2. Also, as I understand it is possible to emulate the ATSHA204A, on what hardware is is possible (on Uno's ATMega too?)?

              3. Is it also possible to use whitelisting with RF24Mesh somehow?

              Again, sorry for any dumb questions and my poor English.

              AnticimexA Offline
              AnticimexA Offline
              Anticimex
              Contest Winner
              wrote on last edited by
              #181

              @Avamander

              1. Signing as described in this post is specific to users of the MySensors library. I suppose you could use any rf backend you like but you will need to use the MySensors library to get the nonce exchange and such. Or manually port the signing specifics out from the MySensors library and integrate them into another library. It's all open source.
              2. The software emulated atsha signing backend (for MySensors) is compatible with any Arduino product.
              3. See 1.

              Lastly, there are no dumb questions, only dumb answers :)

              Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • S Offline
                S Offline
                Silver978
                wrote on last edited by
                #182

                Hello,

                firstly, I must say that you're doing a great job and this section about security is very interesting.
                Sorry, but I want to ask a question: as regards the whitelisting system, how can I add more nodes to the list of the trusted nodes of the gateway?
                The part of code is this:

                [...]
                #ifdef MY_SECURE_NODE_WHITELISTING
                whitelist_entry_t node_whitelist[] = {
                  { //I want to add nodes HERE:
                    .nodeId = 55, // Just some value, this need to be changed  to the NodeId of the trusted node
                    .serial = {0x01,0x02,0x03,0x04,0x05,0x06,0x07,0x08,0x09} } // This need to change to the serial of the trusted node
                };
                MySigningAtsha204 signer(true, 1, node_whitelist);  // Select ATSHA204A software signing backend with one entry in the whitelist
                [...]
                

                but the gateway continue to fail the verification of the trusted nodes that I inserted.

                To sum up, how can I add more nodeIDs and serials in addition to the number "55" presented in the example of the code?

                Thank you very much in advance,
                Silver978

                AnticimexA 1 Reply Last reply
                1
                • S Silver978

                  Hello,

                  firstly, I must say that you're doing a great job and this section about security is very interesting.
                  Sorry, but I want to ask a question: as regards the whitelisting system, how can I add more nodes to the list of the trusted nodes of the gateway?
                  The part of code is this:

                  [...]
                  #ifdef MY_SECURE_NODE_WHITELISTING
                  whitelist_entry_t node_whitelist[] = {
                    { //I want to add nodes HERE:
                      .nodeId = 55, // Just some value, this need to be changed  to the NodeId of the trusted node
                      .serial = {0x01,0x02,0x03,0x04,0x05,0x06,0x07,0x08,0x09} } // This need to change to the serial of the trusted node
                  };
                  MySigningAtsha204 signer(true, 1, node_whitelist);  // Select ATSHA204A software signing backend with one entry in the whitelist
                  [...]
                  

                  but the gateway continue to fail the verification of the trusted nodes that I inserted.

                  To sum up, how can I add more nodeIDs and serials in addition to the number "55" presented in the example of the code?

                  Thank you very much in advance,
                  Silver978

                  AnticimexA Offline
                  AnticimexA Offline
                  Anticimex
                  Contest Winner
                  wrote on last edited by Anticimex
                  #183

                  @Silver978 Thanks!
                  Try something like this:

                  whitelist_entry_t node_whitelist[] = {
                    {
                      .nodeId = 55, // Just some value, this need to be changed  to the NodeId of the trusted node
                      .serial = {0x01,0x02,0x03,0x04,0x05,0x06,0x07,0x08,0x09} // This need to change to the serial of the trusted node
                    },
                    {
                      .nodeId = 56, // Just some value, this need to be changed  to the NodeId of the trusted node
                      .serial = {0x01,0x02,0x03,0x04,0x05,0x06,0x07,0x08,0x09} // This need to change to the serial of the trusted node
                    },
                    {
                      .nodeId = 57, // Just some value, this need to be changed  to the NodeId of the trusted node
                      .serial = {0x01,0x02,0x03,0x04,0x05,0x06,0x07,0x08,0x09} // This need to change to the serial of the trusted node
                    }
                  };
                  MySigningAtsha204 signer(true, 3, node_whitelist);  // Select ATSHA204A software signing backend with three entries in the whitelist
                  
                  

                  Note the changed argument in the constructor (3 and not 1)

                  Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  • S Offline
                    S Offline
                    Silver978
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #184

                    @Anticimex I tried also this syntax but I haven't changed the argument of the signer, so that number indicates how many nodes the gateway must trust?
                    Thank you!

                    AnticimexA 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • S Silver978

                      @Anticimex I tried also this syntax but I haven't changed the argument of the signer, so that number indicates how many nodes the gateway must trust?
                      Thank you!

                      AnticimexA Offline
                      AnticimexA Offline
                      Anticimex
                      Contest Winner
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #185

                      @Silver978 The number gives the number of entries in the whitelist the backend is expected to iterate over. Having a number for this allows the use of a potenitally very large whitelist but where "uninteresting" entries to this particular node can be ignored by having them last in the list and make sure the number does not cover those entries when searching the list.

                      Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • S Offline
                        S Offline
                        Silver978
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #186

                        @Anticimex Perfect, understood! Very good explanation and super-fast support, fantastic :)
                        Thank you very much again!

                        AnticimexA 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • S Silver978

                          @Anticimex Perfect, understood! Very good explanation and super-fast support, fantastic :)
                          Thank you very much again!

                          AnticimexA Offline
                          AnticimexA Offline
                          Anticimex
                          Contest Winner
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #187

                          @Silver978 :+1:

                          Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • siodS Offline
                            siodS Offline
                            siod
                            wrote on last edited by siod
                            #188

                            I would like to add security to my sensor network as well so I am very glad I found your thread. Your explanation are very detailed but I´m a guy who needs more practical examples. For example I would like to know, where exactly I have to activate this. I am using an arduino as an MQTT to Ethernet gateway and Mosquitto running on a raspberry pi. So all I have to do is activate the soft version in Myconfig.h, if not already activated, set a serial, re-upload to my arduino gateway and that´s it? I guess the Nodes have to get flashed again to get the serials as well, right?

                            still learning...

                            AnticimexA 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • siodS siod

                              I would like to add security to my sensor network as well so I am very glad I found your thread. Your explanation are very detailed but I´m a guy who needs more practical examples. For example I would like to know, where exactly I have to activate this. I am using an arduino as an MQTT to Ethernet gateway and Mosquitto running on a raspberry pi. So all I have to do is activate the soft version in Myconfig.h, if not already activated, set a serial, re-upload to my arduino gateway and that´s it? I guess the Nodes have to get flashed again to get the serials as well, right?

                              AnticimexA Offline
                              AnticimexA Offline
                              Anticimex
                              Contest Winner
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #189

                              @siod correct. You have to activate signing in both ends. The serial numbers you only need of you want to use whitelisting which is a bit more complex to set up. At the very least, for software signing, you need to enable it, have an unconnected analog pin on your boards, and set a hmac key.

                              Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • AnticimexA Offline
                                AnticimexA Offline
                                Anticimex
                                Contest Winner
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #190

                                EDIT: Topic post updates with a documentation link for those using the development branch.

                                Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • ahmedadelhosniA Offline
                                  ahmedadelhosniA Offline
                                  ahmedadelhosni
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #191

                                  Great topic as usual. I have a question please.

                                  You mentioned "Because it is pure-software however, it does not provide as good nonces (it uses the Arduino pseudo-random generator) and the HMAC key is stored in SW and is therefore readable if the memory is dumped. "

                                  Isn't this case also dangerous if the node which contains ATSHA chip was stolen ? The attacker will use the chip to be on the network ?

                                  Thanks.

                                  AnticimexA 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • ahmedadelhosniA ahmedadelhosni

                                    Great topic as usual. I have a question please.

                                    You mentioned "Because it is pure-software however, it does not provide as good nonces (it uses the Arduino pseudo-random generator) and the HMAC key is stored in SW and is therefore readable if the memory is dumped. "

                                    Isn't this case also dangerous if the node which contains ATSHA chip was stolen ? The attacker will use the chip to be on the network ?

                                    Thanks.

                                    AnticimexA Offline
                                    AnticimexA Offline
                                    Anticimex
                                    Contest Winner
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #192

                                    @ahmedadelhosni thanks!
                                    Correct. That is why I also implemented whitelisting and node revocation. It's all described in the topic (and for development branch in doxygen, linked in the topic).

                                    Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

                                    ahmedadelhosniA 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • AnticimexA Anticimex

                                      @ahmedadelhosni thanks!
                                      Correct. That is why I also implemented whitelisting and node revocation. It's all described in the topic (and for development branch in doxygen, linked in the topic).

                                      ahmedadelhosniA Offline
                                      ahmedadelhosniA Offline
                                      ahmedadelhosni
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #193

                                      @Anticimex Thanks.

                                      So this gets me to my next question :)

                                      What I understood is that if I use whitelisting, I need to know the node ID of my sensor door to define it in the GW, correct ?
                                      I guess the below code is in the GW.

                                      whitelist_entry_t node_whitelist[] = {
                                        { .nodeId = 55, // Just some value, this need to be changed  to the NodeId of the trusted node
                                          .serial = {0x01,0x02,0x03,0x04,0x05,0x06,0x07,0x08,0x09} } // This need to change to the serial of the trusted node
                                      };
                                      

                                      another question, If I want to remove this node, do I have to reflash the GW and remove it ?

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • AnticimexA Offline
                                        AnticimexA Offline
                                        Anticimex
                                        Contest Winner
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #194

                                        Yes.

                                        Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

                                        ahmedadelhosniA 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • AnticimexA Anticimex

                                          Yes.

                                          ahmedadelhosniA Offline
                                          ahmedadelhosniA Offline
                                          ahmedadelhosni
                                          wrote on last edited by ahmedadelhosni
                                          #195

                                          @Anticimex mmmm
                                          Can't it be implemented in a way so that whitelist is to be defined by the controller ?
                                          For example, an internal message to be used to set the data.

                                          My concern is that auto assignation of nodes is flexible but at the same time you may need to choose which sensor node to be added to your whitelist. Thus if a Controller can show you all your nodes, like vera or domoticz, I guess this option can be added to the plugin to send an internal message to the GW to choose which sensor node to be added.

                                          Am I saying something logic ? :)

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          15

                                          Online

                                          11.7k

                                          Users

                                          11.2k

                                          Topics

                                          113.1k

                                          Posts


                                          Copyright 2025 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • MySensors
                                          • OpenHardware.io
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular